[go: nahoru, domu]

US20060192668A1 - System and method for monitoring security at a premises - Google Patents

System and method for monitoring security at a premises Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060192668A1
US20060192668A1 US11/399,161 US39916106A US2006192668A1 US 20060192668 A1 US20060192668 A1 US 20060192668A1 US 39916106 A US39916106 A US 39916106A US 2006192668 A1 US2006192668 A1 US 2006192668A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
premises
audio
audio signals
security system
server
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/399,161
Inventor
Gary Friar
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Stanley Convergent Security Solutions Inc
Original Assignee
Sonitrol Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sonitrol Corp filed Critical Sonitrol Corp
Priority to US11/399,161 priority Critical patent/US20060192668A1/en
Publication of US20060192668A1 publication Critical patent/US20060192668A1/en
Assigned to SONITROL CORPORATION reassignment SONITROL CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: FRIAR, GARY
Assigned to STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. reassignment STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SONITROL CORPORATION
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B1/00Systems for signalling characterised solely by the form of transmission of the signal
    • G08B1/08Systems for signalling characterised solely by the form of transmission of the signal using electric transmission ; transformation of alarm signals to electrical signals from a different medium, e.g. transmission of an electric alarm signal upon detection of an audible alarm signal
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/16Actuation by interference with mechanical vibrations in air or other fluid
    • G08B13/1654Actuation by interference with mechanical vibrations in air or other fluid using passive vibration detection systems
    • G08B13/1672Actuation by interference with mechanical vibrations in air or other fluid using passive vibration detection systems using sonic detecting means, e.g. a microphone operating in the audio frequency range

Definitions

  • This invention relates to alarm systems, and more particularly, this invention relates to alarm systems in which audio is forwarded from an audio sensor to a central monitoring station or server.
  • the assignee of the present invention provides security solutions using audio intrusion detection, access control, video monitoring and fire detection. These security systems allow 24-hour monitoring and are integrated into a single, easy-to-use system that is monitored by highly trained professionals at a central monitoring station.
  • the security system incorporates verified audio detection, which allows a central monitoring station to monitor what is happening at a premises using sound detection.
  • Small analog audio sensors are strategically placed throughout a premises to allow an operator at the central monitoring station to hear the sounds of abnormal activity in the monitored premises or facility.
  • the sounds of the break-in initiates a code that describes the location of the activated analog audio sensor, e.g., a microphone. Audio is transmitted to the central monitoring station.
  • a skilled operator hears the live audio from the monitored premises while pertinent customer data can be displayed on a computer screen for the operator to review and report.
  • Monitoring can occur 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
  • the system can also include devices that permit ID badging with card readers, door contacts to indicate when doors are open at a time when they should not be open, for example, by unauthorized entry, and similar devices.
  • video cameras and fire detectors have been included in the overall security system. Audio signals are transmitted as analog signals from the audio sensor, e.g., microphone, through a wired control panel, and over the public switched telephone system to the central monitoring station. The analog system suffers drawbacks and is not always efficient.
  • a security system monitors security at a premises and includes at least one audio sensor located at the premises that receives audio signals and converts the audio signals to digitized audio signals.
  • a central monitoring station is located remote from the premises and receives the digitized audio signals and converts the digitized audio signals into audible audio for an operator that is monitoring the premises.
  • the audio sensor includes a processor that is operative for determining whether any digitized audio signals are indicative of an alarm condition and should be received at the central monitoring station.
  • a memory can store digital signatures of different audio sounds indicative of an alarm condition.
  • the processor can be operative for comparing a digitized audio signal with digital signatures stored within the memory.
  • the audio sensor can also be operative for receiving data relating to audio patterns indicative of false alarms allowing the processor to recognize audio signals indicative of false alarms.
  • a premises controller can be located at the premises such as part of a control panel and operatively connected to each audio sensor for receiving the digitized audio signals and transmitting the digitized audio signals to the central monitoring station.
  • Each audio sensor can include a transceiver for receiving a communications signal from the central monitoring station and transmitting a communications signal to the central monitoring station, such as a signal representing a voice, such as for voice instructions and reply.
  • the central monitoring station can include a server.
  • a client can be in communication with the server for accessing the server and receiving data regarding the security system.
  • the communications network can interconnect the client and server and be formed as an internet or local area network (LAN) or incorporate elements of both.
  • the central monitoring station can also include a first receiver for receiving digitized audio signals generated by the audio sensor and a second receiver for receiving analog signals a security system that does not generate digitized signals because it uses an analog audio sensor.
  • a data bus can interconnect each of the audio sensors and receive the digitized audio signals thereon.
  • Each audio sensor can include an identifying data address on the data bus.
  • a method aspect is also set forth.
  • FIG. 1 is a fragmentary, block diagram of an existing, prior art security system.
  • FIG. 2 is fragmentary, block diagram of a first embodiment of the security system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2A is a block diagram showing basic high level components of an audio sensor that can be used in the security system shown in FIG. 2 in accordance with one non-limiting example of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 8 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 9 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 10 is a logic diagram showing an example of the different software modules that can be used in the software architecture for the present invention.
  • FIG. 11 is a block diagram showing an example of the type of devices that can be used as an example in the system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 12 is a block diagram showing various application, database and data aggregation servers operative with central monitoring stations as servers as an example of a security system of the present invention.
  • Digitized audio can now be used with sufficient processing capability at the audio sensor, typically a microphone and associated components as explained below.
  • the audio sensor typically a microphone and associated components
  • franchisees, clients or other customers can operate their own central monitoring station and have the capability to allow a more centralized service to incorporate its monitoring capability.
  • some type of sound analysis at the audio sensor as a microphone or other local device can be provided. Processing can also occur at a premises controller, for example, as part of a control panel, or processing can occur at the remote central monitoring station.
  • a digital audio sensor as a microphone can include a processor for processing digitized audio signals, a memory for storage, and a transceiver that transmits digitized audio signals across a telephone line, or some other wired communications network or a wireless network to the central monitoring station or server.
  • Separate central monitoring station receivers can receive either analog audio signals from an existing system using analog audio microphones, or digitized audio signals from the audio sensors or both.
  • the security system as described can monitor security at one or more premises and typically includes at least one premises located audio sensor that converts analog audio signals to digitized audio signals and transmits the digitized audio signals to a central monitoring station at a remote location from the premises.
  • the central monitoring station receives the digitized audio signals and converts the digitized audio signals for playback to an operator that is monitoring the premises.
  • the digital audio sensor can include a processor for recognizing digital signatures of sounds and determine whether any false alarms occur and whether the digitized audio signals should be transmitted to the central monitoring station.
  • a premises controller for example, as part of a control panel, can be located at the premises and receive any digitized audio signals from one or more audio sensors located at the premises through a data bus in which audio sensors are addressable.
  • the digitized audio signals could be multiplexed for transmission to the central monitoring station or analysis can occur at the premises controller to determine which digitized audio signals should be transmitted or stored.
  • FIG. 1 shows an existing security or alarm system 20 located in a customer premises 21 in which the audio sensors 22 are formed as analog audio modules having microphones and connect into an analog control panel 24 .
  • the audio modules 22 are operative as analog microphones and may include a small amplifier.
  • Door contacts 26 can also be used and are wired to the control panel 24 .
  • Other devices 27 could include an ID card reader or similar devices wired to the control panel.
  • This section of a customer premises 21 such as a factory, school, home or other premises, includes wiring that connects the analog audio modules 22 direct to the control panel 24 with any appropriate add-ons incorporated into the system.
  • the phone system 28 as a Plain Ordinary Telephone System (POTS) is connected to the control panel 24 , and telephone signals are transmitted over a 300 baud industry standard telephone connection as a POTS connection to a remotely located central monitoring station 30 through a Remote Access Device (RAD) 32 .
  • the central monitoring station typically includes a computer that requires Underwriter Laboratory (UL) approval.
  • UL Underwriter Laboratory
  • the different accounts that are directed to different premises or groups of alarm devices can be console specific. There is no load leveling in this system.
  • typical operation can occur when a sound crosses a threshold, for example, a volume, intensity or decibel (dB) level, causing the control panel 26 to indicate that there is an intrusion.
  • a threshold for example, a volume, intensity or decibel (dB) level
  • a short indicator signal which could be a digital signal, is sent to the central monitoring station 30 from the control panel 26 to indicate the intrusion.
  • the central monitoring station 30 switches to an audio mode and begins playing the audio heard at the premises 21 through the microphone at the audio sensors or modules 22 to an operator located at the central monitoring station 30 .
  • This operator listens for any sounds indicative of an emergency, crime, or other problem.
  • the audio is sent at a 300 baud data rate over regular telephone lines as an analog signal.
  • the 300 baud transmit rate is commonplace in the industry.
  • control panel 24 In a more complex control panel 24 used in these types of systems, it is possible to add a storage device or other memory that will store about five seconds of audio around the audio event, which could be a trigger for an alarm.
  • the control panel 24 could send a signal back to the central monitoring station 30 of about one-half second to about one second before the event and four seconds after the event.
  • the security or alarm system 20 can begin streaming live audio from the audio sensors 22 . This can be accomplished at the control panel 24 or elsewhere.
  • the existing security system 20 transmits analog audio signals from the microphone in the audio sensor or module 22 to the control panel 24 .
  • This analog audio is transmitted typically over the phone lines via a Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) line 28 to the central monitoring station 30 having operators that monitor the audio.
  • POTS Plain Old Telephone Service
  • the central monitoring station 30 could include a number of “listening” stations as computers or other consoles located in one monitoring center. Any computers and consoles are typically Underwriter Laboratory (UL) listed, including any interface devices, for example phone interfaces.
  • Control panels 24 and their lines are typically dedicated to specific computer consoles usually located at the central monitoring station 30 . In this security system 20 , if a particular computer console is busy, the control panel 24 typically has to wait before transmitting the audio. It is possible to include a digital recorder as a chip that is placed in the control panel 24 to record audio for database storage or other options.
  • FIG. 2 is a fragmentary block diagram of a security system 40 , in accordance with one non-limiting example of the present invention, and at a premises 42 in which a processor, e.g., a microcontroller or other microprocessor, is formed as part of each audio sensor (also referred to as audio module), forming a digital audio module, sensor or microphone 44 .
  • a processor e.g., a microcontroller or other microprocessor
  • the audio sensor 44 is typically formed as an audio module with components contained within a module housing 44 a that can be placed at strategic points within the premises 42 .
  • Different components include a microphone 46 that receives sounds from the premises.
  • An analog/digital converter 48 receives the analog sound signals and converts them into digital signals that are processed within a processor 50 , for example, a standard microcontroller such as manufactured by PIC or other microprocessor.
  • the processor 50 can be operative with a memory 52 that includes a database of audio signatures 52 for comparing various sounds for determining whether any digitized audio signals are indicative of an alarm condition and should be forwarded to the central monitoring station.
  • the memory 52 can store digital signatures of different audio sounds, typically indicative of an alarm condition (or a false alarm) and the processor can be operative for comparing a digitized audio signal with digital signals stored within the memory to determine whether an alarm condition exists.
  • the audio sensor 44 can also receive data relating to audio patterns indicative of false alarms, allowing the processor 50 to recognize audio sounds indicative of false alarms.
  • the processor 50 could receive such data from the central monitoring station through a transceiver 54 that is typically connected to a data bus 55 that extends through the premises into a premises controller as part of a control panel or other component.
  • the transceiver 54 is also connected into a digital/analog converter 56 that is connected to a speaker 58 . It is possible for the transceiver 54 to receive voice commands or instructions from an operator located at the central monitoring station or other client location, which are converted by the processor 50 into analog voice signals. Someone at the premises could hear through the speaker 58 and reply through the microphone. It is also possible for the audio sensor 44 to be formed different such that the microphone could be separate from other internal components.
  • the audio sensor shown in FIG. 2A allows two-way communication, the audio sensor does not have to include such components as shown in FIG. 2 , and could be an embodiment for an audio sensor 44 ′ that does not include the transceiver 54 , digital/analog converter 56 , and speaker 58 .
  • This device would be a more simple audio sensor.
  • some digital audio sensors 44 could include a jack 60 that allows other devices to connect into the data bus 55 through the audio sensors and allow other devices such as a door contact 62 to connect and allow any signals to be transmitted along the data bus.
  • Door contacts 61 and other devices can be connected into an audio sensor as a module.
  • the audio sensor 44 could include the appropriate inputs as part of a jack 60 for use with auxiliary devices along a single data bus 55 .
  • Some audio modules 44 can include circuitry, for example, the transceiver 54 as explained above, permitting two-way communications and allowing an operator at a central monitoring station 62 or other location to communicate back to an individual located at the premises 42 , for example, for determining false alarms or receiving passwords or maintenance testing.
  • the system typically includes an open wiring topology with digital audio and advanced noise cancellation allowing a cost reduction as compared to prior art systems, such as shown in FIG. 1 .
  • the audio sensors are typically positioned on the addressable data bus 55 , allowing each audio sensor and other device, such as door contacts, card readers or keyed entries to be addressable with a specific address.
  • a premises controller 66 can operate as a communications hub receiving signals from the data bus 55 rather than being operative as a wired audio control panel, such as in the prior art system shown in FIG. 1 .
  • audio can be digitized at the audio sensor 44 , substantially eliminating electrical noise that can occur from the wiring at the audio sensor to the premises controller 66 . Any noise that occurs within the phone system is also substantially eliminated from the premises controller 66 to the central monitoring station 62 .
  • a video camera 68 , badge or ID card reader 70 and other devices 72 as typical with a security system could be connected into the data bus 55 and located within the premises 42 .
  • the premises controller 66 can be part of a central panel, and can include PCMCIA slots 74 .
  • the premises controller 66 can be a stand-alone unit, for example, a processor, and not part of a control panel.
  • two PCMCIA slots 74 can be incorporated, but any number of slots and devices can be incorporated into a control panel for part of the premises controller 66 .
  • the slots can receive contemporary PC cards, modems, or other devices.
  • the PCMCIA devices could transmit audio data at 56K modem speed across telephone lines, at higher Ethernet speeds across a data network, at a fast broadband, or wireless, for example, cellular CDMA systems.
  • a communications network 76 extends between the premises controller 66 and the central monitoring station 62 and could be a wired or wireless communications network or a PSTN.
  • the PCMCIA slots 74 could receive cellular or similar wireless transmitter devices to transmit data over a wireless network to the central monitoring station 62 .
  • a receiver 78 is located at the central monitoring station 62 , and in this non-limiting example, is designated a central station receiver type II in FIG. 2 , and receives the digitized audio signals.
  • a receiver 80 for analog audio signals from a control panel in the system 20 of FIG. 1 could be designated a central station receiver type I, and both receivers output digitized audio signals to a local area network 82 .
  • Other premises 84 having digital audio sensors 44 as explained above could be connected to receiver 78 , such that a plurality of premises could be connected and digital audio data from various premises 84 - 84 n for “n” number of premises being monitored.
  • any receivers at the central monitoring station 62 It is also possible to separate any receivers at the central monitoring station 62 away from any computer consoles used for monitoring a premises.
  • a portion of the product required to be Underwriter Laboratory (UL) approved could possibly be the central station receiver 78 .
  • Any computer consoles as part of the central monitoring station could be connected to the local area network (LAN) 82 .
  • a central station server 94 could be operative through the LAN 82 , as well as any auxiliary equipment. Because the system is digital, load sharing and data redirecting could be provided to allow any monitoring console or clients 90 , 92 to operate through the local area network 82 , while the central station server 94 allows a client/server relationship.
  • a database at the central station server 94 can share appropriate data and other information regarding customers and premises.
  • a firewall 96 can be connected between the local area network 82 and an internet/worldwide web 98 , allowing others to access the system through the web 98 and LAN 82 if they pass appropriate security.
  • FIG. 3 is another view similar to FIG. 2 , but showing a service to an installed customer base of a security system 80 with existing accounts, replacing some of the central monitoring station equipment for digital operation.
  • the analog security system 20 is located at premises 21 and includes the typical components as shown in FIG. 1 , which connect through the PSTN 28 to a central station receiver type 180 for analog processing. Other devices 100 are shown with the digital security system 40 at premises 42 .
  • the central station receiver type 180 is operative with any existing and installed equipment in which analog signals are received from the analog audio modules 22 , door contacts 26 or other devices 27 , and transmitted through the control panel 26 at 300 baud rate over the telephone line 28 .
  • the system at premises 44 digitizes the analog sound picked up by audio sensors 44 transmits the digitized data into the central monitoring station 62 and into its local area network 82 via the premises controller 74 .
  • Data processing can occur at the premises controller 74 , which is digitized and operative with the digital audio sensors 44 .
  • a central monitoring station 62 an operator typically sits at an operator console.
  • the audio is received as digitized data from the digital audio sensors 44 and received at the central station receiver type II 78 .
  • Other analog signals from the analog audio modules 22 , control panel 26 and telephone line 28 are received in a central station receiver type 180 .
  • All data has been digitized when it enters the local area network (LAN) 82 and is processed at client consoles 90 , 92 .
  • the clients could include any number of different or selected operators. Load sharing is possible, of course, in such a system, as performed by the central station server 94 , such that a console typically used by one client could be used by another client to aid in load balancing.
  • FIG. 4 shows the type of service that can be used for remote accounts when a phone problem exist at a premises 20 , or along a telephone line in which it would be difficult to pass an analog audio signal at 300 baud rate from the control panel 26 .
  • a digitizer 102 is illustrated as operative with the control panel 26 and provides a remedy for the analog signals emanating from the control panel over a standard telephone line to the central monitoring station 62 , when the signals cannot be received in an intelligible manner.
  • the digitizer 102 digitizes the analog audio signal using appropriate analog-to-digital conversion circuitry and transmits it at a higher data rate, for example at a 56K baud rate to the central monitoring station 62 .
  • the digitizer could transmit over an Ethernet network connection, or over a wireless CDMA cellular phone signal to the central monitoring station 62 .
  • the signal is received in a central station receiver type II 78 , which is operative to receive the digital signals.
  • This improved system using the digitizer 102 in conjunction with a more conventional system could be used in the rare instance when there is poor service over existing telephone lines.
  • the digitizer 102 could be part of the control panel 26 within the premises or located outside the premises and connected to a telephone line.
  • FIG. 5 shows different security systems 20 , 20 ′ and 40 in which legacy accounts using the analog audio modules 22 have been provided for through either the digitizer 102 that transmits signals to the central station receiver type II 78 or the use of the central station receiver type 180 , which receives the analog signals, such as from the security system 20 ′.
  • Other individuals can connect to the central monitoring station 62 through the internet, i.e., worldwide web 98 as illustrated.
  • a remote client 110 could connect to the central station server 94 through the web 98 , allowing access even from a home residence in some cases.
  • Data back-up could also be provided at a server 112 or other database that could include an application service provider (ASP) as an application host and operative as a web-based product to allow clients to obtain services and account information.
  • ASP application service provider
  • Technical support 114 could be provided by another client or operator that connects through the web 98 into the system at the central monitoring station 62 to determine basic aspects and allow problem solving at different security systems. Because each audio sensor 44 is addressable on the data bus 55 , it is possible to troubleshoot individual audio sensors 44 from a remote location, such as the illustrated clients 90 , 92 , 110 or technical support 114 .
  • a client/server application at the application host 112 which can be a web-based product.
  • Customers can access their accounts to determine security issues through use of the worldwide web/internet 98 .
  • Data can pass through the firewall 96 into the local area network 82 at the central monitoring station 62 and a customer or local administrator for a franchisee or other similarly situated individual can access the central station server 94 and access account information. It is also possible to have data back-up at the application host (ASP) 112 in cooperation with a client application operated by a system operator.
  • ASP application host
  • Outside technical support 114 can access the central monitoring station 62 local area network 82 through the internet 98 , through the firewall 96 , and into the local area network 82 and access the central station server 94 or other clients 90 , 92 on the local area network.
  • Technical support can also access equipment for maintenance.
  • the system as described relative to FIG. 5 can also allow account activation through the application host 112 or other means.
  • FIG. 6 shows a system with a different business model in which the central station server 94 is remote with the database and application host (ASP) 112 and accessed through the internet/web 98 .
  • the central station server 94 in this non-limiting example is connected to the internet 98 and different numbers of servers 94 could be connected to the internet to form a plurality of central monitoring stations, which can connect to different client monitoring consoles (with speakers for audio).
  • Different client monitoring consoles could be owned by different customers, for example, dealers or franchisees.
  • a corporate parent or franchisor can provide services and maintain software with updates 24/7 in an IP environment. Franchisees, customers or dealers could pay a service fee and access a corporate database.
  • FIG. 7 shows that the system of the present invention has the ability to monitor at a remote location, load share, late shift or back-up.
  • a remote operator 120 as a client can connect through the internet 98 to the local area network 82 .
  • the remote client 120 is connected to the internet 98 via a firewall 122 .
  • Both clients 110 , 120 connect to the web 98 and to the central monitoring station 82 via the firewall 96 and LAN 82 .
  • load sharing can be accomplished and some of the balance of duties assumed by the clients 110 , 120 .
  • a number of local monitoring stations as monitoring centers could be owned by franchisees or run by customers/clients.
  • central monitoring stations owned or operated by a franchisee, which does not desire to monitor its site. It is possible to have monitoring stations in secure locations, or allow expansion for a smaller operator. With a web-based, broadband based station, it is possible to monitor smaller operators and/or customers, franchisees, or other clients and also locate a central monitoring station in a local region and do monitoring at other sites. It is also possible to use a virtual private network (VPN) 130 , as illustrated in FIG. 8 .
  • Central monitoring station receiving equipment 132 as servers or computers could be remotely located for functioning as a central monitoring station (CS), which can be placed anywhere.
  • CS central monitoring station
  • the system could call an 800 number or a local number and send data to the more local monitoring location where a central monitoring station 132 exists.
  • a central monitoring station in the locality or city where the account is located and use the internet move data. This allows local phone service activation and reduces telephone infrastructure costs.
  • the virtual private network 130 is not a weak link in the system and is operable to move data at high speeds. Appropriate firewalls 134 could be used.
  • FIG. 9 shows that remote monitoring in the security system can be accomplished with any type of account, as shown by the premises at 140 , which includes a control panel as a premises controller 142 for monitoring a security system 143 having a design different from the design of other security systems as described above.
  • a control panel as a premises controller 142 for monitoring a security system 143 having a design different from the design of other security systems as described above.
  • This can be operative with the control panel as a premises controller, which can receive information from other digital security alarms.
  • a central monitoring station receiver could be Underwriter Laboratory approved and operative as a central
  • FIG. 10 is a logic diagram showing an example of software modules that could be used for the security system of the present invention.
  • a central station receiver type 180 , central station receiver type II 78 , and central station receiver OEM 144 are operative with respective central station receiver communications module 150 and central station digital receiver communications module 152 .
  • Other modules include an install assistance module 154 to aid in installing any software, a net communications module 156 that is operative to allow network communications, and a logger module 158 that is operable for logging data and transactions.
  • a schedule module 160 is operable for scheduling different system aspects, and a panel message module 162 is operative for providing panel messages.
  • Other modules include the resolve module 164 and navigator module 166 .
  • a database 168 is operative with a database interface 170 , and a bouncer program 172 is also operable with the client 174 that includes a user interface 176 and audio 178 .
  • the database 168 can be accessed through the web 98 using the ASP 112 or other modules and devices as explained above.
  • the bouncer 172 could be operative as a proxy and also act to “bounce” connections from one machine to another.
  • FIG. 11 shows different types of field equipment that can be used with a security system 40 in accordance with one non-limiting example of the present invention.
  • field equipment for a monitored premises 42 is illustrated as connected on one data bus 55 .
  • the equipment includes audio sensors 44 ′, door contacts 61 , keypads 200 and card readers 202 , which can connect on one bus 55 through other sensors 44 .
  • Some third party systems could be used, and relays 204 for zones 205 and wireless receivers 206 could be connected.
  • some pattern recognition can be done at the audio sensor 44 as a microphone with appropriate processing capability. For example, if common noises exceed a certain threshold, or if a telephone rings, in the prior art system using analog audio sensors 22 such as shown in FIG. 1 , the noise could trip the audio. For example, a telephone could ring and the audio would trip any equipment central monitoring station, indicating an alarm. The operator would listen to the audio and conclude that a phone had rung and have to reset the system.
  • intrusion noise characteristics that are volume based or have certain frequency components for a certain duration and amplitude could be used. It is also possible to establish a learning algorithm such that when an operator at a central monitoring station 62 has determined if a telephone has rung, and resets a panel, an indication can be sent back to the digital audio sensor 44 that an invalid alarm has occurred.
  • the processor 56 within the digital audio sensor 44 can process and store selected segments of that audio pattern, for example, certain frequency elements, similar to a fingerprint voice pattern. After a number of invalid alarms, which could be 5, 10 or 15 depending on selected processing and pattern determination, a built-in pattern recognition occurs at the audio sensor. A phone could ring in the future and the audio sensor 44 would not transmit an alarm.
  • any software and artificial intelligence could be broken into different segments.
  • some of the artificial intelligence can be accomplished at the digital audio sensor 44 , which includes the internal processing capability through the processor 50 ( FIG. 2 ).
  • Some software and artificial intelligence processing could occur at the control panel as the premises controller 66 .
  • the digital audio sensor 44 could send a specific pattern back to the premises controller 66 or central monitoring station 62 .
  • lightning occurs with thunder, and every audio sensor 44 in many different premises as monitored locations could initiate an alarm signal as the thunder cracks.
  • a central monitoring station 62 would have to monitor, for example, 500 alarms simultaneously. These alarms must be cleared. Any burglar who desired to burglarize a premises would find this to be an opportune time to burglarize the monitored premises because the operator at a central monitoring station 62 would be busy clearing out the security system and would not recognize that an intruder had entered the premises.
  • an algorithm operable within the processor of the premises controller 66 can determine when all audio sensors 44 went off, and based on a characteristic or common signal between most audio sensors, determine that a lightning strike and thunder has occurred. It is also possible to incorporate an AM receiver or similar reception circuitry at the premises controller 66 as part of the control panel, which receives radio waves or other signals, indicative of lightning. Based upon receipt of these signals and that different audio sensors 44 generated signals, the system can determine that the nuisance noise was created by lightning and thunder, and not transmit alarm signals to the central monitoring station 62 . This could eliminate a logjam at the central monitoring station and allow intrusion to be caught at the more local level.
  • the field equipment shown in FIG. 11 indicates that digital audio sensors 44 digitize the audio at the audio sensor and can perform pattern recognition on-board. Audio can also be stored at the audio sensor using any memory 52 ( FIG. 2 ). Audio can also be streamed after an alarm signals. As illustrated, different devices are situated on one data bus and can interface to other devices to simplify wiring demands. These devices could be programmed and flash-updateable from the premises controller 66 or the event more remotely. There can also be different zones and relays.
  • the digital audio sensor 44 could include different types of microprocessors or other processors depending on what functions the digital audio sensor is to perform. Each audio sensor typically would be addressable on the data bus 55 . Thus, an audio sensor location can be known at all times and software can be established that associates an audio sensor location with an alarm. It is also possible to interface a video camera 68 into the alarm system. When the system determines which audio sensor has signaled an alarm and audio has begun streaming, the digital signal could indicate at the premises controller 66 if there is an associated camera and whether the camera should be activated and video begin from that camera.
  • door contacts 62 could be connected to the digital audio sensor 44 , enhancing overall security processing and wiring efficiency.
  • Some rooms at a premises could have more than two audio sensors, for example, a digital audio sensor with the microprocessor, and another auxiliary sensor as a microphone 22 , which could be analog. The signal from this microphone 22 could be converted by the digital audio sensor 44 .
  • Keypads 200 and keyless entries 202 could be connected to the digital audio sensor to allow a digital keypad input.
  • Door contacts 62 can include auxiliary equipment and be connected into the digital audio sensor.
  • the security system could include different relays 204 and zones 205 and auxiliary devices as illustrated.
  • a wireless receiver 206 such as manufactured by RF Innovonics, could receive signals from the RF transmitters indicative of alarms from wireless audio digital sensors. This would allow a wireless alarm network to be established. There is also the ability to accomplish two-way communication on some of the digital audio sensors, in which the monitoring station could communicate back as explained above. It is also possible to communicate using Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) from the premises controller to the central monitoring station and in reverse order from the central monitoring station to a premises controller, allowing greater use of an IP network.
  • VoIP Voice over Internet Protocol
  • intrusion noises include a broad spectrum of frequencies that incorporate different frequency components, which typically cannot be carried along the phone lines as analog information.
  • the phone lines are typically limited in transmission range to about 300 hertz to about 3,300 hertz.
  • the data can be transmitted at higher frequency digital rates using different packet formats.
  • the range of frequencies that the system can operate under is widened, and better information and data is transmitted back to the central monitoring station, as compared to the older analog security system such as shown in FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 12 shows the security system 40 in one non-limiting example of the present invention in which customers 300 can interact with a web IEG SP1 secure site 302 , which in turn is operative with a colocation facility 304 , such as a Verio facility, including an application server 306 database server 308 and data aggregation server 310 . These servers connect to various remote central monitoring stations 312 through a web VPN network 314 . Advanced Suite software could be used.
  • the described embodiments of the security system have advantages over prior art security systems, such as shown in FIG. 1 .
  • maintenance is difficult and there are hardware difficulties, for example, meeting Underwriter Laboratory requirements for the central monitoring station consoles, RAD slayery, and computers.
  • the central monitoring stations could now include a separate user interface and port all code to net.
  • Features and functions can be updated as required and obsolete modules can be rewritten and new modules can be written. Modular releases can mitigate this risk to have time to the field. It is possible to retain functionality and retain the look and feel of the user interface. It is also possible to remove the Underwriter Laboratory requirement from computers.
  • the enhanced operating efficiency includes load balancing, decreased activations, decreased misses, increased accounts per monitor, and integrated digital capability for the alarm system.
  • Disaster recovery is possible with shared monitoring, for example, on nights and weekends. This enables future internet protocol or ASP business modules.
  • the existing wired control panel used in prior art systems is expensive to install and requires difficult programming. It has a high cost to manufacture and requires analog technology.
  • the premises controller 66 as part of a control panel is operative with digitized audio and designed for use with field equipment having addressable module protocols.
  • the 300 baud rate equipment of prior art systems can be replaced with devices that fit into PCMCIA slots and operative at 56K or higher rates.
  • Written noise canceling algorithms can enhance digital signal processing.
  • This design can be accomplished with a contemporary microcontroller (or microprocessor).
  • the system also supports multiple communications media including telephone company, DSL, cable modem and a digital cellular systems. It enables a series topology with full digital support. There is a lower cost to manufacture and about 40% reduction in the cost of a control panel in one non-limiting example. It also allows an interface for legacy control panels and digital audio detection and verification. It allows increased communication speeds. It is IP ready and reduces telephone company infrastructure costs.
  • any AC humming could be switched on/off, as well as other background noises, for example a telephone or air compressor noise. It is also possible to reduce the audio to a signature and recognize a likely alarm scenario and avoid false alarm indications for system wide noise, such as thunder.
  • the digital audio sensors could record five seconds of audio data, as one non-limiting example, and the premises controller as a control panel can process this information. With this capability, the central monitoring station would not receive 25 different five-second audio clips to make a decision, for example, which could slow overall processing, even at the higher speeds associated with advanced equipment.
  • a signature can be developed for the audio digital sensor, containing enough data to accomplish a comparison at the premises controller for lightning strikes and thunder.
  • the central monitoring station can also store audio data on any of its servers and databases. This storage of audio data can be used for record purposes.
  • Each audio sensor can be a separate data field. Any algorithms that are used in the system can do more than determine amplitude and sound noise level, but can also process a selected frequency mix and duration of such mix.
  • the audio produced by a loud thunder strike could be processed at the digital audio sensor.
  • Processing of audio data can also occur at the premises controller at the control panel or at the central monitoring station. It is also possible to have a database server work as a high-end server for greater processing capability. It is also possible to use digital verification served-up to a client PC from a central monitoring station server. This could allow intrusion detection and verification, which could use fuzzy logic or other artificial intelligence.
  • the system could use dual technology audio sensors, including microwave and passive infrared (PIR) low energy devices. For example, there could be two sets of circuitry. A glass could break and the first circuitry in the audio sensor could be operative at microamps and low current looks for activation at sufficient amplitude. If a threshold is crossed, the first circuitry, including a processor, initiates operation of other circuitry and hardware, thus drawing more power to perform a complete analysis. It could then shut-off. Any type of audio sensors used in this system could operate in this manner.
  • PIR passive infrared
  • the circuit could include an amplitude based microphone such that when a threshold is crossed, other equipment would be powered, and the alarm transmitted. It could also shut itself off as a two-way device. It is possible to have processing power to determine when any circuitry should arm and disarm or when it should “sleep.”
  • processing power for example at the (1) audio sensor, (2) at the premises controller located the control panel, or (3) the central monitoring station, where a more powerful server would typically be available.
  • the system typically eliminates nuisance noise and in front of the physical operator at a central monitoring station.
  • Any type of sophisticated pattern recognition software can be operable.
  • different databases can be used to store pattern recognition “signatures.”
  • Digital signal processing does not have to occur with any type of advanced processing power but can be a form of simplified A/D conversion at the microphone. It is also not necessary to use Fourier analysis algorithms at the microphone.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Alarm Systems (AREA)

Abstract

Digital audio sensors receive and digitize audio signals and transmit the digitized signals to a central monitoring station for monitoring by an operator. The system can allow load balancing and other improvements.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATION
  • This application is based upon prior filed copending provisional application Ser. No. 60/628,357 filed Nov. 16, 2004, the disclosure which is hereby incorporated in its entirety.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention relates to alarm systems, and more particularly, this invention relates to alarm systems in which audio is forwarded from an audio sensor to a central monitoring station or server.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The assignee of the present invention, Sonitrol Corporation, provides security solutions using audio intrusion detection, access control, video monitoring and fire detection. These security systems allow 24-hour monitoring and are integrated into a single, easy-to-use system that is monitored by highly trained professionals at a central monitoring station. The security system incorporates verified audio detection, which allows a central monitoring station to monitor what is happening at a premises using sound detection.
  • Small analog audio sensors are strategically placed throughout a premises to allow an operator at the central monitoring station to hear the sounds of abnormal activity in the monitored premises or facility. When the security system is activated, the sounds of the break-in initiates a code that describes the location of the activated analog audio sensor, e.g., a microphone. Audio is transmitted to the central monitoring station. When activation occurs, a skilled operator hears the live audio from the monitored premises while pertinent customer data can be displayed on a computer screen for the operator to review and report.
  • Monitoring can occur 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The system can also include devices that permit ID badging with card readers, door contacts to indicate when doors are open at a time when they should not be open, for example, by unauthorized entry, and similar devices. In some systems, video cameras and fire detectors have been included in the overall security system. Audio signals are transmitted as analog signals from the audio sensor, e.g., microphone, through a wired control panel, and over the public switched telephone system to the central monitoring station. The analog system suffers drawbacks and is not always efficient.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In one non-limiting aspect of the present invention, a security system monitors security at a premises and includes at least one audio sensor located at the premises that receives audio signals and converts the audio signals to digitized audio signals. A central monitoring station is located remote from the premises and receives the digitized audio signals and converts the digitized audio signals into audible audio for an operator that is monitoring the premises. In one non-limiting aspect, the audio sensor includes a processor that is operative for determining whether any digitized audio signals are indicative of an alarm condition and should be received at the central monitoring station. A memory can store digital signatures of different audio sounds indicative of an alarm condition. The processor can be operative for comparing a digitized audio signal with digital signatures stored within the memory. The audio sensor can also be operative for receiving data relating to audio patterns indicative of false alarms allowing the processor to recognize audio signals indicative of false alarms.
  • In yet another aspect, a premises controller can be located at the premises such as part of a control panel and operatively connected to each audio sensor for receiving the digitized audio signals and transmitting the digitized audio signals to the central monitoring station. Each audio sensor can include a transceiver for receiving a communications signal from the central monitoring station and transmitting a communications signal to the central monitoring station, such as a signal representing a voice, such as for voice instructions and reply. The central monitoring station can include a server. A client can be in communication with the server for accessing the server and receiving data regarding the security system. The communications network can interconnect the client and server and be formed as an internet or local area network (LAN) or incorporate elements of both. The central monitoring station can also include a first receiver for receiving digitized audio signals generated by the audio sensor and a second receiver for receiving analog signals a security system that does not generate digitized signals because it uses an analog audio sensor. A data bus can interconnect each of the audio sensors and receive the digitized audio signals thereon. Each audio sensor can include an identifying data address on the data bus.
  • A method aspect is also set forth.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description of the invention which follows, when considered in light of the accompanying drawings in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a fragmentary, block diagram of an existing, prior art security system.
  • FIG. 2 is fragmentary, block diagram of a first embodiment of the security system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2A is a block diagram showing basic high level components of an audio sensor that can be used in the security system shown in FIG. 2 in accordance with one non-limiting example of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 8 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 9 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 10 is a logic diagram showing an example of the different software modules that can be used in the software architecture for the present invention.
  • FIG. 11 is a block diagram showing an example of the type of devices that can be used as an example in the system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 12 is a block diagram showing various application, database and data aggregation servers operative with central monitoring stations as servers as an example of a security system of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • Different embodiments will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments are shown. Many different forms can be set forth and described embodiments should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout, and prime notation is used to indicate similar elements in alternative embodiments.
  • Digitized audio can now be used with sufficient processing capability at the audio sensor, typically a microphone and associated components as explained below. With the system and method as described, franchisees, clients or other customers can operate their own central monitoring station and have the capability to allow a more centralized service to incorporate its monitoring capability. Also, some type of sound analysis at the audio sensor as a microphone or other local device can be provided. Processing can also occur at a premises controller, for example, as part of a control panel, or processing can occur at the remote central monitoring station.
  • A digital audio sensor as a microphone can include a processor for processing digitized audio signals, a memory for storage, and a transceiver that transmits digitized audio signals across a telephone line, or some other wired communications network or a wireless network to the central monitoring station or server. Separate central monitoring station receivers can receive either analog audio signals from an existing system using analog audio microphones, or digitized audio signals from the audio sensors or both.
  • The security system as described can monitor security at one or more premises and typically includes at least one premises located audio sensor that converts analog audio signals to digitized audio signals and transmits the digitized audio signals to a central monitoring station at a remote location from the premises. The central monitoring station receives the digitized audio signals and converts the digitized audio signals for playback to an operator that is monitoring the premises. The digital audio sensor can include a processor for recognizing digital signatures of sounds and determine whether any false alarms occur and whether the digitized audio signals should be transmitted to the central monitoring station. A premises controller, for example, as part of a control panel, can be located at the premises and receive any digitized audio signals from one or more audio sensors located at the premises through a data bus in which audio sensors are addressable. The digitized audio signals could be multiplexed for transmission to the central monitoring station or analysis can occur at the premises controller to determine which digitized audio signals should be transmitted or stored.
  • FIG. 1 shows an existing security or alarm system 20 located in a customer premises 21 in which the audio sensors 22 are formed as analog audio modules having microphones and connect into an analog control panel 24. The audio modules 22 are operative as analog microphones and may include a small amplifier. Door contacts 26 can also be used and are wired to the control panel 24. Other devices 27 could include an ID card reader or similar devices wired to the control panel. This section of a customer premises 21, such as a factory, school, home or other premises, includes wiring that connects the analog audio modules 22 direct to the control panel 24 with any appropriate add-ons incorporated into the system. The phone system 28 as a Plain Ordinary Telephone System (POTS) is connected to the control panel 24, and telephone signals are transmitted over a 300 baud industry standard telephone connection as a POTS connection to a remotely located central monitoring station 30 through a Remote Access Device (RAD) 32. The central monitoring station typically includes a computer that requires Underwriter Laboratory (UL) approval. The different accounts that are directed to different premises or groups of alarm devices can be console specific. There is no load leveling in this system.
  • In this type of existing security system 20, typical operation can occur when a sound crosses a threshold, for example, a volume, intensity or decibel (dB) level, causing the control panel 26 to indicate that there is an intrusion.
  • A short indicator signal, which could be a digital signal, is sent to the central monitoring station 30 from the control panel 26 to indicate the intrusion. The central monitoring station 30 switches to an audio mode and begins playing the audio heard at the premises 21 through the microphone at the audio sensors or modules 22 to an operator located at the central monitoring station 30. This operator listens for any sounds indicative of an emergency, crime, or other problem. In this existing system, the audio is sent at a 300 baud data rate over regular telephone lines as an analog signal. The 300 baud transmit rate is commonplace in the industry.
  • In a more complex control panel 24 used in these types of systems, it is possible to add a storage device or other memory that will store about five seconds of audio around the audio event, which could be a trigger for an alarm. The control panel 24 could send a signal back to the central monitoring station 30 of about one-half second to about one second before the event and four seconds after the event. At that time, the security or alarm system 20 can begin streaming live audio from the audio sensors 22. This can be accomplished at the control panel 24 or elsewhere.
  • The existing security system 20 transmits analog audio signals from the microphone in the audio sensor or module 22 to the control panel 24. This analog audio is transmitted typically over the phone lines via a Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) line 28 to the central monitoring station 30 having operators that monitor the audio. The central monitoring station 30 could include a number of “listening” stations as computers or other consoles located in one monitoring center. Any computers and consoles are typically Underwriter Laboratory (UL) listed, including any interface devices, for example phone interfaces. Control panels 24 and their lines are typically dedicated to specific computer consoles usually located at the central monitoring station 30. In this security system 20, if a particular computer console is busy, the control panel 24 typically has to wait before transmitting the audio. It is possible to include a digital recorder as a chip that is placed in the control panel 24 to record audio for database storage or other options.
  • FIG. 2 is a fragmentary block diagram of a security system 40, in accordance with one non-limiting example of the present invention, and at a premises 42 in which a processor, e.g., a microcontroller or other microprocessor, is formed as part of each audio sensor (also referred to as audio module), forming a digital audio module, sensor or microphone 44.
  • The audio sensor 44 is typically formed as an audio module with components contained within a module housing 44 a that can be placed at strategic points within the premises 42. Different components include a microphone 46 that receives sounds from the premises. An analog/digital converter 48 receives the analog sound signals and converts them into digital signals that are processed within a processor 50, for example, a standard microcontroller such as manufactured by PIC or other microprocessor. The processor 50 can be operative with a memory 52 that includes a database of audio signatures 52 for comparing various sounds for determining whether any digitized audio signals are indicative of an alarm condition and should be forwarded to the central monitoring station. The memory 52 can store digital signatures of different audio sounds, typically indicative of an alarm condition (or a false alarm) and the processor can be operative for comparing a digitized audio signal with digital signals stored within the memory to determine whether an alarm condition exists. The audio sensor 44 can also receive data relating to audio patterns indicative of false alarms, allowing the processor 50 to recognize audio sounds indicative of false alarms. The processor 50 could receive such data from the central monitoring station through a transceiver 54 that is typically connected to a data bus 55 that extends through the premises into a premises controller as part of a control panel or other component.
  • The transceiver 54 is also connected into a digital/analog converter 56 that is connected to a speaker 58. It is possible for the transceiver 54 to receive voice commands or instructions from an operator located at the central monitoring station or other client location, which are converted by the processor 50 into analog voice signals. Someone at the premises could hear through the speaker 58 and reply through the microphone. It is also possible for the audio sensor 44 to be formed different such that the microphone could be separate from other internal components.
  • Although the audio sensor shown in FIG. 2A allows two-way communication, the audio sensor does not have to include such components as shown in FIG. 2, and could be an embodiment for an audio sensor 44′ that does not include the transceiver 54, digital/analog converter 56, and speaker 58. This device would be a more simple audio sensor. Also, some digital audio sensors 44 could include a jack 60 that allows other devices to connect into the data bus 55 through the audio sensors and allow other devices such as a door contact 62 to connect and allow any signals to be transmitted along the data bus.
  • Door contacts 61 and other devices can be connected into an audio sensor as a module. The audio sensor 44 could include the appropriate inputs as part of a jack 60 for use with auxiliary devices along a single data bus 55. Some audio modules 44 can include circuitry, for example, the transceiver 54 as explained above, permitting two-way communications and allowing an operator at a central monitoring station 62 or other location to communicate back to an individual located at the premises 42, for example, for determining false alarms or receiving passwords or maintenance testing. The system typically includes an open wiring topology with digital audio and advanced noise cancellation allowing a cost reduction as compared to prior art systems, such as shown in FIG. 1. Instead of wiring each audio sensor as a microphone back to the control panel as in the system shown in FIG. 1, the audio sensors are typically positioned on the addressable data bus 55, allowing each audio sensor and other device, such as door contacts, card readers or keyed entries to be addressable with a specific address.
  • It is possible to encode the audio at the digital audio sensor 44 and send the digitized audio signal to a premises controller 66 as part of a control panel in one non-limiting example, which can operate as a communications hub receiving signals from the data bus 55 rather than being operative as a wired audio control panel, such as in the prior art system shown in FIG. 1. Thus, audio can be digitized at the audio sensor 44, substantially eliminating electrical noise that can occur from the wiring at the audio sensor to the premises controller 66. Any noise that occurs within the phone system is also substantially eliminated from the premises controller 66 to the central monitoring station 62. As shown in FIG. 2, a video camera 68, badge or ID card reader 70 and other devices 72 as typical with a security system could be connected into the data bus 55 and located within the premises 42.
  • One problem that occurs in current phone systems is the use of digital phone devices that multiplex numerous signals and perform other functions in transmission. As a result, a “pure” audio signal in analog prior art security systems, such as shown in FIG. 1, was not sent to the central monitoring station 30 along the contemporary phone network 28 when the 300 baud analog audio system was used. Some of the information was lost. In the system shown in FIG. 2, on the other hand, because digitization of the audio signal typically occurs at the audio sensor 44, more exact data is forwarded to the central monitoring station 62, and as a result, the audio heard at the central monitoring station is a better representation of the audio received at the microphone 46.
  • As shown in FIG. 2, the premises controller 66 can be part of a central panel, and can include PCMCIA slots 74. In another example, the premises controller 66 can be a stand-alone unit, for example, a processor, and not part of a control panel. In this non-limiting illustrated example, two PCMCIA slots 74 can be incorporated, but any number of slots and devices can be incorporated into a control panel for part of the premises controller 66. The slots can receive contemporary PC cards, modems, or other devices. The PCMCIA devices could transmit audio data at 56K modem speed across telephone lines, at higher Ethernet speeds across a data network, at a fast broadband, or wireless, for example, cellular CDMA systems. A communications network 76 extends between the premises controller 66 and the central monitoring station 62 and could be a wired or wireless communications network or a PSTN. The PCMCIA slots 74 could receive cellular or similar wireless transmitter devices to transmit data over a wireless network to the central monitoring station 62. As illustrated, a receiver 78 is located at the central monitoring station 62, and in this non-limiting example, is designated a central station receiver type II in FIG. 2, and receives the digitized audio signals. A receiver 80 for analog audio signals from a control panel in the system 20 of FIG. 1 could be designated a central station receiver type I, and both receivers output digitized audio signals to a local area network 82. Other premises 84 having digital audio sensors 44 as explained above could be connected to receiver 78, such that a plurality of premises could be connected and digital audio data from various premises 84-84 n for “n” number of premises being monitored.
  • It is also possible to separate any receivers at the central monitoring station 62 away from any computer consoles used for monitoring a premises. A portion of the product required to be Underwriter Laboratory (UL) approved could possibly be the central station receiver 78. Any computer consoles as part of the central monitoring station could be connected to the local area network (LAN) 82. A central station server 94 could be operative through the LAN 82, as well as any auxiliary equipment. Because the system is digital, load sharing and data redirecting could be provided to allow any monitoring console or clients 90,92 to operate through the local area network 82, while the central station server 94 allows a client/server relationship. A database at the central station server 94 can share appropriate data and other information regarding customers and premises. This server based environment can allow greater control and use of different software applications, increased database functions and enhanced application programming. A firewall 96 can be connected between the local area network 82 and an internet/worldwide web 98, allowing others to access the system through the web 98 and LAN 82 if they pass appropriate security.
  • FIG. 3 is another view similar to FIG. 2, but showing a service to an installed customer base of a security system 80 with existing accounts, replacing some of the central monitoring station equipment for digital operation. The analog security system 20 is located at premises 21 and includes the typical components as shown in FIG. 1, which connect through the PSTN 28 to a central station receiver type 180 for analog processing. Other devices 100 are shown with the digital security system 40 at premises 42. For existing security systems 20 that are analog based, the central station receiver type 180 is operative with any existing and installed equipment in which analog signals are received from the analog audio modules 22, door contacts 26 or other devices 27, and transmitted through the control panel 26 at 300 baud rate over the telephone line 28. The system at premises 44, on the other hand, digitizes the analog sound picked up by audio sensors 44 transmits the digitized data into the central monitoring station 62 and into its local area network 82 via the premises controller 74. Data processing can occur at the premises controller 74, which is digitized and operative with the digital audio sensors 44.
  • At a central monitoring station 62, an operator typically sits at an operator console. The audio is received as digitized data from the digital audio sensors 44 and received at the central station receiver type II 78. Other analog signals from the analog audio modules 22, control panel 26 and telephone line 28 are received in a central station receiver type 180. All data has been digitized when it enters the local area network (LAN) 82 and is processed at client consoles 90,92. The clients could include any number of different or selected operators. Load sharing is possible, of course, in such a system, as performed by the central station server 94, such that a console typically used by one client could be used by another client to aid in load balancing.
  • FIG. 4 shows the type of service that can be used for remote accounts when a phone problem exist at a premises 20, or along a telephone line in which it would be difficult to pass an analog audio signal at 300 baud rate from the control panel 26. A digitizer 102 is illustrated as operative with the control panel 26 and provides a remedy for the analog signals emanating from the control panel over a standard telephone line to the central monitoring station 62, when the signals cannot be received in an intelligible manner. The digitizer 102 digitizes the analog audio signal using appropriate analog-to-digital conversion circuitry and transmits it at a higher data rate, for example at a 56K baud rate to the central monitoring station 62. In other embodiments, the digitizer could transmit over an Ethernet network connection, or over a wireless CDMA cellular phone signal to the central monitoring station 62. The signal is received in a central station receiver type II 78, which is operative to receive the digital signals. This improved system using the digitizer 102 in conjunction with a more conventional system could be used in the rare instance when there is poor service over existing telephone lines. The digitizer 102 could be part of the control panel 26 within the premises or located outside the premises and connected to a telephone line.
  • FIG. 5 shows different security systems 20, 20′ and 40 in which legacy accounts using the analog audio modules 22 have been provided for through either the digitizer 102 that transmits signals to the central station receiver type II 78 or the use of the central station receiver type 180, which receives the analog signals, such as from the security system 20′. Other individuals can connect to the central monitoring station 62 through the internet, i.e., worldwide web 98 as illustrated. For example, a remote client 110 could connect to the central station server 94 through the web 98, allowing access even from a home residence in some cases. Data back-up could also be provided at a server 112 or other database that could include an application service provider (ASP) as an application host and operative as a web-based product to allow clients to obtain services and account information. Technical support 114 could be provided by another client or operator that connects through the web 98 into the system at the central monitoring station 62 to determine basic aspects and allow problem solving at different security systems. Because each audio sensor 44 is addressable on the data bus 55, it is possible to troubleshoot individual audio sensors 44 from a remote location, such as the illustrated clients 90, 92, 110 or technical support 114.
  • Problem accounts are also accounted for and software services provide greater client control, for example, for account information, including a client/server application at the application host 112, which can be a web-based product. Customers can access their accounts to determine security issues through use of the worldwide web/internet 98. Data can pass through the firewall 96 into the local area network 82 at the central monitoring station 62 and a customer or local administrator for a franchisee or other similarly situated individual can access the central station server 94 and access account information. It is also possible to have data back-up at the application host (ASP) 112 in cooperation with a client application operated by a system operator. Outside technical support 114 can access the central monitoring station 62 local area network 82 through the internet 98, through the firewall 96, and into the local area network 82 and access the central station server 94 or other clients 90,92 on the local area network. Technical support can also access equipment for maintenance. The system as described relative to FIG. 5 can also allow account activation through the application host 112 or other means.
  • FIG. 6 shows a system with a different business model in which the central station server 94 is remote with the database and application host (ASP) 112 and accessed through the internet/web 98. The central station server 94 in this non-limiting example is connected to the internet 98 and different numbers of servers 94 could be connected to the internet to form a plurality of central monitoring stations, which can connect to different client monitoring consoles (with speakers for audio). Different client monitoring consoles could be owned by different customers, for example, dealers or franchisees. A corporate parent or franchisor can provide services and maintain software with updates 24/7 in an IP environment. Franchisees, customers or dealers could pay a service fee and access a corporate database.
  • FIG. 7 shows that the system of the present invention has the ability to monitor at a remote location, load share, late shift or back-up. A remote operator 120 as a client, for example, can connect through the internet 98 to the local area network 82. As illustrated, the remote client 120 is connected to the internet 98 via a firewall 122. Both clients 110,120 connect to the web 98 and to the central monitoring station 82 via the firewall 96 and LAN 82. At the central monitoring station 62, if an operator does not show for work, load sharing can be accomplished and some of the balance of duties assumed by the clients 110,120. Also, it is possible to monitor a client system for a fee. This could be applicable in disasters when a local monitoring station as a monitoring center goes down. Naturally, a number of local monitoring stations as monitoring centers could be owned by franchisees or run by customers/clients.
  • There may also be central monitoring stations owned or operated by a franchisee, which does not desire to monitor its site. It is possible to have monitoring stations in secure locations, or allow expansion for a smaller operator. With a web-based, broadband based station, it is possible to monitor smaller operators and/or customers, franchisees, or other clients and also locate a central monitoring station in a local region and do monitoring at other sites. It is also possible to use a virtual private network (VPN) 130, as illustrated in FIG. 8. Central monitoring station receiving equipment 132 as servers or computers could be remotely located for functioning as a central monitoring station (CS), which can be placed anywhere. For example, when a local control panel (premises controller) 66 activates, the system could call an 800 number or a local number and send data to the more local monitoring location where a central monitoring station 132 exists. Thus, it is possible to place a central monitoring station in the locality or city where the account is located and use the internet move data. This allows local phone service activation and reduces telephone infrastructure costs. It should be understood that the virtual private network 130 is not a weak link in the system and is operable to move data at high speeds. Appropriate firewalls 134 could be used.
  • FIG. 9 shows that remote monitoring in the security system can be accomplished with any type of account, as shown by the premises at 140, which includes a control panel as a premises controller 142 for monitoring a security system 143 having a design different from the design of other security systems as described above. There could be some original equipment manufacturer accounts, for example, users of equipment manufactured by Tyco Electronics, Radionics Corporation or other equipment and device providers. It is possible in the security system to monitor control equipment provided by different manufacturers. This monitoring could be transparent to the central monitoring stations through an OEM central monitoring station receiver 144. It is possible with an appropriate use of software and an applicable receiver at the central monitoring station that any alarm system of a manufacturer could be monitored. This can be operative with the control panel as a premises controller, which can receive information from other digital security alarms. A central monitoring station receiver could be Underwriter Laboratory approved and operative as a central monitoring station receiver 144 for an original equipment manufacturer (OEM).
  • FIG. 10 is a logic diagram showing an example of software modules that could be used for the security system of the present invention. A central station receiver type 180, central station receiver type II 78, and central station receiver OEM 144 are operative with respective central station receiver communications module 150 and central station digital receiver communications module 152. Other modules include an install assistance module 154 to aid in installing any software, a net communications module 156 that is operative to allow network communications, and a logger module 158 that is operable for logging data and transactions. A schedule module 160 is operable for scheduling different system aspects, and a panel message module 162 is operative for providing panel messages. Other modules include the resolve module 164 and navigator module 166. A database 168 is operative with a database interface 170, and a bouncer program 172 is also operable with the client 174 that includes a user interface 176 and audio 178. The database 168 can be accessed through the web 98 using the ASP 112 or other modules and devices as explained above. The bouncer 172 could be operative as a proxy and also act to “bounce” connections from one machine to another.
  • FIG. 11 shows different types of field equipment that can be used with a security system 40 in accordance with one non-limiting example of the present invention. As illustrated, field equipment for a monitored premises 42 is illustrated as connected on one data bus 55. The equipment includes audio sensors 44′, door contacts 61, keypads 200 and card readers 202, which can connect on one bus 55 through other sensors 44. Some third party systems could be used, and relays 204 for zones 205 and wireless receivers 206 could be connected.
  • It should be understood that some pattern recognition can be done at the audio sensor 44 as a microphone with appropriate processing capability. For example, if common noises exceed a certain threshold, or if a telephone rings, in the prior art system using analog audio sensors 22 such as shown in FIG. 1, the noise could trip the audio. For example, a telephone could ring and the audio would trip any equipment central monitoring station, indicating an alarm. The operator would listen to the audio and conclude that a phone had rung and have to reset the system.
  • In the security system of the present invention, there is sufficient processing power at the audio sensor 44 with associated artificial intelligence (AI) to learn that the telephone is a nuisance as it recognizes when the phone rings and does not bother to transmit a signal back to the central monitoring station via the premises controller.
  • There are a number of non-limiting examples of different approaches that could be used. For example, intrusion noise characteristics that are volume based or have certain frequency components for a certain duration and amplitude could be used. It is also possible to establish a learning algorithm such that when an operator at a central monitoring station 62 has determined if a telephone has rung, and resets a panel, an indication can be sent back to the digital audio sensor 44 that an invalid alarm has occurred. The processor 56 within the digital audio sensor 44 can process and store selected segments of that audio pattern, for example, certain frequency elements, similar to a fingerprint voice pattern. After a number of invalid alarms, which could be 5, 10 or 15 depending on selected processing and pattern determination, a built-in pattern recognition occurs at the audio sensor. A phone could ring in the future and the audio sensor 44 would not transmit an alarm.
  • Any software and artificial intelligence could be broken into different segments. For example, some of the artificial intelligence can be accomplished at the digital audio sensor 44, which includes the internal processing capability through the processor 50 (FIG. 2). Some software and artificial intelligence processing could occur at the control panel as the premises controller 66. For example, the digital audio sensor 44 could send a specific pattern back to the premises controller 66 or central monitoring station 62. In one scenario, lightning occurs with thunder, and every audio sensor 44 in many different premises as monitored locations could initiate an alarm signal as the thunder cracks. In a worse case scenario, a central monitoring station 62 would have to monitor, for example, 500 alarms simultaneously. These alarms must be cleared. Any burglar who desired to burglarize a premises would find this to be an opportune time to burglarize the monitored premises because the operator at a central monitoring station 62 would be busy clearing out the security system and would not recognize that an intruder had entered the premises.
  • In another non-limiting example of the present invention, an algorithm operable within the processor of the premises controller 66 can determine when all audio sensors 44 went off, and based on a characteristic or common signal between most audio sensors, determine that a lightning strike and thunder has occurred. It is also possible to incorporate an AM receiver or similar reception circuitry at the premises controller 66 as part of the control panel, which receives radio waves or other signals, indicative of lightning. Based upon receipt of these signals and that different audio sensors 44 generated signals, the system can determine that the nuisance noise was created by lightning and thunder, and not transmit alarm signals to the central monitoring station 62. This could eliminate a logjam at the central monitoring station and allow intrusion to be caught at the more local level.
  • The field equipment shown in FIG. 11 indicates that digital audio sensors 44 digitize the audio at the audio sensor and can perform pattern recognition on-board. Audio can also be stored at the audio sensor using any memory 52 (FIG. 2). Audio can also be streamed after an alarm signals. As illustrated, different devices are situated on one data bus and can interface to other devices to simplify wiring demands. These devices could be programmed and flash-updateable from the premises controller 66 or the event more remotely. There can also be different zones and relays.
  • The digital audio sensor 44 could include different types of microprocessors or other processors depending on what functions the digital audio sensor is to perform. Each audio sensor typically would be addressable on the data bus 55. Thus, an audio sensor location can be known at all times and software can be established that associates an audio sensor location with an alarm. It is also possible to interface a video camera 68 into the alarm system. When the system determines which audio sensor has signaled an alarm and audio has begun streaming, the digital signal could indicate at the premises controller 66 if there is an associated camera and whether the camera should be activated and video begin from that camera.
  • As indicated in FIG. 11, door contacts 62 could be connected to the digital audio sensor 44, enhancing overall security processing and wiring efficiency. Some rooms at a premises could have more than two audio sensors, for example, a digital audio sensor with the microprocessor, and another auxiliary sensor as a microphone 22, which could be analog. The signal from this microphone 22 could be converted by the digital audio sensor 44. Keypads 200 and keyless entries 202 could be connected to the digital audio sensor to allow a digital keypad input. There could also be different auxiliary inputs, including an audio sensor that receives analog information and inputs it into the digital audio sensor, which processes the audio with its analog-to-digital converter. Door contacts 62 can include auxiliary equipment and be connected into the digital audio sensor. The security system could include different relays 204 and zones 205 and auxiliary devices as illustrated. A wireless receiver 206 such as manufactured by RF Innovonics, could receive signals from the RF transmitters indicative of alarms from wireless audio digital sensors. This would allow a wireless alarm network to be established. There is also the ability to accomplish two-way communication on some of the digital audio sensors, in which the monitoring station could communicate back as explained above. It is also possible to communicate using Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) from the premises controller to the central monitoring station and in reverse order from the central monitoring station to a premises controller, allowing greater use of an IP network.
  • It should be understood that intrusion noises include a broad spectrum of frequencies that incorporate different frequency components, which typically cannot be carried along the phone lines as analog information. The phone lines are typically limited in transmission range to about 300 hertz to about 3,300 hertz. By digitizing the audio signals, the data can be transmitted at higher frequency digital rates using different packet formats. Thus, the range of frequencies that the system can operate under is widened, and better information and data is transmitted back to the central monitoring station, as compared to the older analog security system such as shown in FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 12 shows the security system 40 in one non-limiting example of the present invention in which customers 300 can interact with a web IEG SP1 secure site 302, which in turn is operative with a colocation facility 304, such as a Verio facility, including an application server 306 database server 308 and data aggregation server 310. These servers connect to various remote central monitoring stations 312 through a web VPN network 314. Advanced Suite software could be used.
  • The described embodiments of the security system have advantages over prior art security systems, such as shown in FIG. 1. For prior art security systems, maintenance is difficult and there are hardware difficulties, for example, meeting Underwriter Laboratory requirements for the central monitoring station consoles, RAD slayery, and computers. In the security system of the present invention, the central monitoring stations could now include a separate user interface and port all code to net. Features and functions can be updated as required and obsolete modules can be rewritten and new modules can be written. Modular releases can mitigate this risk to have time to the field. It is possible to retain functionality and retain the look and feel of the user interface. It is also possible to remove the Underwriter Laboratory requirement from computers.
  • The enhanced operating efficiency includes load balancing, decreased activations, decreased misses, increased accounts per monitor, and integrated digital capability for the alarm system. Disaster recovery is possible with shared monitoring, for example, on nights and weekends. This enables future internet protocol or ASP business modules. The existing wired control panel used in prior art systems is expensive to install and requires difficult programming. It has a high cost to manufacture and requires analog technology.
  • The premises controller 66 as part of a control panel is operative with digitized audio and designed for use with field equipment having addressable module protocols. The 300 baud rate equipment of prior art systems, such as explained with reference to FIG. 1, can be replaced with devices that fit into PCMCIA slots and operative at 56K or higher rates. Written noise canceling algorithms can enhance digital signal processing. This design can be accomplished with a contemporary microcontroller (or microprocessor). The system also supports multiple communications media including telephone company, DSL, cable modem and a digital cellular systems. It enables a series topology with full digital support. There is a lower cost to manufacture and about 40% reduction in the cost of a control panel in one non-limiting example. It also allows an interface for legacy control panels and digital audio detection and verification. It allows increased communication speeds. It is IP ready and reduces telephone company infrastructure costs.
  • There are many benefits, which includes the digitizing of audio at the audio sensors. Digital signal processing can occur at the audio sensor, thus eliminating background noise at the audio sensor. For example, any AC humming could be switched on/off, as well as other background noises, for example a telephone or air compressor noise. It is also possible to reduce the audio to a signature and recognize a likely alarm scenario and avoid false alarm indications for system wide noise, such as thunder. The digital audio sensors could record five seconds of audio data, as one non-limiting example, and the premises controller as a control panel can process this information. With this capability, the central monitoring station would not receive 25 different five-second audio clips to make a decision, for example, which could slow overall processing, even at the higher speeds associated with advanced equipment. Thus, a signature can be developed for the audio digital sensor, containing enough data to accomplish a comparison at the premises controller for lightning strikes and thunder.
  • Although some digital audio can be stored at the premises controller of the control panel or a central monitoring station, it is desirable to store some audio data at the digital audio sensors. The central monitoring station can also store audio data on any of its servers and databases. This storage of audio data can be used for record purposes. Each audio sensor can be a separate data field. Any algorithms that are used in the system can do more than determine amplitude and sound noise level, but can also process a selected frequency mix and duration of such mix.
  • There can also be progressive audio. For example, the audio produced by a loud thunder strike could be processed at the digital audio sensor. Processing of audio data, depending on the type of audio activation, can also occur at the premises controller at the control panel or at the central monitoring station. It is also possible to have a database server work as a high-end server for greater processing capability. It is also possible to use digital verification served-up to a client PC from a central monitoring station server. This could allow intrusion detection and verification, which could use fuzzy logic or other artificial intelligence.
  • The system could use dual technology audio sensors, including microwave and passive infrared (PIR) low energy devices. For example, there could be two sets of circuitry. A glass could break and the first circuitry in the audio sensor could be operative at microamps and low current looks for activation at sufficient amplitude. If a threshold is crossed, the first circuitry, including a processor, initiates operation of other circuitry and hardware, thus drawing more power to perform a complete analysis. It could then shut-off. Any type of audio sensors used in this system could operate in this manner.
  • The circuit could include an amplitude based microphone such that when a threshold is crossed, other equipment would be powered, and the alarm transmitted. It could also shut itself off as a two-way device. It is possible to have processing power to determine when any circuitry should arm and disarm or when it should “sleep.”
  • As noted before, there can be different levels of processing power, for example at the (1) audio sensor, (2) at the premises controller located the control panel, or (3) the central monitoring station, where a more powerful server would typically be available. The system typically eliminates nuisance noise and in front of the physical operator at a central monitoring station. Any type of sophisticated pattern recognition software can be operable. For example, different databases can be used to store pattern recognition “signatures.” Digital signal processing does not have to occur with any type of advanced processing power but can be a form of simplified A/D conversion at the microphone. It is also not necessary to use Fourier analysis algorithms at the microphone.
  • This application is related to copending patent applications entitled, “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING SECURITY AT A PLURALITY OF PREMISES,” which is filed on the same date and by the same assignee and inventor, the disclosure which is hereby incorporated by reference.
  • Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, and that modifications and embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims (29)

