[go: nahoru, domu]

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ceph.spec.in: clarify two important comments #5077

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2015

Conversation

smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor

First, the terms "common" and "specific" are vague. Second,
"common" can easily be confused with the ceph-common subpackage.

Fix this by rephrasing to "distro-unconditional dependencies" and
"distro-conditional dependencies", respectively.

Third, move the "distro-unconditional dependencies" header so it
is above the part where these dependencies are actually defined.

Signed-off-by: Nathan Cutler ncutler@suse.com

@@ -33,6 +30,9 @@ Source0: http://ceph.com/download/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
%if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel}
Patch0: init-ceph.in-fedora.patch
%endif
#################################################################################
# distro-unconditional dependencies
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe reword unconditional -> "independent" ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"distro-independent dependencies" . . . dunno, sounds rather confusing.

Originally I had written "dependencies that apply across all distros" and "dependencies that are specific only to a particular distro" but that seemed too verbose. Another option would be "non-distro-specific dependencies" and "distro-specific dependencies".

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"dependencies that apply across all distro families" sounds fine to me (not too verbose)

First, the terms "common" and "specific" are vague. Second,
"common" can easily be confused with the ceph-common subpackage.

Fix this by rephrasing to "distro-unconditional dependencies" and
"distro-conditional dependencies", respectively.

Third, move the "distro-unconditional dependencies" header so it
is above the part where these dependencies are actually defined.

Signed-off-by: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.com>
@smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ktdreyer updated

@ktdreyer ktdreyer merged commit dd212fd into ceph:master Jun 25, 2015
ktdreyer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2015
ceph.spec.in: clarify two important comments
@jan--f jan--f deleted the wip-spec-comment-clarify branch February 8, 2017 20:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants