[go: nahoru, domu]
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Refactor QueryJob.query to read from resource dictionary #7763

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2019
Merged

Refactor QueryJob.query to read from resource dictionary #7763

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2019

Conversation

tswast
Copy link
Contributor
@tswast tswast commented Apr 22, 2019

This explicitly documents the QueryJob.query property and also aligns it
with the other resource properties in the BigQuery client.

@tswast
Refactor QueryJob.query to read from resource dictionary
4112a99 
This explicitly documents the QueryJob.query property and also aligns it
with the other resource properties in the BigQuery client.
@tswast tswast requested a review from shollyman April 22, 2019 20:50
@tswast tswast requested a review from crwilcox as a code owner April 22, 2019 20:50
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Apr 22, 2019
@tswast tswast added the api: bigquery Issues related to the BigQuery API. label Apr 22, 2019
@tswast tswast merged commit fb8c802 into googleapis:master Apr 23, 2019
@tswast tswast deleted the issue7759-query-property branch April 23, 2019 20:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@tseaver tseaver tseaver approved these changes

@shollyman shollyman shollyman approved these changes

@crwilcox crwilcox Awaiting requested review from crwilcox

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
api: bigquery Issues related to the BigQuery API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@tswast @tseaver @shollyman @googlebot