-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 579
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pulled the HaplotypeCallerIntegration tests into a common interface between spark and non-spark #5451
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks fine to me - very straightforward. It needs rebasing since the strict
changes went in.
@jamesemery it would be good to get this one in (needs rebasing). |
…en spark and non-spark versions
6fbdbbe
to
a429713
Compare
@tomwhite This should be good for you to take a look |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, just a couple of very minor comments. Happy for you to merge once tests pass.
@@ -22,12 +23,13 @@ | |||
|
|||
import java.io.File; | |||
import java.util.Collections; | |||
import java.util.List; | |||
|
|||
import org.broadinstitute.hellbender.tools.walkers.haplotypecaller.HaplotypeCallerIntegrationTest; | |||
|
|||
@Test(groups = {"variantcalling"}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should also be in the spark
group.
vc.getAlternateAllele(0).equals(Allele.NON_REF_ALLELE); | ||
@Override | ||
public List<String> getToolSpecificArguments() { | ||
return Collections.emptyList(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe make this the default implementation (i.e. in the abstract class) and just have the Spark version override it.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5451 +/- ##
===============================================
- Coverage 87.069% 80.155% -6.914%
+ Complexity 31875 30203 -1672
===============================================
Files 1940 1941 +1
Lines 146738 146745 +7
Branches 16226 16226
===============================================
- Hits 127764 117624 -10140
- Misses 13061 23431 +10370
+ Partials 5913 5690 -223
|
@jamesemery This depended on #5416, which has since been merged. What's the status of this PR now? |
This was a quick job, I think more than anything it highlighted that we are missing many features in spark as of right now.
Depends On #5416