Fix for repoGet request #6273
Merged
Fix for repoGet request #6273
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 7e09d4b The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 3 packages
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
Size Report 1Affected Products
Test Logs |
Size Analysis Report 1This report is too large (925,925 characters) to be displayed here in a GitHub comment. Please use the below link to see the full report on Google Cloud Storage.Test Logs |
jmwski
reviewed
May 20, 2022
jmwski
approved these changes
May 25, 2022
|
We'll want to generate a changeset here: docs: https://github.com/firebase/firebase-js-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#adding-changeset-to-pr, example: https://github.com/firebase/firebase-js-sdk/pull/4408/files. |
jmwski
reviewed
Jun 7, 2022
yarn.lock
Outdated
| @@ -17099,7 +17099,7 @@ uuid@^3.0.0, uuid@^3.3.2, uuid@^3.3.3: | |||
| resolved "https://registry.npmjs.org/uuid/-/uuid-3.4.0.tgz#b23e4358afa8a202fe7a100af1f5f883f02007ee" | |||
| integrity sha512-HjSDRw6gZE5JMggctHBcjVak08+KEVhSIiDzFnT9S9aegmp85S/bReBVTb4QTFaRNptJ9kuYaNhnbNEOkbKb/A== | |||
|
|
|||
| uuid@^8.3.2: | |||
| uuid@^8.0.0, uuid@^8.3.2: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this intentional? Seems like we shouldn't need to pull in an older version.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good catch. I assumed yarn would've resolved to the existing one installed in the repo
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like this is still here?
|
Latest commit w new tests LGTM. @jsdt could you have a look for code-owner approval? |
jmwski
approved these changes
Jun 15, 2022
jsdt
approved these changes
Jun 15, 2022
hsubox76
reviewed
Jun 15, 2022
| @@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ | |||
| "@firebase/app": "0.7.25", | |||
| "rollup": "2.72.1", | |||
| "rollup-plugin-typescript2": "0.31.2", | |||
| "typescript": "4.2.2" | |||
| "typescript": "4.2.2", | |||
| "uuid": "^8.3.2" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we avoid bringing in an extra dep here? I see in app-check we just implemented a function ourselves, is this good enough?
If it is, maybe we can extract it into @firebase/util and share it between app-check and database (maybe in a later PR, just have a duplicate implementation in this one?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, let me just reimplement it here and add a TODO
hsubox76
approved these changes
Jun 16, 2022
Merged
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix issue where the wrong cache was being updated by get. First noticed here