1. A security system for monitoring security at a premises comprising:
at least one audio sensor located at the premises that receives audio signals;
a digitizer at the premises that receives the audio signals from the at least one audio sensor and converts the audio signals to digitized audio signals; and
a central monitoring station located remote from the premises that receives the digitized audio signals and converts the digitized audio signals into audible audio for an operator that is monitoring the premises.
2. (canceled)
3. (canceled)
4. (canceled)
5. A security system according to claim 1, and further comprising a premises controller located at the premises and operatively connected to each audio sensor and said digitizer for receiving the digitized audio signals and transmitting said digitized audio signals through said digitizer to said central monitoring station.
6. (canceled)
7. (canceled)
8. A security system according to claim 1, wherein said central monitoring station includes a server, and further comprising a client in communication with said server for accessing said server and receiving data regarding security.
9. A security system according to claim 8, and further comprising a communications network interconnecting said client and server.
10. A security system according to claim 9, wherein said communications network comprises an internet.
11. A security system according to claim 9, wherein said communications network comprises a local area network.
12. (canceled)
13. (canceled)
14. (canceled)
15. (canceled)
16. (canceled)
17. (canceled)
18. A method for monitoring security at a premises, which comprises:
converting an audio signal at the premises into a digitized audio signal;
transmitting the digitized audio signal along a communications network to a central monitoring station; and
converting the digitized audio signal into audio for an operator that is monitoring the premises.
19. (canceled)
20. A method according to claim 18, which further comprises transmitting the digitized audio signal from the central monitoring station along a communications network to a client for monitoring.
21. A security system for monitoring security at a plurality of premises comprising:
at least one audio sensor located at each of the premises that receives audio signals at the respective premises;
a digitizer at each premises that receives the audio signals from respective audio sensors at the premises and converts the audio signals to digitized audio signals;
a server located remote from the plurality of premises that receives the digitized audio signals from each of the premises; and
a plurality of clients in communication with said server, wherein said server is operative for selecting a client for receiving digitized audio signals for a selected premises, and said client is operative for converting said digitized audio signals from the selected premises into audio for an operator that is monitoring the premises.
22. A security system according to claim 21, wherein said server is operative for load balancing to select a client for receiving digitized audio signals.
23. A security system according to claim 21, and further comprising a premises controller located at each premises for receiving the audio signals.
24. A security system according to claim 21, wherein said communications signal comprises a signal representing a voice.
25. A security system according to claim 21, and further comprising a communications network interconnecting said clients and server.
26. A security system according to claim 25, wherein said communications network comprises an internet.
27. A security system according to claim 25, wherein said communications network comprises a local area network.
28. A security system according to claim 21, and further comprising a first receiver located at said server for receiving digitized audio signals generated by said audio sensors and a second receiver for receiving analog audio signals.
29. A method for monitoring security at a plurality of premises, which comprises:
converting audio signals received from a plurality of audio sensors at each of the plurality of premises into a digitized audio signal;
transmitting the digitized audio signals along a communications network to a server;
selecting a client in communication with the server for receiving digitized audio signals for a selected premises; and
converting the digitized audio signals into audio for an operator that is monitoring the selected premises.
US11/399,161 2004-11-16 2006-04-06 System and method for monitoring security at a premises Abandoned US20060192668A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/399,161 US20060192668A1 (en) 2004-11-16 2006-04-06 System and method for monitoring security at a premises

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US62835704P 2004-11-16 2004-11-16
US11/269,380 US8248226B2 (en) 2004-11-16 2005-11-08 System and method for monitoring security at a premises
US11/399,161 US20060192668A1 (en) 2004-11-16 2006-04-06 System and method for monitoring security at a premises

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/269,380 Continuation US8248226B2 (en) 2004-11-16 2005-11-08 System and method for monitoring security at a premises

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060192668A1 true US20060192668A1 (en) 2006-08-31

Family

ID=36386204

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/269,380 Active 2027-12-19 US8248226B2 (en) 2004-11-16 2005-11-08 System and method for monitoring security at a premises
US11/399,161 Abandoned US20060192668A1 (en) 2004-11-16 2006-04-06 System and method for monitoring security at a premises

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/269,380 Active 2027-12-19 US8248226B2 (en) 2004-11-16 2005-11-08 System and method for monitoring security at a premises

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US8248226B2 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100328084A1 (en) * 2009-06-29 2010-12-30 General Electric Company System and method for detecting lightning
US7986228B2 (en) 2007-09-05 2011-07-26 Stanley Convergent Security Solutions, Inc. System and method for monitoring security at a premises using line card
US8248226B2 (en) 2004-11-16 2012-08-21 Black & Decker Inc. System and method for monitoring security at a premises
WO2018057681A1 (en) * 2016-09-22 2018-03-29 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Systems and methods for monitoring conditions on shelves
US10586205B2 (en) 2015-12-30 2020-03-10 Walmart Apollo, Llc Apparatus and method for monitoring stock information in a shopping space

Families Citing this family (112)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6658091B1 (en) 2002-02-01 2003-12-02 @Security Broadband Corp. LIfestyle multimedia security system
US11677577B2 (en) 2004-03-16 2023-06-13 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Premises system management using status signal
US11916870B2 (en) 2004-03-16 2024-02-27 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Gateway registry methods and systems
US10142392B2 (en) 2007-01-24 2018-11-27 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Methods and systems for improved system performance
US8963713B2 (en) 2005-03-16 2015-02-24 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Integrated security network with security alarm signaling system
US9609003B1 (en) 2007-06-12 2017-03-28 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Generating risk profile using data of home monitoring and security system
US11113950B2 (en) 2005-03-16 2021-09-07 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Gateway integrated with premises security system
US12063220B2 (en) 2004-03-16 2024-08-13 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Communication protocols in integrated systems
US20170118037A1 (en) 2008-08-11 2017-04-27 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Integrated cloud system for premises automation
US11201755B2 (en) 2004-03-16 2021-12-14 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Premises system management using status signal
US10237237B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2019-03-19 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Communication protocols in integrated systems
US10156959B2 (en) 2005-03-16 2018-12-18 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Cross-client sensor user interface in an integrated security network
US10382452B1 (en) 2007-06-12 2019-08-13 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Communication protocols in integrated systems
US11582065B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2023-02-14 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Systems and methods for device communication
US10444964B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2019-10-15 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Control system user interface
US10313303B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2019-06-04 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Forming a security network including integrated security system components and network devices
US9191228B2 (en) 2005-03-16 2015-11-17 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Cross-client sensor user interface in an integrated security network
US8635350B2 (en) 2006-06-12 2014-01-21 Icontrol Networks, Inc. IP device discovery systems and methods
US9729342B2 (en) 2010-12-20 2017-08-08 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Defining and implementing sensor triggered response rules
US20090077623A1 (en) 2005-03-16 2009-03-19 Marc Baum Security Network Integrating Security System and Network Devices
US11811845B2 (en) 2004-03-16 2023-11-07 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Communication protocols over internet protocol (IP) networks
US10522026B2 (en) 2008-08-11 2019-12-31 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Automation system user interface with three-dimensional display
GB2428821B (en) 2004-03-16 2008-06-04 Icontrol Networks Inc Premises management system
US9141276B2 (en) 2005-03-16 2015-09-22 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Integrated interface for mobile device
US11343380B2 (en) 2004-03-16 2022-05-24 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Premises system automation
US11368429B2 (en) 2004-03-16 2022-06-21 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Premises management configuration and control
US7711796B2 (en) 2006-06-12 2010-05-04 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Gateway registry methods and systems
US11159484B2 (en) 2004-03-16 2021-10-26 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Forming a security network including integrated security system components and network devices
US20160065414A1 (en) 2013-06-27 2016-03-03 Ken Sundermeyer Control system user interface
US10375253B2 (en) 2008-08-25 2019-08-06 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Security system with networked touchscreen and gateway
US10200504B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2019-02-05 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Communication protocols over internet protocol (IP) networks
US10339791B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2019-07-02 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Security network integrated with premise security system
US10721087B2 (en) 2005-03-16 2020-07-21 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Method for networked touchscreen with integrated interfaces
US11316958B2 (en) 2008-08-11 2022-04-26 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Virtual device systems and methods
US11277465B2 (en) 2004-03-16 2022-03-15 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Generating risk profile using data of home monitoring and security system
US8988221B2 (en) 2005-03-16 2015-03-24 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Integrated security system with parallel processing architecture
US11244545B2 (en) 2004-03-16 2022-02-08 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Cross-client sensor user interface in an integrated security network
US11489812B2 (en) 2004-03-16 2022-11-01 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Forming a security network including integrated security system components and network devices
US9531593B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2016-12-27 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Takeover processes in security network integrated with premise security system
US10999254B2 (en) 2005-03-16 2021-05-04 Icontrol Networks, Inc. System for data routing in networks
US11496568B2 (en) 2005-03-16 2022-11-08 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Security system with networked touchscreen
US20110128378A1 (en) 2005-03-16 2011-06-02 Reza Raji Modular Electronic Display Platform
US9306809B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2016-04-05 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Security system with networked touchscreen
US20120324566A1 (en) 2005-03-16 2012-12-20 Marc Baum Takeover Processes In Security Network Integrated With Premise Security System
US11700142B2 (en) 2005-03-16 2023-07-11 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Security network integrating security system and network devices
US11615697B2 (en) 2005-03-16 2023-03-28 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Premise management systems and methods
US20170180198A1 (en) 2008-08-11 2017-06-22 Marc Baum Forming a security network including integrated security system components
US9189934B2 (en) 2005-09-22 2015-11-17 Rsi Video Technologies, Inc. Security monitoring with programmable mapping
US12063221B2 (en) 2006-06-12 2024-08-13 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Activation of gateway device
US10079839B1 (en) 2007-06-12 2018-09-18 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Activation of gateway device
US11706279B2 (en) 2007-01-24 2023-07-18 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Methods and systems for data communication
US7633385B2 (en) 2007-02-28 2009-12-15 Ucontrol, Inc. Method and system for communicating with and controlling an alarm system from a remote server
US8451986B2 (en) 2007-04-23 2013-05-28 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Method and system for automatically providing alternate network access for telecommunications
US11316753B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2022-04-26 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Communication protocols in integrated systems
US11646907B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2023-05-09 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Communication protocols in integrated systems
US10051078B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2018-08-14 Icontrol Networks, Inc. WiFi-to-serial encapsulation in systems
US11212192B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2021-12-28 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Communication protocols in integrated systems
US11237714B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2022-02-01 Control Networks, Inc. Control system user interface
US12003387B2 (en) 2012-06-27 2024-06-04 Comcast Cable Communications, Llc Control system user interface
US11423756B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2022-08-23 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Communication protocols in integrated systems
US10423309B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2019-09-24 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Device integration framework
US11601810B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2023-03-07 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Communication protocols in integrated systems
US11089122B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2021-08-10 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Controlling data routing among networks
US10523689B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2019-12-31 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Communication protocols over internet protocol (IP) networks
US10498830B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2019-12-03 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Wi-Fi-to-serial encapsulation in systems
US20180198788A1 (en) * 2007-06-12 2018-07-12 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Security system integrated with social media platform
US11218878B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2022-01-04 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Communication protocols in integrated systems
US10389736B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2019-08-20 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Communication protocols in integrated systems
US10616075B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2020-04-07 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Communication protocols in integrated systems
US10666523B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2020-05-26 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Communication protocols in integrated systems
GB2451241A (en) * 2007-07-24 2009-01-28 Infrasonic Pulse Sensing Ltd Infrasonic intruder alarm using digital signature matching
US10223903B2 (en) 2010-09-28 2019-03-05 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Integrated security system with parallel processing architecture
US11831462B2 (en) 2007-08-24 2023-11-28 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Controlling data routing in premises management systems
US11916928B2 (en) 2008-01-24 2024-02-27 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Communication protocols over internet protocol (IP) networks
US20170185278A1 (en) 2008-08-11 2017-06-29 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Automation system user interface
US11258625B2 (en) 2008-08-11 2022-02-22 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Mobile premises automation platform
US11758026B2 (en) 2008-08-11 2023-09-12 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Virtual device systems and methods
US10530839B2 (en) 2008-08-11 2020-01-07 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Integrated cloud system with lightweight gateway for premises automation
US11729255B2 (en) 2008-08-11 2023-08-15 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Integrated cloud system with lightweight gateway for premises automation
US11792036B2 (en) 2008-08-11 2023-10-17 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Mobile premises automation platform
KR20100081587A (en) * 2009-01-06 2010-07-15 삼성전자주식회사 Sound recognition apparatus of robot and method for controlling the same
US8638211B2 (en) 2009-04-30 2014-01-28 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Configurable controller and interface for home SMA, phone and multimedia
AU2011250886A1 (en) 2010-05-10 2013-01-10 Icontrol Networks, Inc Control system user interface
US8836467B1 (en) 2010-09-28 2014-09-16 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Method, system and apparatus for automated reporting of account and sensor zone information to a central station
US11750414B2 (en) 2010-12-16 2023-09-05 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Bidirectional security sensor communication for a premises security system
US9147337B2 (en) 2010-12-17 2015-09-29 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Method and system for logging security event data
US8478987B2 (en) * 2011-03-14 2013-07-02 Thomas F. Karl Wireless activation of IP devices
US8723665B2 (en) * 2011-07-26 2014-05-13 Tyco Safety Products Canada Ltd. Audio buffering in two-way voice alarm systems
WO2013159125A1 (en) * 2012-04-16 2013-10-24 Khan Zulfiker Distress alarm system
US10588173B2 (en) * 2012-06-22 2020-03-10 Honeywell International Inc. Wi-Fi mesh fire detection system
US9495845B1 (en) 2012-10-02 2016-11-15 Rsi Video Technologies, Inc. Control panel for security monitoring system providing cell-system upgrades
US9472067B1 (en) 2013-07-23 2016-10-18 Rsi Video Technologies, Inc. Security devices and related features
US11146637B2 (en) 2014-03-03 2021-10-12 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Media content management
US11405463B2 (en) 2014-03-03 2022-08-02 Icontrol Networks, Inc. Media content management
EP3180779A4 (en) 2014-08-13 2018-04-25 Tyco Safety Products Canada Ltd. Method and apparatus for automation and alarm architecture
US10592306B2 (en) 2014-10-03 2020-03-17 Tyco Safety Products Canada Ltd. Method and apparatus for resource balancing in an automation and alarm architecture
US10803720B2 (en) 2014-08-13 2020-10-13 Tyco Safety Products Canada Ltd. Intelligent smoke sensor with audio-video verification
US10641013B2 (en) 2016-02-16 2020-05-05 Go Lock Technology, Inc. Portable lock with integrity sensors
WO2017176527A1 (en) 2016-04-05 2017-10-12 Carrier Corporation Apparatus, system, and method of establishing a communication link
US10535252B2 (en) 2016-08-10 2020-01-14 Comcast Cable Communications, Llc Monitoring security
WO2018129178A1 (en) 2017-01-04 2018-07-12 Golock Technology, Inc. Cable with integral sensing elements for fault detection
US10544605B2 (en) 2017-05-19 2020-01-28 Douglas A. Yates Sliding lockable housing with supplemental openings
US10482754B2 (en) 2017-05-31 2019-11-19 Turnkey Vacation Rentals, Inc. System and method for remote property management
US10091569B1 (en) * 2017-10-13 2018-10-02 Louroe Electronics Smart microphone devices, systems, apparatuses, and methods
US11785186B2 (en) 2018-07-11 2023-10-10 Total Safety U.S., Inc. Centralized monitoring of confined spaces
EP3594914A1 (en) * 2018-07-11 2020-01-15 Total Safety U.S., Inc. Centralized monitoring of confined space
US11968323B2 (en) * 2018-12-21 2024-04-23 Comcast Cable Communications, Llc Device control based on signature
US20220269388A1 (en) 2021-02-19 2022-08-25 Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP Security / automation system control panel graphical user interface
US12022574B2 (en) 2021-02-19 2024-06-25 Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP Security / automation system with cloud-communicative sensor devices
US12046121B2 (en) 2021-02-19 2024-07-23 Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP Security / automation system control panel with short range communication disarming
US11961377B2 (en) * 2021-02-19 2024-04-16 Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP Security / automation system control panel with acoustic signature detection
US12026243B2 (en) 2021-02-19 2024-07-02 Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP Facial recognition by a security / automation system control panel

