[go: nahoru, domu]
Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2019/Votes/Vit Koz

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2019 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Vit Koz

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: be, ru, pl-3, en-3, de-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    This is my first experience to join the stewards team. For today I am the editor of the belarusian Wikipedia, autoeditor of the russian Wikipedia and sysop of the belarusian Wikiquote.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2019/Questions#Vit Koz


Yes

[edit]
  1. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Novak Watchmen (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Swarm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Swarm (talk) 21:07, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Jarash (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Fresh blood is always good for an old commuinity. The user if elected will help resolve the conflict between be-taraskwiki and bwiki. The project will benefit from the appointment of this candidate. Jarash 08:55, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ayagaures 0 (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  Ayagaures 0 (talk) 16:07, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  5. JogiAsad (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  I support new and young contributors to be given the chance to prove their expertise and skills, atleast new & fresh should also be given the chance. JogiAsad (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Piotr Bart (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  There’s always a first time. Piotr Bart (talk) 18:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Techso01 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Techso01 (talk) 05:34, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Euro know (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Euro know (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Cedalyon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Cedalyon (talk) 08:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
       Aabbccddeeffabcdef (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Tant de statut me semble correct pour être stewart. Aabbccddeeffabcdef (talk) 17:39, 12 February 2019 (UTC).[reply]
  10. Kubura (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Kubura (talk) 19:56, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Saig Keryann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Saig Keryann (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Vermont)2019 •  Nəticə müsbət olmasa da, mən Sizə uğurlar arzu edirəm! ►Cekli829 10:27, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Cekay (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Yes, because we need fresh contributors with new views on old problems. Cekay (talk) 09:53, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  Jusjih (talk) 21:55, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  The attempt to gain the adminship is obviously failed now, I'm just voting yes as a kind of "moral support", and moreover we still need more Russian-speaking stewards, it's very helpful. Wolverène (talk) 18:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Pelz (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2019 •  Pelz (talk) 12:53, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2019 •  Not really experienced but sensible and efficient contributor and candidate. Gryllida 08:36, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Bluemel1 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Bluemel1 (talk) 19:23, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Arif80s (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Arif80s (talk) 05:12, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Zergeist2 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Zergeist2 (talk) 21:24, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Darkhan 17:01, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Sun-crops (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Sun-crops (talk) 10:05, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Unfortunately, I can't support you. Your responses to the questions are poor and even suggested that steward role isn't for you ("Perhaps you `re right"). Leaderboard (talk) 14:01, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  2. PlyrStar93 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Response shows you have insufficient experience. -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 14:03, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  - Too inexperienced, and their "experience with fighting cross-wiki vandalism is unfortunately only theoretical". --Rschen7754 14:04, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  4. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  TonyBallioni (talk) 14:05, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Érico (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  The statement speaks for itself. Érico (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Absolutely not. 100% of inexperience in cross-wiki related works. --Stïnger （会話） 14:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Vogone (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hampcky (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Tks4Fish (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  No crosswiki experience. Perhaps going for Global Renamer would be a better alternative, considering his answers. —Thanks for the fish! talk•contribs 14:22, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Cohaf (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 • Limited Experience and don't seems to have a clue what Stewards entails. I thank them for their humility and willingness to serve. I am really thankful for people who is willing to listen. I will say not now, but yes, Global Renamer maybe all they need for now.--Cohaf (talk) more details of my vote here 14:26, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Nihlus (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Inexperience. Nihlus 14:31, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  12. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  The user needs more cross-wiki experience. —AlvaroMolina (✉ - ✔) 14:44, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Jni (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Not yet. jni (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  insufficient crosswiki experience, sorry Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Ankry (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Sorry, but your answers show an utter and complete misunderstanding of the role.—Jasper Deng (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Vermont (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  User:Vermont/SE/2019#Vit Koz Vermont (talk) 15:32, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Clinamental (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Clinamental (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Lack of permanent administration or functionary positions on any projects, combined with a lack of x-wiki experience drives my opposition here. — xaosflux Talk 15:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  I think more experience is needed. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by علاء)2019 •  Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 16:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  23. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  MZaplotnik(talk) 17:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  He is only temporary administator Fenikals (talk) 17:22, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  per AlvaroMolina and Ajraddatz Mahir256 (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 17:28, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  I think the role of steward isn't fitted for him. He isn't involved on stewards/xwiki areas. Esteban16 (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  cyrfaw (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  29. MrX (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  MrX (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  30. SQL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  SQLQuery me! 19:03, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  31. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  The statement is too meagre. MF-W 19:20, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  32. K6ka (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Little experience with administrative work. Stewardship is not for content creators. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 20:31, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Informationswiedergutmachung (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 21:13, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Rax (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  IMHO (based on answers on question page): so far not knowing enough about what a stewards jobs is. -- Rax (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  inexperienced, also per responses to questions Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:45, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  36. AGK (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  AGK ■ 22:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Same concerns as the others for the most part. Hiàn (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Count Count (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Poor answers to questions, not enough experience with extended rights and anti-abuse. --Count Count (talk) 22:40, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Eurodyne (talk) 22:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  40. NickK (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Unfortunately very limited experience at the moment. Please do participate in various global areas if you are interested in and you might be a good candidate a couple of years later — NickK (talk) 00:26, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  –Ammarpad (talk) 05:50, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  per Cohaf: bizarre nomination all round. ——SerialNumber54129 07:29, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Wojciech Pędzich (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  I would like to see you back with more hands-on experience and an idea of what you would like to assist in as a steward. Let it be an encouragment but for now, it's too early. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 08:52, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  44. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  KPFC 💬 10:50, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Brainswiffer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Brainswiffer (talk) 11:46, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  46. EVinente (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  EVinente (talk) 12:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Santasa99 (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  Santasa99 (talk) 16:07, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Hhkohh (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  Hhkohh (talk) 16:49, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  –Davey2010Talk 17:55, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  50. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Might be a good candidate in the future ! - DePlusJean (talk) 19:10, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Inexperience —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 19:17, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Riha (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Riha (talk) 21:52, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Antanana (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  アンタナナ 00:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Stanglavine (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Rafael (stanglavine) msg 00:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  55. NMW03 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  NMW03 (talk) 06:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  FASTILY 07:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Arystanbek (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Arystanbek (talk) 09:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Artregor (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Artregor (talk) 14:07, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Alan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Alan (talk) 14:18, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  60. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Da du noch nie nicht im Metawiki aktiv warst eindeutig WikiBayer (talk) 16:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Iluvatar (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Iluvatar (talk) 20:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Soul Train (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  I do not see enough experience, judging by the status in different projects. Even adminship at the Belorussian Wikiquote is not enough. Maybe later. Soul Train (talk) 22:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Steindy (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  Steindy (talk) 00:03, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Küñall (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  Küñall (talk) 02:54, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  65. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  *Youngjin (talk) 08:32, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Shizhao (talk) 09:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Dreamy Jazz (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 10:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 11:14, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  69. MarioFinale (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  Maybe is better for you to just apply to global renamer. ~ℳɑrio (talk) 17:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Amorymeltzer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Per answers to questions, in particular being unclear what it would entail. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Galahad (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 03:09, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  72. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  ‐‐1997kB (talk) 08:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Krd (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Krd 09:10, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Fish and karate (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Fish and karate (talk) 11:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  75. QEDK (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  QEDK (talk 桜 enwiki) 15:22, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Klein Muçi (Eligible, checked by Stanglavine)2019 •  Klein Muçi (talk) 16:10, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 20:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  78. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  DannyS712 (talk) 21:37, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 10:53, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Sanmosa (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 • Content creators could gain Stewardship (actually, should be any rights applicable) only when he has much experience with administrative work, then it would be perfect. ΣανμοσαThe Trve Lawe of free Monarchies 14:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Sj (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Welcome interest, but needs cross-wiki experience -- and much of this work can be done there, starting w/focus on spam bots. –SJ talk  17:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  83. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  MelanieN (talk) 22:49, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Looking for xwiki/SWMT experience, and management of spambots and the like  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:27, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Has a countable bad history of "playing-wiki-game" Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:25, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Simplexity22 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Simplexity22 (talk) 15:31, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Kudpung (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  Kudpung (talk) 17:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  88. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  ArdiPras95 (talk) 19:45, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Eihel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  insufficient experience (crosswiki especially) - expérience insuffisante (crosswiki surtout) Eihel (talk) 11:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Abductive (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Abductive (talk) 10:21, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Oshawott 12 (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 06:35, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  92. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  ExtremPilotHD (talk) 12:35, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Snookerado (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Snookerado (talk) 18:52, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Slowking4 (talk) 14:35, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  95. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 15:11, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Dolotta (talk) 22:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Rhododendrites (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019 •  — Rhododendrites talk \\ 01:12, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Waddie96 (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2019 •  Waddie96 (talk) 11:46, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Wikit 19:05, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Rzuwig► 08:37, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  101. PrussianOwl (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  PrussianOwl (talk) 20:27, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Wizard-Lizard (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Wizard-Lizard (talk) 01:11, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Tymon.r (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Tymon.r (talk) 01:22, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Kpgjhpjm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Kpgjhpjm (talk) 09:05, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  As per Leaderboard + insufficient wiki- as well as xwiki experience. Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 11:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Joshualouie711 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Joshualouie711 (talk) 02:04, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Spintendo (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •   Spintendo  17:52, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Enfcer (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Enfcer (talk) 23:31, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Kghbln (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  [[kgh]] (talk) 13:12, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  110. NMW03 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  It's too early NMW03 (talk) 17:44, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Zyephyrus (talk) 19:30, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Hrodvarsson (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019 •  Hrodvarsson (talk) 02:29, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Shangkuanlc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Liang(WMTW) (talk) 06:02, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Vermont)2019 •  Matanya (talk) 23:48, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Masti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  masti <talk> 09:17, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  1. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Not much experience; please try global rollback/global sysop first. GZWDer (talk) 14:05, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  2. JOAN (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  JOAN ~ (Questions?) 15:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Thank you for volunteering, and I would support after you have some experience with intermediate rights. All the best, Miniapolis 16:49, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Wetterwolke (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Wetterwolke (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Pórokhov (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Inexperienced.Pórokhov (talk) 21:56, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Gereon K. (talk) 22:03, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Muhraz (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Muhraz (talk) 04:43, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  8. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  lack of experience — Bukhari (Talk!) 07:45, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Gog the Mild (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  Gog the Mild (talk) 17:00, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  10. AfroThundr3007730 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  — AfroThundr (u · t · c) 19:56, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Linedwell (Eligible, checked by Savh)2019 •  Linedwell [talk] 08:57, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  12. B20180 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  B20180 (talk) 19:14, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 22:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Mahveotm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Mahveotm (talk) 00:03, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 08:16, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  16. 水瀬悠志 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  水瀬悠志 (talk) 01:45, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  17. DGG (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  DGG (talk) 07:15, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  18. StraussInTheHouse (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2019 •  Perhaps try global renamer / global rollback / global sysop first to show proficiency with x-wiki matters / handling sensitive information. SITH (talk) 18:27, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  19. M4r51n (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  M4r51n (talk) 18:39, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Garam (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  as per answers on Stewards/Elections_2019/Questions#Vit Koz. Garam (talk) 20:16, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  21. KlaasZ4usV (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •   Klaas `Z4␟` V:  17:06, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019 •  Stephan1000000 (talk) 06:11, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
       Andyzweb (Not eligible, checked by PlyrStar93) •  Andyzweb (talk) 17:45, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Methodios (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  --Methodios (talk) 07:59, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  24. OSeveno (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  oSeveno (talk) 10:50, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2019 •  Seems too inexperienced for a job such as Steward. Stevenmitchell (talk) 23:34, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Genium (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  genium ⟨✉⟩ 13:01, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  27. MattLongCT (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  ―Matthew J. Long -Talk-☖ 21:04, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2019/Votes/Vit_Koz&oldid=24929689"