[go: nahoru, domu]
Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2019/Votes/Praxidicae

< Stewards | Elections 2019
Warning

The 2019 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Praxidicae

edit
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: EN-n
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hi! I'm Praxidicae. I am currently a global sysop and administrator on Mediawiki, account creator on the English Wikipedia, abuse filter helper and OTRS agent and through these rights, I frequently deal with sensitive, private information. My primary focus is combating cross-wiki spam, vandalism and harassment, especially dealing with spambots, which I have extensive experience identifying, deleting and blocking, where permitted, as well as collaborating with various projects to identify strings for abuse filters to prevent spam and vandalism. Ultimately I am running to help abate the extensive problem of cross-wiki abuse, outside of typical childish vandalism.


    Having been the subject myself of targeted harassment in real life that stemmed from on-wiki abuse, I am hoping to also work with the Wikimedia Foundation through this role to create a healthier environment for editors and find additional resources to help those who may also be targeted in this way. I hope for the community's trust and support.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2019/Questions#Praxidicae


  Yes

edit
  1. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  --Stïnger （会話） 14:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  2. JOAN (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  --JOAN ~ (Questions?) 14:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Cohaf (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 • Clear demonstrated need and competency. As per my SRGP comments when they are applying for GS. I will hope they will understand local policies well before doing any actions, and more gentle communication with community. However, I don't see any chance she will misuse the tools and I am not impressed that if a candidate needs to be a major wiki sysops as smaller wikis are what Stewards are involved most, the GR/GS experience makes up for it.--Cohaf (talk) more details of my vote here 14:25, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  4. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  don’t ordinarily like people who are not admins on a content wiki, but I trust Praxidicae. She is probably the single most active person in steward related responses to x-wiki abuse, and most of this is done via IRC, so it can’t be diff’d to. She may be controversial on en, but in terms of cross-wiki work there are few if any people better suited to be a steward. Strong support. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Barkeep49 (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 • Works diligently in all areas of her Wikimedia work, which have been increasingly focused on x-wiki issues, namely abuse and spam. While she has strong opinions, she is more than willing to double check her first impressions. I have no doubt she would be an active, collobrative member of the steward team. Barkeep49 (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Bradv (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Very active and competent vandal- and spam-fighter. Always willing to learn and collaborate with others, meaning she'll make a great steward. Strong support. Bradv🍁 15:03, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  I'd like, and I'll surely see, a bit more laziness. --15:08, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Ankry (talk) 15:11, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Even though they're not an admin on an individual project, I very much like to work with them and they could use the tools well. I have confidence in them. Trijnsteltalk 15:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Vermont (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Highly active anti-LTA and anti-spam editor crosswiki. User:Vermont/SE/2019#Praxidicae Vermont (talk) 15:30, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Just about meets my threshold for a steward. I don't see her as controversial, and she works hard in anti-vandalism; however, concerns about the lack of en.wiki RfA are valid. Overall, weak support. Leaderboard (talk) 15:42, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by علاء)2019 •  No content wiki adminship, but seems sensible and active. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 16:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Kaviraf (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2019 •  Kaviraf (talk) 16:36, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Lack of content sysop experience not a concern. Miniapolis 16:39, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Dlohcierekim (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Full trust. Full support. Seen her around enwiki. She is sensible and active. per TonyBallioni et al.. "net positive" would be an understatement. Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  18. FR30799386 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  FR30799386 (talk) 16:56, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  cyrfaw (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  20. SQL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  SQLQuery me! 19:00, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Novak Watchmen (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Tks4Fish (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Even though she's not a sysop on a wiki (albeit being a global one), she is extremely active on LTA and spambot fighting, which, as TonyBallioni has already mentioned, is done via IRC, so unfortunately not visible to anyone that's not currently there, but can be easily viewed by staying a little bit in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect. —Thanks for the fish! talk•contribs 19:29, 8 February 2019 (UTC) Edited: —Thanks for the fish! talk•contribs 19:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Mz7 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Mz7 (talk) 19:50, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  24. stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  stwalkerster (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Primefac (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Primefac (talk) 20:31, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Swarm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Highly qualified Swarm (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Majora (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Highly, highly qualified to be a steward. Steward is not a content role. Praxidicae has demonstrated an ability to work with all languages as a global sysop and a knowledge of areas of steward concern such as cross-wiki LTAs. Their actions show that they can be a great steward. Majora (talk) 21:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Pórokhov (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Per Tks4Fish. Highly qualified.Pórokhov (talk) 21:21, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Rax (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  support - like Majora. -- Rax (talk) 21:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Geom (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Geom Habla conmigo 21:41, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Even I think a steward should definitely have some experience as a sysop, Praxidicae is a global sysop and that should be enough from my side. Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:51, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  32. TheSandDoctor (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Highly qualified/net positive. Lack of content sysop experience is not a concern for me in this case. --TheSandDoctor Talk 22:05, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  33. AGK (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  I think this user has the right experience and skills. AGK ■ 22:08, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Complete support - Praxidicae's judgement is one that I admire heavily and I have confidence that whatever inexperience can be quickly made up for. Hiàn (talk) 22:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  I do think that more experience with advanced permissions would be beneficial here, but I also appreciate her existing experience dealing with cross-wiki abuse and think that she could build on that to quickly adapt to the new role. If you are unsuccessful this year, please do stick around and try again in the future after addressing some of the concerns. Many of our best stewards weren't elected on the first try. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:57, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  36. XXBlackburnXx (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  XXBlackburnXx (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  37. L235 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Kevin (aka L235 · t · c · enwiki) 00:14, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Veracious (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Fully supporting. Veracious (talk) 03:39, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Muhraz (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Muhraz (talk) 04:43, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  –Ammarpad (talk) 05:49, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  41. NMW03 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  NMW03 (talk) 07:29, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Abelmoschus Esculentus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk) 09:08, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  43. BugWarp (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  BugWarp (talk) 14:51, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Ayagaures 0 (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  Ayagaures 0 (talk) 16:02, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Santasa99 (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  Santasa99 (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Gog the Mild (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  Gog the Mild (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Érico (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  After reviewing the comments and the answers to the questions, I change to support, largely per Ajraddatz. Érico (talk) 18:26, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Nick (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  I find myself agreeing with Tony and Ajraddatz - more content writing experience would be useful in the case of Praxidicae, but as Majora points out, steward is not a content role. It's a more technical role, with a series of restrictive policies that generally prevent a steward from involving themselves in the types of content related disputes you would find yourself becoming involved with as an administrator.
    I have worked extensively with Praxidicae (she routinely pesters me to deal with copyright violations on Commons and socks on English Wikipedia) and she's got the a sixth sense for spotting socks, something I see in few users, even those admins who work in SPI. I trust her judgement, even when I can't actually work out why she's right, it almost always falls into place and it's spooky, seriously. Nick (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  49. AfroThundr3007730 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  — AfroThundr (u · t · c) 19:55, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Mbrickn (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Mbrickn (talk) 21:44, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Cameron11598 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Has a clue and good x-wiki experience as a GS. --Cameron11598 (talk) 23:47, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  52. K.e.coffman (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Trusted contributor; thank you for volunteering. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:18, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Linedwell (Eligible, checked by Savh)2019 •  Linedwell [talk] 08:55, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Arystanbek (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Arystanbek (talk) 09:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Operator873 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Net positive for the community. Dedicated to xwiki abuse prevention. Small concerns about how she reacts to things at times, but this doesn't detract from the good work she puts into the community. Operator873talkconnect 17:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Iluvatar (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Iluvatar (talk) 20:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  57. AntiCompositeNumber (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Drewmutt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  With all her xwiki sock sniffing abilities, she's an obvious net positive. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 23:34, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Techso01 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Techso01 (talk) 05:32, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Otourly (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Otourly (talk) 07:17, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  It's pretty hard for me to understand why people think mediawiki.org is not a "content wiki". It has plenty of content, it just has a different audience than other Wikimedia projects. If people think adminship (with our non-broken process for handing out +sysop) on mediawiki.org shouldn't qualify for being eligible to be a steward candidate, then that should be fixed before the election instead of opposing candidates who do meet the previously-agreed upon requirements. Legoktm (talk) 07:18, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Shizhao (talk) 08:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  63. BRPever (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  BRP ever 14:16, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Kb03 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019 •  Kb03 (talk) 14:17, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Britishfinance (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2019 •  Britishfinance (talk) 15:43, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
       Levityn (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Levityn (talk) 16:01, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  66. There'sNoTime (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Unwavering confidence - TNT 💖 19:10, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Euro know (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Euro know (talk) 19:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Amorymeltzer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  As noted above, Praxidicae is incredibly vigilant fighting cross-wiki abuse and spam, and is a huge benefit to the global community. She's good at this stuff. I note the no votes, which in anyone else would give me pause, but only good would come of Praxidicae as a steward. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:40, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  69. علاء (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Strong Support. She is very active in fighting cross-wiki abuse/vandals/spammers and LTAs. I think, she will be a good addition for steward team. (+ Per TonyBallioni, Majora and Ajraddatz) --Alaa :)..! 23:49, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Galahad (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 03:08, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  71. فيصل (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Faisal talk 03:14, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Johanna-Hypatia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Johanna-Hypatia (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  73. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Really great at xwiki stuff and a clear need for tools. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 08:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 08:30, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Krd (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Krd 09:08, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  76. QEDK (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  QEDK (talk 桜 enwiki) 15:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
       Aabbccddeeffabcdef (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  La présentation me semble bonne. Aabbccddeeffabcdef (talk) 17:37, 12 February 2019 (UTC).[reply]
  77. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 20:03, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  78. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  DannyS712 (talk) 21:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Drmies (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  What TonyBallioni says. And Trijnstel. And Mike. And others. Drmies (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Defender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Defender (talk) 12:54, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Saig Keryann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Saig Keryann (talk) 14:37, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Sj (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  ++ for thoughtfulness and cross-wiki attention, an essential part of having a healthy global environ. –SJ talk  17:09, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  without hesitation; demonstrably and truly knows their way around the small and medium wikis, their spambots and their vandals; is attentive to detail and applies due respect to their processes, something clearly required for stewards. Has had to deal with trolls, and manages them effectively. Meh! to calls for extensive content wiki experience, it is not a priority to this role against the xwiki spam, small/medium wiki rights, and keeping a level-head.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:24, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  84. TheDragonFire (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  TheDragonFire (talk) 13:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Vermont)2019 •  Uğurlar arzu edirəm! ►Cekli829 10:25, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  86. StraussInTheHouse (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2019 •  Most competent LTA tracker I've come across, I strongly support this candidacy. SITH (talk) 12:23, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
       Rprpr (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Rprpr (talk) 15:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Ymnes (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  Ymnes (talk) 17:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  88. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  ArdiPras95 (talk) 19:41, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Eihel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Eihel (talk) 11:25, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  Maleine258 (talk) 15:57, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Mustafa desamangalam (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Dear User:Praxidica, I am happy to support for your willingness to serve Stewards. Mustafa desamangalam (talk) 05:23, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Oshawott 12 (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 06:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  93. KlaasZ4usV (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •   Klaas `Z4␟` V:  17:08, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Kurtis (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  I find the supporting arguments to be far more persuasive than the opposing ones. Kurtis (talk) 17:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  If you fail the elections, please learn another language and run again. You will pass. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
       Jnovikov (Not eligible, checked by PlyrStar93) •  Jnovikov (talk) 12:18, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Cabayi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Cabayi (talk) 19:35, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  97. FN Markus (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  FN Markus (talk) 03:19, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Rzuwig► 08:35, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Berean Hunter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 13:07, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Dick Bos (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Dick Bos (talk) 15:31, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
       Andyzweb (Not eligible, checked by PlyrStar93) •  Andyzweb (talk) 17:45, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Thanks for your help on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:43, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Clerkon (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2019 •  Clerkon (talk) 18:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  103. DatGuy (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  DatGuy (talk) 12:59, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
       Dane (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  No concerns. She has extremely active, has a demonstrated need and I think she'd do wonderful in the role of Steward. -- Dane talk 20:06, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Billofocham (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Billofocham (talk) 01:52, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  105. TheMesquito (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  TheMesquito (talk) 13:00, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  106. K6ka (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:28, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Radlna15 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Radlna15 (talk) 18:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Nicola (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2019 • --Nicola (talk) 16:56, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  109. L736E (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  L736Etell me 18:22, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2019 •  She has my support. Less experienced than some other candidates, but she seems level-headed and could infuse some necessary estrogen into the heavily patriarchal Wikimedia oversight. She could be a significant contributor. Stevenmitchell (talk) 23:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  111. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  ToBeFree (talk) 08:35, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Zyephyrus (talk) 19:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Rosguill (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Rosguill (talk) 07:51, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Verbistheword (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2019 •  Verbistheword (talk) 17:45, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  115. MattLongCT (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Good editor. All my interactions with her on en:Wikipedia have been pleasant. Great judgement and unique perspective. ―MattLongCT -Talk-☖ 21:54, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Vermont)2019 •  Matanya (talk) 23:47, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Masti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  masti <talk> 09:17, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Sun-crops (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Sun-crops (talk) 09:59, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  119. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  RadiX∞ 11:49, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Wim b (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2019 •  Wim b 13:15, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  121. PlyrStar93 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 13:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  - Not an admin at a content wiki, which leads to experience concerns, and also I don't have a good read on where they stand with policies. In my opinion ACC and OTRS have a lower bar of entry, and neither really deal with the sort of CU/OS private data that one would have access to as a steward - ACC provides IP addresses of new editors, not necessarily those that are already established). The incident that I mentioned in the questions didn't really leave me with a great impression - though it may have been a one-off sort of thing and maybe it's a bit unfair to focus on that one thing, I haven't really noticed the candidate in a different setting and so I'm not sure what that says either. --Rschen7754 14:04, 8 February 2019 (UTC) (Note: I would be willing to reconsider in a future year with more experience). --Rschen7754 01:29, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  2. 無聊龍 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Oppose as the candidate shows limited ability in cross-language cross-wiki collaboration, in particular unwillingness to respect local community policies, conventions, procedures and consensus. 無聊龍 (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Érico (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Per Rschen7754. Érico (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Nihlus (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Inexperience. Nihlus 14:28, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Not enough experience in cross-wiki matters. But do keep up the good work; I would consider supporting next year.—Jasper Deng (talk) 15:12, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Clinamental (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Clinamental (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Opposing due to lack of current administration or functionary positions on any content related projects. — xaosflux Talk 15:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  7. AINH (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Oppose as the candidate shows a lack of understanding of many basic policies such as AFD and SD on other projects according to my observation on IRC AINH (talk) 15:41, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Stang (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Stang 16:39, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  not enough experience Dolotta (talk) 16:59, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 17:29, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  11. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  As per Rschen. MZaplotnik(talk) 17:31, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Fenikals (talk) 17:32, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  13. MrX (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  MrX (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  14. AT (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  AT (talk) 20:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Informationswiedergutmachung (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Gereon K. (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Count Count (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  --Count Count (talk) 22:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Super Wang (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 06:38, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Lacks the requisite temperament. ——SerialNumber54129 07:25, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  20. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  per Rschen7754 KPFC 💬 10:49, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Brainswiffer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Brainswiffer (talk) 11:45, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  22. EVinente (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  I agree with Rschen7754 EVinente (talk) 12:16, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  Not enough experience IMHO –Davey2010Talk 17:54, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Flooded with them hundreds (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Flooded with them hundreds 18:35, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Too soon and English as the only language is a concern to put me here —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 19:17, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  Mirer (talk) 04:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  concerns with limited administrative experience on a content wiki FASTILY 07:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Insufficient cross wiki/admin experience Herby talk thyme 11:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Widr (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Widr (talk) 13:06, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Artregor (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Artregor (talk) 14:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Man77 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  as always my "No" to monolingual stewards → «« Man77 »» [de] 16:56, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Soul Train (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  One language in the international project? No, thanks. Soul Train (talk) 22:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Steindy (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  Steindy (talk) 00:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Küñall (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  Küñall (talk) 02:52, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  35. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  *Youngjin (talk) 08:31, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  36. MarioFinale (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  The fact that he (apparently) only speaks english will likely translate on some cross-wiki communication problems. ~ℳɑrio (talk) 17:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Fish and karate (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Fish and karate (talk) 11:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  38. 1.02 editor (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  as per above, I feel that being proficient in only one language will be a big problem as a steward 1.02 editor (talk) 11:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Dweller (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019 •  per many arguments above, but thank you for standing Dweller (talk) 13:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  40. L293D (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  L293D (☎ • ✎) 21:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Wildly boy (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Wildly boy (talk) 01:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Per Rschen7754. Natuur12 (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Simplexity22 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Simplexity22 (talk) 19:59, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  44. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  MelanieN (talk) 22:48, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Just no, the English-only users are always unhelpful in Meta-Wiki Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:23, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Kudpung (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  Kudpung (talk) 17:23, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  47. DGG (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  DGG (talk) 07:14, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  48. გიო ოქრო (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  გიო ოქრო (talk) 23:03, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Pamputt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Agree with Rschen7754 Pamputt (talk) 10:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  English only? Jusjih (talk) 21:54, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  51. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  ExtremPilotHD (talk) 12:37, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Feminist (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Feminist (talk) 13:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Slowking4 (talk) 14:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Rhododendrites (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019 •  — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:49, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Wikit 19:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Tymon.r (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Tymon.r (talk) 01:21, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Joshualouie711 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Joshualouie711 (talk) 02:42, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Methodios (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  --Methodios (talk) 08:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Guettarda (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Mostly per Rschen Guettarda (talk) 04:25, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Kpgjhpjm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Kpgjhpjm (talk) 09:01, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Per Rschen7754, but I'm likely to change my vote in future elections. Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 11:09, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  62. OSeveno (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  oSeveno (talk) 10:47, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Hrodvarsson (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019 •  Hrodvarsson (talk) 02:27, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Kyykaarme (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2019 •  per xaosflux. kyykaarme (talk) 09:07, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  65. NickK (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  I hesitated for a while as she has a relevant set of experience and overall might be a suitable candidate. However, unfortunately she did not answer any questions asked after the beginning of the election while still being active around. This is not quite what I would expect from a steward — NickK (talk) 10:29, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  I think she is on the right track, however, I do not think he has traveled that path long enough to embark on being steward. —AlvaroMolina (✉ - ✔) 14:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Mixed impression. Might be a good candidate in the future. Vogone (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  I can't oppose someone who has a high track record of xwiki work and a helpful attitude. However, it isn't just about it. Without being sysop on a content wiki she may lack experience on many areas. Esteban16 (talk) 17:30, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  per Esteban16 Mahir256 (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Wetterwolke (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Wetterwolke (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  6. 隼鷹 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  隼鷹 (talk) 23:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  7. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Per Vogone — Bukhari (Talk!) 07:42, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  8. 1233 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  As pointed by some of the people who oppose and support and to be neutral (yes this can be omitted), you lack experience, though most, if not all of his actions, are done in good faith.--1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 08:52, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  9. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Might be a good candidate in the future ! - DePlusJean (talk) 19:01, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Antanana (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  アンタナナ 00:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Stanglavine (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Rafael (stanglavine) msg 00:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  12. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  WikiBayer (talk) 08:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Alan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Alan (talk) 14:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Piotr Bart (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Piotr Bart (talk) 18:28, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  15. B20180 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  B20180 (talk) 19:13, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 22:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Mahveotm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Mahveotm (talk) 23:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 11:13, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Eurodyne (talk) 00:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Good luck! Wolverène (talk) 07:12, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 10:51, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  22. 水瀬悠志 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  水瀬悠志 (talk) 01:48, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Aleator (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  Excellent x-wiki, but I'd prefer a longer track record. Aleator (talk) 16:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Tomybrz (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  per Vogone comment Tomybrz Bip Bip 16:23, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  25. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 15:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
       Rashid Jorvee (Not eligible, checked by PlyrStar93) •  Rashid Jorvee (talk) 04:21, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019 •  Stephan1000000 (talk) 06:10, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Waddie96 (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2019 •  Waddie96 (talk) 11:45, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
       ??pyphp?? (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  ??pyphp?? (talk) 08:48, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  28. PrussianOwl (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  PrussianOwl (talk) 20:31, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  29. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 05:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Enfcer (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Enfcer (talk) 23:30, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Arif80s (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Arif80s (talk) 05:11, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Kghbln (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  [[kgh]] (talk) 13:11, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Shangkuanlc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Liang(WMTW) (talk) 06:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Genium (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  genium ⟨✉⟩ 12:51, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Darkhan 16:51, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2019/Votes/Praxidicae&oldid=24929686"