-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Should mixture models have a clusterer-compatible interface #10336
Comments
In my opinion, yes. I wanted to compare K-Means, GMM and HDBSCAN and was very disappointed that GMM does not have a |
I think we should add |
I would like to work on this! |
@Eight1911 go for it. It is probably relatively simple but maybe not entirely trivial. |
@Eight1911 Mind if I take a look at this? |
@Eight1911 Do you mind if I jump in as well? |
Mixture models are currently a bit different. They are basically clusterers, except they are probabilistic, and are applied to inductive problems unlike many clusterers. But they are unlike clusterers in API:
n_components
parameter, with identical purpose ton_clusters
labels_
of the training datafit_predict
methodAnd they are almost entirely documented separately.
Should we make the MMs more like clusterers?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: