docs: update FAQ docs #6695
Merged
docs: update FAQ docs #6695
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Navendu Pottekkat <navendupottekkat@gmail.com>
|
@juzhiyuan @yzeng25 @avinal Could you review this PR? |
nic-chen
reviewed
Mar 23, 2022
spacewander
reviewed
Mar 24, 2022
yzeng25
reviewed
Mar 24, 2022
Signed-off-by: Navendu Pottekkat <navendupottekkat@gmail.com>
|
@spacewander @nic-chen @yzeng25 @bisakhmondal @avinal I have made the changes as suggestions. |
nic-chen
approved these changes
Mar 25, 2022
|
I will create issues, and find a new contributor to complete it 😄 |
5 tasks
Liu-Junlin
pushed a commit
to Liu-Junlin/apisix
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2022
spacewander
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 30, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: Navendu Pottekkat navendupottekkat@gmail.com
Description
This PR updates the FAQ section to be more readable and consistent.
Fixes #6594