[css-pseudo-4] Add CSSPseudoElement.parentElement #2816
Assignees
Labels
css-pseudo-4
Current Work
Comments
|
Is this "parent element" the originating element, or is this a different concept? |
|
I agree with @Loirooriol that "parent element" is a potentially confusing name for "originating element", because of newer pseudo-elements like ::part (or the various well-established, prefixed selectors for styling browser widgets) which might match an element inside a shadow tree, where that element has parent elements in the shadow structure. |
|
Yes, I think originating element is the corresponding spec term. I'm not sure what the IDL member should be called. |
|
Maybe just .element? |
|
Hmm yeah, |
|
The CSS Working Group just discussed
The full IRC log of that discussion<dael> Topic: Add CSSPseudoElement.parentElement<dael> github: https://github.com//issues/2816 <dael> fantasai: This one was filed by birtles and I don't know too much about the APIs. They have a big red notice saying this was just an idea. It seems Mozilla is shipping some form of this API. <dael> fantasai: We should probably put something there <dael> Rossen_: Currently suggested API, parent element was suggested and then pointed out that was not nec. the best name at the very least. It's the originalting element and fantasai suggested .element <dael> Rossen_: If this is about naming, we can discuss if we want to add the API. I think adding is warranted <dael> TabAtkins: Agree having the attribute to get back to the real element is a necessary part. I like .element suggestion for the name <dael> Rossen_: Additional comments? <florian> sounds good <dael> Rossen_: Objections to adding a .element prop that brings psuedos back to their element? <dael> RESOLVED: Add a .element prop that brings psuedos back to their element |
|
Gecko is not shipping this on any release channel other than Nightly: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/bee8cf15c901b9f4b0c074c9977da4bbebc506e3/modules/libpref/init/StaticPrefList.h#137 |
birtles
added a commit
to birtles/csswg-drafts
that referenced
this issue
Jan 21, 2019
birtles
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 21, 2019
moz-v2v-gh
pushed a commit
to mozilla/gecko-dev
that referenced
this issue
Feb 22, 2019
…nt.element; r=bzbarsky As per CSSWG resolution: w3c/csswg-drafts#2816 (comment) And corresponding spec change: w3c/csswg-drafts@2dbf1e4 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D20427 --HG-- extra : moz-landing-system : lando
mykmelez
pushed a commit
to mykmelez/gecko
that referenced
this issue
Feb 22, 2019
…nt.element; r=bzbarsky As per CSSWG resolution: w3c/csswg-drafts#2816 (comment) And corresponding spec change: w3c/csswg-drafts@2dbf1e4 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D20427
moz-wptsync-bot
pushed a commit
to web-platform-tests/wpt
that referenced
this issue
Feb 25, 2019
As per CSSWG resolution: w3c/csswg-drafts#2816 (comment) And corresponding spec change: w3c/csswg-drafts@2dbf1e4 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D20427 bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1528883 gecko-commit: f35e52301a453825fbe63b074b7702968786d8fe gecko-integration-branch: central gecko-reviewers: bzbarsky
jgraham
pushed a commit
to web-platform-tests/wpt
that referenced
this issue
Feb 28, 2019
As per CSSWG resolution: w3c/csswg-drafts#2816 (comment) And corresponding spec change: w3c/csswg-drafts@2dbf1e4 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D20427 bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1528883 gecko-commit: f35e52301a453825fbe63b074b7702968786d8fe gecko-integration-branch: central gecko-reviewers: bzbarsky
marcoscaceres
pushed a commit
to web-platform-tests/wpt
that referenced
this issue
Jul 23, 2019
As per CSSWG resolution: w3c/csswg-drafts#2816 (comment) And corresponding spec change: w3c/csswg-drafts@2dbf1e4 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D20427 bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1528883 gecko-commit: f35e52301a453825fbe63b074b7702968786d8fe gecko-integration-branch: central gecko-reviewers: bzbarsky
gecko-dev-updater
pushed a commit
to marco-c/gecko-dev-wordified
that referenced
this issue
Oct 3, 2019
…nt.element; r=bzbarsky As per CSSWG resolution: w3c/csswg-drafts#2816 (comment) And corresponding spec change: w3c/csswg-drafts@2dbf1e4 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D20427 UltraBlame original commit: f35e52301a453825fbe63b074b7702968786d8fe
gecko-dev-updater
pushed a commit
to marco-c/gecko-dev-comments-removed
that referenced
this issue
Oct 4, 2019
…nt.element; r=bzbarsky As per CSSWG resolution: w3c/csswg-drafts#2816 (comment) And corresponding spec change: w3c/csswg-drafts@2dbf1e4 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D20427 UltraBlame original commit: f35e52301a453825fbe63b074b7702968786d8fe
gecko-dev-updater
pushed a commit
to marco-c/gecko-dev-wordified-and-comments-removed
that referenced
this issue
Oct 4, 2019
…nt.element; r=bzbarsky As per CSSWG resolution: w3c/csswg-drafts#2816 (comment) And corresponding spec change: w3c/csswg-drafts@2dbf1e4 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D20427 UltraBlame original commit: f35e52301a453825fbe63b074b7702968786d8fe
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
A
CSSPseudoElementwould be much more useful if it were possible to cross-reference it to the DOM tree. I believe this was part of thePseudoElementspecified in CSSOM before that disappeared.(In Gecko we currently implement
CSSPseudoElementwith only two attributes:typeandparentElementsince that seems to be all we need for now.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: