[go: nahoru, domu]
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

core(largest-contentful-paint-element): add LCP savings #15178

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 15, 2023
Merged

core(largest-contentful-paint-element): add LCP savings #15178

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
5f5077e
core(largest-contentful-paint-element): add LCP savings
adamraine Jun 15, 2023
5a5be83
comment
adamraine Jun 15, 2023
c456dfa
Merge branch 'main' into lcp-elem-savings
adamraine Aug 11, 2023
d1d7423
p10
adamraine Aug 11, 2023
1c2eb68
Merge branch 'main' into lcp-elem-savings
adamraine Aug 14, 2023
97ec846
Merge branch 'main' into lcp-elem-savings
adamraine Aug 15, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
p10
  • Loading branch information
@adamraine
adamraine committed Aug 11, 2023
commit d1d7423046fcbd2691df4418b2e5d93e9b85a537
18 changes: 12 additions & 6 deletions core/audits/largest-contentful-paint-element.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@

import {Audit} from './audit.js';
import * as i18n from '../lib/i18n/i18n.js';
import {LargestContentfulPaint} from '../computed/metrics/largest-contentful-paint.js';
import {LargestContentfulPaint as LargestContentfulPaintComputed} from '../computed/metrics/largest-contentful-paint.js';
import LargestContentfulPaint from './metrics/largest-contentful-paint.js';
import {LCPBreakdown} from '../computed/metrics/lcp-breakdown.js';
import {Sentry} from '../lib/sentry.js';

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -125,19 +126,21 @@

const elementTable = this.makeElementTable(artifacts);
if (!elementTable) {
return {
score: null,
notApplicable: true,
metricSavings: {LCP: 0},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've generally been of the mindset that we should avoid adding any of the usual stuff to audits in the notApplicable case. It's not a hard and fast rule, but when looking at an LHR, you generally shouldn't have to wonder if a value on an audit is important. The whole thing has been marked not applicable; it's not that there's no savings to be had, it's that this audit is irrelevant for this particular page load.

(the only exception might be debugdata if we ever want to pipe through information on why something was marked n/a to http archive or wherever, but I don't know if that's ever come up before)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

True, but I was planning for metricSavings to eventually replace our current metric applicability lists. Removing metricSavings when an audit is N/A means that it will always be hidden when the user filters to any metric.

Not necessarily a bad UX, but it's also not how we do the filters right now. Knowing that an audit can affect a certain metric even when it's N/A can be useful information IMO.

};
}

Check warning on line 134 in core/audits/largest-contentful-paint-element.js

View check run for this annotation

Codecov / codecov/patch

core/audits/largest-contentful-paint-element.js#L129-L134 

Added lines #L129 - L134 were not covered by tests

const items = [elementTable];
let displayValue;
let metricLcp = 0;

try {
const {timing: metricLcp} =
await LargestContentfulPaint.request(metricComputationData, context);
const lcpResult =
await LargestContentfulPaintComputed.request(metricComputationData, context);
metricLcp = lcpResult.timing;
displayValue = str_(i18n.UIStrings.ms, {timeInMs: metricLcp});

const phaseTable = await this.makePhaseTable(metricLcp, metricComputationData, context);
Expand All @@ -152,14 +155,17 @@

const details = Audit.makeListDetails(items);

// Conceptually, this doesn't make much sense as "savings" for this audit since there isn't anything to "fix".
// However, this audit will always be useful when improving LCP and that should be reflected in our impact calculations.
const idealLcp = LargestContentfulPaint.defaultOptions[context.settings.formFactor].scoring.p10;
const lcpSavings = Math.max(0, metricLcp - idealLcp);

return {
score: 1,
displayValue,
details,
metricSavings: {
// Conceptually, this doesn't make much sense as "savings" for this audit since there isn't anything to "fix".
// However, this audit will always be useful when improving LCP and that should be reflected in our impact calculations.
LCP: metricLcp || 0,
LCP: lcpSavings,
},
};
}
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion core/test/audits/largest-contentful-paint-element-test.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ describe('Performance: largest-contentful-paint-element audit', () => {
expect(auditResult.score).toEqual(1);
expect(auditResult.notApplicable).toBeUndefined();
expect(auditResult.displayValue).toBeDisplayString('5,800\xa0ms');
expect(auditResult.metricSavings).toEqual({LCP: 5804});
expect(auditResult.metricSavings).toEqual({LCP: 3304}); // 5804 - 2500 (p10 mobile)
expect(auditResult.details.items).toHaveLength(2);
expect(auditResult.details.items[0].items).toHaveLength(1);
expect(auditResult.details.items[0].items[0].node.path).toEqual('1,HTML,3,BODY,5,DIV,0,HEADER');
Expand Down
Loading