Citations (93)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3074053A (en) * 1960-03-01 1963-01-15 American District Telegraph Co Electrical system and method for protecting premises subject to varying ambient conditions
US3437759A (en) * 1965-10-21 1969-04-08 George T Mckinzie Burglar alarm device for detecting sounds in a protected area
US3488436A (en) * 1966-09-29 1970-01-06 Sylvania Electric Prod Intrusion detector control for closed circuit television system
US3573817A (en) * 1968-02-28 1971-04-06 North American Rockwell Monitoring system
US4001771A (en) * 1975-10-20 1977-01-04 International Business Machines Corporation Intruder detecting security system
US4249207A (en) * 1979-02-20 1981-02-03 Computing Devices Company Perimeter surveillance system
US4321593A (en) * 1980-02-21 1982-03-23 Ho Chi C Television set with supervisory functions of alarming burglary and safe watching distance
US4728936A (en) * 1986-04-11 1988-03-01 Adt, Inc. Control and display system
US4728935A (en) * 1986-04-11 1988-03-01 Adt, Inc. Integrity securing monitor and method for a security installation
US4796025A (en) * 1985-06-04 1989-01-03 Simplex Time Recorder Co. Monitor/control communication net with intelligent peripherals
US4812820A (en) * 1985-07-23 1989-03-14 Chatwin Ian Malcolm Electronic surveillance system and transceiver unit therefor
US4821027A (en) * 1987-09-14 1989-04-11 Dicon Systems Limited Voice interactive security system
US4893328A (en) * 1987-07-31 1990-01-09 Microvoice Systems Corporation Automated telephone operator overflow device
US5091780A (en) * 1990-05-09 1992-02-25 Carnegie-Mellon University A trainable security system emthod for the same
US5109278A (en) * 1990-07-06 1992-04-28 Commonwealth Edison Company Auto freeze frame display for intrusion monitoring system
US5398277A (en) * 1992-02-06 1995-03-14 Security Information Network, Inc. Flexible multiprocessor alarm data processing system
US5400011A (en) * 1994-01-18 1995-03-21 Knight Protective Industries, Inc. Method and apparatus for enhancing remote audio monitoring in security systems
US5406254A (en) * 1992-11-25 1995-04-11 Borg-Warner Security Corporation Alarm system with remote module and associated alarm
US5506567A (en) * 1993-10-07 1996-04-09 Temic Telefunken Microelectronic Gmbh Process for monitoring the openings to an enclosed space
US5513244A (en) * 1993-06-08 1996-04-30 Joao; Raymond A. Remote-controlled anti-theft, theft reporting, or vehicle recovery system and method for motor vehicles
US5736927A (en) * 1993-09-29 1998-04-07 Interactive Technologies, Inc. Audio listen and voice security system
US5862201A (en) * 1996-09-12 1999-01-19 Simplex Time Recorder Company Redundant alarm monitoring system
US5862527A (en) * 1996-10-17 1999-01-26 Trevino; Hilario Disposable surgical undergarment
US5872519A (en) * 1992-05-22 1999-02-16 Directed Electronics, Inc. Advanced embedded code hopping system
US5886620A (en) * 1993-09-24 1999-03-23 Simplex Time Recorder Company Building alarm system with synchronized strobes
US6028522A (en) * 1998-10-14 2000-02-22 Statsignal Systems, Inc. System for monitoring the light level around an ATM
US6038289A (en) * 1996-09-12 2000-03-14 Simplex Time Recorder Co. Redundant video alarm monitoring system
US6215404B1 (en) * 1999-03-24 2001-04-10 Fernando Morales Network audio-link fire alarm monitoring system and method
US6218953B1 (en) * 1998-10-14 2001-04-17 Statsignal Systems, Inc. System and method for monitoring the light level around an ATM
US6335976B1 (en) * 1999-02-26 2002-01-01 Bomarc Surveillance, Inc. System and method for monitoring visible changes
US20020005894A1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2002-01-17 Foodman Bruce A. Internet based emergency communication system
US20020008886A1 (en) * 2000-07-18 2002-01-24 Hsm Holographic Systems Munchen Gmbh Information Medium
US6351214B2 (en) * 1997-10-28 2002-02-26 Pittway Corp. Glass breakage detector
US20020024424A1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2002-02-28 Burns T. D. Civil defense alert system and method using power line communication
US20020027504A1 (en) * 1999-03-18 2002-03-07 James Davis System and method for controlling communication between a host computer and communication devices associated with remote devices in an automated monitoring system
US6363079B1 (en) * 1997-12-31 2002-03-26 At&T Corp. Multifunction interface facility connecting wideband multiple access subscriber loops with various networks
US6369705B1 (en) * 1997-12-04 2002-04-09 Thom Kennedy Alarm monitoring and reporting system
US20020040964A1 (en) * 2000-10-05 2002-04-11 Hsm Holographic Systems Munchen Gmbh Moisture sensor
US20030005326A1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-01-02 Todd Flemming Method and system for implementing a security application services provider
US6504479B1 (en) * 2000-09-07 2003-01-07 Comtrak Technologies Llc Integrated security system
US6507790B1 (en) * 1998-07-15 2003-01-14 Horton, Inc. Acoustic monitor
US6507278B1 (en) * 2000-06-28 2003-01-14 Adt Security Services, Inc. Ingress/egress control system for airport concourses and other access controlled areas
US20030016130A1 (en) * 1993-06-08 2003-01-23 Raymond Anthony Joao Control, monitoring and/or security apparatus and method
US20030025599A1 (en) * 2001-05-11 2003-02-06 Monroe David A. Method and apparatus for collecting, sending, archiving and retrieving motion video and still images and notification of detected events
US6529723B1 (en) * 1999-07-06 2003-03-04 Televoke, Inc. Automated user notification system
US6538689B1 (en) * 1998-10-26 2003-03-25 Yu Wen Chang Multi-residence monitoring using centralized image content processing
US6538570B1 (en) * 1999-05-07 2003-03-25 Honeywell International Glass-break detector and method of alarm discrimination
US6542076B1 (en) * 1993-06-08 2003-04-01 Raymond Anthony Joao Control, monitoring and/or security apparatus and method
US6542077B2 (en) * 1993-06-08 2003-04-01 Raymond Anthony Joao Monitoring apparatus for a vehicle and/or a premises
US20030062997A1 (en) * 1999-07-20 2003-04-03 Naidoo Surendra N. Distributed monitoring for a video security system
US20030067541A1 (en) * 1996-03-27 2003-04-10 Joao Raymond Anthony Monitoring apparatus and method
US6549130B1 (en) * 1993-06-08 2003-04-15 Raymond Anthony Joao Control apparatus and method for vehicles and/or for premises
US20030072634A1 (en) * 2001-09-19 2003-04-17 K&R Corporation And Simplex Nails Non-magnetic fastener with magnetic locking nail and two-stage hammer apparatus
US6690414B2 (en) * 2000-12-12 2004-02-10 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and apparatus to reduce false alarms in exit/entrance situations for residential security monitoring
US6690411B2 (en) * 1999-07-20 2004-02-10 @Security Broadband Corp. Security system
US6693530B1 (en) * 2001-10-16 2004-02-17 At&T Corp. Home security administration platform
US6693532B2 (en) * 1999-11-10 2004-02-17 Adt Services Ag Alarm system having improved communication
US20040036573A1 (en) * 2000-01-12 2004-02-26 The Chamberlain Group, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing access to a secure region
US20040036596A1 (en) * 2002-08-07 2004-02-26 Steven Heffner Security system and methods
US20040041694A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2004-03-04 Fei Xie Methods of recording voice signals in a mobile set
US20040041910A1 (en) * 2002-02-01 2004-03-04 Naidoo Surendra N. Lifestyle multimedia security system
US6727811B1 (en) * 1999-06-25 2004-04-27 Gregory Fendis Monitoring system
US20040081322A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2004-04-29 Michael Schliep Method and arrangement for processing noise signal from a noise source
US20040080401A1 (en) * 1993-09-24 2004-04-29 Adt Services Ag Building alarm system with synchronized strobes
US20050012478A1 (en) * 2001-06-28 2005-01-20 Cooley Stephen Francis Gerard Medical needle removal device
US20050041734A1 (en) * 2002-01-31 2005-02-24 Walker Matthew D Video coding
US6864789B2 (en) * 2000-09-06 2005-03-08 Red Wolf Technologies, Inc. Personal property security device
US20050052285A1 (en) * 2003-09-10 2005-03-10 Yamaha Corporation Communication system for remote sound monitoring with ambiguous signal processing
US6873256B2 (en) * 2002-06-21 2005-03-29 Dorothy Lemelson Intelligent building alarm
US20050068175A1 (en) * 2002-07-08 2005-03-31 Faulkner James Otis Security system and method with realtime imagery
US20050073411A1 (en) * 2003-09-23 2005-04-07 Walker Butler Electronic wall using high-resolution millimeter-wave radar in conjunction with multiple plane reflectors and retroreflectors
US6884818B1 (en) * 1999-06-14 2005-04-26 Fidia Farmaceutici S.P.A. Pharmaceutical compositions containing 8-chloro-3 (β-diethylaminoethyl)-4-methyl-7-ethoxycarbonylmethoxy coumarin base and the salts thereof with cholesterol-lowering activity
US20060017579A1 (en) * 2004-07-23 2006-01-26 Innovalarm Corporation Acoustic alert communication system with enhanced signal to noise capabilities
US20060017559A1 (en) * 2004-07-23 2006-01-26 Albert David E Enhanced fire, safety, security and health monitoring and alarm response method, system and device
US20060017561A1 (en) * 2004-07-23 2006-01-26 Albert David E Enhanced fire, safety, security and health monitoring and alarm response method, system and device
US20060017558A1 (en) * 2004-07-23 2006-01-26 Albert David E Enhanced fire, safety, security, and health monitoring and alarm response method, system and device
US20060025938A1 (en) * 2002-09-24 2006-02-02 Invensys Controls Uk Ltd Diagnositc tool for an energy convesion appliance
US20060022816A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2006-02-02 Mitsuhiko Yukawa Home security system
US20060028334A1 (en) * 2004-08-05 2006-02-09 Honeywell International, Inc. False alarm reduction in security systems using weather sensor and control panel logic
US20060049934A1 (en) * 2004-09-07 2006-03-09 Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation Methods and systems for utilizing a data network for the communication of emergency alerts
US20060056386A1 (en) * 2004-09-01 2006-03-16 Scott Stogel Method and system for computer based intercom control and management
US7016813B2 (en) * 2000-09-28 2006-03-21 Vigilos, Inc. Method and process for configuring a premises for monitoring
US7019639B2 (en) * 2003-02-03 2006-03-28 Ingrid, Inc. RFID based security network
US7019633B1 (en) * 1999-07-20 2006-03-28 Adt Services Ag Audio signal sound diffusion system
US7023341B2 (en) * 2003-02-03 2006-04-04 Ingrid, Inc. RFID reader for a security network
US20060072737A1 (en) * 2004-10-05 2006-04-06 Jonathan Paden Dynamic load balancing between multiple locations with different telephony system
US7034677B2 (en) * 2002-07-19 2006-04-25 Smiths Detection Inc. Non-specific sensor array detectors
US7158026B2 (en) * 2004-02-06 2007-01-02 @Security Broadband Corp. Security system configured to provide video and/or audio information to public or private safety personnel at a call center or other fixed or mobile emergency assistance unit
US20070008125A1 (en) * 2004-06-17 2007-01-11 Smith Richard A Method of eliminating impact/shock related false alarms in an acoustical glassbreak detector
US7202789B1 (en) * 2003-02-03 2007-04-10 Ingrid, Inc. Clip for RFID transponder of a security network
US20080001734A1 (en) * 2003-02-03 2008-01-03 Stilp Louis A Portable telephone in a security network
US20080036593A1 (en) * 2006-08-04 2008-02-14 The Government Of The Us, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Volume sensor: data fusion-based, multi-sensor system for advanced damage control
US20080043987A1 (en) * 2006-08-15 2008-02-21 Adam Waalkes System and method for balancing agent console load during automated call processing

Family Cites Families (160)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3109165A (en) 1958-09-05 1963-10-29 Specialties Dev Corp Intruder detecting system
US3404393A (en) 1965-04-01 1968-10-01 Sidney L. Blivice Alarm system
US3461241A (en) 1966-07-07 1969-08-12 John L Menke Recorder controlled automatic dialing and message reporting system
US3383678A (en) 1966-12-23 1968-05-14 Advanced Devices Lab Inc Moving object detection system
US3537095A (en) 1968-03-20 1970-10-27 Cones Jet Air System Inc Appliance theft control alarm system
GB1266344A (en) 1968-03-20 1972-03-08
US3662112A (en) 1969-12-22 1972-05-09 Robertshaw Controls Co Automatic security system
US3838408A (en) 1973-02-09 1974-09-24 Detection Syst Inc Environmental test switch for intruder detection systems
US3833897A (en) 1973-03-13 1974-09-03 Gte Sylvania Inc Intrusion detection system and method using an electret cable
US3883695A (en) 1973-05-14 1975-05-13 Vertex Science Ind Inc Alarm reporting system for transmitting digital alarm signals via a telephone line
US4023139A (en) 1974-10-24 1977-05-10 Gene Samburg Security control and alarm system
US4060803A (en) 1976-02-09 1977-11-29 Audio Alert, Inc. Security alarm system with audio monitoring capability
US4333170A (en) 1977-11-21 1982-06-01 Northrop Corporation Acoustical detection and tracking system
US4241335A (en) 1978-06-26 1980-12-23 Modern Automatic Alarms Limited Automatically supervised alarm system
US4283717A (en) 1979-10-01 1981-08-11 Digital Monitoring Products Monitoring system for a direct-wire alarm system
US4538139A (en) 1982-04-30 1985-08-27 Bolt Beranek And Newman Inc. Signalling apparatus
US4633234A (en) 1982-09-20 1986-12-30 Audio Sentry Manufacturing, Inc. Sonic detector having digital sampling circuit
US4839640A (en) 1984-09-24 1989-06-13 Adt Inc. Access control system having centralized/distributed control
US4827247A (en) 1985-05-08 1989-05-02 Adt, Inc. Self-compensating projected-beam smoke detector
US4749871A (en) 1985-05-08 1988-06-07 Adt, Inc. Self-diagnostic projected-beam smoke detector
US4709151A (en) 1985-10-23 1987-11-24 Adt, Inc. Steerable mirror assembly and cooperative housing for a passive infrared intrusion detection system
US4707604A (en) 1985-10-23 1987-11-17 Adt, Inc. Ceiling mountable passive infrared intrusion detection system
US4706069A (en) 1986-04-08 1987-11-10 Rca Corporation Security system
US4850018A (en) 1986-07-01 1989-07-18 Baker Industries, Inc. Security system with enhanced protection against compromising
US4758827A (en) 1986-07-28 1988-07-19 Adt, Inc. Duct smoke detector
US4952931A (en) 1987-01-27 1990-08-28 Serageldin Ahmedelhadi Y Signal adaptive processor
SE459539B (en) 1987-04-08 1989-07-10 Jan Lennart Johansson SECURITY SYSTEM INCLUDING A SIGNAL TRANSMITTER FOR TRANSFER OF CONDITION INFORMATION THROUGH A TELECOMMUNICATION CHANNEL
US4843462A (en) 1987-09-04 1989-06-27 Adt Security Systems, Inc. Remote video observation systems
US4876597A (en) 1987-09-04 1989-10-24 Adt Security Systems, Inc. Video observation systems
US4853685A (en) 1988-04-29 1989-08-01 Baker Industries, Inc. Switch monitoring arrangement with remote adjustment capability having debounce circuitry for accurate state determination
US4857912A (en) 1988-07-27 1989-08-15 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Intelligent security assessment system
US5023901A (en) 1988-08-22 1991-06-11 Vorec Corporation Surveillance system having a voice verification unit
EP0403659B1 (en) 1988-12-02 1996-08-14 Nohmi Bosai Kabushiki Kaisha Fire alarm system
US5150099A (en) 1990-07-19 1992-09-22 Lienau Richard M Home security system and methodology for implementing the same
US5249223A (en) 1991-01-03 1993-09-28 At&T Bell Laboratories Call-load-control arrangement for an emergency-call-answering center
US5144661A (en) 1991-02-11 1992-09-01 Robert Shamosh Security protection system and method
US5555404A (en) 1992-03-17 1996-09-10 Telenor As Continuously available database server having multiple groups of nodes with minimum intersecting sets of database fragment replicas
US5532670A (en) 1992-05-22 1996-07-02 Directed Electronics, Inc. Method of indicating the threat level of an incoming shock to an electronically secured vehicle and apparatus therefore
US5798711A (en) 1992-05-22 1998-08-25 Directed Electronics, Inc. High throughput embedded code hopping system with bypass mode
US5990786A (en) 1992-05-22 1999-11-23 Issa; Darrell E. Advanced method of indicating incoming threat level to an electronically secured vehicle and apparatus therefor
US5646591A (en) 1992-05-22 1997-07-08 Directed Electronics, Inc. Advanced method of indicating incoming threat level to an electronically secured vehicle and apparatus therefor
US5900806A (en) 1992-05-22 1999-05-04 Issa; Darrell E. Alarm sensor multiplexing
US5783989A (en) 1992-05-22 1998-07-21 Issa; Darrell E. Alarm sensor multiplexing
US5534845A (en) 1992-09-16 1996-07-09 Issa; Darrell E. Advanced automotive automation and security system
DE4239962C1 (en) * 1992-11-27 1994-07-21 Erich Doering Belt drive, especially for gate drives
US5436610A (en) 1992-12-14 1995-07-25 Honeywell Inc. System and method for transferring local alarm service monitoring on an overload basis
US5471194A (en) 1993-03-23 1995-11-28 Aritech Corporation Event detection system with centralized signal processing and dynamically adjustable detection threshold
US20040160319A1 (en) 1993-06-08 2004-08-19 Joao Raymond Anthony Control, monitoring and/or security apparatus and method
US5557254A (en) 1993-11-16 1996-09-17 Mobile Security Communications, Inc. Programmable vehicle monitoring and security system having multiple access verification devices
CH686913A5 (en) 1993-11-22 1996-07-31 Cerberus Ag Arrangement for early detection of fires.
IL109601A (en) 1994-05-09 1996-05-14 Audiogard International Ltd Device for the verification of an alarm
US6094134A (en) 1994-05-09 2000-07-25 Audiogard International Device for the verification of an alarm
US5543783A (en) 1994-05-20 1996-08-06 Caddx-Caddi Controls, Inc. Glass break detector and a method therefor
IT1275549B (en) 1994-07-16 1997-08-07 Kiekert Ag PROCEDURE FOR THE SURVEILLANCE OF THE INTERIOR SPACE OF A VEHICLE
US5629687A (en) 1994-08-29 1997-05-13 Emergency Technologies, Inc. Universal interface for remotely-monitored security systems
US5818334A (en) 1995-02-03 1998-10-06 Simplex Time Recorder Company Addressable devices with interface modules having electrically readable addresses
US5917410A (en) 1995-03-03 1999-06-29 Digital Security Controls Ltd. Glass break sensor
US5675320A (en) 1995-09-01 1997-10-07 Digital Security Controls Ltd. Glass break detector
EP0744755A1 (en) 1995-05-25 1996-11-27 International Business Machines Corporation Test method and device for embedded memories on semiconductor substrates
US6246322B1 (en) 1995-12-26 2001-06-12 Headwaters Research & Development, Inc. Impulse characteristic responsive missing object locator operable in noisy environments
US5917775A (en) 1996-02-07 1999-06-29 808 Incorporated Apparatus for detecting the discharge of a firearm and transmitting an alerting signal to a predetermined location
US6090576A (en) 1996-03-08 2000-07-18 Connaught Laboratories Limited DNA encoding a transferrin receptor of Moraxella
US10152876B2 (en) 1996-03-27 2018-12-11 Gtj Ventures, Llc Control, monitoring, and/or security apparatus and method
US10011247B2 (en) 1996-03-27 2018-07-03 Gtj Ventures, Llc Control, monitoring and/or security apparatus and method
US6587046B2 (en) 1996-03-27 2003-07-01 Raymond Anthony Joao Monitoring apparatus and method
US5963662A (en) 1996-08-07 1999-10-05 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Inspection system and method for bond detection and validation of surface mount devices
US5815198A (en) 1996-05-31 1998-09-29 Vachtsevanos; George J. Method and apparatus for analyzing an image to detect and identify defects
US5914655A (en) 1996-10-17 1999-06-22 Senstar-Stellar Corporation Self-compensating intruder detector system
US5956424A (en) 1996-12-23 1999-09-21 Esco Electronics Corporation Low false alarm rate detection for a video image processing based security alarm system
US6078253A (en) * 1997-02-04 2000-06-20 Mytech Corporation Occupancy sensor and method of operating same
US6081193A (en) 1997-07-30 2000-06-27 Tecno Alarm Snc Di Trucchi Luciano E Negro Giovanni Electronic intrusion detection system for monitored environments
US6618074B1 (en) 1997-08-01 2003-09-09 Wells Fargo Alarm Systems, Inc. Central alarm computer for video security system
US6097429A (en) * 1997-08-01 2000-08-01 Esco Electronics Corporation Site control unit for video security system
US6091771A (en) * 1997-08-01 2000-07-18 Wells Fargo Alarm Services, Inc. Workstation for video security system
US6069655A (en) * 1997-08-01 2000-05-30 Wells Fargo Alarm Services, Inc. Advanced video security system
EP1010328B1 (en) 1997-08-25 2002-06-12 Digital Security Controls Ltd. Video security system
DE19744066B4 (en) 1997-10-06 2008-06-26 Knorr-Bremse Systeme für Nutzfahrzeuge GmbH Method and device for detecting trailer operation in a motor vehicle
US6759954B1 (en) * 1997-10-15 2004-07-06 Hubbell Incorporated Multi-dimensional vector-based occupancy sensor and method of operating same
US6313744B1 (en) 1998-03-25 2001-11-06 Simplex Time Recorder Company Alarm system with individual alarm indicator testing
US6437692B1 (en) 1998-06-22 2002-08-20 Statsignal Systems, Inc. System and method for monitoring and controlling remote devices
US7228429B2 (en) 2001-09-21 2007-06-05 E-Watch Multimedia network appliances for security and surveillance applications
US6970183B1 (en) * 2000-06-14 2005-11-29 E-Watch, Inc. Multimedia surveillance and monitoring system including network configuration
GB9822956D0 (en) 1998-10-20 1998-12-16 Vsd Limited Smoke detection
US6459370B1 (en) 1998-11-03 2002-10-01 Adt Services Ag Method and apparatus for determining proper installation of alarm devices
IT1305345B1 (en) 1998-12-14 2001-05-04 Meta System Spa IMPROVEMENT IN BURGLAR ALARM SYSTEMS AGAINST FALSE ALARMS
JP4386216B2 (en) 1999-03-09 2009-12-16 キヤノン株式会社 Color printing system and control method thereof
US6265971B1 (en) 1999-04-09 2001-07-24 Simplex Time Recorder Company Fiber-sync communications channel
US6281789B1 (en) 1999-05-14 2001-08-28 Simplex Time Recorder Company Alarm system having improved control of notification appliances over common power lines
US20030104822A1 (en) 1999-07-06 2003-06-05 Televoke Inc. Location reporting system utilizing a voice interface
US6810244B2 (en) 1999-07-06 2004-10-26 Telcontar Method for synthesizing mobile identification numbers
US6591094B1 (en) 1999-07-06 2003-07-08 Televoke, Inc. Automated user notification system
US6281790B1 (en) 1999-09-01 2001-08-28 Net Talon Security Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for remotely monitoring a site
US6917288B2 (en) 1999-09-01 2005-07-12 Nettalon Security Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for remotely monitoring a site
US6972676B1 (en) 1999-09-01 2005-12-06 Nettalon Security Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for remotely monitoring a site
US6954859B1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2005-10-11 Axcess, Inc. Networked digital security system and methods
US6493687B1 (en) 1999-12-18 2002-12-10 Detection Systems, Inc. Apparatus and method for detecting glass break
US6633640B1 (en) 2000-02-01 2003-10-14 Avaya Technology Corp. Methods and apparatus for analysis of load-balanced multi-site call processing systems
US6567001B1 (en) 2000-02-24 2003-05-20 Simplex Time Recorder Co. Fire control panel monitoring for degradation of wiring integrity during alarm state
US6433683B1 (en) 2000-02-28 2002-08-13 Carl Robinson Multipurpose wireless video alarm device and system
WO2001069564A2 (en) * 2000-03-13 2001-09-20 Pittway Corporation Integrated security and communications system with secure communications link
US6975220B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2005-12-13 Radia Technologies Corporation Internet based security, fire and emergency identification and communication system
US7149774B2 (en) 2000-06-02 2006-12-12 Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation Method of facilitating access to IP-based emergency services
US6300872B1 (en) 2000-06-20 2001-10-09 Philips Electronics North America Corp. Object proximity/security adaptive event detection
US6411209B1 (en) * 2000-12-06 2002-06-25 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and apparatus to select the best video frame to transmit to a remote station for CCTV based residential security monitoring
CA2327847C (en) 2000-12-07 2010-02-23 Phasys Limited System for transmitting and verifying alarm signals
JP3699648B2 (en) * 2000-12-20 2005-09-28 富士電機ホールディングス株式会社 Noise monitoring system
GB0102355D0 (en) 2001-01-30 2001-03-14 Mygard Plc Security system
US6563910B2 (en) 2001-02-26 2003-05-13 Royal Thoughts, Llc Emergency response information distribution
US20020135491A1 (en) 2001-03-22 2002-09-26 Simplex Time Recorder Co. Electronically controlled multi-tone peripheral
US6400265B1 (en) * 2001-04-24 2002-06-04 Microstrategy, Inc. System and method for monitoring security systems by using video images
US7082125B1 (en) 2001-09-17 2006-07-25 Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. Communication model for linecard modems
US20030120367A1 (en) * 2001-12-21 2003-06-26 Chang Matthew C.T. System and method of monitoring audio signals
US6778084B2 (en) 2002-01-09 2004-08-17 Chang Industry, Inc. Interactive wireless surveillance and security system and associated method
US7046985B2 (en) 2002-04-02 2006-05-16 Talk Emergency, Llc Security system
US10562492B2 (en) 2002-05-01 2020-02-18 Gtj Ventures, Llc Control, monitoring and/or security apparatus and method
US7093241B2 (en) 2002-06-07 2006-08-15 Intel Corporation Method for eliminating redundant method calls in an object oriented program
US7091832B1 (en) 2002-06-14 2006-08-15 Fonar, Inc. Acoustic detection of machinery malfunction
US6798344B2 (en) 2002-07-08 2004-09-28 James Otis Faulkner Security alarm system and method with realtime streaming video
US7171312B2 (en) 2002-07-19 2007-01-30 Smiths Detection, Inc. Chemical and biological agent sensor array detectors
US20040032491A1 (en) 2002-08-15 2004-02-19 Don Woody Frame grabber for image processing in ingress/egress control system
US20040155770A1 (en) 2002-08-22 2004-08-12 Nelson Carl V. Audible alarm relay system
KR100463786B1 (en) 2002-09-16 2004-12-29 주식회사 오픈솔루션 Apparatus and method for transmitting a wireless data through an adaptive selection of frequency
ES2291707T3 (en) * 2002-10-02 2008-03-01 COMBUSTION SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, INC. METHOD AND APPLIANCE TO INDICATE THE ACTIVATION OF AN ALARM OF A SMOKE DETECTOR.
US20040135885A1 (en) 2002-10-16 2004-07-15 George Hage Non-intrusive sensor and method
US6890133B2 (en) 2002-10-18 2005-05-10 Irwin Industrial Tool Company Stepped drill bit having split tip
US20040086093A1 (en) 2002-10-29 2004-05-06 Schranz Paul Steven VoIP security monitoring & alarm system
KR20040065605A (en) 2003-01-15 2004-07-23 엘지전자 주식회사 Home Appliance System
US20040217847A1 (en) 2003-01-24 2004-11-04 Fries Robert G. Wireless sensing system
US20060132302A1 (en) 2003-02-03 2006-06-22 Stilp Louis A Power management of transponders and sensors in an RFID security network
US7283048B2 (en) 2003-02-03 2007-10-16 Ingrid, Inc. Multi-level meshed security network
US7091827B2 (en) 2003-02-03 2006-08-15 Ingrid, Inc. Communications control in a security system
US6888459B2 (en) 2003-02-03 2005-05-03 Louis A. Stilp RFID based security system
US7119658B2 (en) 2003-02-03 2006-10-10 Ingrid, Inc. Device enrollment in a security system
US7079034B2 (en) 2003-02-03 2006-07-18 Ingrid, Inc. RFID transponder for a security system
US7057512B2 (en) 2003-02-03 2006-06-06 Ingrid, Inc. RFID reader for a security system
US7495544B2 (en) 2003-02-03 2009-02-24 Ingrid, Inc. Component diversity in a RFID security network
US7532114B2 (en) 2003-02-03 2009-05-12 Ingrid, Inc. Fixed part-portable part communications network for a security network
US7079020B2 (en) 2003-02-03 2006-07-18 Ingrid, Inc. Multi-controller security network
US7053764B2 (en) 2003-02-03 2006-05-30 Ingrid, Inc. Controller for a security system
US7777740B2 (en) 2003-02-20 2010-08-17 Binary Simplex, Inc. Spatial decomposition methods using bit manipulation
US7095321B2 (en) 2003-04-14 2006-08-22 American Power Conversion Corporation Extensible sensor monitoring, alert processing and notification system and method
US7436789B2 (en) 2003-10-09 2008-10-14 Sarnoff Corporation Ad Hoc wireless node and network
US7221260B2 (en) 2003-11-21 2007-05-22 Honeywell International, Inc. Multi-sensor fire detectors with audio sensors and systems thereof
US7109861B2 (en) 2003-11-26 2006-09-19 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for alarm generation based on the detection of the presence of a person
US20050128067A1 (en) 2003-12-11 2005-06-16 Honeywell International, Inc. Automatic sensitivity adjustment on motion detectors in security system
US7106193B2 (en) 2003-12-23 2006-09-12 Honeywell International, Inc. Integrated alarm detection and verification device
US7629880B2 (en) 2004-03-09 2009-12-08 Ingrid, Inc. System, method and device for detecting a siren
US20050225634A1 (en) 2004-04-05 2005-10-13 Sam Brunetti Closed circuit TV security system
US7411490B2 (en) * 2004-04-30 2008-08-12 Infrasafe, Inc. Security monitoring methodology using digital audio
US7103176B2 (en) 2004-05-13 2006-09-05 International Business Machines Corporation Direct coupling of telephone volume control with remote microphone gain and noise cancellation
US7378945B2 (en) * 2004-05-27 2008-05-27 Omega Patents, L.L.C. Vehicle security system controlling vehicle body position and related methods
US20050273831A1 (en) 2004-06-03 2005-12-08 Juda Slomovich Video monitoring system
US7315244B2 (en) 2004-07-14 2008-01-01 Carmichel Eric L Excessive noise level alerting device
WO2006026401A2 (en) 2004-08-27 2006-03-09 L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus to detect event signatures
US8248226B2 (en) 2004-11-16 2012-08-21 Black & Decker Inc. System and method for monitoring security at a premises
US7391315B2 (en) 2004-11-16 2008-06-24 Sonitrol Corporation System and method for monitoring security at a plurality of premises
GB2422041B (en) 2005-01-10 2006-12-27 May And Scofield Ltd Detection system and method for determining an alarm condition therein
US20060176167A1 (en) 2005-01-25 2006-08-10 Laser Shield Systems, Inc. Apparatus, system, and method for alarm systems
US7323978B2 (en) 2005-02-16 2008-01-29 Ee Systems Group Inc. False alarm reduction method and system
US7203132B2 (en) 2005-04-07 2007-04-10 Safety Dynamics, Inc. Real time acoustic event location and classification system with camera display

Patent Citations (99)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3074053A (en) * 1960-03-01 1963-01-15 American District Telegraph Co Electrical system and method for protecting premises subject to varying ambient conditions
US3437759A (en) * 1965-10-21 1969-04-08 George T Mckinzie Burglar alarm device for detecting sounds in a protected area
US3488436A (en) * 1966-09-29 1970-01-06 Sylvania Electric Prod Intrusion detector control for closed circuit television system
US3573817A (en) * 1968-02-28 1971-04-06 North American Rockwell Monitoring system
US4001771A (en) * 1975-10-20 1977-01-04 International Business Machines Corporation Intruder detecting security system
US4249207A (en) * 1979-02-20 1981-02-03 Computing Devices Company Perimeter surveillance system
US4321593A (en) * 1980-02-21 1982-03-23 Ho Chi C Television set with supervisory functions of alarming burglary and safe watching distance
US4796025A (en) * 1985-06-04 1989-01-03 Simplex Time Recorder Co. Monitor/control communication net with intelligent peripherals
US4812820A (en) * 1985-07-23 1989-03-14 Chatwin Ian Malcolm Electronic surveillance system and transceiver unit therefor
US4728935A (en) * 1986-04-11 1988-03-01 Adt, Inc. Integrity securing monitor and method for a security installation
US4728936A (en) * 1986-04-11 1988-03-01 Adt, Inc. Control and display system
US4893328A (en) * 1987-07-31 1990-01-09 Microvoice Systems Corporation Automated telephone operator overflow device
US4821027A (en) * 1987-09-14 1989-04-11 Dicon Systems Limited Voice interactive security system
US5091780A (en) * 1990-05-09 1992-02-25 Carnegie-Mellon University A trainable security system emthod for the same
US5109278A (en) * 1990-07-06 1992-04-28 Commonwealth Edison Company Auto freeze frame display for intrusion monitoring system
US5398277A (en) * 1992-02-06 1995-03-14 Security Information Network, Inc. Flexible multiprocessor alarm data processing system
US5872519A (en) * 1992-05-22 1999-02-16 Directed Electronics, Inc. Advanced embedded code hopping system
US5406254A (en) * 1992-11-25 1995-04-11 Borg-Warner Security Corporation Alarm system with remote module and associated alarm
US6549130B1 (en) * 1993-06-08 2003-04-15 Raymond Anthony Joao Control apparatus and method for vehicles and/or for premises
US6542077B2 (en) * 1993-06-08 2003-04-01 Raymond Anthony Joao Monitoring apparatus for a vehicle and/or a premises
US5513244A (en) * 1993-06-08 1996-04-30 Joao; Raymond A. Remote-controlled anti-theft, theft reporting, or vehicle recovery system and method for motor vehicles
US6542076B1 (en) * 1993-06-08 2003-04-01 Raymond Anthony Joao Control, monitoring and/or security apparatus and method
US20030016130A1 (en) * 1993-06-08 2003-01-23 Raymond Anthony Joao Control, monitoring and/or security apparatus and method
US5886620A (en) * 1993-09-24 1999-03-23 Simplex Time Recorder Company Building alarm system with synchronized strobes
US20060017556A1 (en) * 1993-09-24 2006-01-26 Adt Services Ag Building alarm system with synchronized strobes
US7005971B2 (en) * 1993-09-24 2006-02-28 Adt Services Ag Building alarm system with synchronized strobes
US20040080401A1 (en) * 1993-09-24 2004-04-29 Adt Services Ag Building alarm system with synchronized strobes
US20060087421A1 (en) * 1993-09-24 2006-04-27 Adt Services Ag Building alarm system with synchronized strobes
US5736927A (en) * 1993-09-29 1998-04-07 Interactive Technologies, Inc. Audio listen and voice security system
US5506567A (en) * 1993-10-07 1996-04-09 Temic Telefunken Microelectronic Gmbh Process for monitoring the openings to an enclosed space
US5400011A (en) * 1994-01-18 1995-03-21 Knight Protective Industries, Inc. Method and apparatus for enhancing remote audio monitoring in security systems
US20030067541A1 (en) * 1996-03-27 2003-04-10 Joao Raymond Anthony Monitoring apparatus and method
US5862201A (en) * 1996-09-12 1999-01-19 Simplex Time Recorder Company Redundant alarm monitoring system
US6038289A (en) * 1996-09-12 2000-03-14 Simplex Time Recorder Co. Redundant video alarm monitoring system
US5862527A (en) * 1996-10-17 1999-01-26 Trevino; Hilario Disposable surgical undergarment
US6351214B2 (en) * 1997-10-28 2002-02-26 Pittway Corp. Glass breakage detector
US6369705B1 (en) * 1997-12-04 2002-04-09 Thom Kennedy Alarm monitoring and reporting system
US6363079B1 (en) * 1997-12-31 2002-03-26 At&T Corp. Multifunction interface facility connecting wideband multiple access subscriber loops with various networks
US6507790B1 (en) * 1998-07-15 2003-01-14 Horton, Inc. Acoustic monitor
US6218953B1 (en) * 1998-10-14 2001-04-17 Statsignal Systems, Inc. System and method for monitoring the light level around an ATM
US6028522A (en) * 1998-10-14 2000-02-22 Statsignal Systems, Inc. System for monitoring the light level around an ATM
US6538689B1 (en) * 1998-10-26 2003-03-25 Yu Wen Chang Multi-residence monitoring using centralized image content processing
US6335976B1 (en) * 1999-02-26 2002-01-01 Bomarc Surveillance, Inc. System and method for monitoring visible changes
US20020027504A1 (en) * 1999-03-18 2002-03-07 James Davis System and method for controlling communication between a host computer and communication devices associated with remote devices in an automated monitoring system
US6215404B1 (en) * 1999-03-24 2001-04-10 Fernando Morales Network audio-link fire alarm monitoring system and method
US6538570B1 (en) * 1999-05-07 2003-03-25 Honeywell International Glass-break detector and method of alarm discrimination
US6884818B1 (en) * 1999-06-14 2005-04-26 Fidia Farmaceutici S.P.A. Pharmaceutical compositions containing 8-chloro-3 (β-diethylaminoethyl)-4-methyl-7-ethoxycarbonylmethoxy coumarin base and the salts thereof with cholesterol-lowering activity
US6727811B1 (en) * 1999-06-25 2004-04-27 Gregory Fendis Monitoring system
US6529723B1 (en) * 1999-07-06 2003-03-04 Televoke, Inc. Automated user notification system
US7019633B1 (en) * 1999-07-20 2006-03-28 Adt Services Ag Audio signal sound diffusion system
US20030062997A1 (en) * 1999-07-20 2003-04-03 Naidoo Surendra N. Distributed monitoring for a video security system
US6690411B2 (en) * 1999-07-20 2004-02-10 @Security Broadband Corp. Security system
US7015806B2 (en) * 1999-07-20 2006-03-21 @Security Broadband Corporation Distributed monitoring for a video security system
US6693532B2 (en) * 1999-11-10 2004-02-17 Adt Services Ag Alarm system having improved communication
US20040036573A1 (en) * 2000-01-12 2004-02-26 The Chamberlain Group, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing access to a secure region
US20020005894A1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2002-01-17 Foodman Bruce A. Internet based emergency communication system
US20020024424A1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2002-02-28 Burns T. D. Civil defense alert system and method using power line communication
US6507278B1 (en) * 2000-06-28 2003-01-14 Adt Security Services, Inc. Ingress/egress control system for airport concourses and other access controlled areas
US20020008886A1 (en) * 2000-07-18 2002-01-24 Hsm Holographic Systems Munchen Gmbh Information Medium
US6864789B2 (en) * 2000-09-06 2005-03-08 Red Wolf Technologies, Inc. Personal property security device
US6504479B1 (en) * 2000-09-07 2003-01-07 Comtrak Technologies Llc Integrated security system
US7016813B2 (en) * 2000-09-28 2006-03-21 Vigilos, Inc. Method and process for configuring a premises for monitoring
US20020040964A1 (en) * 2000-10-05 2002-04-11 Hsm Holographic Systems Munchen Gmbh Moisture sensor
US6690414B2 (en) * 2000-12-12 2004-02-10 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and apparatus to reduce false alarms in exit/entrance situations for residential security monitoring
US20040041694A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2004-03-04 Fei Xie Methods of recording voice signals in a mobile set
US20040081322A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2004-04-29 Michael Schliep Method and arrangement for processing noise signal from a noise source
US20030025599A1 (en) * 2001-05-11 2003-02-06 Monroe David A. Method and apparatus for collecting, sending, archiving and retrieving motion video and still images and notification of detected events
US20050012478A1 (en) * 2001-06-28 2005-01-20 Cooley Stephen Francis Gerard Medical needle removal device
US20030005326A1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-01-02 Todd Flemming Method and system for implementing a security application services provider
US20030072634A1 (en) * 2001-09-19 2003-04-17 K&R Corporation And Simplex Nails Non-magnetic fastener with magnetic locking nail and two-stage hammer apparatus
US6693530B1 (en) * 2001-10-16 2004-02-17 At&T Corp. Home security administration platform
US20050041734A1 (en) * 2002-01-31 2005-02-24 Walker Matthew D Video coding
US20040041910A1 (en) * 2002-02-01 2004-03-04 Naidoo Surendra N. Lifestyle multimedia security system
US20080048861A1 (en) * 2002-02-01 2008-02-28 Security Broadband Corp. Lifestyle multimedia security system
US6873256B2 (en) * 2002-06-21 2005-03-29 Dorothy Lemelson Intelligent building alarm
US7323980B2 (en) * 2002-07-08 2008-01-29 James Otis Faulkner Security system and method with realtime imagery
US20050068175A1 (en) * 2002-07-08 2005-03-31 Faulkner James Otis Security system and method with realtime imagery
US7034677B2 (en) * 2002-07-19 2006-04-25 Smiths Detection Inc. Non-specific sensor array detectors
US20040036596A1 (en) * 2002-08-07 2004-02-26 Steven Heffner Security system and methods
US20060025938A1 (en) * 2002-09-24 2006-02-02 Invensys Controls Uk Ltd Diagnositc tool for an energy convesion appliance
US20080001734A1 (en) * 2003-02-03 2008-01-03 Stilp Louis A Portable telephone in a security network
US7202789B1 (en) * 2003-02-03 2007-04-10 Ingrid, Inc. Clip for RFID transponder of a security network
US7019639B2 (en) * 2003-02-03 2006-03-28 Ingrid, Inc. RFID based security network
US7023341B2 (en) * 2003-02-03 2006-04-04 Ingrid, Inc. RFID reader for a security network
US20050052285A1 (en) * 2003-09-10 2005-03-10 Yamaha Corporation Communication system for remote sound monitoring with ambiguous signal processing
US20050073411A1 (en) * 2003-09-23 2005-04-07 Walker Butler Electronic wall using high-resolution millimeter-wave radar in conjunction with multiple plane reflectors and retroreflectors
US7158026B2 (en) * 2004-02-06 2007-01-02 @Security Broadband Corp. Security system configured to provide video and/or audio information to public or private safety personnel at a call center or other fixed or mobile emergency assistance unit
US20070008125A1 (en) * 2004-06-17 2007-01-11 Smith Richard A Method of eliminating impact/shock related false alarms in an acoustical glassbreak detector
US20060017559A1 (en) * 2004-07-23 2006-01-26 Albert David E Enhanced fire, safety, security and health monitoring and alarm response method, system and device
US20060017558A1 (en) * 2004-07-23 2006-01-26 Albert David E Enhanced fire, safety, security, and health monitoring and alarm response method, system and device
US20060017561A1 (en) * 2004-07-23 2006-01-26 Albert David E Enhanced fire, safety, security and health monitoring and alarm response method, system and device
US20060017579A1 (en) * 2004-07-23 2006-01-26 Innovalarm Corporation Acoustic alert communication system with enhanced signal to noise capabilities
US20060022816A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2006-02-02 Mitsuhiko Yukawa Home security system
US20060028334A1 (en) * 2004-08-05 2006-02-09 Honeywell International, Inc. False alarm reduction in security systems using weather sensor and control panel logic
US20060056386A1 (en) * 2004-09-01 2006-03-16 Scott Stogel Method and system for computer based intercom control and management
US20060049934A1 (en) * 2004-09-07 2006-03-09 Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation Methods and systems for utilizing a data network for the communication of emergency alerts
US20060072737A1 (en) * 2004-10-05 2006-04-06 Jonathan Paden Dynamic load balancing between multiple locations with different telephony system
US20080036593A1 (en) * 2006-08-04 2008-02-14 The Government Of The Us, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Volume sensor: data fusion-based, multi-sensor system for advanced damage control
US20080043987A1 (en) * 2006-08-15 2008-02-21 Adam Waalkes System and method for balancing agent console load during automated call processing

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8248226B2 (en) 2004-11-16 2012-08-21 Black & Decker Inc. System and method for monitoring security at a premises
US7986228B2 (en) 2007-09-05 2011-07-26 Stanley Convergent Security Solutions, Inc. System and method for monitoring security at a premises using line card
US8531286B2 (en) 2007-09-05 2013-09-10 Stanley Convergent Security Solutions, Inc. System and method for monitoring security at a premises using line card with secondary communications channel
US20100328084A1 (en) * 2009-06-29 2010-12-30 General Electric Company System and method for detecting lightning
CN101937025A (en) * 2009-06-29 2011-01-05 通用电气公司 Be used to detect the system and method for thunder and lightning
US8427333B2 (en) * 2009-06-29 2013-04-23 General Electric Company System and method for detecting lightning
US10586205B2 (en) 2015-12-30 2020-03-10 Walmart Apollo, Llc Apparatus and method for monitoring stock information in a shopping space
WO2018057681A1 (en) * 2016-09-22 2018-03-29 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Systems and methods for monitoring conditions on shelves
GB2569254A (en) * 2016-09-22 2019-06-12 Walmart Apollo Llc Systems and methods for monitoring conditions on shelves
US10586206B2 (en) * 2016-09-22 2020-03-10 Walmart Apollo, Llc Systems and methods for monitoring conditions on shelves

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20060104312A1 (en) 2006-05-18
US8248226B2 (en) 2012-08-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8248226B2 (en) System and method for monitoring security at a premises
US7391315B2 (en) System and method for monitoring security at a plurality of premises
US20200258375A1 (en) System and method for alarm signaling during alarm system destruction
US7015806B2 (en) Distributed monitoring for a video security system
US9300921B2 (en) Video security systems and methods
US8531286B2 (en) System and method for monitoring security at a premises using line card with secondary communications channel
US8520068B2 (en) Video security system
US7228429B2 (en) Multimedia network appliances for security and surveillance applications
US7633388B2 (en) Method and apparatus for interfacing security systems by periodic check in with remote facility
US20060271695A1 (en) System for remote secured operation, monitoring and control of security and other types of events
US11158174B2 (en) Security system with distributed audio and video sources
KR100591380B1 (en) Integrated management system which provides prompt action to urgent conditions
JP2005208878A (en) Security system
US20210209932A1 (en) Establishing an audio/video link to a central monitoring station
JP2004054400A (en) Security device and security system
JP2001307238A (en) System for preventing crime and method for detecting cutting sound
JP2004029998A (en) Information apparatus, electrical information appliance for domestic use, information system using the same, control method therefor and program
JP2002367059A (en) Transfer type security system
JP2002183852A (en) Security system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SONITROL CORPORATION, FLORIDA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FRIAR, GARY;REEL/FRAME:022001/0842

Effective date: 20060111

AS Assignment

Owner name: STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC., ILLIN

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:SONITROL CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:022460/0866

Effective date: 20080927

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION