-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 520
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Query compacted blocks that fall within 2 * BlocklistPoll #583
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Annanay <annanayagarwal@gmail.com>
Internally we discussed the possibility of deleting the Would be happy to discuss and come up with an alternate setting / option that can replace both the polling and retention! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
doc content change request.
Signed-off-by: Annanay <annanayagarwal@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Annanay <annanayagarwal@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Annanay <annanayagarwal@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Annanay annanayagarwal@gmail.com
What this PR does:
Search blocks that have been compacted within
2 * BlocklistPoll
.This was added because we were inadvertently skipping some blocks from search due to the nature of query sharding and blocklist polling in our architecture.
For a complete explanation do check the comment in the issue linked below!
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #565
Checklist
CHANGELOG.md
updated - the order of entries should be[CHANGE]
,[FEATURE]
,[ENHANCEMENT]
,[BUGFIX]