US20060192668A1 - System and method for monitoring security at a premises - Google Patents
System and method for monitoring security at a premises Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060192668A1 US20060192668A1 US11/399,161 US39916106A US2006192668A1 US 20060192668 A1 US20060192668 A1 US 20060192668A1 US 39916106 A US39916106 A US 39916106A US 2006192668 A1 US2006192668 A1 US 2006192668A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- premises
- audio
- audio signals
- security system
- server
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 128
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 11
- 230000005236 sound signal Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 69
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 30
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 21
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 15
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000001994 activation Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000013473 artificial intelligence Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000003909 pattern recognition Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000750 progressive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B1/00—Systems for signalling characterised solely by the form of transmission of the signal
- G08B1/08—Systems for signalling characterised solely by the form of transmission of the signal using electric transmission ; transformation of alarm signals to electrical signals from a different medium, e.g. transmission of an electric alarm signal upon detection of an audible alarm signal
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/16—Actuation by interference with mechanical vibrations in air or other fluid
- G08B13/1654—Actuation by interference with mechanical vibrations in air or other fluid using passive vibration detection systems
- G08B13/1672—Actuation by interference with mechanical vibrations in air or other fluid using passive vibration detection systems using sonic detecting means, e.g. a microphone operating in the audio frequency range
Definitions
- This invention relates to alarm systems, and more particularly, this invention relates to alarm systems in which audio is forwarded from an audio sensor to a central monitoring station or server.
- the assignee of the present invention provides security solutions using audio intrusion detection, access control, video monitoring and fire detection. These security systems allow 24-hour monitoring and are integrated into a single, easy-to-use system that is monitored by highly trained professionals at a central monitoring station.
- the security system incorporates verified audio detection, which allows a central monitoring station to monitor what is happening at a premises using sound detection.
- Small analog audio sensors are strategically placed throughout a premises to allow an operator at the central monitoring station to hear the sounds of abnormal activity in the monitored premises or facility.
- the sounds of the break-in initiates a code that describes the location of the activated analog audio sensor, e.g., a microphone. Audio is transmitted to the central monitoring station.
- a skilled operator hears the live audio from the monitored premises while pertinent customer data can be displayed on a computer screen for the operator to review and report.
- Monitoring can occur 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
- the system can also include devices that permit ID badging with card readers, door contacts to indicate when doors are open at a time when they should not be open, for example, by unauthorized entry, and similar devices.
- video cameras and fire detectors have been included in the overall security system. Audio signals are transmitted as analog signals from the audio sensor, e.g., microphone, through a wired control panel, and over the public switched telephone system to the central monitoring station. The analog system suffers drawbacks and is not always efficient.
- a security system monitors security at a premises and includes at least one audio sensor located at the premises that receives audio signals and converts the audio signals to digitized audio signals.
- a central monitoring station is located remote from the premises and receives the digitized audio signals and converts the digitized audio signals into audible audio for an operator that is monitoring the premises.
- the audio sensor includes a processor that is operative for determining whether any digitized audio signals are indicative of an alarm condition and should be received at the central monitoring station.
- a memory can store digital signatures of different audio sounds indicative of an alarm condition.
- the processor can be operative for comparing a digitized audio signal with digital signatures stored within the memory.
- the audio sensor can also be operative for receiving data relating to audio patterns indicative of false alarms allowing the processor to recognize audio signals indicative of false alarms.
- a premises controller can be located at the premises such as part of a control panel and operatively connected to each audio sensor for receiving the digitized audio signals and transmitting the digitized audio signals to the central monitoring station.
- Each audio sensor can include a transceiver for receiving a communications signal from the central monitoring station and transmitting a communications signal to the central monitoring station, such as a signal representing a voice, such as for voice instructions and reply.
- the central monitoring station can include a server.
- a client can be in communication with the server for accessing the server and receiving data regarding the security system.
- the communications network can interconnect the client and server and be formed as an internet or local area network (LAN) or incorporate elements of both.
- the central monitoring station can also include a first receiver for receiving digitized audio signals generated by the audio sensor and a second receiver for receiving analog signals a security system that does not generate digitized signals because it uses an analog audio sensor.
- a data bus can interconnect each of the audio sensors and receive the digitized audio signals thereon.
- Each audio sensor can include an identifying data address on the data bus.
- a method aspect is also set forth.
- FIG. 1 is a fragmentary, block diagram of an existing, prior art security system.
- FIG. 2 is fragmentary, block diagram of a first embodiment of the security system of the present invention.
- FIG. 2A is a block diagram showing basic high level components of an audio sensor that can be used in the security system shown in FIG. 2 in accordance with one non-limiting example of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
- FIG. 8 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
- FIG. 9 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention.
- FIG. 10 is a logic diagram showing an example of the different software modules that can be used in the software architecture for the present invention.
- FIG. 11 is a block diagram showing an example of the type of devices that can be used as an example in the system of the present invention.
- FIG. 12 is a block diagram showing various application, database and data aggregation servers operative with central monitoring stations as servers as an example of a security system of the present invention.
- Digitized audio can now be used with sufficient processing capability at the audio sensor, typically a microphone and associated components as explained below.
- the audio sensor typically a microphone and associated components
- franchisees, clients or other customers can operate their own central monitoring station and have the capability to allow a more centralized service to incorporate its monitoring capability.
- some type of sound analysis at the audio sensor as a microphone or other local device can be provided. Processing can also occur at a premises controller, for example, as part of a control panel, or processing can occur at the remote central monitoring station.
- a digital audio sensor as a microphone can include a processor for processing digitized audio signals, a memory for storage, and a transceiver that transmits digitized audio signals across a telephone line, or some other wired communications network or a wireless network to the central monitoring station or server.
- Separate central monitoring station receivers can receive either analog audio signals from an existing system using analog audio microphones, or digitized audio signals from the audio sensors or both.
- the security system as described can monitor security at one or more premises and typically includes at least one premises located audio sensor that converts analog audio signals to digitized audio signals and transmits the digitized audio signals to a central monitoring station at a remote location from the premises.
- the central monitoring station receives the digitized audio signals and converts the digitized audio signals for playback to an operator that is monitoring the premises.
- the digital audio sensor can include a processor for recognizing digital signatures of sounds and determine whether any false alarms occur and whether the digitized audio signals should be transmitted to the central monitoring station.
- a premises controller for example, as part of a control panel, can be located at the premises and receive any digitized audio signals from one or more audio sensors located at the premises through a data bus in which audio sensors are addressable.
- the digitized audio signals could be multiplexed for transmission to the central monitoring station or analysis can occur at the premises controller to determine which digitized audio signals should be transmitted or stored.
- FIG. 1 shows an existing security or alarm system 20 located in a customer premises 21 in which the audio sensors 22 are formed as analog audio modules having microphones and connect into an analog control panel 24 .
- the audio modules 22 are operative as analog microphones and may include a small amplifier.
- Door contacts 26 can also be used and are wired to the control panel 24 .
- Other devices 27 could include an ID card reader or similar devices wired to the control panel.
- This section of a customer premises 21 such as a factory, school, home or other premises, includes wiring that connects the analog audio modules 22 direct to the control panel 24 with any appropriate add-ons incorporated into the system.
- the phone system 28 as a Plain Ordinary Telephone System (POTS) is connected to the control panel 24 , and telephone signals are transmitted over a 300 baud industry standard telephone connection as a POTS connection to a remotely located central monitoring station 30 through a Remote Access Device (RAD) 32 .
- the central monitoring station typically includes a computer that requires Underwriter Laboratory (UL) approval.
- UL Underwriter Laboratory
- the different accounts that are directed to different premises or groups of alarm devices can be console specific. There is no load leveling in this system.
- typical operation can occur when a sound crosses a threshold, for example, a volume, intensity or decibel (dB) level, causing the control panel 26 to indicate that there is an intrusion.
- a threshold for example, a volume, intensity or decibel (dB) level
- a short indicator signal which could be a digital signal, is sent to the central monitoring station 30 from the control panel 26 to indicate the intrusion.
- the central monitoring station 30 switches to an audio mode and begins playing the audio heard at the premises 21 through the microphone at the audio sensors or modules 22 to an operator located at the central monitoring station 30 .
- This operator listens for any sounds indicative of an emergency, crime, or other problem.
- the audio is sent at a 300 baud data rate over regular telephone lines as an analog signal.
- the 300 baud transmit rate is commonplace in the industry.
- control panel 24 In a more complex control panel 24 used in these types of systems, it is possible to add a storage device or other memory that will store about five seconds of audio around the audio event, which could be a trigger for an alarm.
- the control panel 24 could send a signal back to the central monitoring station 30 of about one-half second to about one second before the event and four seconds after the event.
- the security or alarm system 20 can begin streaming live audio from the audio sensors 22 . This can be accomplished at the control panel 24 or elsewhere.
- the existing security system 20 transmits analog audio signals from the microphone in the audio sensor or module 22 to the control panel 24 .
- This analog audio is transmitted typically over the phone lines via a Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) line 28 to the central monitoring station 30 having operators that monitor the audio.
- POTS Plain Old Telephone Service
- the central monitoring station 30 could include a number of “listening” stations as computers or other consoles located in one monitoring center. Any computers and consoles are typically Underwriter Laboratory (UL) listed, including any interface devices, for example phone interfaces.
- Control panels 24 and their lines are typically dedicated to specific computer consoles usually located at the central monitoring station 30 . In this security system 20 , if a particular computer console is busy, the control panel 24 typically has to wait before transmitting the audio. It is possible to include a digital recorder as a chip that is placed in the control panel 24 to record audio for database storage or other options.
- FIG. 2 is a fragmentary block diagram of a security system 40 , in accordance with one non-limiting example of the present invention, and at a premises 42 in which a processor, e.g., a microcontroller or other microprocessor, is formed as part of each audio sensor (also referred to as audio module), forming a digital audio module, sensor or microphone 44 .
- a processor e.g., a microcontroller or other microprocessor
- the audio sensor 44 is typically formed as an audio module with components contained within a module housing 44 a that can be placed at strategic points within the premises 42 .
- Different components include a microphone 46 that receives sounds from the premises.
- An analog/digital converter 48 receives the analog sound signals and converts them into digital signals that are processed within a processor 50 , for example, a standard microcontroller such as manufactured by PIC or other microprocessor.
- the processor 50 can be operative with a memory 52 that includes a database of audio signatures 52 for comparing various sounds for determining whether any digitized audio signals are indicative of an alarm condition and should be forwarded to the central monitoring station.
- the memory 52 can store digital signatures of different audio sounds, typically indicative of an alarm condition (or a false alarm) and the processor can be operative for comparing a digitized audio signal with digital signals stored within the memory to determine whether an alarm condition exists.
- the audio sensor 44 can also receive data relating to audio patterns indicative of false alarms, allowing the processor 50 to recognize audio sounds indicative of false alarms.
- the processor 50 could receive such data from the central monitoring station through a transceiver 54 that is typically connected to a data bus 55 that extends through the premises into a premises controller as part of a control panel or other component.
- the transceiver 54 is also connected into a digital/analog converter 56 that is connected to a speaker 58 . It is possible for the transceiver 54 to receive voice commands or instructions from an operator located at the central monitoring station or other client location, which are converted by the processor 50 into analog voice signals. Someone at the premises could hear through the speaker 58 and reply through the microphone. It is also possible for the audio sensor 44 to be formed different such that the microphone could be separate from other internal components.
- the audio sensor shown in FIG. 2A allows two-way communication, the audio sensor does not have to include such components as shown in FIG. 2 , and could be an embodiment for an audio sensor 44 ′ that does not include the transceiver 54 , digital/analog converter 56 , and speaker 58 .
- This device would be a more simple audio sensor.
- some digital audio sensors 44 could include a jack 60 that allows other devices to connect into the data bus 55 through the audio sensors and allow other devices such as a door contact 62 to connect and allow any signals to be transmitted along the data bus.
- Door contacts 61 and other devices can be connected into an audio sensor as a module.
- the audio sensor 44 could include the appropriate inputs as part of a jack 60 for use with auxiliary devices along a single data bus 55 .
- Some audio modules 44 can include circuitry, for example, the transceiver 54 as explained above, permitting two-way communications and allowing an operator at a central monitoring station 62 or other location to communicate back to an individual located at the premises 42 , for example, for determining false alarms or receiving passwords or maintenance testing.
- the system typically includes an open wiring topology with digital audio and advanced noise cancellation allowing a cost reduction as compared to prior art systems, such as shown in FIG. 1 .
- the audio sensors are typically positioned on the addressable data bus 55 , allowing each audio sensor and other device, such as door contacts, card readers or keyed entries to be addressable with a specific address.
- a premises controller 66 can operate as a communications hub receiving signals from the data bus 55 rather than being operative as a wired audio control panel, such as in the prior art system shown in FIG. 1 .
- audio can be digitized at the audio sensor 44 , substantially eliminating electrical noise that can occur from the wiring at the audio sensor to the premises controller 66 . Any noise that occurs within the phone system is also substantially eliminated from the premises controller 66 to the central monitoring station 62 .
- a video camera 68 , badge or ID card reader 70 and other devices 72 as typical with a security system could be connected into the data bus 55 and located within the premises 42 .
- the premises controller 66 can be part of a central panel, and can include PCMCIA slots 74 .
- the premises controller 66 can be a stand-alone unit, for example, a processor, and not part of a control panel.
- two PCMCIA slots 74 can be incorporated, but any number of slots and devices can be incorporated into a control panel for part of the premises controller 66 .
- the slots can receive contemporary PC cards, modems, or other devices.
- the PCMCIA devices could transmit audio data at 56K modem speed across telephone lines, at higher Ethernet speeds across a data network, at a fast broadband, or wireless, for example, cellular CDMA systems.
- a communications network 76 extends between the premises controller 66 and the central monitoring station 62 and could be a wired or wireless communications network or a PSTN.
- the PCMCIA slots 74 could receive cellular or similar wireless transmitter devices to transmit data over a wireless network to the central monitoring station 62 .
- a receiver 78 is located at the central monitoring station 62 , and in this non-limiting example, is designated a central station receiver type II in FIG. 2 , and receives the digitized audio signals.
- a receiver 80 for analog audio signals from a control panel in the system 20 of FIG. 1 could be designated a central station receiver type I, and both receivers output digitized audio signals to a local area network 82 .
- Other premises 84 having digital audio sensors 44 as explained above could be connected to receiver 78 , such that a plurality of premises could be connected and digital audio data from various premises 84 - 84 n for “n” number of premises being monitored.
- any receivers at the central monitoring station 62 It is also possible to separate any receivers at the central monitoring station 62 away from any computer consoles used for monitoring a premises.
- a portion of the product required to be Underwriter Laboratory (UL) approved could possibly be the central station receiver 78 .
- Any computer consoles as part of the central monitoring station could be connected to the local area network (LAN) 82 .
- a central station server 94 could be operative through the LAN 82 , as well as any auxiliary equipment. Because the system is digital, load sharing and data redirecting could be provided to allow any monitoring console or clients 90 , 92 to operate through the local area network 82 , while the central station server 94 allows a client/server relationship.
- a database at the central station server 94 can share appropriate data and other information regarding customers and premises.
- a firewall 96 can be connected between the local area network 82 and an internet/worldwide web 98 , allowing others to access the system through the web 98 and LAN 82 if they pass appropriate security.
- FIG. 3 is another view similar to FIG. 2 , but showing a service to an installed customer base of a security system 80 with existing accounts, replacing some of the central monitoring station equipment for digital operation.
- the analog security system 20 is located at premises 21 and includes the typical components as shown in FIG. 1 , which connect through the PSTN 28 to a central station receiver type 180 for analog processing. Other devices 100 are shown with the digital security system 40 at premises 42 .
- the central station receiver type 180 is operative with any existing and installed equipment in which analog signals are received from the analog audio modules 22 , door contacts 26 or other devices 27 , and transmitted through the control panel 26 at 300 baud rate over the telephone line 28 .
- the system at premises 44 digitizes the analog sound picked up by audio sensors 44 transmits the digitized data into the central monitoring station 62 and into its local area network 82 via the premises controller 74 .
- Data processing can occur at the premises controller 74 , which is digitized and operative with the digital audio sensors 44 .
- a central monitoring station 62 an operator typically sits at an operator console.
- the audio is received as digitized data from the digital audio sensors 44 and received at the central station receiver type II 78 .
- Other analog signals from the analog audio modules 22 , control panel 26 and telephone line 28 are received in a central station receiver type 180 .
- All data has been digitized when it enters the local area network (LAN) 82 and is processed at client consoles 90 , 92 .
- the clients could include any number of different or selected operators. Load sharing is possible, of course, in such a system, as performed by the central station server 94 , such that a console typically used by one client could be used by another client to aid in load balancing.
- FIG. 4 shows the type of service that can be used for remote accounts when a phone problem exist at a premises 20 , or along a telephone line in which it would be difficult to pass an analog audio signal at 300 baud rate from the control panel 26 .
- a digitizer 102 is illustrated as operative with the control panel 26 and provides a remedy for the analog signals emanating from the control panel over a standard telephone line to the central monitoring station 62 , when the signals cannot be received in an intelligible manner.
- the digitizer 102 digitizes the analog audio signal using appropriate analog-to-digital conversion circuitry and transmits it at a higher data rate, for example at a 56K baud rate to the central monitoring station 62 .
- the digitizer could transmit over an Ethernet network connection, or over a wireless CDMA cellular phone signal to the central monitoring station 62 .
- the signal is received in a central station receiver type II 78 , which is operative to receive the digital signals.
- This improved system using the digitizer 102 in conjunction with a more conventional system could be used in the rare instance when there is poor service over existing telephone lines.
- the digitizer 102 could be part of the control panel 26 within the premises or located outside the premises and connected to a telephone line.
- FIG. 5 shows different security systems 20 , 20 ′ and 40 in which legacy accounts using the analog audio modules 22 have been provided for through either the digitizer 102 that transmits signals to the central station receiver type II 78 or the use of the central station receiver type 180 , which receives the analog signals, such as from the security system 20 ′.
- Other individuals can connect to the central monitoring station 62 through the internet, i.e., worldwide web 98 as illustrated.
- a remote client 110 could connect to the central station server 94 through the web 98 , allowing access even from a home residence in some cases.
- Data back-up could also be provided at a server 112 or other database that could include an application service provider (ASP) as an application host and operative as a web-based product to allow clients to obtain services and account information.
- ASP application service provider
- Technical support 114 could be provided by another client or operator that connects through the web 98 into the system at the central monitoring station 62 to determine basic aspects and allow problem solving at different security systems. Because each audio sensor 44 is addressable on the data bus 55 , it is possible to troubleshoot individual audio sensors 44 from a remote location, such as the illustrated clients 90 , 92 , 110 or technical support 114 .
- a client/server application at the application host 112 which can be a web-based product.
- Customers can access their accounts to determine security issues through use of the worldwide web/internet 98 .
- Data can pass through the firewall 96 into the local area network 82 at the central monitoring station 62 and a customer or local administrator for a franchisee or other similarly situated individual can access the central station server 94 and access account information. It is also possible to have data back-up at the application host (ASP) 112 in cooperation with a client application operated by a system operator.
- ASP application host
- Outside technical support 114 can access the central monitoring station 62 local area network 82 through the internet 98 , through the firewall 96 , and into the local area network 82 and access the central station server 94 or other clients 90 , 92 on the local area network.
- Technical support can also access equipment for maintenance.
- the system as described relative to FIG. 5 can also allow account activation through the application host 112 or other means.
- FIG. 6 shows a system with a different business model in which the central station server 94 is remote with the database and application host (ASP) 112 and accessed through the internet/web 98 .
- the central station server 94 in this non-limiting example is connected to the internet 98 and different numbers of servers 94 could be connected to the internet to form a plurality of central monitoring stations, which can connect to different client monitoring consoles (with speakers for audio).
- Different client monitoring consoles could be owned by different customers, for example, dealers or franchisees.
- a corporate parent or franchisor can provide services and maintain software with updates 24/7 in an IP environment. Franchisees, customers or dealers could pay a service fee and access a corporate database.
- FIG. 7 shows that the system of the present invention has the ability to monitor at a remote location, load share, late shift or back-up.
- a remote operator 120 as a client can connect through the internet 98 to the local area network 82 .
- the remote client 120 is connected to the internet 98 via a firewall 122 .
- Both clients 110 , 120 connect to the web 98 and to the central monitoring station 82 via the firewall 96 and LAN 82 .
- load sharing can be accomplished and some of the balance of duties assumed by the clients 110 , 120 .
- a number of local monitoring stations as monitoring centers could be owned by franchisees or run by customers/clients.
- central monitoring stations owned or operated by a franchisee, which does not desire to monitor its site. It is possible to have monitoring stations in secure locations, or allow expansion for a smaller operator. With a web-based, broadband based station, it is possible to monitor smaller operators and/or customers, franchisees, or other clients and also locate a central monitoring station in a local region and do monitoring at other sites. It is also possible to use a virtual private network (VPN) 130 , as illustrated in FIG. 8 .
- Central monitoring station receiving equipment 132 as servers or computers could be remotely located for functioning as a central monitoring station (CS), which can be placed anywhere.
- CS central monitoring station
- the system could call an 800 number or a local number and send data to the more local monitoring location where a central monitoring station 132 exists.
- a central monitoring station in the locality or city where the account is located and use the internet move data. This allows local phone service activation and reduces telephone infrastructure costs.
- the virtual private network 130 is not a weak link in the system and is operable to move data at high speeds. Appropriate firewalls 134 could be used.
- FIG. 9 shows that remote monitoring in the security system can be accomplished with any type of account, as shown by the premises at 140 , which includes a control panel as a premises controller 142 for monitoring a security system 143 having a design different from the design of other security systems as described above.
- a control panel as a premises controller 142 for monitoring a security system 143 having a design different from the design of other security systems as described above.
- This can be operative with the control panel as a premises controller, which can receive information from other digital security alarms.
- a central monitoring station receiver could be Underwriter Laboratory approved and operative as a central
- FIG. 10 is a logic diagram showing an example of software modules that could be used for the security system of the present invention.
- a central station receiver type 180 , central station receiver type II 78 , and central station receiver OEM 144 are operative with respective central station receiver communications module 150 and central station digital receiver communications module 152 .
- Other modules include an install assistance module 154 to aid in installing any software, a net communications module 156 that is operative to allow network communications, and a logger module 158 that is operable for logging data and transactions.
- a schedule module 160 is operable for scheduling different system aspects, and a panel message module 162 is operative for providing panel messages.
- Other modules include the resolve module 164 and navigator module 166 .
- a database 168 is operative with a database interface 170 , and a bouncer program 172 is also operable with the client 174 that includes a user interface 176 and audio 178 .
- the database 168 can be accessed through the web 98 using the ASP 112 or other modules and devices as explained above.
- the bouncer 172 could be operative as a proxy and also act to “bounce” connections from one machine to another.
- FIG. 11 shows different types of field equipment that can be used with a security system 40 in accordance with one non-limiting example of the present invention.
- field equipment for a monitored premises 42 is illustrated as connected on one data bus 55 .
- the equipment includes audio sensors 44 ′, door contacts 61 , keypads 200 and card readers 202 , which can connect on one bus 55 through other sensors 44 .
- Some third party systems could be used, and relays 204 for zones 205 and wireless receivers 206 could be connected.
- some pattern recognition can be done at the audio sensor 44 as a microphone with appropriate processing capability. For example, if common noises exceed a certain threshold, or if a telephone rings, in the prior art system using analog audio sensors 22 such as shown in FIG. 1 , the noise could trip the audio. For example, a telephone could ring and the audio would trip any equipment central monitoring station, indicating an alarm. The operator would listen to the audio and conclude that a phone had rung and have to reset the system.
- intrusion noise characteristics that are volume based or have certain frequency components for a certain duration and amplitude could be used. It is also possible to establish a learning algorithm such that when an operator at a central monitoring station 62 has determined if a telephone has rung, and resets a panel, an indication can be sent back to the digital audio sensor 44 that an invalid alarm has occurred.
- the processor 56 within the digital audio sensor 44 can process and store selected segments of that audio pattern, for example, certain frequency elements, similar to a fingerprint voice pattern. After a number of invalid alarms, which could be 5, 10 or 15 depending on selected processing and pattern determination, a built-in pattern recognition occurs at the audio sensor. A phone could ring in the future and the audio sensor 44 would not transmit an alarm.
- any software and artificial intelligence could be broken into different segments.
- some of the artificial intelligence can be accomplished at the digital audio sensor 44 , which includes the internal processing capability through the processor 50 ( FIG. 2 ).
- Some software and artificial intelligence processing could occur at the control panel as the premises controller 66 .
- the digital audio sensor 44 could send a specific pattern back to the premises controller 66 or central monitoring station 62 .
- lightning occurs with thunder, and every audio sensor 44 in many different premises as monitored locations could initiate an alarm signal as the thunder cracks.
- a central monitoring station 62 would have to monitor, for example, 500 alarms simultaneously. These alarms must be cleared. Any burglar who desired to burglarize a premises would find this to be an opportune time to burglarize the monitored premises because the operator at a central monitoring station 62 would be busy clearing out the security system and would not recognize that an intruder had entered the premises.
- an algorithm operable within the processor of the premises controller 66 can determine when all audio sensors 44 went off, and based on a characteristic or common signal between most audio sensors, determine that a lightning strike and thunder has occurred. It is also possible to incorporate an AM receiver or similar reception circuitry at the premises controller 66 as part of the control panel, which receives radio waves or other signals, indicative of lightning. Based upon receipt of these signals and that different audio sensors 44 generated signals, the system can determine that the nuisance noise was created by lightning and thunder, and not transmit alarm signals to the central monitoring station 62 . This could eliminate a logjam at the central monitoring station and allow intrusion to be caught at the more local level.
- the field equipment shown in FIG. 11 indicates that digital audio sensors 44 digitize the audio at the audio sensor and can perform pattern recognition on-board. Audio can also be stored at the audio sensor using any memory 52 ( FIG. 2 ). Audio can also be streamed after an alarm signals. As illustrated, different devices are situated on one data bus and can interface to other devices to simplify wiring demands. These devices could be programmed and flash-updateable from the premises controller 66 or the event more remotely. There can also be different zones and relays.
- the digital audio sensor 44 could include different types of microprocessors or other processors depending on what functions the digital audio sensor is to perform. Each audio sensor typically would be addressable on the data bus 55 . Thus, an audio sensor location can be known at all times and software can be established that associates an audio sensor location with an alarm. It is also possible to interface a video camera 68 into the alarm system. When the system determines which audio sensor has signaled an alarm and audio has begun streaming, the digital signal could indicate at the premises controller 66 if there is an associated camera and whether the camera should be activated and video begin from that camera.
- door contacts 62 could be connected to the digital audio sensor 44 , enhancing overall security processing and wiring efficiency.
- Some rooms at a premises could have more than two audio sensors, for example, a digital audio sensor with the microprocessor, and another auxiliary sensor as a microphone 22 , which could be analog. The signal from this microphone 22 could be converted by the digital audio sensor 44 .
- Keypads 200 and keyless entries 202 could be connected to the digital audio sensor to allow a digital keypad input.
- Door contacts 62 can include auxiliary equipment and be connected into the digital audio sensor.
- the security system could include different relays 204 and zones 205 and auxiliary devices as illustrated.
- a wireless receiver 206 such as manufactured by RF Innovonics, could receive signals from the RF transmitters indicative of alarms from wireless audio digital sensors. This would allow a wireless alarm network to be established. There is also the ability to accomplish two-way communication on some of the digital audio sensors, in which the monitoring station could communicate back as explained above. It is also possible to communicate using Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) from the premises controller to the central monitoring station and in reverse order from the central monitoring station to a premises controller, allowing greater use of an IP network.
- VoIP Voice over Internet Protocol
- intrusion noises include a broad spectrum of frequencies that incorporate different frequency components, which typically cannot be carried along the phone lines as analog information.
- the phone lines are typically limited in transmission range to about 300 hertz to about 3,300 hertz.
- the data can be transmitted at higher frequency digital rates using different packet formats.
- the range of frequencies that the system can operate under is widened, and better information and data is transmitted back to the central monitoring station, as compared to the older analog security system such as shown in FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 12 shows the security system 40 in one non-limiting example of the present invention in which customers 300 can interact with a web IEG SP1 secure site 302 , which in turn is operative with a colocation facility 304 , such as a Verio facility, including an application server 306 database server 308 and data aggregation server 310 . These servers connect to various remote central monitoring stations 312 through a web VPN network 314 . Advanced Suite software could be used.
- the described embodiments of the security system have advantages over prior art security systems, such as shown in FIG. 1 .
- maintenance is difficult and there are hardware difficulties, for example, meeting Underwriter Laboratory requirements for the central monitoring station consoles, RAD slayery, and computers.
- the central monitoring stations could now include a separate user interface and port all code to net.
- Features and functions can be updated as required and obsolete modules can be rewritten and new modules can be written. Modular releases can mitigate this risk to have time to the field. It is possible to retain functionality and retain the look and feel of the user interface. It is also possible to remove the Underwriter Laboratory requirement from computers.
- the enhanced operating efficiency includes load balancing, decreased activations, decreased misses, increased accounts per monitor, and integrated digital capability for the alarm system.
- Disaster recovery is possible with shared monitoring, for example, on nights and weekends. This enables future internet protocol or ASP business modules.
- the existing wired control panel used in prior art systems is expensive to install and requires difficult programming. It has a high cost to manufacture and requires analog technology.
- the premises controller 66 as part of a control panel is operative with digitized audio and designed for use with field equipment having addressable module protocols.
- the 300 baud rate equipment of prior art systems can be replaced with devices that fit into PCMCIA slots and operative at 56K or higher rates.
- Written noise canceling algorithms can enhance digital signal processing.
- This design can be accomplished with a contemporary microcontroller (or microprocessor).
- the system also supports multiple communications media including telephone company, DSL, cable modem and a digital cellular systems. It enables a series topology with full digital support. There is a lower cost to manufacture and about 40% reduction in the cost of a control panel in one non-limiting example. It also allows an interface for legacy control panels and digital audio detection and verification. It allows increased communication speeds. It is IP ready and reduces telephone company infrastructure costs.
- any AC humming could be switched on/off, as well as other background noises, for example a telephone or air compressor noise. It is also possible to reduce the audio to a signature and recognize a likely alarm scenario and avoid false alarm indications for system wide noise, such as thunder.
- the digital audio sensors could record five seconds of audio data, as one non-limiting example, and the premises controller as a control panel can process this information. With this capability, the central monitoring station would not receive 25 different five-second audio clips to make a decision, for example, which could slow overall processing, even at the higher speeds associated with advanced equipment.
- a signature can be developed for the audio digital sensor, containing enough data to accomplish a comparison at the premises controller for lightning strikes and thunder.
- the central monitoring station can also store audio data on any of its servers and databases. This storage of audio data can be used for record purposes.
- Each audio sensor can be a separate data field. Any algorithms that are used in the system can do more than determine amplitude and sound noise level, but can also process a selected frequency mix and duration of such mix.
- the audio produced by a loud thunder strike could be processed at the digital audio sensor.
- Processing of audio data can also occur at the premises controller at the control panel or at the central monitoring station. It is also possible to have a database server work as a high-end server for greater processing capability. It is also possible to use digital verification served-up to a client PC from a central monitoring station server. This could allow intrusion detection and verification, which could use fuzzy logic or other artificial intelligence.
- the system could use dual technology audio sensors, including microwave and passive infrared (PIR) low energy devices. For example, there could be two sets of circuitry. A glass could break and the first circuitry in the audio sensor could be operative at microamps and low current looks for activation at sufficient amplitude. If a threshold is crossed, the first circuitry, including a processor, initiates operation of other circuitry and hardware, thus drawing more power to perform a complete analysis. It could then shut-off. Any type of audio sensors used in this system could operate in this manner.
- PIR passive infrared
- the circuit could include an amplitude based microphone such that when a threshold is crossed, other equipment would be powered, and the alarm transmitted. It could also shut itself off as a two-way device. It is possible to have processing power to determine when any circuitry should arm and disarm or when it should “sleep.”
- processing power for example at the (1) audio sensor, (2) at the premises controller located the control panel, or (3) the central monitoring station, where a more powerful server would typically be available.
- the system typically eliminates nuisance noise and in front of the physical operator at a central monitoring station.
- Any type of sophisticated pattern recognition software can be operable.
- different databases can be used to store pattern recognition “signatures.”
- Digital signal processing does not have to occur with any type of advanced processing power but can be a form of simplified A/D conversion at the microphone. It is also not necessary to use Fourier analysis algorithms at the microphone.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Alarm Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Digital audio sensors receive and digitize audio signals and transmit the digitized signals to a central monitoring station for monitoring by an operator. The system can allow load balancing and other improvements.
Description
- This application is based upon prior filed copending provisional application Ser. No. 60/628,357 filed Nov. 16, 2004, the disclosure which is hereby incorporated in its entirety.
- This invention relates to alarm systems, and more particularly, this invention relates to alarm systems in which audio is forwarded from an audio sensor to a central monitoring station or server.
- The assignee of the present invention, Sonitrol Corporation, provides security solutions using audio intrusion detection, access control, video monitoring and fire detection. These security systems allow 24-hour monitoring and are integrated into a single, easy-to-use system that is monitored by highly trained professionals at a central monitoring station. The security system incorporates verified audio detection, which allows a central monitoring station to monitor what is happening at a premises using sound detection.
- Small analog audio sensors are strategically placed throughout a premises to allow an operator at the central monitoring station to hear the sounds of abnormal activity in the monitored premises or facility. When the security system is activated, the sounds of the break-in initiates a code that describes the location of the activated analog audio sensor, e.g., a microphone. Audio is transmitted to the central monitoring station. When activation occurs, a skilled operator hears the live audio from the monitored premises while pertinent customer data can be displayed on a computer screen for the operator to review and report.
- Monitoring can occur 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The system can also include devices that permit ID badging with card readers, door contacts to indicate when doors are open at a time when they should not be open, for example, by unauthorized entry, and similar devices. In some systems, video cameras and fire detectors have been included in the overall security system. Audio signals are transmitted as analog signals from the audio sensor, e.g., microphone, through a wired control panel, and over the public switched telephone system to the central monitoring station. The analog system suffers drawbacks and is not always efficient.
- In one non-limiting aspect of the present invention, a security system monitors security at a premises and includes at least one audio sensor located at the premises that receives audio signals and converts the audio signals to digitized audio signals. A central monitoring station is located remote from the premises and receives the digitized audio signals and converts the digitized audio signals into audible audio for an operator that is monitoring the premises. In one non-limiting aspect, the audio sensor includes a processor that is operative for determining whether any digitized audio signals are indicative of an alarm condition and should be received at the central monitoring station. A memory can store digital signatures of different audio sounds indicative of an alarm condition. The processor can be operative for comparing a digitized audio signal with digital signatures stored within the memory. The audio sensor can also be operative for receiving data relating to audio patterns indicative of false alarms allowing the processor to recognize audio signals indicative of false alarms.
- In yet another aspect, a premises controller can be located at the premises such as part of a control panel and operatively connected to each audio sensor for receiving the digitized audio signals and transmitting the digitized audio signals to the central monitoring station. Each audio sensor can include a transceiver for receiving a communications signal from the central monitoring station and transmitting a communications signal to the central monitoring station, such as a signal representing a voice, such as for voice instructions and reply. The central monitoring station can include a server. A client can be in communication with the server for accessing the server and receiving data regarding the security system. The communications network can interconnect the client and server and be formed as an internet or local area network (LAN) or incorporate elements of both. The central monitoring station can also include a first receiver for receiving digitized audio signals generated by the audio sensor and a second receiver for receiving analog signals a security system that does not generate digitized signals because it uses an analog audio sensor. A data bus can interconnect each of the audio sensors and receive the digitized audio signals thereon. Each audio sensor can include an identifying data address on the data bus.
- A method aspect is also set forth.
- Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description of the invention which follows, when considered in light of the accompanying drawings in which:
-
FIG. 1 is a fragmentary, block diagram of an existing, prior art security system. -
FIG. 2 is fragmentary, block diagram of a first embodiment of the security system of the present invention. -
FIG. 2A is a block diagram showing basic high level components of an audio sensor that can be used in the security system shown inFIG. 2 in accordance with one non-limiting example of the present invention. -
FIG. 3 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention. -
FIG. 4 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention. -
FIG. 5 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention. -
FIG. 6 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention. -
FIG. 7 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention. -
FIG. 8 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention. -
FIG. 9 is a fragmentary, block diagram of another embodiment of a security system of the present invention. -
FIG. 10 is a logic diagram showing an example of the different software modules that can be used in the software architecture for the present invention. -
FIG. 11 is a block diagram showing an example of the type of devices that can be used as an example in the system of the present invention. -
FIG. 12 is a block diagram showing various application, database and data aggregation servers operative with central monitoring stations as servers as an example of a security system of the present invention. - Different embodiments will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments are shown. Many different forms can be set forth and described embodiments should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout, and prime notation is used to indicate similar elements in alternative embodiments.
- Digitized audio can now be used with sufficient processing capability at the audio sensor, typically a microphone and associated components as explained below. With the system and method as described, franchisees, clients or other customers can operate their own central monitoring station and have the capability to allow a more centralized service to incorporate its monitoring capability. Also, some type of sound analysis at the audio sensor as a microphone or other local device can be provided. Processing can also occur at a premises controller, for example, as part of a control panel, or processing can occur at the remote central monitoring station.
- A digital audio sensor as a microphone can include a processor for processing digitized audio signals, a memory for storage, and a transceiver that transmits digitized audio signals across a telephone line, or some other wired communications network or a wireless network to the central monitoring station or server. Separate central monitoring station receivers can receive either analog audio signals from an existing system using analog audio microphones, or digitized audio signals from the audio sensors or both.
- The security system as described can monitor security at one or more premises and typically includes at least one premises located audio sensor that converts analog audio signals to digitized audio signals and transmits the digitized audio signals to a central monitoring station at a remote location from the premises. The central monitoring station receives the digitized audio signals and converts the digitized audio signals for playback to an operator that is monitoring the premises. The digital audio sensor can include a processor for recognizing digital signatures of sounds and determine whether any false alarms occur and whether the digitized audio signals should be transmitted to the central monitoring station. A premises controller, for example, as part of a control panel, can be located at the premises and receive any digitized audio signals from one or more audio sensors located at the premises through a data bus in which audio sensors are addressable. The digitized audio signals could be multiplexed for transmission to the central monitoring station or analysis can occur at the premises controller to determine which digitized audio signals should be transmitted or stored.
-
FIG. 1 shows an existing security oralarm system 20 located in acustomer premises 21 in which theaudio sensors 22 are formed as analog audio modules having microphones and connect into an analog control panel 24. Theaudio modules 22 are operative as analog microphones and may include a small amplifier.Door contacts 26 can also be used and are wired to the control panel 24.Other devices 27 could include an ID card reader or similar devices wired to the control panel. This section of acustomer premises 21, such as a factory, school, home or other premises, includes wiring that connects theanalog audio modules 22 direct to the control panel 24 with any appropriate add-ons incorporated into the system. Thephone system 28 as a Plain Ordinary Telephone System (POTS) is connected to the control panel 24, and telephone signals are transmitted over a 300 baud industry standard telephone connection as a POTS connection to a remotely locatedcentral monitoring station 30 through a Remote Access Device (RAD) 32. The central monitoring station typically includes a computer that requires Underwriter Laboratory (UL) approval. The different accounts that are directed to different premises or groups of alarm devices can be console specific. There is no load leveling in this system. - In this type of existing
security system 20, typical operation can occur when a sound crosses a threshold, for example, a volume, intensity or decibel (dB) level, causing thecontrol panel 26 to indicate that there is an intrusion. - A short indicator signal, which could be a digital signal, is sent to the
central monitoring station 30 from thecontrol panel 26 to indicate the intrusion. Thecentral monitoring station 30 switches to an audio mode and begins playing the audio heard at thepremises 21 through the microphone at the audio sensors ormodules 22 to an operator located at thecentral monitoring station 30. This operator listens for any sounds indicative of an emergency, crime, or other problem. In this existing system, the audio is sent at a 300 baud data rate over regular telephone lines as an analog signal. The 300 baud transmit rate is commonplace in the industry. - In a more complex control panel 24 used in these types of systems, it is possible to add a storage device or other memory that will store about five seconds of audio around the audio event, which could be a trigger for an alarm. The control panel 24 could send a signal back to the
central monitoring station 30 of about one-half second to about one second before the event and four seconds after the event. At that time, the security oralarm system 20 can begin streaming live audio from theaudio sensors 22. This can be accomplished at the control panel 24 or elsewhere. - The existing
security system 20 transmits analog audio signals from the microphone in the audio sensor ormodule 22 to the control panel 24. This analog audio is transmitted typically over the phone lines via a Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS)line 28 to thecentral monitoring station 30 having operators that monitor the audio. Thecentral monitoring station 30 could include a number of “listening” stations as computers or other consoles located in one monitoring center. Any computers and consoles are typically Underwriter Laboratory (UL) listed, including any interface devices, for example phone interfaces. Control panels 24 and their lines are typically dedicated to specific computer consoles usually located at thecentral monitoring station 30. In thissecurity system 20, if a particular computer console is busy, the control panel 24 typically has to wait before transmitting the audio. It is possible to include a digital recorder as a chip that is placed in the control panel 24 to record audio for database storage or other options. -
FIG. 2 is a fragmentary block diagram of asecurity system 40, in accordance with one non-limiting example of the present invention, and at apremises 42 in which a processor, e.g., a microcontroller or other microprocessor, is formed as part of each audio sensor (also referred to as audio module), forming a digital audio module, sensor ormicrophone 44. - The
audio sensor 44 is typically formed as an audio module with components contained within amodule housing 44 a that can be placed at strategic points within thepremises 42. Different components include amicrophone 46 that receives sounds from the premises. An analog/digital converter 48 receives the analog sound signals and converts them into digital signals that are processed within aprocessor 50, for example, a standard microcontroller such as manufactured by PIC or other microprocessor. Theprocessor 50 can be operative with amemory 52 that includes a database ofaudio signatures 52 for comparing various sounds for determining whether any digitized audio signals are indicative of an alarm condition and should be forwarded to the central monitoring station. Thememory 52 can store digital signatures of different audio sounds, typically indicative of an alarm condition (or a false alarm) and the processor can be operative for comparing a digitized audio signal with digital signals stored within the memory to determine whether an alarm condition exists. Theaudio sensor 44 can also receive data relating to audio patterns indicative of false alarms, allowing theprocessor 50 to recognize audio sounds indicative of false alarms. Theprocessor 50 could receive such data from the central monitoring station through atransceiver 54 that is typically connected to adata bus 55 that extends through the premises into a premises controller as part of a control panel or other component. - The
transceiver 54 is also connected into a digital/analog converter 56 that is connected to aspeaker 58. It is possible for thetransceiver 54 to receive voice commands or instructions from an operator located at the central monitoring station or other client location, which are converted by theprocessor 50 into analog voice signals. Someone at the premises could hear through thespeaker 58 and reply through the microphone. It is also possible for theaudio sensor 44 to be formed different such that the microphone could be separate from other internal components. - Although the audio sensor shown in
FIG. 2A allows two-way communication, the audio sensor does not have to include such components as shown inFIG. 2 , and could be an embodiment for anaudio sensor 44′ that does not include thetransceiver 54, digital/analog converter 56, andspeaker 58. This device would be a more simple audio sensor. Also, some digitalaudio sensors 44 could include ajack 60 that allows other devices to connect into thedata bus 55 through the audio sensors and allow other devices such as adoor contact 62 to connect and allow any signals to be transmitted along the data bus. -
Door contacts 61 and other devices can be connected into an audio sensor as a module. Theaudio sensor 44 could include the appropriate inputs as part of ajack 60 for use with auxiliary devices along asingle data bus 55. Someaudio modules 44 can include circuitry, for example, thetransceiver 54 as explained above, permitting two-way communications and allowing an operator at acentral monitoring station 62 or other location to communicate back to an individual located at thepremises 42, for example, for determining false alarms or receiving passwords or maintenance testing. The system typically includes an open wiring topology with digital audio and advanced noise cancellation allowing a cost reduction as compared to prior art systems, such as shown inFIG. 1 . Instead of wiring each audio sensor as a microphone back to the control panel as in the system shown inFIG. 1 , the audio sensors are typically positioned on theaddressable data bus 55, allowing each audio sensor and other device, such as door contacts, card readers or keyed entries to be addressable with a specific address. - It is possible to encode the audio at the
digital audio sensor 44 and send the digitized audio signal to apremises controller 66 as part of a control panel in one non-limiting example, which can operate as a communications hub receiving signals from thedata bus 55 rather than being operative as a wired audio control panel, such as in the prior art system shown inFIG. 1 . Thus, audio can be digitized at theaudio sensor 44, substantially eliminating electrical noise that can occur from the wiring at the audio sensor to thepremises controller 66. Any noise that occurs within the phone system is also substantially eliminated from thepremises controller 66 to thecentral monitoring station 62. As shown inFIG. 2 , avideo camera 68, badge orID card reader 70 andother devices 72 as typical with a security system could be connected into thedata bus 55 and located within thepremises 42. - One problem that occurs in current phone systems is the use of digital phone devices that multiplex numerous signals and perform other functions in transmission. As a result, a “pure” audio signal in analog prior art security systems, such as shown in
FIG. 1 , was not sent to thecentral monitoring station 30 along thecontemporary phone network 28 when the 300 baud analog audio system was used. Some of the information was lost. In the system shown inFIG. 2 , on the other hand, because digitization of the audio signal typically occurs at theaudio sensor 44, more exact data is forwarded to thecentral monitoring station 62, and as a result, the audio heard at the central monitoring station is a better representation of the audio received at themicrophone 46. - As shown in
FIG. 2 , thepremises controller 66 can be part of a central panel, and can includePCMCIA slots 74. In another example, thepremises controller 66 can be a stand-alone unit, for example, a processor, and not part of a control panel. In this non-limiting illustrated example, twoPCMCIA slots 74 can be incorporated, but any number of slots and devices can be incorporated into a control panel for part of thepremises controller 66. The slots can receive contemporary PC cards, modems, or other devices. The PCMCIA devices could transmit audio data at 56K modem speed across telephone lines, at higher Ethernet speeds across a data network, at a fast broadband, or wireless, for example, cellular CDMA systems. Acommunications network 76 extends between thepremises controller 66 and thecentral monitoring station 62 and could be a wired or wireless communications network or a PSTN. ThePCMCIA slots 74 could receive cellular or similar wireless transmitter devices to transmit data over a wireless network to thecentral monitoring station 62. As illustrated, areceiver 78 is located at thecentral monitoring station 62, and in this non-limiting example, is designated a central station receiver type II inFIG. 2 , and receives the digitized audio signals. Areceiver 80 for analog audio signals from a control panel in thesystem 20 ofFIG. 1 could be designated a central station receiver type I, and both receivers output digitized audio signals to alocal area network 82.Other premises 84 having digitalaudio sensors 44 as explained above could be connected toreceiver 78, such that a plurality of premises could be connected and digital audio data from various premises 84-84 n for “n” number of premises being monitored. - It is also possible to separate any receivers at the
central monitoring station 62 away from any computer consoles used for monitoring a premises. A portion of the product required to be Underwriter Laboratory (UL) approved could possibly be thecentral station receiver 78. Any computer consoles as part of the central monitoring station could be connected to the local area network (LAN) 82. Acentral station server 94 could be operative through theLAN 82, as well as any auxiliary equipment. Because the system is digital, load sharing and data redirecting could be provided to allow any monitoring console orclients local area network 82, while thecentral station server 94 allows a client/server relationship. A database at thecentral station server 94 can share appropriate data and other information regarding customers and premises. This server based environment can allow greater control and use of different software applications, increased database functions and enhanced application programming. Afirewall 96 can be connected between thelocal area network 82 and an internet/worldwide web 98, allowing others to access the system through theweb 98 andLAN 82 if they pass appropriate security. -
FIG. 3 is another view similar toFIG. 2 , but showing a service to an installed customer base of asecurity system 80 with existing accounts, replacing some of the central monitoring station equipment for digital operation. Theanalog security system 20 is located atpremises 21 and includes the typical components as shown inFIG. 1 , which connect through thePSTN 28 to a central station receiver type 180 for analog processing.Other devices 100 are shown with thedigital security system 40 atpremises 42. For existingsecurity systems 20 that are analog based, the central station receiver type 180 is operative with any existing and installed equipment in which analog signals are received from theanalog audio modules 22,door contacts 26 orother devices 27, and transmitted through thecontrol panel 26 at 300 baud rate over thetelephone line 28. The system atpremises 44, on the other hand, digitizes the analog sound picked up byaudio sensors 44 transmits the digitized data into thecentral monitoring station 62 and into itslocal area network 82 via thepremises controller 74. Data processing can occur at thepremises controller 74, which is digitized and operative with the digitalaudio sensors 44. - At a
central monitoring station 62, an operator typically sits at an operator console. The audio is received as digitized data from the digitalaudio sensors 44 and received at the central stationreceiver type II 78. Other analog signals from theanalog audio modules 22,control panel 26 andtelephone line 28 are received in a central station receiver type 180. All data has been digitized when it enters the local area network (LAN) 82 and is processed at client consoles 90,92. The clients could include any number of different or selected operators. Load sharing is possible, of course, in such a system, as performed by thecentral station server 94, such that a console typically used by one client could be used by another client to aid in load balancing. -
FIG. 4 shows the type of service that can be used for remote accounts when a phone problem exist at apremises 20, or along a telephone line in which it would be difficult to pass an analog audio signal at 300 baud rate from thecontrol panel 26. Adigitizer 102 is illustrated as operative with thecontrol panel 26 and provides a remedy for the analog signals emanating from the control panel over a standard telephone line to thecentral monitoring station 62, when the signals cannot be received in an intelligible manner. Thedigitizer 102 digitizes the analog audio signal using appropriate analog-to-digital conversion circuitry and transmits it at a higher data rate, for example at a 56K baud rate to thecentral monitoring station 62. In other embodiments, the digitizer could transmit over an Ethernet network connection, or over a wireless CDMA cellular phone signal to thecentral monitoring station 62. The signal is received in a central station receiver type II 78, which is operative to receive the digital signals. This improved system using thedigitizer 102 in conjunction with a more conventional system could be used in the rare instance when there is poor service over existing telephone lines. Thedigitizer 102 could be part of thecontrol panel 26 within the premises or located outside the premises and connected to a telephone line. -
FIG. 5 showsdifferent security systems analog audio modules 22 have been provided for through either thedigitizer 102 that transmits signals to the central station receiver type II 78 or the use of the central station receiver type 180, which receives the analog signals, such as from thesecurity system 20′. Other individuals can connect to thecentral monitoring station 62 through the internet, i.e.,worldwide web 98 as illustrated. For example, aremote client 110 could connect to thecentral station server 94 through theweb 98, allowing access even from a home residence in some cases. Data back-up could also be provided at aserver 112 or other database that could include an application service provider (ASP) as an application host and operative as a web-based product to allow clients to obtain services and account information.Technical support 114 could be provided by another client or operator that connects through theweb 98 into the system at thecentral monitoring station 62 to determine basic aspects and allow problem solving at different security systems. Because eachaudio sensor 44 is addressable on thedata bus 55, it is possible to troubleshoot individualaudio sensors 44 from a remote location, such as the illustratedclients technical support 114. - Problem accounts are also accounted for and software services provide greater client control, for example, for account information, including a client/server application at the
application host 112, which can be a web-based product. Customers can access their accounts to determine security issues through use of the worldwide web/internet 98. Data can pass through thefirewall 96 into thelocal area network 82 at thecentral monitoring station 62 and a customer or local administrator for a franchisee or other similarly situated individual can access thecentral station server 94 and access account information. It is also possible to have data back-up at the application host (ASP) 112 in cooperation with a client application operated by a system operator. Outsidetechnical support 114 can access thecentral monitoring station 62local area network 82 through theinternet 98, through thefirewall 96, and into thelocal area network 82 and access thecentral station server 94 orother clients FIG. 5 can also allow account activation through theapplication host 112 or other means. -
FIG. 6 shows a system with a different business model in which thecentral station server 94 is remote with the database and application host (ASP) 112 and accessed through the internet/web 98. Thecentral station server 94 in this non-limiting example is connected to theinternet 98 and different numbers ofservers 94 could be connected to the internet to form a plurality of central monitoring stations, which can connect to different client monitoring consoles (with speakers for audio). Different client monitoring consoles could be owned by different customers, for example, dealers or franchisees. A corporate parent or franchisor can provide services and maintain software with updates 24/7 in an IP environment. Franchisees, customers or dealers could pay a service fee and access a corporate database. -
FIG. 7 shows that the system of the present invention has the ability to monitor at a remote location, load share, late shift or back-up. Aremote operator 120 as a client, for example, can connect through theinternet 98 to thelocal area network 82. As illustrated, theremote client 120 is connected to theinternet 98 via afirewall 122. Bothclients web 98 and to thecentral monitoring station 82 via thefirewall 96 andLAN 82. At thecentral monitoring station 62, if an operator does not show for work, load sharing can be accomplished and some of the balance of duties assumed by theclients - There may also be central monitoring stations owned or operated by a franchisee, which does not desire to monitor its site. It is possible to have monitoring stations in secure locations, or allow expansion for a smaller operator. With a web-based, broadband based station, it is possible to monitor smaller operators and/or customers, franchisees, or other clients and also locate a central monitoring station in a local region and do monitoring at other sites. It is also possible to use a virtual private network (VPN) 130, as illustrated in
FIG. 8 . Central monitoringstation receiving equipment 132 as servers or computers could be remotely located for functioning as a central monitoring station (CS), which can be placed anywhere. For example, when a local control panel (premises controller) 66 activates, the system could call an 800 number or a local number and send data to the more local monitoring location where acentral monitoring station 132 exists. Thus, it is possible to place a central monitoring station in the locality or city where the account is located and use the internet move data. This allows local phone service activation and reduces telephone infrastructure costs. It should be understood that the virtualprivate network 130 is not a weak link in the system and is operable to move data at high speeds.Appropriate firewalls 134 could be used. -
FIG. 9 shows that remote monitoring in the security system can be accomplished with any type of account, as shown by the premises at 140, which includes a control panel as apremises controller 142 for monitoring asecurity system 143 having a design different from the design of other security systems as described above. There could be some original equipment manufacturer accounts, for example, users of equipment manufactured by Tyco Electronics, Radionics Corporation or other equipment and device providers. It is possible in the security system to monitor control equipment provided by different manufacturers. This monitoring could be transparent to the central monitoring stations through an OEM centralmonitoring station receiver 144. It is possible with an appropriate use of software and an applicable receiver at the central monitoring station that any alarm system of a manufacturer could be monitored. This can be operative with the control panel as a premises controller, which can receive information from other digital security alarms. A central monitoring station receiver could be Underwriter Laboratory approved and operative as a centralmonitoring station receiver 144 for an original equipment manufacturer (OEM). -
FIG. 10 is a logic diagram showing an example of software modules that could be used for the security system of the present invention. A central station receiver type 180, central station receiver type II 78, and centralstation receiver OEM 144 are operative with respective central stationreceiver communications module 150 and central station digitalreceiver communications module 152. Other modules include an installassistance module 154 to aid in installing any software, anet communications module 156 that is operative to allow network communications, and alogger module 158 that is operable for logging data and transactions. Aschedule module 160 is operable for scheduling different system aspects, and apanel message module 162 is operative for providing panel messages. Other modules include theresolve module 164 andnavigator module 166. Adatabase 168 is operative with adatabase interface 170, and abouncer program 172 is also operable with theclient 174 that includes auser interface 176 andaudio 178. Thedatabase 168 can be accessed through theweb 98 using theASP 112 or other modules and devices as explained above. Thebouncer 172 could be operative as a proxy and also act to “bounce” connections from one machine to another. -
FIG. 11 shows different types of field equipment that can be used with asecurity system 40 in accordance with one non-limiting example of the present invention. As illustrated, field equipment for a monitoredpremises 42 is illustrated as connected on onedata bus 55. The equipment includesaudio sensors 44′,door contacts 61,keypads 200 andcard readers 202, which can connect on onebus 55 throughother sensors 44. Some third party systems could be used, and relays 204 forzones 205 andwireless receivers 206 could be connected. - It should be understood that some pattern recognition can be done at the
audio sensor 44 as a microphone with appropriate processing capability. For example, if common noises exceed a certain threshold, or if a telephone rings, in the prior art system usinganalog audio sensors 22 such as shown inFIG. 1 , the noise could trip the audio. For example, a telephone could ring and the audio would trip any equipment central monitoring station, indicating an alarm. The operator would listen to the audio and conclude that a phone had rung and have to reset the system. - In the security system of the present invention, there is sufficient processing power at the
audio sensor 44 with associated artificial intelligence (AI) to learn that the telephone is a nuisance as it recognizes when the phone rings and does not bother to transmit a signal back to the central monitoring station via the premises controller. - There are a number of non-limiting examples of different approaches that could be used. For example, intrusion noise characteristics that are volume based or have certain frequency components for a certain duration and amplitude could be used. It is also possible to establish a learning algorithm such that when an operator at a
central monitoring station 62 has determined if a telephone has rung, and resets a panel, an indication can be sent back to thedigital audio sensor 44 that an invalid alarm has occurred. Theprocessor 56 within thedigital audio sensor 44 can process and store selected segments of that audio pattern, for example, certain frequency elements, similar to a fingerprint voice pattern. After a number of invalid alarms, which could be 5, 10 or 15 depending on selected processing and pattern determination, a built-in pattern recognition occurs at the audio sensor. A phone could ring in the future and theaudio sensor 44 would not transmit an alarm. - Any software and artificial intelligence could be broken into different segments. For example, some of the artificial intelligence can be accomplished at the
digital audio sensor 44, which includes the internal processing capability through the processor 50 (FIG. 2 ). Some software and artificial intelligence processing could occur at the control panel as thepremises controller 66. For example, thedigital audio sensor 44 could send a specific pattern back to thepremises controller 66 orcentral monitoring station 62. In one scenario, lightning occurs with thunder, and everyaudio sensor 44 in many different premises as monitored locations could initiate an alarm signal as the thunder cracks. In a worse case scenario, acentral monitoring station 62 would have to monitor, for example, 500 alarms simultaneously. These alarms must be cleared. Any burglar who desired to burglarize a premises would find this to be an opportune time to burglarize the monitored premises because the operator at acentral monitoring station 62 would be busy clearing out the security system and would not recognize that an intruder had entered the premises. - In another non-limiting example of the present invention, an algorithm operable within the processor of the
premises controller 66 can determine when allaudio sensors 44 went off, and based on a characteristic or common signal between most audio sensors, determine that a lightning strike and thunder has occurred. It is also possible to incorporate an AM receiver or similar reception circuitry at thepremises controller 66 as part of the control panel, which receives radio waves or other signals, indicative of lightning. Based upon receipt of these signals and that differentaudio sensors 44 generated signals, the system can determine that the nuisance noise was created by lightning and thunder, and not transmit alarm signals to thecentral monitoring station 62. This could eliminate a logjam at the central monitoring station and allow intrusion to be caught at the more local level. - The field equipment shown in
FIG. 11 indicates that digitalaudio sensors 44 digitize the audio at the audio sensor and can perform pattern recognition on-board. Audio can also be stored at the audio sensor using any memory 52 (FIG. 2 ). Audio can also be streamed after an alarm signals. As illustrated, different devices are situated on one data bus and can interface to other devices to simplify wiring demands. These devices could be programmed and flash-updateable from thepremises controller 66 or the event more remotely. There can also be different zones and relays. - The
digital audio sensor 44 could include different types of microprocessors or other processors depending on what functions the digital audio sensor is to perform. Each audio sensor typically would be addressable on thedata bus 55. Thus, an audio sensor location can be known at all times and software can be established that associates an audio sensor location with an alarm. It is also possible to interface avideo camera 68 into the alarm system. When the system determines which audio sensor has signaled an alarm and audio has begun streaming, the digital signal could indicate at thepremises controller 66 if there is an associated camera and whether the camera should be activated and video begin from that camera. - As indicated in
FIG. 11 ,door contacts 62 could be connected to thedigital audio sensor 44, enhancing overall security processing and wiring efficiency. Some rooms at a premises could have more than two audio sensors, for example, a digital audio sensor with the microprocessor, and another auxiliary sensor as amicrophone 22, which could be analog. The signal from thismicrophone 22 could be converted by thedigital audio sensor 44.Keypads 200 andkeyless entries 202 could be connected to the digital audio sensor to allow a digital keypad input. There could also be different auxiliary inputs, including an audio sensor that receives analog information and inputs it into the digital audio sensor, which processes the audio with its analog-to-digital converter.Door contacts 62 can include auxiliary equipment and be connected into the digital audio sensor. The security system could includedifferent relays 204 andzones 205 and auxiliary devices as illustrated. Awireless receiver 206 such as manufactured by RF Innovonics, could receive signals from the RF transmitters indicative of alarms from wireless audio digital sensors. This would allow a wireless alarm network to be established. There is also the ability to accomplish two-way communication on some of the digital audio sensors, in which the monitoring station could communicate back as explained above. It is also possible to communicate using Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) from the premises controller to the central monitoring station and in reverse order from the central monitoring station to a premises controller, allowing greater use of an IP network. - It should be understood that intrusion noises include a broad spectrum of frequencies that incorporate different frequency components, which typically cannot be carried along the phone lines as analog information. The phone lines are typically limited in transmission range to about 300 hertz to about 3,300 hertz. By digitizing the audio signals, the data can be transmitted at higher frequency digital rates using different packet formats. Thus, the range of frequencies that the system can operate under is widened, and better information and data is transmitted back to the central monitoring station, as compared to the older analog security system such as shown in
FIG. 1 . -
FIG. 12 shows thesecurity system 40 in one non-limiting example of the present invention in whichcustomers 300 can interact with a web IEG SP1secure site 302, which in turn is operative with acolocation facility 304, such as a Verio facility, including anapplication server 306database server 308 anddata aggregation server 310. These servers connect to various remotecentral monitoring stations 312 through aweb VPN network 314. Advanced Suite software could be used. - The described embodiments of the security system have advantages over prior art security systems, such as shown in
FIG. 1 . For prior art security systems, maintenance is difficult and there are hardware difficulties, for example, meeting Underwriter Laboratory requirements for the central monitoring station consoles, RAD slayery, and computers. In the security system of the present invention, the central monitoring stations could now include a separate user interface and port all code to net. Features and functions can be updated as required and obsolete modules can be rewritten and new modules can be written. Modular releases can mitigate this risk to have time to the field. It is possible to retain functionality and retain the look and feel of the user interface. It is also possible to remove the Underwriter Laboratory requirement from computers. - The enhanced operating efficiency includes load balancing, decreased activations, decreased misses, increased accounts per monitor, and integrated digital capability for the alarm system. Disaster recovery is possible with shared monitoring, for example, on nights and weekends. This enables future internet protocol or ASP business modules. The existing wired control panel used in prior art systems is expensive to install and requires difficult programming. It has a high cost to manufacture and requires analog technology.
- The
premises controller 66 as part of a control panel is operative with digitized audio and designed for use with field equipment having addressable module protocols. The 300 baud rate equipment of prior art systems, such as explained with reference toFIG. 1 , can be replaced with devices that fit into PCMCIA slots and operative at 56K or higher rates. Written noise canceling algorithms can enhance digital signal processing. This design can be accomplished with a contemporary microcontroller (or microprocessor). The system also supports multiple communications media including telephone company, DSL, cable modem and a digital cellular systems. It enables a series topology with full digital support. There is a lower cost to manufacture and about 40% reduction in the cost of a control panel in one non-limiting example. It also allows an interface for legacy control panels and digital audio detection and verification. It allows increased communication speeds. It is IP ready and reduces telephone company infrastructure costs. - There are many benefits, which includes the digitizing of audio at the audio sensors. Digital signal processing can occur at the audio sensor, thus eliminating background noise at the audio sensor. For example, any AC humming could be switched on/off, as well as other background noises, for example a telephone or air compressor noise. It is also possible to reduce the audio to a signature and recognize a likely alarm scenario and avoid false alarm indications for system wide noise, such as thunder. The digital audio sensors could record five seconds of audio data, as one non-limiting example, and the premises controller as a control panel can process this information. With this capability, the central monitoring station would not receive 25 different five-second audio clips to make a decision, for example, which could slow overall processing, even at the higher speeds associated with advanced equipment. Thus, a signature can be developed for the audio digital sensor, containing enough data to accomplish a comparison at the premises controller for lightning strikes and thunder.
- Although some digital audio can be stored at the premises controller of the control panel or a central monitoring station, it is desirable to store some audio data at the digital audio sensors. The central monitoring station can also store audio data on any of its servers and databases. This storage of audio data can be used for record purposes. Each audio sensor can be a separate data field. Any algorithms that are used in the system can do more than determine amplitude and sound noise level, but can also process a selected frequency mix and duration of such mix.
- There can also be progressive audio. For example, the audio produced by a loud thunder strike could be processed at the digital audio sensor. Processing of audio data, depending on the type of audio activation, can also occur at the premises controller at the control panel or at the central monitoring station. It is also possible to have a database server work as a high-end server for greater processing capability. It is also possible to use digital verification served-up to a client PC from a central monitoring station server. This could allow intrusion detection and verification, which could use fuzzy logic or other artificial intelligence.
- The system could use dual technology audio sensors, including microwave and passive infrared (PIR) low energy devices. For example, there could be two sets of circuitry. A glass could break and the first circuitry in the audio sensor could be operative at microamps and low current looks for activation at sufficient amplitude. If a threshold is crossed, the first circuitry, including a processor, initiates operation of other circuitry and hardware, thus drawing more power to perform a complete analysis. It could then shut-off. Any type of audio sensors used in this system could operate in this manner.
- The circuit could include an amplitude based microphone such that when a threshold is crossed, other equipment would be powered, and the alarm transmitted. It could also shut itself off as a two-way device. It is possible to have processing power to determine when any circuitry should arm and disarm or when it should “sleep.”
- As noted before, there can be different levels of processing power, for example at the (1) audio sensor, (2) at the premises controller located the control panel, or (3) the central monitoring station, where a more powerful server would typically be available. The system typically eliminates nuisance noise and in front of the physical operator at a central monitoring station. Any type of sophisticated pattern recognition software can be operable. For example, different databases can be used to store pattern recognition “signatures.” Digital signal processing does not have to occur with any type of advanced processing power but can be a form of simplified A/D conversion at the microphone. It is also not necessary to use Fourier analysis algorithms at the microphone.
- This application is related to copending patent applications entitled, “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING SECURITY AT A PLURALITY OF PREMISES,” which is filed on the same date and by the same assignee and inventor, the disclosure which is hereby incorporated by reference.
- Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, and that modifications and embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.
Claims (29)
1. A security system for monitoring security at a premises comprising:
at least one audio sensor located at the premises that receives audio signals;
a digitizer at the premises that receives the audio signals from the at least one audio sensor and converts the audio signals to digitized audio signals; and
a central monitoring station located remote from the premises that receives the digitized audio signals and converts the digitized audio signals into audible audio for an operator that is monitoring the premises.
2. (canceled)
3. (canceled)
4. (canceled)
5. A security system according to claim 1 , and further comprising a premises controller located at the premises and operatively connected to each audio sensor and said digitizer for receiving the digitized audio signals and transmitting said digitized audio signals through said digitizer to said central monitoring station.
6. (canceled)
7. (canceled)
8. A security system according to claim 1 , wherein said central monitoring station includes a server, and further comprising a client in communication with said server for accessing said server and receiving data regarding security.
9. A security system according to claim 8 , and further comprising a communications network interconnecting said client and server.
10. A security system according to claim 9 , wherein said communications network comprises an internet.
11. A security system according to claim 9 , wherein said communications network comprises a local area network.
12. (canceled)
13. (canceled)
14. (canceled)
15. (canceled)
16. (canceled)
17. (canceled)
18. A method for monitoring security at a premises, which comprises:
converting an audio signal at the premises into a digitized audio signal;
transmitting the digitized audio signal along a communications network to a central monitoring station; and
converting the digitized audio signal into audio for an operator that is monitoring the premises.
19. (canceled)
20. A method according to claim 18 , which further comprises transmitting the digitized audio signal from the central monitoring station along a communications network to a client for monitoring.
21. A security system for monitoring security at a plurality of premises comprising:
at least one audio sensor located at each of the premises that receives audio signals at the respective premises;
a digitizer at each premises that receives the audio signals from respective audio sensors at the premises and converts the audio signals to digitized audio signals;
a server located remote from the plurality of premises that receives the digitized audio signals from each of the premises; and
a plurality of clients in communication with said server, wherein said server is operative for selecting a client for receiving digitized audio signals for a selected premises, and said client is operative for converting said digitized audio signals from the selected premises into audio for an operator that is monitoring the premises.
22. A security system according to claim 21 , wherein said server is operative for load balancing to select a client for receiving digitized audio signals.
23. A security system according to claim 21 , and further comprising a premises controller located at each premises for receiving the audio signals.
24. A security system according to claim 21 , wherein said communications signal comprises a signal representing a voice.
25. A security system according to claim 21 , and further comprising a communications network interconnecting said clients and server.
26. A security system according to claim 25 , wherein said communications network comprises an internet.
27. A security system according to claim 25 , wherein said communications network comprises a local area network.
28. A security system according to claim 21 , and further comprising a first receiver located at said server for receiving digitized audio signals generated by said audio sensors and a second receiver for receiving analog audio signals.
29. A method for monitoring security at a plurality of premises, which comprises:
converting audio signals received from a plurality of audio sensors at each of the plurality of premises into a digitized audio signal;
transmitting the digitized audio signals along a communications network to a server;
selecting a client in communication with the server for receiving digitized audio signals for a selected premises; and
converting the digitized audio signals into audio for an operator that is monitoring the selected premises.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/399,161 US20060192668A1 (en) | 2004-11-16 | 2006-04-06 | System and method for monitoring security at a premises |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US62835704P | 2004-11-16 | 2004-11-16 | |
US11/269,380 US8248226B2 (en) | 2004-11-16 | 2005-11-08 | System and method for monitoring security at a premises |
US11/399,161 US20060192668A1 (en) | 2004-11-16 | 2006-04-06 | System and method for monitoring security at a premises |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/269,380 Continuation US8248226B2 (en) | 2004-11-16 | 2005-11-08 | System and method for monitoring security at a premises |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060192668A1 true US20060192668A1 (en) | 2006-08-31 |
Family
ID=36386204
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/269,380 Active 2027-12-19 US8248226B2 (en) | 2004-11-16 | 2005-11-08 | System and method for monitoring security at a premises |
US11/399,161 Abandoned US20060192668A1 (en) | 2004-11-16 | 2006-04-06 | System and method for monitoring security at a premises |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/269,380 Active 2027-12-19 US8248226B2 (en) | 2004-11-16 | 2005-11-08 | System and method for monitoring security at a premises |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US8248226B2 (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100328084A1 (en) * | 2009-06-29 | 2010-12-30 | General Electric Company | System and method for detecting lightning |
US7986228B2 (en) | 2007-09-05 | 2011-07-26 | Stanley Convergent Security Solutions, Inc. | System and method for monitoring security at a premises using line card |
US8248226B2 (en) | 2004-11-16 | 2012-08-21 | Black & Decker Inc. | System and method for monitoring security at a premises |
WO2018057681A1 (en) * | 2016-09-22 | 2018-03-29 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | Systems and methods for monitoring conditions on shelves |
US10586205B2 (en) | 2015-12-30 | 2020-03-10 | Walmart Apollo, Llc | Apparatus and method for monitoring stock information in a shopping space |
Families Citing this family (112)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6658091B1 (en) | 2002-02-01 | 2003-12-02 | @Security Broadband Corp. | LIfestyle multimedia security system |
US11677577B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2023-06-13 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Premises system management using status signal |
US11916870B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2024-02-27 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Gateway registry methods and systems |
US10142392B2 (en) | 2007-01-24 | 2018-11-27 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Methods and systems for improved system performance |
US8963713B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2015-02-24 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated security network with security alarm signaling system |
US9609003B1 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2017-03-28 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Generating risk profile using data of home monitoring and security system |
US11113950B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2021-09-07 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Gateway integrated with premises security system |
US12063220B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2024-08-13 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US20170118037A1 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2017-04-27 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated cloud system for premises automation |
US11201755B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2021-12-14 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Premises system management using status signal |
US10237237B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-03-19 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US10156959B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2018-12-18 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Cross-client sensor user interface in an integrated security network |
US10382452B1 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-08-13 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US11582065B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2023-02-14 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Systems and methods for device communication |
US10444964B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-10-15 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Control system user interface |
US10313303B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-06-04 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Forming a security network including integrated security system components and network devices |
US9191228B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2015-11-17 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Cross-client sensor user interface in an integrated security network |
US8635350B2 (en) | 2006-06-12 | 2014-01-21 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | IP device discovery systems and methods |
US9729342B2 (en) | 2010-12-20 | 2017-08-08 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Defining and implementing sensor triggered response rules |
US20090077623A1 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2009-03-19 | Marc Baum | Security Network Integrating Security System and Network Devices |
US11811845B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2023-11-07 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols over internet protocol (IP) networks |
US10522026B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2019-12-31 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Automation system user interface with three-dimensional display |
GB2428821B (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2008-06-04 | Icontrol Networks Inc | Premises management system |
US9141276B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2015-09-22 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated interface for mobile device |
US11343380B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2022-05-24 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Premises system automation |
US11368429B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2022-06-21 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Premises management configuration and control |
US7711796B2 (en) | 2006-06-12 | 2010-05-04 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Gateway registry methods and systems |
US11159484B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2021-10-26 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Forming a security network including integrated security system components and network devices |
US20160065414A1 (en) | 2013-06-27 | 2016-03-03 | Ken Sundermeyer | Control system user interface |
US10375253B2 (en) | 2008-08-25 | 2019-08-06 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security system with networked touchscreen and gateway |
US10200504B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-02-05 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols over internet protocol (IP) networks |
US10339791B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-07-02 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security network integrated with premise security system |
US10721087B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2020-07-21 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Method for networked touchscreen with integrated interfaces |
US11316958B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2022-04-26 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Virtual device systems and methods |
US11277465B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2022-03-15 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Generating risk profile using data of home monitoring and security system |
US8988221B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2015-03-24 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated security system with parallel processing architecture |
US11244545B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2022-02-08 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Cross-client sensor user interface in an integrated security network |
US11489812B2 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2022-11-01 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Forming a security network including integrated security system components and network devices |
US9531593B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2016-12-27 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Takeover processes in security network integrated with premise security system |
US10999254B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2021-05-04 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | System for data routing in networks |
US11496568B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2022-11-08 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security system with networked touchscreen |
US20110128378A1 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2011-06-02 | Reza Raji | Modular Electronic Display Platform |
US9306809B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2016-04-05 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security system with networked touchscreen |
US20120324566A1 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2012-12-20 | Marc Baum | Takeover Processes In Security Network Integrated With Premise Security System |
US11700142B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2023-07-11 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security network integrating security system and network devices |
US11615697B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2023-03-28 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Premise management systems and methods |
US20170180198A1 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2017-06-22 | Marc Baum | Forming a security network including integrated security system components |
US9189934B2 (en) | 2005-09-22 | 2015-11-17 | Rsi Video Technologies, Inc. | Security monitoring with programmable mapping |
US12063221B2 (en) | 2006-06-12 | 2024-08-13 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Activation of gateway device |
US10079839B1 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2018-09-18 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Activation of gateway device |
US11706279B2 (en) | 2007-01-24 | 2023-07-18 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Methods and systems for data communication |
US7633385B2 (en) | 2007-02-28 | 2009-12-15 | Ucontrol, Inc. | Method and system for communicating with and controlling an alarm system from a remote server |
US8451986B2 (en) | 2007-04-23 | 2013-05-28 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Method and system for automatically providing alternate network access for telecommunications |
US11316753B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2022-04-26 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US11646907B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2023-05-09 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US10051078B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2018-08-14 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | WiFi-to-serial encapsulation in systems |
US11212192B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2021-12-28 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US11237714B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2022-02-01 | Control Networks, Inc. | Control system user interface |
US12003387B2 (en) | 2012-06-27 | 2024-06-04 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Control system user interface |
US11423756B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2022-08-23 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US10423309B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-09-24 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Device integration framework |
US11601810B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2023-03-07 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US11089122B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2021-08-10 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Controlling data routing among networks |
US10523689B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-12-31 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols over internet protocol (IP) networks |
US10498830B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-12-03 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Wi-Fi-to-serial encapsulation in systems |
US20180198788A1 (en) * | 2007-06-12 | 2018-07-12 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Security system integrated with social media platform |
US11218878B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2022-01-04 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US10389736B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2019-08-20 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US10616075B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2020-04-07 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
US10666523B2 (en) | 2007-06-12 | 2020-05-26 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols in integrated systems |
GB2451241A (en) * | 2007-07-24 | 2009-01-28 | Infrasonic Pulse Sensing Ltd | Infrasonic intruder alarm using digital signature matching |
US10223903B2 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2019-03-05 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated security system with parallel processing architecture |
US11831462B2 (en) | 2007-08-24 | 2023-11-28 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Controlling data routing in premises management systems |
US11916928B2 (en) | 2008-01-24 | 2024-02-27 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Communication protocols over internet protocol (IP) networks |
US20170185278A1 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2017-06-29 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Automation system user interface |
US11258625B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2022-02-22 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Mobile premises automation platform |
US11758026B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2023-09-12 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Virtual device systems and methods |
US10530839B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2020-01-07 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated cloud system with lightweight gateway for premises automation |
US11729255B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2023-08-15 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Integrated cloud system with lightweight gateway for premises automation |
US11792036B2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2023-10-17 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Mobile premises automation platform |
KR20100081587A (en) * | 2009-01-06 | 2010-07-15 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Sound recognition apparatus of robot and method for controlling the same |
US8638211B2 (en) | 2009-04-30 | 2014-01-28 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Configurable controller and interface for home SMA, phone and multimedia |
AU2011250886A1 (en) | 2010-05-10 | 2013-01-10 | Icontrol Networks, Inc | Control system user interface |
US8836467B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2014-09-16 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Method, system and apparatus for automated reporting of account and sensor zone information to a central station |
US11750414B2 (en) | 2010-12-16 | 2023-09-05 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Bidirectional security sensor communication for a premises security system |
US9147337B2 (en) | 2010-12-17 | 2015-09-29 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Method and system for logging security event data |
US8478987B2 (en) * | 2011-03-14 | 2013-07-02 | Thomas F. Karl | Wireless activation of IP devices |
US8723665B2 (en) * | 2011-07-26 | 2014-05-13 | Tyco Safety Products Canada Ltd. | Audio buffering in two-way voice alarm systems |
WO2013159125A1 (en) * | 2012-04-16 | 2013-10-24 | Khan Zulfiker | Distress alarm system |
US10588173B2 (en) * | 2012-06-22 | 2020-03-10 | Honeywell International Inc. | Wi-Fi mesh fire detection system |
US9495845B1 (en) | 2012-10-02 | 2016-11-15 | Rsi Video Technologies, Inc. | Control panel for security monitoring system providing cell-system upgrades |
US9472067B1 (en) | 2013-07-23 | 2016-10-18 | Rsi Video Technologies, Inc. | Security devices and related features |
US11146637B2 (en) | 2014-03-03 | 2021-10-12 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Media content management |
US11405463B2 (en) | 2014-03-03 | 2022-08-02 | Icontrol Networks, Inc. | Media content management |
EP3180779A4 (en) | 2014-08-13 | 2018-04-25 | Tyco Safety Products Canada Ltd. | Method and apparatus for automation and alarm architecture |
US10592306B2 (en) | 2014-10-03 | 2020-03-17 | Tyco Safety Products Canada Ltd. | Method and apparatus for resource balancing in an automation and alarm architecture |
US10803720B2 (en) | 2014-08-13 | 2020-10-13 | Tyco Safety Products Canada Ltd. | Intelligent smoke sensor with audio-video verification |
US10641013B2 (en) | 2016-02-16 | 2020-05-05 | Go Lock Technology, Inc. | Portable lock with integrity sensors |
WO2017176527A1 (en) | 2016-04-05 | 2017-10-12 | Carrier Corporation | Apparatus, system, and method of establishing a communication link |
US10535252B2 (en) | 2016-08-10 | 2020-01-14 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Monitoring security |
WO2018129178A1 (en) | 2017-01-04 | 2018-07-12 | Golock Technology, Inc. | Cable with integral sensing elements for fault detection |
US10544605B2 (en) | 2017-05-19 | 2020-01-28 | Douglas A. Yates | Sliding lockable housing with supplemental openings |
US10482754B2 (en) | 2017-05-31 | 2019-11-19 | Turnkey Vacation Rentals, Inc. | System and method for remote property management |
US10091569B1 (en) * | 2017-10-13 | 2018-10-02 | Louroe Electronics | Smart microphone devices, systems, apparatuses, and methods |
US11785186B2 (en) | 2018-07-11 | 2023-10-10 | Total Safety U.S., Inc. | Centralized monitoring of confined spaces |
EP3594914A1 (en) * | 2018-07-11 | 2020-01-15 | Total Safety U.S., Inc. | Centralized monitoring of confined space |
US11968323B2 (en) * | 2018-12-21 | 2024-04-23 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Device control based on signature |
US20220269388A1 (en) | 2021-02-19 | 2022-08-25 | Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP | Security / automation system control panel graphical user interface |
US12022574B2 (en) | 2021-02-19 | 2024-06-25 | Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP | Security / automation system with cloud-communicative sensor devices |
US12046121B2 (en) | 2021-02-19 | 2024-07-23 | Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP | Security / automation system control panel with short range communication disarming |
US11961377B2 (en) * | 2021-02-19 | 2024-04-16 | Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP | Security / automation system control panel with acoustic signature detection |
US12026243B2 (en) | 2021-02-19 | 2024-07-02 | Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP | Facial recognition by a security / automation system control panel |
Citations (93)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3074053A (en) * | 1960-03-01 | 1963-01-15 | American District Telegraph Co | Electrical system and method for protecting premises subject to varying ambient conditions |
US3437759A (en) * | 1965-10-21 | 1969-04-08 | George T Mckinzie | Burglar alarm device for detecting sounds in a protected area |
US3488436A (en) * | 1966-09-29 | 1970-01-06 | Sylvania Electric Prod | Intrusion detector control for closed circuit television system |
US3573817A (en) * | 1968-02-28 | 1971-04-06 | North American Rockwell | Monitoring system |
US4001771A (en) * | 1975-10-20 | 1977-01-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Intruder detecting security system |
US4249207A (en) * | 1979-02-20 | 1981-02-03 | Computing Devices Company | Perimeter surveillance system |
US4321593A (en) * | 1980-02-21 | 1982-03-23 | Ho Chi C | Television set with supervisory functions of alarming burglary and safe watching distance |
US4728936A (en) * | 1986-04-11 | 1988-03-01 | Adt, Inc. | Control and display system |
US4728935A (en) * | 1986-04-11 | 1988-03-01 | Adt, Inc. | Integrity securing monitor and method for a security installation |
US4796025A (en) * | 1985-06-04 | 1989-01-03 | Simplex Time Recorder Co. | Monitor/control communication net with intelligent peripherals |
US4812820A (en) * | 1985-07-23 | 1989-03-14 | Chatwin Ian Malcolm | Electronic surveillance system and transceiver unit therefor |
US4821027A (en) * | 1987-09-14 | 1989-04-11 | Dicon Systems Limited | Voice interactive security system |
US4893328A (en) * | 1987-07-31 | 1990-01-09 | Microvoice Systems Corporation | Automated telephone operator overflow device |
US5091780A (en) * | 1990-05-09 | 1992-02-25 | Carnegie-Mellon University | A trainable security system emthod for the same |
US5109278A (en) * | 1990-07-06 | 1992-04-28 | Commonwealth Edison Company | Auto freeze frame display for intrusion monitoring system |
US5398277A (en) * | 1992-02-06 | 1995-03-14 | Security Information Network, Inc. | Flexible multiprocessor alarm data processing system |
US5400011A (en) * | 1994-01-18 | 1995-03-21 | Knight Protective Industries, Inc. | Method and apparatus for enhancing remote audio monitoring in security systems |
US5406254A (en) * | 1992-11-25 | 1995-04-11 | Borg-Warner Security Corporation | Alarm system with remote module and associated alarm |
US5506567A (en) * | 1993-10-07 | 1996-04-09 | Temic Telefunken Microelectronic Gmbh | Process for monitoring the openings to an enclosed space |
US5513244A (en) * | 1993-06-08 | 1996-04-30 | Joao; Raymond A. | Remote-controlled anti-theft, theft reporting, or vehicle recovery system and method for motor vehicles |
US5736927A (en) * | 1993-09-29 | 1998-04-07 | Interactive Technologies, Inc. | Audio listen and voice security system |
US5862201A (en) * | 1996-09-12 | 1999-01-19 | Simplex Time Recorder Company | Redundant alarm monitoring system |
US5862527A (en) * | 1996-10-17 | 1999-01-26 | Trevino; Hilario | Disposable surgical undergarment |
US5872519A (en) * | 1992-05-22 | 1999-02-16 | Directed Electronics, Inc. | Advanced embedded code hopping system |
US5886620A (en) * | 1993-09-24 | 1999-03-23 | Simplex Time Recorder Company | Building alarm system with synchronized strobes |
US6028522A (en) * | 1998-10-14 | 2000-02-22 | Statsignal Systems, Inc. | System for monitoring the light level around an ATM |
US6038289A (en) * | 1996-09-12 | 2000-03-14 | Simplex Time Recorder Co. | Redundant video alarm monitoring system |
US6215404B1 (en) * | 1999-03-24 | 2001-04-10 | Fernando Morales | Network audio-link fire alarm monitoring system and method |
US6218953B1 (en) * | 1998-10-14 | 2001-04-17 | Statsignal Systems, Inc. | System and method for monitoring the light level around an ATM |
US6335976B1 (en) * | 1999-02-26 | 2002-01-01 | Bomarc Surveillance, Inc. | System and method for monitoring visible changes |
US20020005894A1 (en) * | 2000-04-10 | 2002-01-17 | Foodman Bruce A. | Internet based emergency communication system |
US20020008886A1 (en) * | 2000-07-18 | 2002-01-24 | Hsm Holographic Systems Munchen Gmbh | Information Medium |
US6351214B2 (en) * | 1997-10-28 | 2002-02-26 | Pittway Corp. | Glass breakage detector |
US20020024424A1 (en) * | 2000-04-10 | 2002-02-28 | Burns T. D. | Civil defense alert system and method using power line communication |
US20020027504A1 (en) * | 1999-03-18 | 2002-03-07 | James Davis | System and method for controlling communication between a host computer and communication devices associated with remote devices in an automated monitoring system |
US6363079B1 (en) * | 1997-12-31 | 2002-03-26 | At&T Corp. | Multifunction interface facility connecting wideband multiple access subscriber loops with various networks |
US6369705B1 (en) * | 1997-12-04 | 2002-04-09 | Thom Kennedy | Alarm monitoring and reporting system |
US20020040964A1 (en) * | 2000-10-05 | 2002-04-11 | Hsm Holographic Systems Munchen Gmbh | Moisture sensor |
US20030005326A1 (en) * | 2001-06-29 | 2003-01-02 | Todd Flemming | Method and system for implementing a security application services provider |
US6504479B1 (en) * | 2000-09-07 | 2003-01-07 | Comtrak Technologies Llc | Integrated security system |
US6507790B1 (en) * | 1998-07-15 | 2003-01-14 | Horton, Inc. | Acoustic monitor |
US6507278B1 (en) * | 2000-06-28 | 2003-01-14 | Adt Security Services, Inc. | Ingress/egress control system for airport concourses and other access controlled areas |
US20030016130A1 (en) * | 1993-06-08 | 2003-01-23 | Raymond Anthony Joao | Control, monitoring and/or security apparatus and method |
US20030025599A1 (en) * | 2001-05-11 | 2003-02-06 | Monroe David A. | Method and apparatus for collecting, sending, archiving and retrieving motion video and still images and notification of detected events |
US6529723B1 (en) * | 1999-07-06 | 2003-03-04 | Televoke, Inc. | Automated user notification system |
US6538689B1 (en) * | 1998-10-26 | 2003-03-25 | Yu Wen Chang | Multi-residence monitoring using centralized image content processing |
US6538570B1 (en) * | 1999-05-07 | 2003-03-25 | Honeywell International | Glass-break detector and method of alarm discrimination |
US6542076B1 (en) * | 1993-06-08 | 2003-04-01 | Raymond Anthony Joao | Control, monitoring and/or security apparatus and method |
US6542077B2 (en) * | 1993-06-08 | 2003-04-01 | Raymond Anthony Joao | Monitoring apparatus for a vehicle and/or a premises |
US20030062997A1 (en) * | 1999-07-20 | 2003-04-03 | Naidoo Surendra N. | Distributed monitoring for a video security system |
US20030067541A1 (en) * | 1996-03-27 | 2003-04-10 | Joao Raymond Anthony | Monitoring apparatus and method |
US6549130B1 (en) * | 1993-06-08 | 2003-04-15 | Raymond Anthony Joao | Control apparatus and method for vehicles and/or for premises |
US20030072634A1 (en) * | 2001-09-19 | 2003-04-17 | K&R Corporation And Simplex Nails | Non-magnetic fastener with magnetic locking nail and two-stage hammer apparatus |
US6690414B2 (en) * | 2000-12-12 | 2004-02-10 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus to reduce false alarms in exit/entrance situations for residential security monitoring |
US6690411B2 (en) * | 1999-07-20 | 2004-02-10 | @Security Broadband Corp. | Security system |
US6693530B1 (en) * | 2001-10-16 | 2004-02-17 | At&T Corp. | Home security administration platform |
US6693532B2 (en) * | 1999-11-10 | 2004-02-17 | Adt Services Ag | Alarm system having improved communication |
US20040036573A1 (en) * | 2000-01-12 | 2004-02-26 | The Chamberlain Group, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing access to a secure region |
US20040036596A1 (en) * | 2002-08-07 | 2004-02-26 | Steven Heffner | Security system and methods |
US20040041694A1 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2004-03-04 | Fei Xie | Methods of recording voice signals in a mobile set |
US20040041910A1 (en) * | 2002-02-01 | 2004-03-04 | Naidoo Surendra N. | Lifestyle multimedia security system |
US6727811B1 (en) * | 1999-06-25 | 2004-04-27 | Gregory Fendis | Monitoring system |
US20040081322A1 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2004-04-29 | Michael Schliep | Method and arrangement for processing noise signal from a noise source |
US20040080401A1 (en) * | 1993-09-24 | 2004-04-29 | Adt Services Ag | Building alarm system with synchronized strobes |
US20050012478A1 (en) * | 2001-06-28 | 2005-01-20 | Cooley Stephen Francis Gerard | Medical needle removal device |
US20050041734A1 (en) * | 2002-01-31 | 2005-02-24 | Walker Matthew D | Video coding |
US6864789B2 (en) * | 2000-09-06 | 2005-03-08 | Red Wolf Technologies, Inc. | Personal property security device |
US20050052285A1 (en) * | 2003-09-10 | 2005-03-10 | Yamaha Corporation | Communication system for remote sound monitoring with ambiguous signal processing |
US6873256B2 (en) * | 2002-06-21 | 2005-03-29 | Dorothy Lemelson | Intelligent building alarm |
US20050068175A1 (en) * | 2002-07-08 | 2005-03-31 | Faulkner James Otis | Security system and method with realtime imagery |
US20050073411A1 (en) * | 2003-09-23 | 2005-04-07 | Walker Butler | Electronic wall using high-resolution millimeter-wave radar in conjunction with multiple plane reflectors and retroreflectors |
US6884818B1 (en) * | 1999-06-14 | 2005-04-26 | Fidia Farmaceutici S.P.A. | Pharmaceutical compositions containing 8-chloro-3 (β-diethylaminoethyl)-4-methyl-7-ethoxycarbonylmethoxy coumarin base and the salts thereof with cholesterol-lowering activity |
US20060017579A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-01-26 | Innovalarm Corporation | Acoustic alert communication system with enhanced signal to noise capabilities |
US20060017559A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-01-26 | Albert David E | Enhanced fire, safety, security and health monitoring and alarm response method, system and device |
US20060017561A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-01-26 | Albert David E | Enhanced fire, safety, security and health monitoring and alarm response method, system and device |
US20060017558A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-01-26 | Albert David E | Enhanced fire, safety, security, and health monitoring and alarm response method, system and device |
US20060025938A1 (en) * | 2002-09-24 | 2006-02-02 | Invensys Controls Uk Ltd | Diagnositc tool for an energy convesion appliance |
US20060022816A1 (en) * | 2004-07-30 | 2006-02-02 | Mitsuhiko Yukawa | Home security system |
US20060028334A1 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2006-02-09 | Honeywell International, Inc. | False alarm reduction in security systems using weather sensor and control panel logic |
US20060049934A1 (en) * | 2004-09-07 | 2006-03-09 | Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation | Methods and systems for utilizing a data network for the communication of emergency alerts |
US20060056386A1 (en) * | 2004-09-01 | 2006-03-16 | Scott Stogel | Method and system for computer based intercom control and management |
US7016813B2 (en) * | 2000-09-28 | 2006-03-21 | Vigilos, Inc. | Method and process for configuring a premises for monitoring |
US7019639B2 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2006-03-28 | Ingrid, Inc. | RFID based security network |
US7019633B1 (en) * | 1999-07-20 | 2006-03-28 | Adt Services Ag | Audio signal sound diffusion system |
US7023341B2 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2006-04-04 | Ingrid, Inc. | RFID reader for a security network |
US20060072737A1 (en) * | 2004-10-05 | 2006-04-06 | Jonathan Paden | Dynamic load balancing between multiple locations with different telephony system |
US7034677B2 (en) * | 2002-07-19 | 2006-04-25 | Smiths Detection Inc. | Non-specific sensor array detectors |
US7158026B2 (en) * | 2004-02-06 | 2007-01-02 | @Security Broadband Corp. | Security system configured to provide video and/or audio information to public or private safety personnel at a call center or other fixed or mobile emergency assistance unit |
US20070008125A1 (en) * | 2004-06-17 | 2007-01-11 | Smith Richard A | Method of eliminating impact/shock related false alarms in an acoustical glassbreak detector |
US7202789B1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2007-04-10 | Ingrid, Inc. | Clip for RFID transponder of a security network |
US20080001734A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2008-01-03 | Stilp Louis A | Portable telephone in a security network |
US20080036593A1 (en) * | 2006-08-04 | 2008-02-14 | The Government Of The Us, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Volume sensor: data fusion-based, multi-sensor system for advanced damage control |
US20080043987A1 (en) * | 2006-08-15 | 2008-02-21 | Adam Waalkes | System and method for balancing agent console load during automated call processing |
Family Cites Families (160)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3109165A (en) | 1958-09-05 | 1963-10-29 | Specialties Dev Corp | Intruder detecting system |
US3404393A (en) | 1965-04-01 | 1968-10-01 | Sidney L. Blivice | Alarm system |
US3461241A (en) | 1966-07-07 | 1969-08-12 | John L Menke | Recorder controlled automatic dialing and message reporting system |
US3383678A (en) | 1966-12-23 | 1968-05-14 | Advanced Devices Lab Inc | Moving object detection system |
US3537095A (en) | 1968-03-20 | 1970-10-27 | Cones Jet Air System Inc | Appliance theft control alarm system |
GB1266344A (en) | 1968-03-20 | 1972-03-08 | ||
US3662112A (en) | 1969-12-22 | 1972-05-09 | Robertshaw Controls Co | Automatic security system |
US3838408A (en) | 1973-02-09 | 1974-09-24 | Detection Syst Inc | Environmental test switch for intruder detection systems |
US3833897A (en) | 1973-03-13 | 1974-09-03 | Gte Sylvania Inc | Intrusion detection system and method using an electret cable |
US3883695A (en) | 1973-05-14 | 1975-05-13 | Vertex Science Ind Inc | Alarm reporting system for transmitting digital alarm signals via a telephone line |
US4023139A (en) | 1974-10-24 | 1977-05-10 | Gene Samburg | Security control and alarm system |
US4060803A (en) | 1976-02-09 | 1977-11-29 | Audio Alert, Inc. | Security alarm system with audio monitoring capability |
US4333170A (en) | 1977-11-21 | 1982-06-01 | Northrop Corporation | Acoustical detection and tracking system |
US4241335A (en) | 1978-06-26 | 1980-12-23 | Modern Automatic Alarms Limited | Automatically supervised alarm system |
US4283717A (en) | 1979-10-01 | 1981-08-11 | Digital Monitoring Products | Monitoring system for a direct-wire alarm system |
US4538139A (en) | 1982-04-30 | 1985-08-27 | Bolt Beranek And Newman Inc. | Signalling apparatus |
US4633234A (en) | 1982-09-20 | 1986-12-30 | Audio Sentry Manufacturing, Inc. | Sonic detector having digital sampling circuit |
US4839640A (en) | 1984-09-24 | 1989-06-13 | Adt Inc. | Access control system having centralized/distributed control |
US4827247A (en) | 1985-05-08 | 1989-05-02 | Adt, Inc. | Self-compensating projected-beam smoke detector |
US4749871A (en) | 1985-05-08 | 1988-06-07 | Adt, Inc. | Self-diagnostic projected-beam smoke detector |
US4709151A (en) | 1985-10-23 | 1987-11-24 | Adt, Inc. | Steerable mirror assembly and cooperative housing for a passive infrared intrusion detection system |
US4707604A (en) | 1985-10-23 | 1987-11-17 | Adt, Inc. | Ceiling mountable passive infrared intrusion detection system |
US4706069A (en) | 1986-04-08 | 1987-11-10 | Rca Corporation | Security system |
US4850018A (en) | 1986-07-01 | 1989-07-18 | Baker Industries, Inc. | Security system with enhanced protection against compromising |
US4758827A (en) | 1986-07-28 | 1988-07-19 | Adt, Inc. | Duct smoke detector |
US4952931A (en) | 1987-01-27 | 1990-08-28 | Serageldin Ahmedelhadi Y | Signal adaptive processor |
SE459539B (en) | 1987-04-08 | 1989-07-10 | Jan Lennart Johansson | SECURITY SYSTEM INCLUDING A SIGNAL TRANSMITTER FOR TRANSFER OF CONDITION INFORMATION THROUGH A TELECOMMUNICATION CHANNEL |
US4843462A (en) | 1987-09-04 | 1989-06-27 | Adt Security Systems, Inc. | Remote video observation systems |
US4876597A (en) | 1987-09-04 | 1989-10-24 | Adt Security Systems, Inc. | Video observation systems |
US4853685A (en) | 1988-04-29 | 1989-08-01 | Baker Industries, Inc. | Switch monitoring arrangement with remote adjustment capability having debounce circuitry for accurate state determination |
US4857912A (en) | 1988-07-27 | 1989-08-15 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Intelligent security assessment system |
US5023901A (en) | 1988-08-22 | 1991-06-11 | Vorec Corporation | Surveillance system having a voice verification unit |
EP0403659B1 (en) | 1988-12-02 | 1996-08-14 | Nohmi Bosai Kabushiki Kaisha | Fire alarm system |
US5150099A (en) | 1990-07-19 | 1992-09-22 | Lienau Richard M | Home security system and methodology for implementing the same |
US5249223A (en) | 1991-01-03 | 1993-09-28 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Call-load-control arrangement for an emergency-call-answering center |
US5144661A (en) | 1991-02-11 | 1992-09-01 | Robert Shamosh | Security protection system and method |
US5555404A (en) | 1992-03-17 | 1996-09-10 | Telenor As | Continuously available database server having multiple groups of nodes with minimum intersecting sets of database fragment replicas |
US5532670A (en) | 1992-05-22 | 1996-07-02 | Directed Electronics, Inc. | Method of indicating the threat level of an incoming shock to an electronically secured vehicle and apparatus therefore |
US5798711A (en) | 1992-05-22 | 1998-08-25 | Directed Electronics, Inc. | High throughput embedded code hopping system with bypass mode |
US5990786A (en) | 1992-05-22 | 1999-11-23 | Issa; Darrell E. | Advanced method of indicating incoming threat level to an electronically secured vehicle and apparatus therefor |
US5646591A (en) | 1992-05-22 | 1997-07-08 | Directed Electronics, Inc. | Advanced method of indicating incoming threat level to an electronically secured vehicle and apparatus therefor |
US5900806A (en) | 1992-05-22 | 1999-05-04 | Issa; Darrell E. | Alarm sensor multiplexing |
US5783989A (en) | 1992-05-22 | 1998-07-21 | Issa; Darrell E. | Alarm sensor multiplexing |
US5534845A (en) | 1992-09-16 | 1996-07-09 | Issa; Darrell E. | Advanced automotive automation and security system |
DE4239962C1 (en) * | 1992-11-27 | 1994-07-21 | Erich Doering | Belt drive, especially for gate drives |
US5436610A (en) | 1992-12-14 | 1995-07-25 | Honeywell Inc. | System and method for transferring local alarm service monitoring on an overload basis |
US5471194A (en) | 1993-03-23 | 1995-11-28 | Aritech Corporation | Event detection system with centralized signal processing and dynamically adjustable detection threshold |
US20040160319A1 (en) | 1993-06-08 | 2004-08-19 | Joao Raymond Anthony | Control, monitoring and/or security apparatus and method |
US5557254A (en) | 1993-11-16 | 1996-09-17 | Mobile Security Communications, Inc. | Programmable vehicle monitoring and security system having multiple access verification devices |
CH686913A5 (en) | 1993-11-22 | 1996-07-31 | Cerberus Ag | Arrangement for early detection of fires. |
IL109601A (en) | 1994-05-09 | 1996-05-14 | Audiogard International Ltd | Device for the verification of an alarm |
US6094134A (en) | 1994-05-09 | 2000-07-25 | Audiogard International | Device for the verification of an alarm |
US5543783A (en) | 1994-05-20 | 1996-08-06 | Caddx-Caddi Controls, Inc. | Glass break detector and a method therefor |
IT1275549B (en) | 1994-07-16 | 1997-08-07 | Kiekert Ag | PROCEDURE FOR THE SURVEILLANCE OF THE INTERIOR SPACE OF A VEHICLE |
US5629687A (en) | 1994-08-29 | 1997-05-13 | Emergency Technologies, Inc. | Universal interface for remotely-monitored security systems |
US5818334A (en) | 1995-02-03 | 1998-10-06 | Simplex Time Recorder Company | Addressable devices with interface modules having electrically readable addresses |
US5917410A (en) | 1995-03-03 | 1999-06-29 | Digital Security Controls Ltd. | Glass break sensor |
US5675320A (en) | 1995-09-01 | 1997-10-07 | Digital Security Controls Ltd. | Glass break detector |
EP0744755A1 (en) | 1995-05-25 | 1996-11-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Test method and device for embedded memories on semiconductor substrates |
US6246322B1 (en) | 1995-12-26 | 2001-06-12 | Headwaters Research & Development, Inc. | Impulse characteristic responsive missing object locator operable in noisy environments |
US5917775A (en) | 1996-02-07 | 1999-06-29 | 808 Incorporated | Apparatus for detecting the discharge of a firearm and transmitting an alerting signal to a predetermined location |
US6090576A (en) | 1996-03-08 | 2000-07-18 | Connaught Laboratories Limited | DNA encoding a transferrin receptor of Moraxella |
US10152876B2 (en) | 1996-03-27 | 2018-12-11 | Gtj Ventures, Llc | Control, monitoring, and/or security apparatus and method |
US10011247B2 (en) | 1996-03-27 | 2018-07-03 | Gtj Ventures, Llc | Control, monitoring and/or security apparatus and method |
US6587046B2 (en) | 1996-03-27 | 2003-07-01 | Raymond Anthony Joao | Monitoring apparatus and method |
US5963662A (en) | 1996-08-07 | 1999-10-05 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Inspection system and method for bond detection and validation of surface mount devices |
US5815198A (en) | 1996-05-31 | 1998-09-29 | Vachtsevanos; George J. | Method and apparatus for analyzing an image to detect and identify defects |
US5914655A (en) | 1996-10-17 | 1999-06-22 | Senstar-Stellar Corporation | Self-compensating intruder detector system |
US5956424A (en) | 1996-12-23 | 1999-09-21 | Esco Electronics Corporation | Low false alarm rate detection for a video image processing based security alarm system |
US6078253A (en) * | 1997-02-04 | 2000-06-20 | Mytech Corporation | Occupancy sensor and method of operating same |
US6081193A (en) | 1997-07-30 | 2000-06-27 | Tecno Alarm Snc Di Trucchi Luciano E Negro Giovanni | Electronic intrusion detection system for monitored environments |
US6618074B1 (en) | 1997-08-01 | 2003-09-09 | Wells Fargo Alarm Systems, Inc. | Central alarm computer for video security system |
US6097429A (en) * | 1997-08-01 | 2000-08-01 | Esco Electronics Corporation | Site control unit for video security system |
US6091771A (en) * | 1997-08-01 | 2000-07-18 | Wells Fargo Alarm Services, Inc. | Workstation for video security system |
US6069655A (en) * | 1997-08-01 | 2000-05-30 | Wells Fargo Alarm Services, Inc. | Advanced video security system |
EP1010328B1 (en) | 1997-08-25 | 2002-06-12 | Digital Security Controls Ltd. | Video security system |
DE19744066B4 (en) | 1997-10-06 | 2008-06-26 | Knorr-Bremse Systeme für Nutzfahrzeuge GmbH | Method and device for detecting trailer operation in a motor vehicle |
US6759954B1 (en) * | 1997-10-15 | 2004-07-06 | Hubbell Incorporated | Multi-dimensional vector-based occupancy sensor and method of operating same |
US6313744B1 (en) | 1998-03-25 | 2001-11-06 | Simplex Time Recorder Company | Alarm system with individual alarm indicator testing |
US6437692B1 (en) | 1998-06-22 | 2002-08-20 | Statsignal Systems, Inc. | System and method for monitoring and controlling remote devices |
US7228429B2 (en) | 2001-09-21 | 2007-06-05 | E-Watch | Multimedia network appliances for security and surveillance applications |
US6970183B1 (en) * | 2000-06-14 | 2005-11-29 | E-Watch, Inc. | Multimedia surveillance and monitoring system including network configuration |
GB9822956D0 (en) | 1998-10-20 | 1998-12-16 | Vsd Limited | Smoke detection |
US6459370B1 (en) | 1998-11-03 | 2002-10-01 | Adt Services Ag | Method and apparatus for determining proper installation of alarm devices |
IT1305345B1 (en) | 1998-12-14 | 2001-05-04 | Meta System Spa | IMPROVEMENT IN BURGLAR ALARM SYSTEMS AGAINST FALSE ALARMS |
JP4386216B2 (en) | 1999-03-09 | 2009-12-16 | キヤノン株式会社 | Color printing system and control method thereof |
US6265971B1 (en) | 1999-04-09 | 2001-07-24 | Simplex Time Recorder Company | Fiber-sync communications channel |
US6281789B1 (en) | 1999-05-14 | 2001-08-28 | Simplex Time Recorder Company | Alarm system having improved control of notification appliances over common power lines |
US20030104822A1 (en) | 1999-07-06 | 2003-06-05 | Televoke Inc. | Location reporting system utilizing a voice interface |
US6810244B2 (en) | 1999-07-06 | 2004-10-26 | Telcontar | Method for synthesizing mobile identification numbers |
US6591094B1 (en) | 1999-07-06 | 2003-07-08 | Televoke, Inc. | Automated user notification system |
US6281790B1 (en) | 1999-09-01 | 2001-08-28 | Net Talon Security Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for remotely monitoring a site |
US6917288B2 (en) | 1999-09-01 | 2005-07-12 | Nettalon Security Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for remotely monitoring a site |
US6972676B1 (en) | 1999-09-01 | 2005-12-06 | Nettalon Security Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for remotely monitoring a site |
US6954859B1 (en) * | 1999-10-08 | 2005-10-11 | Axcess, Inc. | Networked digital security system and methods |
US6493687B1 (en) | 1999-12-18 | 2002-12-10 | Detection Systems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for detecting glass break |
US6633640B1 (en) | 2000-02-01 | 2003-10-14 | Avaya Technology Corp. | Methods and apparatus for analysis of load-balanced multi-site call processing systems |
US6567001B1 (en) | 2000-02-24 | 2003-05-20 | Simplex Time Recorder Co. | Fire control panel monitoring for degradation of wiring integrity during alarm state |
US6433683B1 (en) | 2000-02-28 | 2002-08-13 | Carl Robinson | Multipurpose wireless video alarm device and system |
WO2001069564A2 (en) * | 2000-03-13 | 2001-09-20 | Pittway Corporation | Integrated security and communications system with secure communications link |
US6975220B1 (en) | 2000-04-10 | 2005-12-13 | Radia Technologies Corporation | Internet based security, fire and emergency identification and communication system |
US7149774B2 (en) | 2000-06-02 | 2006-12-12 | Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation | Method of facilitating access to IP-based emergency services |
US6300872B1 (en) | 2000-06-20 | 2001-10-09 | Philips Electronics North America Corp. | Object proximity/security adaptive event detection |
US6411209B1 (en) * | 2000-12-06 | 2002-06-25 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus to select the best video frame to transmit to a remote station for CCTV based residential security monitoring |
CA2327847C (en) | 2000-12-07 | 2010-02-23 | Phasys Limited | System for transmitting and verifying alarm signals |
JP3699648B2 (en) * | 2000-12-20 | 2005-09-28 | 富士電機ホールディングス株式会社 | Noise monitoring system |
GB0102355D0 (en) | 2001-01-30 | 2001-03-14 | Mygard Plc | Security system |
US6563910B2 (en) | 2001-02-26 | 2003-05-13 | Royal Thoughts, Llc | Emergency response information distribution |
US20020135491A1 (en) | 2001-03-22 | 2002-09-26 | Simplex Time Recorder Co. | Electronically controlled multi-tone peripheral |
US6400265B1 (en) * | 2001-04-24 | 2002-06-04 | Microstrategy, Inc. | System and method for monitoring security systems by using video images |
US7082125B1 (en) | 2001-09-17 | 2006-07-25 | Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. | Communication model for linecard modems |
US20030120367A1 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2003-06-26 | Chang Matthew C.T. | System and method of monitoring audio signals |
US6778084B2 (en) | 2002-01-09 | 2004-08-17 | Chang Industry, Inc. | Interactive wireless surveillance and security system and associated method |
US7046985B2 (en) | 2002-04-02 | 2006-05-16 | Talk Emergency, Llc | Security system |
US10562492B2 (en) | 2002-05-01 | 2020-02-18 | Gtj Ventures, Llc | Control, monitoring and/or security apparatus and method |
US7093241B2 (en) | 2002-06-07 | 2006-08-15 | Intel Corporation | Method for eliminating redundant method calls in an object oriented program |
US7091832B1 (en) | 2002-06-14 | 2006-08-15 | Fonar, Inc. | Acoustic detection of machinery malfunction |
US6798344B2 (en) | 2002-07-08 | 2004-09-28 | James Otis Faulkner | Security alarm system and method with realtime streaming video |
US7171312B2 (en) | 2002-07-19 | 2007-01-30 | Smiths Detection, Inc. | Chemical and biological agent sensor array detectors |
US20040032491A1 (en) | 2002-08-15 | 2004-02-19 | Don Woody | Frame grabber for image processing in ingress/egress control system |
US20040155770A1 (en) | 2002-08-22 | 2004-08-12 | Nelson Carl V. | Audible alarm relay system |
KR100463786B1 (en) | 2002-09-16 | 2004-12-29 | 주식회사 오픈솔루션 | Apparatus and method for transmitting a wireless data through an adaptive selection of frequency |
ES2291707T3 (en) * | 2002-10-02 | 2008-03-01 | COMBUSTION SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, INC. | METHOD AND APPLIANCE TO INDICATE THE ACTIVATION OF AN ALARM OF A SMOKE DETECTOR. |
US20040135885A1 (en) | 2002-10-16 | 2004-07-15 | George Hage | Non-intrusive sensor and method |
US6890133B2 (en) | 2002-10-18 | 2005-05-10 | Irwin Industrial Tool Company | Stepped drill bit having split tip |
US20040086093A1 (en) | 2002-10-29 | 2004-05-06 | Schranz Paul Steven | VoIP security monitoring & alarm system |
KR20040065605A (en) | 2003-01-15 | 2004-07-23 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Home Appliance System |
US20040217847A1 (en) | 2003-01-24 | 2004-11-04 | Fries Robert G. | Wireless sensing system |
US20060132302A1 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2006-06-22 | Stilp Louis A | Power management of transponders and sensors in an RFID security network |
US7283048B2 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2007-10-16 | Ingrid, Inc. | Multi-level meshed security network |
US7091827B2 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2006-08-15 | Ingrid, Inc. | Communications control in a security system |
US6888459B2 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2005-05-03 | Louis A. Stilp | RFID based security system |
US7119658B2 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2006-10-10 | Ingrid, Inc. | Device enrollment in a security system |
US7079034B2 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2006-07-18 | Ingrid, Inc. | RFID transponder for a security system |
US7057512B2 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2006-06-06 | Ingrid, Inc. | RFID reader for a security system |
US7495544B2 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2009-02-24 | Ingrid, Inc. | Component diversity in a RFID security network |
US7532114B2 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2009-05-12 | Ingrid, Inc. | Fixed part-portable part communications network for a security network |
US7079020B2 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2006-07-18 | Ingrid, Inc. | Multi-controller security network |
US7053764B2 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2006-05-30 | Ingrid, Inc. | Controller for a security system |
US7777740B2 (en) | 2003-02-20 | 2010-08-17 | Binary Simplex, Inc. | Spatial decomposition methods using bit manipulation |
US7095321B2 (en) | 2003-04-14 | 2006-08-22 | American Power Conversion Corporation | Extensible sensor monitoring, alert processing and notification system and method |
US7436789B2 (en) | 2003-10-09 | 2008-10-14 | Sarnoff Corporation | Ad Hoc wireless node and network |
US7221260B2 (en) | 2003-11-21 | 2007-05-22 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Multi-sensor fire detectors with audio sensors and systems thereof |
US7109861B2 (en) | 2003-11-26 | 2006-09-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for alarm generation based on the detection of the presence of a person |
US20050128067A1 (en) | 2003-12-11 | 2005-06-16 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Automatic sensitivity adjustment on motion detectors in security system |
US7106193B2 (en) | 2003-12-23 | 2006-09-12 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Integrated alarm detection and verification device |
US7629880B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2009-12-08 | Ingrid, Inc. | System, method and device for detecting a siren |
US20050225634A1 (en) | 2004-04-05 | 2005-10-13 | Sam Brunetti | Closed circuit TV security system |
US7411490B2 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2008-08-12 | Infrasafe, Inc. | Security monitoring methodology using digital audio |
US7103176B2 (en) | 2004-05-13 | 2006-09-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Direct coupling of telephone volume control with remote microphone gain and noise cancellation |
US7378945B2 (en) * | 2004-05-27 | 2008-05-27 | Omega Patents, L.L.C. | Vehicle security system controlling vehicle body position and related methods |
US20050273831A1 (en) | 2004-06-03 | 2005-12-08 | Juda Slomovich | Video monitoring system |
US7315244B2 (en) | 2004-07-14 | 2008-01-01 | Carmichel Eric L | Excessive noise level alerting device |
WO2006026401A2 (en) | 2004-08-27 | 2006-03-09 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus to detect event signatures |
US8248226B2 (en) | 2004-11-16 | 2012-08-21 | Black & Decker Inc. | System and method for monitoring security at a premises |
US7391315B2 (en) | 2004-11-16 | 2008-06-24 | Sonitrol Corporation | System and method for monitoring security at a plurality of premises |
GB2422041B (en) | 2005-01-10 | 2006-12-27 | May And Scofield Ltd | Detection system and method for determining an alarm condition therein |
US20060176167A1 (en) | 2005-01-25 | 2006-08-10 | Laser Shield Systems, Inc. | Apparatus, system, and method for alarm systems |
US7323978B2 (en) | 2005-02-16 | 2008-01-29 | Ee Systems Group Inc. | False alarm reduction method and system |
US7203132B2 (en) | 2005-04-07 | 2007-04-10 | Safety Dynamics, Inc. | Real time acoustic event location and classification system with camera display |
-
2005
- 2005-11-08 US US11/269,380 patent/US8248226B2/en active Active
-
2006
- 2006-04-06 US US11/399,161 patent/US20060192668A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (99)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3074053A (en) * | 1960-03-01 | 1963-01-15 | American District Telegraph Co | Electrical system and method for protecting premises subject to varying ambient conditions |
US3437759A (en) * | 1965-10-21 | 1969-04-08 | George T Mckinzie | Burglar alarm device for detecting sounds in a protected area |
US3488436A (en) * | 1966-09-29 | 1970-01-06 | Sylvania Electric Prod | Intrusion detector control for closed circuit television system |
US3573817A (en) * | 1968-02-28 | 1971-04-06 | North American Rockwell | Monitoring system |
US4001771A (en) * | 1975-10-20 | 1977-01-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Intruder detecting security system |
US4249207A (en) * | 1979-02-20 | 1981-02-03 | Computing Devices Company | Perimeter surveillance system |
US4321593A (en) * | 1980-02-21 | 1982-03-23 | Ho Chi C | Television set with supervisory functions of alarming burglary and safe watching distance |
US4796025A (en) * | 1985-06-04 | 1989-01-03 | Simplex Time Recorder Co. | Monitor/control communication net with intelligent peripherals |
US4812820A (en) * | 1985-07-23 | 1989-03-14 | Chatwin Ian Malcolm | Electronic surveillance system and transceiver unit therefor |
US4728935A (en) * | 1986-04-11 | 1988-03-01 | Adt, Inc. | Integrity securing monitor and method for a security installation |
US4728936A (en) * | 1986-04-11 | 1988-03-01 | Adt, Inc. | Control and display system |
US4893328A (en) * | 1987-07-31 | 1990-01-09 | Microvoice Systems Corporation | Automated telephone operator overflow device |
US4821027A (en) * | 1987-09-14 | 1989-04-11 | Dicon Systems Limited | Voice interactive security system |
US5091780A (en) * | 1990-05-09 | 1992-02-25 | Carnegie-Mellon University | A trainable security system emthod for the same |
US5109278A (en) * | 1990-07-06 | 1992-04-28 | Commonwealth Edison Company | Auto freeze frame display for intrusion monitoring system |
US5398277A (en) * | 1992-02-06 | 1995-03-14 | Security Information Network, Inc. | Flexible multiprocessor alarm data processing system |
US5872519A (en) * | 1992-05-22 | 1999-02-16 | Directed Electronics, Inc. | Advanced embedded code hopping system |
US5406254A (en) * | 1992-11-25 | 1995-04-11 | Borg-Warner Security Corporation | Alarm system with remote module and associated alarm |
US6549130B1 (en) * | 1993-06-08 | 2003-04-15 | Raymond Anthony Joao | Control apparatus and method for vehicles and/or for premises |
US6542077B2 (en) * | 1993-06-08 | 2003-04-01 | Raymond Anthony Joao | Monitoring apparatus for a vehicle and/or a premises |
US5513244A (en) * | 1993-06-08 | 1996-04-30 | Joao; Raymond A. | Remote-controlled anti-theft, theft reporting, or vehicle recovery system and method for motor vehicles |
US6542076B1 (en) * | 1993-06-08 | 2003-04-01 | Raymond Anthony Joao | Control, monitoring and/or security apparatus and method |
US20030016130A1 (en) * | 1993-06-08 | 2003-01-23 | Raymond Anthony Joao | Control, monitoring and/or security apparatus and method |
US5886620A (en) * | 1993-09-24 | 1999-03-23 | Simplex Time Recorder Company | Building alarm system with synchronized strobes |
US20060017556A1 (en) * | 1993-09-24 | 2006-01-26 | Adt Services Ag | Building alarm system with synchronized strobes |
US7005971B2 (en) * | 1993-09-24 | 2006-02-28 | Adt Services Ag | Building alarm system with synchronized strobes |
US20040080401A1 (en) * | 1993-09-24 | 2004-04-29 | Adt Services Ag | Building alarm system with synchronized strobes |
US20060087421A1 (en) * | 1993-09-24 | 2006-04-27 | Adt Services Ag | Building alarm system with synchronized strobes |
US5736927A (en) * | 1993-09-29 | 1998-04-07 | Interactive Technologies, Inc. | Audio listen and voice security system |
US5506567A (en) * | 1993-10-07 | 1996-04-09 | Temic Telefunken Microelectronic Gmbh | Process for monitoring the openings to an enclosed space |
US5400011A (en) * | 1994-01-18 | 1995-03-21 | Knight Protective Industries, Inc. | Method and apparatus for enhancing remote audio monitoring in security systems |
US20030067541A1 (en) * | 1996-03-27 | 2003-04-10 | Joao Raymond Anthony | Monitoring apparatus and method |
US5862201A (en) * | 1996-09-12 | 1999-01-19 | Simplex Time Recorder Company | Redundant alarm monitoring system |
US6038289A (en) * | 1996-09-12 | 2000-03-14 | Simplex Time Recorder Co. | Redundant video alarm monitoring system |
US5862527A (en) * | 1996-10-17 | 1999-01-26 | Trevino; Hilario | Disposable surgical undergarment |
US6351214B2 (en) * | 1997-10-28 | 2002-02-26 | Pittway Corp. | Glass breakage detector |
US6369705B1 (en) * | 1997-12-04 | 2002-04-09 | Thom Kennedy | Alarm monitoring and reporting system |
US6363079B1 (en) * | 1997-12-31 | 2002-03-26 | At&T Corp. | Multifunction interface facility connecting wideband multiple access subscriber loops with various networks |
US6507790B1 (en) * | 1998-07-15 | 2003-01-14 | Horton, Inc. | Acoustic monitor |
US6218953B1 (en) * | 1998-10-14 | 2001-04-17 | Statsignal Systems, Inc. | System and method for monitoring the light level around an ATM |
US6028522A (en) * | 1998-10-14 | 2000-02-22 | Statsignal Systems, Inc. | System for monitoring the light level around an ATM |
US6538689B1 (en) * | 1998-10-26 | 2003-03-25 | Yu Wen Chang | Multi-residence monitoring using centralized image content processing |
US6335976B1 (en) * | 1999-02-26 | 2002-01-01 | Bomarc Surveillance, Inc. | System and method for monitoring visible changes |
US20020027504A1 (en) * | 1999-03-18 | 2002-03-07 | James Davis | System and method for controlling communication between a host computer and communication devices associated with remote devices in an automated monitoring system |
US6215404B1 (en) * | 1999-03-24 | 2001-04-10 | Fernando Morales | Network audio-link fire alarm monitoring system and method |
US6538570B1 (en) * | 1999-05-07 | 2003-03-25 | Honeywell International | Glass-break detector and method of alarm discrimination |
US6884818B1 (en) * | 1999-06-14 | 2005-04-26 | Fidia Farmaceutici S.P.A. | Pharmaceutical compositions containing 8-chloro-3 (β-diethylaminoethyl)-4-methyl-7-ethoxycarbonylmethoxy coumarin base and the salts thereof with cholesterol-lowering activity |
US6727811B1 (en) * | 1999-06-25 | 2004-04-27 | Gregory Fendis | Monitoring system |
US6529723B1 (en) * | 1999-07-06 | 2003-03-04 | Televoke, Inc. | Automated user notification system |
US7019633B1 (en) * | 1999-07-20 | 2006-03-28 | Adt Services Ag | Audio signal sound diffusion system |
US20030062997A1 (en) * | 1999-07-20 | 2003-04-03 | Naidoo Surendra N. | Distributed monitoring for a video security system |
US6690411B2 (en) * | 1999-07-20 | 2004-02-10 | @Security Broadband Corp. | Security system |
US7015806B2 (en) * | 1999-07-20 | 2006-03-21 | @Security Broadband Corporation | Distributed monitoring for a video security system |
US6693532B2 (en) * | 1999-11-10 | 2004-02-17 | Adt Services Ag | Alarm system having improved communication |
US20040036573A1 (en) * | 2000-01-12 | 2004-02-26 | The Chamberlain Group, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing access to a secure region |
US20020005894A1 (en) * | 2000-04-10 | 2002-01-17 | Foodman Bruce A. | Internet based emergency communication system |
US20020024424A1 (en) * | 2000-04-10 | 2002-02-28 | Burns T. D. | Civil defense alert system and method using power line communication |
US6507278B1 (en) * | 2000-06-28 | 2003-01-14 | Adt Security Services, Inc. | Ingress/egress control system for airport concourses and other access controlled areas |
US20020008886A1 (en) * | 2000-07-18 | 2002-01-24 | Hsm Holographic Systems Munchen Gmbh | Information Medium |
US6864789B2 (en) * | 2000-09-06 | 2005-03-08 | Red Wolf Technologies, Inc. | Personal property security device |
US6504479B1 (en) * | 2000-09-07 | 2003-01-07 | Comtrak Technologies Llc | Integrated security system |
US7016813B2 (en) * | 2000-09-28 | 2006-03-21 | Vigilos, Inc. | Method and process for configuring a premises for monitoring |
US20020040964A1 (en) * | 2000-10-05 | 2002-04-11 | Hsm Holographic Systems Munchen Gmbh | Moisture sensor |
US6690414B2 (en) * | 2000-12-12 | 2004-02-10 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus to reduce false alarms in exit/entrance situations for residential security monitoring |
US20040041694A1 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2004-03-04 | Fei Xie | Methods of recording voice signals in a mobile set |
US20040081322A1 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2004-04-29 | Michael Schliep | Method and arrangement for processing noise signal from a noise source |
US20030025599A1 (en) * | 2001-05-11 | 2003-02-06 | Monroe David A. | Method and apparatus for collecting, sending, archiving and retrieving motion video and still images and notification of detected events |
US20050012478A1 (en) * | 2001-06-28 | 2005-01-20 | Cooley Stephen Francis Gerard | Medical needle removal device |
US20030005326A1 (en) * | 2001-06-29 | 2003-01-02 | Todd Flemming | Method and system for implementing a security application services provider |
US20030072634A1 (en) * | 2001-09-19 | 2003-04-17 | K&R Corporation And Simplex Nails | Non-magnetic fastener with magnetic locking nail and two-stage hammer apparatus |
US6693530B1 (en) * | 2001-10-16 | 2004-02-17 | At&T Corp. | Home security administration platform |
US20050041734A1 (en) * | 2002-01-31 | 2005-02-24 | Walker Matthew D | Video coding |
US20040041910A1 (en) * | 2002-02-01 | 2004-03-04 | Naidoo Surendra N. | Lifestyle multimedia security system |
US20080048861A1 (en) * | 2002-02-01 | 2008-02-28 | Security Broadband Corp. | Lifestyle multimedia security system |
US6873256B2 (en) * | 2002-06-21 | 2005-03-29 | Dorothy Lemelson | Intelligent building alarm |
US7323980B2 (en) * | 2002-07-08 | 2008-01-29 | James Otis Faulkner | Security system and method with realtime imagery |
US20050068175A1 (en) * | 2002-07-08 | 2005-03-31 | Faulkner James Otis | Security system and method with realtime imagery |
US7034677B2 (en) * | 2002-07-19 | 2006-04-25 | Smiths Detection Inc. | Non-specific sensor array detectors |
US20040036596A1 (en) * | 2002-08-07 | 2004-02-26 | Steven Heffner | Security system and methods |
US20060025938A1 (en) * | 2002-09-24 | 2006-02-02 | Invensys Controls Uk Ltd | Diagnositc tool for an energy convesion appliance |
US20080001734A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2008-01-03 | Stilp Louis A | Portable telephone in a security network |
US7202789B1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2007-04-10 | Ingrid, Inc. | Clip for RFID transponder of a security network |
US7019639B2 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2006-03-28 | Ingrid, Inc. | RFID based security network |
US7023341B2 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2006-04-04 | Ingrid, Inc. | RFID reader for a security network |
US20050052285A1 (en) * | 2003-09-10 | 2005-03-10 | Yamaha Corporation | Communication system for remote sound monitoring with ambiguous signal processing |
US20050073411A1 (en) * | 2003-09-23 | 2005-04-07 | Walker Butler | Electronic wall using high-resolution millimeter-wave radar in conjunction with multiple plane reflectors and retroreflectors |
US7158026B2 (en) * | 2004-02-06 | 2007-01-02 | @Security Broadband Corp. | Security system configured to provide video and/or audio information to public or private safety personnel at a call center or other fixed or mobile emergency assistance unit |
US20070008125A1 (en) * | 2004-06-17 | 2007-01-11 | Smith Richard A | Method of eliminating impact/shock related false alarms in an acoustical glassbreak detector |
US20060017559A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-01-26 | Albert David E | Enhanced fire, safety, security and health monitoring and alarm response method, system and device |
US20060017558A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-01-26 | Albert David E | Enhanced fire, safety, security, and health monitoring and alarm response method, system and device |
US20060017561A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-01-26 | Albert David E | Enhanced fire, safety, security and health monitoring and alarm response method, system and device |
US20060017579A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-01-26 | Innovalarm Corporation | Acoustic alert communication system with enhanced signal to noise capabilities |
US20060022816A1 (en) * | 2004-07-30 | 2006-02-02 | Mitsuhiko Yukawa | Home security system |
US20060028334A1 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2006-02-09 | Honeywell International, Inc. | False alarm reduction in security systems using weather sensor and control panel logic |
US20060056386A1 (en) * | 2004-09-01 | 2006-03-16 | Scott Stogel | Method and system for computer based intercom control and management |
US20060049934A1 (en) * | 2004-09-07 | 2006-03-09 | Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation | Methods and systems for utilizing a data network for the communication of emergency alerts |
US20060072737A1 (en) * | 2004-10-05 | 2006-04-06 | Jonathan Paden | Dynamic load balancing between multiple locations with different telephony system |
US20080036593A1 (en) * | 2006-08-04 | 2008-02-14 | The Government Of The Us, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Volume sensor: data fusion-based, multi-sensor system for advanced damage control |
US20080043987A1 (en) * | 2006-08-15 | 2008-02-21 | Adam Waalkes | System and method for balancing agent console load during automated call processing |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8248226B2 (en) | 2004-11-16 | 2012-08-21 | Black & Decker Inc. | System and method for monitoring security at a premises |
US7986228B2 (en) | 2007-09-05 | 2011-07-26 | Stanley Convergent Security Solutions, Inc. | System and method for monitoring security at a premises using line card |
US8531286B2 (en) | 2007-09-05 | 2013-09-10 | Stanley Convergent Security Solutions, Inc. | System and method for monitoring security at a premises using line card with secondary communications channel |
US20100328084A1 (en) * | 2009-06-29 | 2010-12-30 | General Electric Company | System and method for detecting lightning |
CN101937025A (en) * | 2009-06-29 | 2011-01-05 | 通用电气公司 | Be used to detect the system and method for thunder and lightning |
US8427333B2 (en) * | 2009-06-29 | 2013-04-23 | General Electric Company | System and method for detecting lightning |
US10586205B2 (en) | 2015-12-30 | 2020-03-10 | Walmart Apollo, Llc | Apparatus and method for monitoring stock information in a shopping space |
WO2018057681A1 (en) * | 2016-09-22 | 2018-03-29 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | Systems and methods for monitoring conditions on shelves |
GB2569254A (en) * | 2016-09-22 | 2019-06-12 | Walmart Apollo Llc | Systems and methods for monitoring conditions on shelves |
US10586206B2 (en) * | 2016-09-22 | 2020-03-10 | Walmart Apollo, Llc | Systems and methods for monitoring conditions on shelves |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20060104312A1 (en) | 2006-05-18 |
US8248226B2 (en) | 2012-08-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8248226B2 (en) | System and method for monitoring security at a premises | |
US7391315B2 (en) | System and method for monitoring security at a plurality of premises | |
US20200258375A1 (en) | System and method for alarm signaling during alarm system destruction | |
US7015806B2 (en) | Distributed monitoring for a video security system | |
US9300921B2 (en) | Video security systems and methods | |
US8531286B2 (en) | System and method for monitoring security at a premises using line card with secondary communications channel | |
US8520068B2 (en) | Video security system | |
US7228429B2 (en) | Multimedia network appliances for security and surveillance applications | |
US7633388B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for interfacing security systems by periodic check in with remote facility | |
US20060271695A1 (en) | System for remote secured operation, monitoring and control of security and other types of events | |
US11158174B2 (en) | Security system with distributed audio and video sources | |
KR100591380B1 (en) | Integrated management system which provides prompt action to urgent conditions | |
JP2005208878A (en) | Security system | |
US20210209932A1 (en) | Establishing an audio/video link to a central monitoring station | |
JP2004054400A (en) | Security device and security system | |
JP2001307238A (en) | System for preventing crime and method for detecting cutting sound | |
JP2004029998A (en) | Information apparatus, electrical information appliance for domestic use, information system using the same, control method therefor and program | |
JP2002367059A (en) | Transfer type security system | |
JP2002183852A (en) | Security system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SONITROL CORPORATION, FLORIDA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FRIAR, GARY;REEL/FRAME:022001/0842 Effective date: 20060111 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC., ILLIN Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:SONITROL CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:022460/0866 Effective date: 20080927 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |