US20070145183A1 - A device for assisting an airplane in intercepting a segment of a flight path utilizing positional and ground speed indicators - Google Patents
A device for assisting an airplane in intercepting a segment of a flight path utilizing positional and ground speed indicators Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070145183A1 US20070145183A1 US10/723,064 US72306403A US2007145183A1 US 20070145183 A1 US20070145183 A1 US 20070145183A1 US 72306403 A US72306403 A US 72306403A US 2007145183 A1 US2007145183 A1 US 2007145183A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- flight path
- airplane
- indicator
- flight
- symbol
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 14
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- RZVHIXYEVGDQDX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 9,10-anthraquinone Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(=O)C3=CC=CC=C3C(=O)C2=C1 RZVHIXYEVGDQDX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004807 localization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
- G01C23/00—Combined instruments indicating more than one navigational value, e.g. for aircraft; Combined measuring devices for measuring two or more variables of movement, e.g. distance, speed or acceleration
- G01C23/005—Flight directors
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
- G01C21/00—Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00
- G01C21/10—Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00 by using measurements of speed or acceleration
- G01C21/12—Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00 by using measurements of speed or acceleration executed aboard the object being navigated; Dead reckoning
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
- G05D1/02—Control of position or course in two dimensions
- G05D1/0202—Control of position or course in two dimensions specially adapted to aircraft
Definitions
- This invention concerns a device for assistance with interception by an aircraft for a flight path segment located in a horizontal plane, and a system for assistance with the interception and follow-up of such a segment.
- the precision required to follow an intercepted flight path varies along said flight path. Accordingly, the flight path monitoring accuracy is far greater during final approach than during cruise flight phases.
- the pilot following the current flight phase must make various selections and gather appropriate flight path deviation information to follow at various positions of the display screen (and even on two different screen pages), which information is generally presented using different formalisms.
- This invention concerns a device assisting with interception by an aircraft of a flight path segment located in a horizontal plane designed to remedy these drawbacks.
- said device assisting with interception by an aircraft of a flight path segment located in a horizontal plane, said device being brought abroad the aircraft and including:
- the initial resources first means determine at least one ground speed vector representative of the speed of the aircraft with respect to the ground and in that said initial resources first display means are liable to present, in addition, on said display screen:
- the pilot is given graphic information supplying him both with the real direction towards which the aircraft is moving and a first estimation of the ground speed vector module at which it is moving.
- this indication offers the advantage of being displayed close to a screen position used by the pilot a great deal during the pre-defined flight path interception/monitoring phase, i.e., said first symbol indicating the current position of the aircraft.
- said first means of display present the second means of indication on said display screen only:
- the pilot has synthetic graphic information giving him the future rectilinear interception flight path if he continues to fly with the same current ground speed vector (module and direction). As soon as the ground speed vector varies, said graphic information is updated in real time.
- said circle arc of the third means of indication includes a radius depending on the speed of the aircraft and/or the aircraft capacities. Furthermore, said circle arc may be deformed to allow for the intensity and direction of the wind.
- the pilot has synthetic graphic information supplying him with the future turn to be made to intercept with and align on the flight path if the aircraft continues to fly along the same ground speed vector (module and direction).
- said interception assistance device includes, in addition, second means for detecting an obstacle and the first means of display are liable to present, in addition, on said display screen, at least a second symbol illustrating the position of said obstacle in said horizontal plane.
- This invention also concerns an on-board system for assistance with the interception and monitoring by an aircraft of a flight path segment located in a horizontal plane.
- said system is outstanding remarkable in that it includes:
- said flight path monitoring assistance device includes:
- the size of the fixed scale remains constant thanks to the automatic adjustment of the proportion between the real deviation and its representation on the display screen. Accordingly, whatever the aircraft flight phase, the fixed scale preserves the same size on the display screen.
- said second means of display will also present on said display screen a sixth means of indicating a change in flight path segment to follow.
- said second means of display will present on said display screen a seventh means of indicating the lateral velocity tendency.
- said first display means for the device providing interception assistance and said second means of display of the second monitoring assistance device will be part of one and the same display unit.
- system in accordance with the invention will also include means of transmitting information liable to connect said first means of said interception aid device and said third means of said monitoring aid device to an aircraft acceptance autopilot for the transmission of information. Accordingly, all the data generated by the first and third means can be transmitted to an autopilot, which deals with automatic aircraft guidance.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system conforming to the invention.
- FIG. 2 illustrates the information displayed by means of an interception aid device conforming to the invention.
- FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a particular case of interception.
- FIG. 4 illustrates the information displayed by means of a monitoring aid device conforming to the invention.
- FIG. 5 is a schematic view of the various flight phases with the corresponding required flight details.
- FIGS. 6 to 19 illustrate the various displays possible using a monitoring aid device conforming to the invention.
- FIGS. 20 to 26 illustrate the various steps involved in the interception and monitoring of a flight path.
- Device 1 conforming to the invention is intended to assist with the interception by an aircraft of a flight path segment T located in a horizontal plane.
- This device 1 may be part of a system 2 conforming to the invention and represented schematically in FIG. 1 , designed to assist with the interception and monitoring by an aircraft of a flight path segment of this type.
- said system 2 carried on the aircraft includes:
- device 1 for interception aid includes:
- Said means of display 5 include, in a customary manner:
- said means 4 determine at least one ground speed vector representative of the ground speed, i.e., the speed of the aircraft with respect to the ground and said display means 5 , liable to appear on said display screen 6 , in addition to the aforementioned indications and as represented in FIG. 2 .
- rectilinear sections 11 and 13 of circle arc 15 have been depicted using different lines (broken) so as to provide a clear distinction. In practice they can, however, be continuous and be differentiated, for instance, using different colors.
- this indication offers the advantage of being displayed near a screen position used specifically by the pilot during the interception and monitoring phase of a pre-defined flight path, i.e., said symbol 7 , indicating the current position of the aircraft.
- the means of display 5 present said means of indication 12 on said display screen 6 only:
- the means of display 5 will not display said means of indication 12 .
- the pilot is given synthetic graphic information supplying him with the future rectilinear interception flight path if he continues to fly with the same ground speed vector (module and direction).
- circle arc 15 of means of indication 14 includes a radius R depending on the speed of the aircraft and/or the aircraft capacities.
- the interception turn is calculated to the benefit of a rounded form, therefore without any overshoot of the flight path over segment S 3 of the flight path to be intercepted unless the pilot has first chosen this option, or if the maneuver to be carried out by the pilot necessarily involves an overshoot (for instance because the aircraft is too close to segment S 3 to be intercepted). Accordingly, in the case of a flight path overshoot, the final circle arc 15 will be replaced by circle arcs 15 A and 15 B tangents in twos, as represented in FIG. 3 two circle arcs 15 A and 15 B (the arrows F indicate the direction of flight).
- circle arc 15 or circle arcs 15 A and 15 B can be deformed to allow both for the intensity of the wind and its direction.
- said means of display 5 present said means of indication 14 on said display screen 6 only:
- the means of display 5 will not display said means of indication 14 .
- the pilot has synthetic graphic information supplying him with the future turn to be made to intercept and align on said flight path segment S 3 , if the aircraft continues to fly at the same current ground speed vector (module and direction). As soon as the ground speed vector varies, said graphic information will be updated in real time.
- said interception assistance device 1 will include, in addition, means 16 for detecting an obstacle (natural or man-made) and said display means 5 are liable to present, in addition, on said display screen 6 , at least one symbol 17 ( FIG. 2 ) illustrating the position of at least the nearest obstacle in said horizontal plane.
- the means of indication color 10 changes and, for instance, changes to amber or red.
- system 2 includes, in addition to device 1 for interception assistance specified above, a device 3 assisting with flight path follow-up.
- said device 3 assisting with flight path follow-up includes:
- Said fixed scale 20 is of a constant size in all the flight phases thanks to the automatic adjustment of the proportions between the real distances and their representation on display screen 6 .
- This adjustment of the proportion takes into consideration the real and variable width of a basic corridor 26 relative to the required flight accuracy along flight path T to be followed and the variable form of the limits of said corridor 26 .
- the required follow-up precision is variable throughout the length of flight path T. For instance, the required flight path monitoring precision is naturally far greater during final approach than during a cruising phase.
- the means of indication 22 includes a longitudinal straight-line segment 23 ( FIG. 10 ), the width of which does not vary on display screen 6 .
- This straight-line segment 23 represents a lateral distance deviation cursor, which moves horizontally between two variable limits of scale 20 in proportion to the current lateral deviation (effective) generated by means 18 .
- the sensitivity of this cursor is therefore also variable. For instance, it is more emphatic during the approach phase, which requires greater accuracy than during the cruise phase.
- this straight-line segment or cursor 23 passes exactly below symbol 7 illustrating the aircraft.
- this lateral distance deviation cursor 23 may be inclined in the direction of the turn ( FIG. 11 ).
- means of indication 22 When means of indication 22 reaches the limit (right or left) of corridor 26 relative to the required flight accuracy, whatever the current flight phase, it continues to be displayed but its representation is modified. For instance, it is plotted as dotted lines ( FIG. 12 for a left limit and FIG. 13 for a right limit), whereas it is in a continuous line in all the other cases (although for the understanding of the illustration and ease of discrimination of said means of indication 22 , the latter is shown in dotted lines in all the figures).
- This limit case must be consecutive to the display of excessive lateral deviation chevrons 25 because the graphic scale of the visual guide is adjusted constantly so that corridor 26 relative to the required horizontal real flight precision either side of the aircraft is fully displayed.
- said means of display 5 also offer on display screen 6 , a means of indicating a change of flight path segment to be followed.
- it will concern straight segment 23 which in this case will flash.
- the chevrons 25 appear as flashing at a fixed scale 20 whatever the current flight phase and as soon as the aircraft moves too close to the lateral limits (right or left) of corridor 26 relative to the required flight precision. Accordingly, if the pilot persists in moving horizontally away from the set flight path, the symbology relative to device 3 providing assistance with follow-up and chevrons 25 will finally disappear. The pilot will then be obliged to use the interception assistance device 1 if he wishes to join the flight path T he has left (at any point).
- chevrons 25 are plotted between two successive circles 21 if said same fixed scale 20 is made up of four circles 21 , as is the case of flight phases Ph 1 , Ph 2 and Ph 4 ( FIGS. 16 and 17 for excessive deviations respectively towards the right and towards the left).
- Said means of display 5 also present, on said display screen 6 , a means of indication 28 of the lateral speed tendency.
- This means of indication 28 shown for instance in FIG. 18 , includes a horizontal segment 29 A connected to aircraft symbol 7 , terminating in a vertical segment 29 B (or a perpendicular arrow point, pointing towards fixed scale 20 for the lateral deviation).
- This means of indication 28 corresponds to the derived drifting of the current lateral deviation and, in real time, [[peak]] points to the next lateral distance with respect to the flight path, as it will be here, of a particular and predetermined duration.
- the process of intercepting a flight path T in the horizontal plane and its follow-up is carried out accurately and efficiently according to the four following steps E 1 to E 4 .
- the aircraft has abandoned following flight path T 1 comprising three segments S 1 , S 2 and S 3 while it was directed towards a point P 2 . Then, the pilot wishes to reintegrate the following up of flight path T 1 at a point P 5 . To do this, the pilot directs the aircraft (ground speed vector) towards this point P 5 . In this case, it will be seen that device 1 may report to it that the approach flight path TR is unsuitable for two reasons:
- the pilot modifies the route of his aircraft so that the point of conflict with the ground (or the obstacle) disappears and/or slows down by reducing the ground speed module to eliminate the flight path overrun; an interception turn at a pre-defined factor appears at the end of the display on device 1 .
- the approach flight path TR converges towards the same segment S 3 , but at a point P 6 ( FIG. 22 ) further downstream that point P 5 . Accordingly, in the two aforementioned cases, the pilot will have been able to see and act early to adjust the approach and then his interception turn.
- System 2 conforming to the invention guides the pilot into flight path T 2 ( FIG. 25 ) by means of device 3 . To do this, the pilot simply needs to cancel the lateral deviation and bring cursor 23 for the lateral deviation under symbol 7 of the aircraft ( FIG. 26 ). Device 3 also reminds the pilot that he is in the final approach phase at point P 4 and that the scale sensitivity is therefore maximum so that he can fly accurately in the horizontal plane.
- System 2 conforming to the invention also includes means of display 5 , means 4 , 16 and 18 as mentioned above, including, as shown in FIG. 1 :
- aforementioned means 30 , 31 , 34 and 35 are sufficient to supply secure guidance information needed by the aircraft autopilot 37 , in this case the information allows [[he]] the interception and then the follow-up of the flight path.
- all the data generated by the approach and follow-up flight path calculator 34 can be exported by the customary means of transmission 37 to an autopilot 36 in such a way that the latter can then fly the aircraft automatically.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
- Navigation (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- This invention concerns a device for assistance with interception by an aircraft for a flight path segment located in a horizontal plane, and a system for assistance with the interception and follow-up of such a segment.
- 2. Description of Related Art
- In general, when an aircraft pilot, for instance flying a helicopter, wishes to intercept a flight path in the horizontal plane, he has to perform the following operations:
-
- identify the flight path part (segment) to be reached, and take a heading for its interception allowing for the effect of wind, if known;
- anticipate the turning of the aircraft to join the flight path without overshoot, depending on the speed of the aircraft and the angle of interception; and
- ensure that the interception flight path is reliable with respect to ground and any nearby obstacles.
- The precision required to follow an intercepted flight path, including a multitude of segments, varies along said flight path. Accordingly, the flight path monitoring accuracy is far greater during final approach than during cruise flight phases.
- It is known that the pilot in the approach phase in a horizontal plane uses ILS (Indicator Landing System) type information, displayed by dedicated symbology of varying sensitivity, which is constantly increasing as the aircraft approaches the touchdown point. Conversely, during the cruise phase, in order to provide sufficient accuracy, a flight path segment monitoring procedure in the horizontal plane requires the pilot to select the most appropriate scale at a given moment, so as to comply with the required precision and/or use flight path deviation digital information combined with another dedicated symbology, for instance an [[HSI]] HSI (Horizontal Situation Indicator).
- Accordingly, the pilot following the current flight phase must make various selections and gather appropriate flight path deviation information to follow at various positions of the display screen (and even on two different screen pages), which information is generally presented using different formalisms.
- Furthermore, during the periods of intense workload encountered by the pilot, omitting to modify a scale can have damaging consequences. Indeed, the pilot may believe erroneously that the aircraft is properly aligned on the flight path to follow whereas, in reality, the selected scale is too large.
- Finally, in order to accomplish with satisfactory accuracy, the complete procedure demands a great deal of know-how and also intense attention and activity (high workload) throughout the interception and follow-up duration. Note that organization and dosing difficulties are essentially due to the fact that the customary instruments and/or symbologies used are not organized to present an obvious synthesis of the effective situation.
- This invention concerns a device assisting with interception by an aircraft of a flight path segment located in a horizontal plane designed to remedy these drawbacks.
- Indeed, according to the invention, said device assisting with interception by an aircraft of a flight path segment located in a horizontal plane, said device being brought abroad the aircraft and including:
-
- initial resources first means for determining the values of the aircraft parameters; and
- initial first display resources means to present on at least one display screen:
- at least said flight path segment in the horizontal plane to be intercepted; and
- an initial a first symbol illustrating the position of the aircraft in the horizontal plane with respect to said flight path,
- is outstanding remarkable in that the initial resources first means determine at least one ground speed vector representative of the speed of the aircraft with respect to the ground and in that said initial resources first display means are liable to present, in addition, on said display screen:
-
- a first means of indicating the ground speed corresponding to a first rectilinear section in said horizontal plane, connected to said symbol whose angular orientation corresponds to the direction of said ground speed vector and whose length:
- is proportional to the ground speed vector module when said ground speed is greater than a predetermined value; and
- is fixed and proportional to the module of said predetermined value when said ground speed is less than or equal to this predetermined value;
- a second means of interception approach indication, corresponding to a second rectilinear section in said horizontal plane, in the direction of said flight path segment to be intercepted and whose length adjusts automatically so that said second rectilinear section extends at one of its ends, said first rectilinear section and at the other of its ends, a third means of indication; and
- said third means of interception turn indication, corresponding to a curve portion including at least one circle arc in said horizontal plane, one end of said curve portion extending at a tangent into second rectilinear section and, at the other end, connected at a tangent to said flight path to be intercepted.
- a first means of indicating the ground speed corresponding to a first rectilinear section in said horizontal plane, connected to said symbol whose angular orientation corresponds to the direction of said ground speed vector and whose length:
- All this graphic information forms the flight path interception path which ends, if there is no flight path overshoot, in an interception turn (circle arc more or less deformed to allow for wind effect) in the horizontal plane. This graphic representation enables the pilot to see and act early enough to adjust his approach, then his interception turn. This results in a gain in terms of efficiency and availability because, in particular, it relieves the pilot of the need to release the controls.
- In addition, thanks to the first means of indication, the pilot is given graphic information supplying him both with the real direction towards which the aircraft is moving and a first estimation of the ground speed vector module at which it is moving. In addition, this indication offers the advantage of being displayed close to a screen position used by the pilot a great deal during the pre-defined flight path interception/monitoring phase, i.e., said first symbol indicating the current position of the aircraft.
- In an advantageous embodiment, said first means of display present the second means of indication on said display screen only:
-
- if a segment of the flight path is in the direction of said first rectilinear section of first indication resources means; and
- if this segment is at a distance less than a predetermined distance with respect to said first rectilinear section[[,]].
- Thanks to said second means of indication, the pilot has synthetic graphic information giving him the future rectilinear interception flight path if he continues to fly with the same current ground speed vector (module and direction). As soon as the ground speed vector varies, said graphic information is updated in real time.
- In addition, in an advantageous embodiment, said circle arc of the third means of indication includes a radius depending on the speed of the aircraft and/or the aircraft capacities. Furthermore, said circle arc may be deformed to allow for the intensity and direction of the wind.
- Furthermore, in an advantageous embodiment,
-
- if a flight path segment is in the direction of said second rectilinear section of the second indication resource means;
- if this segment is located at a distance less than a predetermined distance from said second rectilinear section; and
- if the flight plan requirements make an interception maneuver possible.
- Thanks to the third means of indication resource, the pilot has synthetic graphic information supplying him with the future turn to be made to intercept with and align on the flight path if the aircraft continues to fly along the same ground speed vector (module and direction).
- In one specific embodiment, said interception assistance device includes, in addition, second means for detecting an obstacle and the first means of display are liable to present, in addition, on said display screen, at least a second symbol illustrating the position of said obstacle in said horizontal plane.
- This invention also concerns an on-board system for assistance with the interception and monitoring by an aircraft of a flight path segment located in a horizontal plane. According to the invention, said system is outstanding remarkable in that it includes:
-
- an interception aid device as specified above; and
- a flight path follow-up aid device.
- In addition, according to the invention, said flight path monitoring assistance device includes:
-
- third means of determining:
- a lateral deviation of the aircraft from a segment of the flight path in the horizontal plane; and
- lateral margins tolerated either side-of said flight path segment in the horizontal plane; and
- second means of display liable to appear on the display screen:
- a fixed (immobile) lateral deviation scale;
- a fourth means of effective lateral deviation indication corresponding to a straight line segment provided for on said scale and illustrating the effective lateral deviation of the aircraft from the flight path segment to be followed; and
- a fifth means of indicating excessive lateral deviation appearing on said scale when the aircraft approaches at a predetermined distance, one of said lateral margins.
- third means of determining:
- In an advantageous embodiment, the size of the fixed scale remains constant thanks to the automatic adjustment of the proportion between the real deviation and its representation on the display screen. Accordingly, whatever the aircraft flight phase, the fixed scale preserves the same size on the display screen.
- In addition, in an advantageous embodiment:
-
- said straight line segment of said fourth means of indication is inclinable; extraordinary; and/or
- when said fourth means of indication reaches its stop, it changes form and remains at the stop; and/or
- said fifth means of indication is flashing.
- To assist with the interception of a flight path including a multitude of segments, advantageously, said second means of display will also present on said display screen a sixth means of indicating a change in flight path segment to follow.
- In addition, advantageously, said second means of display will present on said display screen a seventh means of indicating the lateral velocity tendency.
- In a simplified and preferred embodiment, said first display means for the device providing interception assistance and said second means of display of the second monitoring assistance device will be part of one and the same display unit.
- Furthermore, the system in accordance with the invention will also include means of transmitting information liable to connect said first means of said interception aid device and said third means of said monitoring aid device to an aircraft acceptance autopilot for the transmission of information. Accordingly, all the data generated by the first and third means can be transmitted to an autopilot, which deals with automatic aircraft guidance.
- The figures of the attached illustration provide a clear understanding of how the invention can be accomplished. In these figures, identical references designate similar items.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system conforming to the invention. -
FIG. 2 illustrates the information displayed by means of an interception aid device conforming to the invention. -
FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a particular case of interception. -
FIG. 4 illustrates the information displayed by means of a monitoring aid device conforming to the invention. -
FIG. 5 is a schematic view of the various flight phases with the corresponding required flight details. - FIGS. 6 to 19 illustrate the various displays possible using a monitoring aid device conforming to the invention.
- FIGS. 20 to 26 illustrate the various steps involved in the interception and monitoring of a flight path.
-
Device 1 conforming to the invention is intended to assist with the interception by an aircraft of a flight path segment T located in a horizontal plane. Thisdevice 1 may be part of asystem 2 conforming to the invention and represented schematically inFIG. 1 , designed to assist with the interception and monitoring by an aircraft of a flight path segment of this type. To this end, saidsystem 2 carried on the aircraft includes: -
-
interception aid device 1; and - flight path
monitoring aid device 3.
-
- In a known manner,
device 1 for interception aid includes: -
- means 4 for determining the values of the aircraft parameters; and
- display means 5 for presenting, on at least one basic display screen 6, as shown in
FIG. 2 :- at least said segment S3 to be intercepted on flight path T. Flight path T includes, in the horizontal plane, a multitude of rectilinear segments S1, S2, S3 and S4, connected together or limited by points P1, P2, P3, P4;
- and
-
- a
symbol 7 illustrating the position of the aircraft in the horizontal plane with respect to said flight path T.
- a
- Said means of
display 5 include, in a customary manner: -
- a
digital calculator 8 ensuring the transformation of the physical data received by resources means 4 into data adapted to display on the screen; and - a
symbol generator 9 or a plotter, capable of materializing on display screen 6, from the data supplied byconversion calculator 8, graphic characteristics of the presentation of the information as specified and envisaged in the following.
- a
- According to the invention, said means 4 determine at least one ground speed vector representative of the ground speed, i.e., the speed of the aircraft with respect to the ground and said display means 5, liable to appear on said display screen 6, in addition to the aforementioned indications and as represented in
FIG. 2 . -
- a means of
indication 10 giving the ground speed corresponding to a firstrectilinear section 11 in said horizontal plane which is connected to saidsymbol 7 and whose angular orientation corresponds to the direction of said ground speed vector, and whose length:- is proportional to the ground speed vector module when said ground speed is greater than a predetermined value; and
- is fixed and proportional to the module of said predetermined value when said ground speed is less than or equal to said predetermined value.
- [[A]] a means of
interception approach indication 12 corresponding to a secondrectilinear section 13 in said horizontal plane towards said flight path segment S3 to be intercepted, and whose length is adjusted automatically so that the secondrectilinear section 13 extends at one of its ends said firstrectilinear section 11, and that the other of its ends, an indication resource means 14; and - said means of
interception turn indication 14, corresponding to a portion of the curve including at least acircle arc 15 in said horizontal plane, one end of said curve portion extending at a tangent said sectionrectilinear section 13 and at the other end, connected at a tangent to said flight path segment S3 to be intercepted.
- a means of
- To make the drawing more understandable,
rectilinear sections circle arc 15 have been depicted using different lines (broken) so as to provide a clear distinction. In practice they can, however, be continuous and be differentiated, for instance, using different colors. - Thanks to said means of
indication 10, the pilot is given graphic information supplying him with both the real direction towards which the aircraft is moving and a initial first estimation of the ground speed vector module at which the aircraft is moving. In addition, this indication offers the advantage of being displayed near a screen position used specifically by the pilot during the interception and monitoring phase of a pre-defined flight path, i.e., saidsymbol 7, indicating the current position of the aircraft. - The means of
display 5 present said means ofindication 12 on said display screen 6 only: - a) if a segment S1, S2, S3 of flight path T is in the direction of the first
rectilinear section 11 of the indication means 10; and - b) if this segment S1, S2, S3 (segment 53 in general in
FIG. 2 ) is at a distance less than a predetermined distance with respect to said firstrectilinear section 11. - Conversely, if at least one of the two previous conditions a) and b) is not fulfilled, the means of
display 5 will not display said means ofindication 12. - Thanks to said means of
indication 12, the pilot is given synthetic graphic information supplying him with the future rectilinear interception flight path if he continues to fly with the same ground speed vector (module and direction). - Furthermore,
circle arc 15 of means ofindication 14 includes a radius R depending on the speed of the aircraft and/or the aircraft capacities. - By default, the interception turn is calculated to the benefit of a rounded form, therefore without any overshoot of the flight path over segment S3 of the flight path to be intercepted unless the pilot has first chosen this option, or if the maneuver to be carried out by the pilot necessarily involves an overshoot (for instance because the aircraft is too close to segment S3 to be intercepted). Accordingly, in the case of a flight path overshoot, the
final circle arc 15 will be replaced by circle arcs 15A and 15B tangents in twos, as represented inFIG. 3 two circle arcs 15A and 15B (the arrows F indicate the direction of flight). - It should be noted that in the presence of wind,
circle arc 15 or circle arcs 15A and 15B can be deformed to allow both for the intensity of the wind and its direction. - Furthermore, said means of
display 5 present said means ofindication 14 on said display screen 6 only: - α) if a segment S3 of flight path T is in the direction of said second
rectilinear section 13 of the means of indication 12[[.]]; - β) if said segment S3 is located at a distance less than a predetermined distance compared to the second
rectilinear section 13; and - γ) if the demands of the flight path render an interception maneuver possible.
- Conversely, if at least one of the three previous conditions α), β) and γ) is not realized, the means of
display 5 will not display said means ofindication 14. - Thanks to said means of
indication 14, the pilot has synthetic graphic information supplying him with the future turn to be made to intercept and align on said flight path segment S3, if the aircraft continues to fly at the same current ground speed vector (module and direction). As soon as the ground speed vector varies, said graphic information will be updated in real time. - In one specific embodiment, said
interception assistance device 1 will include, in addition, means 16 for detecting an obstacle (natural or man-made) and said display means 5 are liable to present, in addition, on said display screen 6, at least one symbol 17 (FIG. 2 ) illustrating the position of at least the nearest obstacle in said horizontal plane. - It is also possible during interference with the relief (information supplied by a field module hosted, for instance, by a mapping calculator, a GCAS (Ground Collision Avoidance System) or with a detected obstacle (detection for instance by radar, laser) that the means of
indication color 10 changes and, for instance, changes to amber or red. - Furthermore, as indicated previously,
system 2 includes, in addition todevice 1 for interception assistance specified above, adevice 3 assisting with flight path follow-up. - According to the invention, said
device 3 assisting with flight path follow-up includes: -
- means 18 for determining a lateral deviation of the aircraft from a flight path segment S3 in the horizontal plane and the tolerated lateral margins either side of said flight path segment S3; and
- said means of
display 5 that are liable to present, on the display screen 6 as represented inFIG. 4 :- a fixed (immobile)
lateral deviation scale 20 provided withmarkers 21, for instance circles; - an effective means of
lateral deviation indication 22 corresponding to astraight line segment 23 on saidscale 20 and illustrating the effective lateral deviation of the aircraft compared to flight path segment S3 to be followed; and - a means of indicating excessive
lateral deviation 24 includingchevrons 25 appearing at saidscale 20 when the aircraft approaches, at a predetermined distance, one of said lateral margins.
- a fixed (immobile)
- Said fixed
scale 20 is of a constant size in all the flight phases thanks to the automatic adjustment of the proportions between the real distances and their representation on display screen 6. This adjustment of the proportion takes into consideration the real and variable width of abasic corridor 26 relative to the required flight accuracy along flight path T to be followed and the variable form of the limits of saidcorridor 26. In reality, it is agreed that the required follow-up precision is variable throughout the length of flight path T. For instance, the required flight path monitoring precision is naturally far greater during final approach than during a cruising phase. - This required precision thus forms a
corridor 26 all along the length of flight path T, generally breaking down into four parts (or flight phases), distinct and successive, of variable width, as shown inFIG. 5 : -
- in a phase Ph1 (cruise phase), the required precision is less but remains constant at a value Mmax (maximum margin or maximum tolerated lateral deviation);
- in a phase Ph2 (start of approach), the required precision will increase gradually to achieve the maximum value. The maximum tolerated lateral deviation decreases gradually to achieve a value Mmin (minimum margin or minimum tolerated lateral deviation);
- in a phase Ph3, corresponding to the final approach or the beginning of throttle re-application go-around, the required accuracy is maximum but stays constant at value Mmin; and
- in a phase Ph4 (takeoff), the accuracy gradually decreases to achieve the value Mmax of phase Ph1.
- Accordingly, the various plots of the fixed
scale 20 are as follows: -
- for phase Ph1 (cruise phase), the actual width of
corridor 26 relative to the required flight precision is constant and takes on value Mmax. Markers 21 (for instance four circles) are plotted and the shape of thecorridor 26 limits is symbolized by two straight longitudinal lines 27 (FIG. 6 ); - for phase Ph2 (beginning of approach), the real width of
corridor 26 relative to the required flight precision varies and shrinks to achieve the value Mmin. Markers 21 (four circles, for Instance) are plotted and the shape of the limits ofcorridor 26 is symbolized by twolongitudinal lines 27, the upper end of which inclines towardssymbol 7 of the aircraft (FIG. 7 ); - for phase Ph3 (final approach or beginning of throttle re-application go-around), the real width of corridor [[27]] 26 relative to the required flight precision is constant and takes on value Mmin. To discriminate easily this phase Ph3 from phase Ph1, it also has a real and constant width, but of far greater size and
fewer markers 21 are displayed than in phase Ph1 and Ph2 that precede (for instance, only twomarkers 21 instead of four in phase Ph1 and Ph2) that are, however, at wider intervals. Conversely, the shapes of the limits ofcorridor 26 remain symbolized by two longitudinal straight lines 27 (FIG. 8 ); - for phase Ph4 (takeoff), the real width of
corridor 26 relative to the required flight accuracy varies and increases gradually to achieve the value Mmax. Accordingly,more markers 21 than in phase Ph3 (e.g. four markers or circles) are again plotted, and the form of the corridor limits is symbolized by twolongitudinal lines 27, the upper ends of which incline toward the outside of scale 20 (FIG. 9 ).
- for phase Ph1 (cruise phase), the actual width of
- The means of
indication 22 includes a longitudinal straight-line segment 23 (FIG. 10 ), the width of which does not vary on display screen 6. This straight-line segment 23 represents a lateral distance deviation cursor, which moves horizontally between two variable limits ofscale 20 in proportion to the current lateral deviation (effective) generated bymeans 18. The sensitivity of this cursor is therefore also variable. For instance, it is more emphatic during the approach phase, which requires greater accuracy than during the cruise phase. Naturally, when the aircraft is positioned exactly and stably on the horizontal flight path to be followed, this straight-line segment orcursor 23 passes exactly belowsymbol 7 illustrating the aircraft. - Note that during a change of flight path segment or when the flight path segment being followed is curved, this lateral
distance deviation cursor 23 may be inclined in the direction of the turn (FIG. 11 ). - When means of
indication 22 reaches the limit (right or left) ofcorridor 26 relative to the required flight accuracy, whatever the current flight phase, it continues to be displayed but its representation is modified. For instance, it is plotted as dotted lines (FIG. 12 for a left limit andFIG. 13 for a right limit), whereas it is in a continuous line in all the other cases (although for the understanding of the illustration and ease of discrimination of said means ofindication 22, the latter is shown in dotted lines in all the figures). This limit case must be consecutive to the display of excessivelateral deviation chevrons 25 because the graphic scale of the visual guide is adjusted constantly so thatcorridor 26 relative to the required horizontal real flight precision either side of the aircraft is fully displayed. - Furthermore, to assist with the interception and follow-up of a flight path T including a multitude of segments S1, S2 and S3, said means of
display 5 also offer on display screen 6, a means of indicating a change of flight path segment to be followed. Preferably, it will concernstraight segment 23 which in this case will flash. - According to the invention, the
chevrons 25 appear as flashing at a fixedscale 20 whatever the current flight phase and as soon as the aircraft moves too close to the lateral limits (right or left) ofcorridor 26 relative to the required flight precision. Accordingly, if the pilot persists in moving horizontally away from the set flight path, the symbology relative todevice 3 providing assistance with follow-up andchevrons 25 will finally disappear. The pilot will then be obliged to use theinterception assistance device 1 if he wishes to join the flight path T he has left (at any point). - If we refer to the previous scale examples illustrating the description of this visual guide, it becomes important to note that the two
chevrons 25 are arranged at either side ofsymbol 7 illustrating the aircraft if fixedscale 20 includes two markers orcircles 21, as is the case of flight phase Ph3 (FIGS. 14 and 15 for excessive deviations respectively to the right and to the left). - Conversely, the
chevrons 25 are plotted between twosuccessive circles 21 if said same fixedscale 20 is made up of fourcircles 21, as is the case of flight phases Ph1, Ph2 and Ph4 (FIGS. 16 and 17 for excessive deviations respectively towards the right and towards the left). - Said means of
display 5 also present, on said display screen 6, a means ofindication 28 of the lateral speed tendency. This means ofindication 28, shown for instance inFIG. 18 , includes ahorizontal segment 29A connected toaircraft symbol 7, terminating in avertical segment 29B (or a perpendicular arrow point, pointing towards fixedscale 20 for the lateral deviation). This means ofindication 28 corresponds to the derived drifting of the current lateral deviation and, in real time, [[peak]] points to the next lateral distance with respect to the flight path, as it will be here, of a particular and predetermined duration. - If
vertical segment 29B (or the tip of the arrow) is continuously superimposed on straight segment 23 (lateral distance deviation cursor) of the means ofindication 22 as shown inFIG. 19 , by suitable flight control, the pilot may gradually and in an optimized manner, cancel out the value of the current lateral deviation and thus perform optimized interception within the horizontal plane of flight path T. - Thanks to the invention, the process of intercepting a flight path T in the horizontal plane and its follow-up is carried out accurately and efficiently according to the four following steps E1 to E4.
- 1/Initial Outright Determination of the Interception Point Step E1
- The aircraft has abandoned following flight path T1 comprising three segments S1, S2 and S3 while it was directed towards a point P2. Then, the pilot wishes to reintegrate the following up of flight path T1 at a point P5. To do this, the pilot directs the aircraft (ground speed vector) towards this point P5. In this case, it will be seen that
device 1 may report to it that the approach flight path TR is unsuitable for two reasons: -
- either it interferes with the ground (or an obstacle) at one or several points, the closest of which is highlighted and symbolized by a
symbol 17, for instance a red triangle (FIG. 20 ). Note that in this example, the aircraft has generated considerable slip due to the wind, explaining why the ground speed vector direction is no longer in line with the aircraft; - or the current ground speed of the aircraft is excessive because of its nearness to the segment to be intercepted, obliging it to overshoot the flight path (
FIG. 21 ).
- either it interferes with the ground (or an obstacle) at one or several points, the closest of which is highlighted and symbolized by a
- 2/Convergence Step [[E32]] E2
- The pilot modifies the route of his aircraft so that the point of conflict with the ground (or the obstacle) disappears and/or slows down by reducing the ground speed module to eliminate the flight path overrun; an interception turn at a pre-defined factor appears at the end of the display on
device 1. The approach flight path TR converges towards the same segment S3, but at a point P6 (FIG. 22 ) further downstream that point P5. Accordingly, in the two aforementioned cases, the pilot will have been able to see and act early to adjust the approach and then his interception turn. - 3/Interception Step E3
- The pilot sets approach flight path TR derived from
device 1 by engaging it (action on a control). In this way, he obtains a new flight path T2 to follow, replacing the former flight path T1 (with T2=TR+part of T1 starting from interception point P6). In addition, the next new target to be achieved is point P4 (FIG. 23 ), replacing the former target, point P2. From then on,device 3 supplies the pilot with the lateral deviation of the aircraft with respect to the new flight path T2 (FIG. 24 ). If he is too far away from the latter, excessive deviation chevrons 25 will appear informing him that he must immediately move closer to said flight path T2, which is to his left in this example, or otherwise leave the precision corridor. - 4/Precise Follow-Up of Flight Path Step E4
-
System 2 conforming to the invention guides the pilot into flight path T2 (FIG. 25 ) by means ofdevice 3. To do this, the pilot simply needs to cancel the lateral deviation and bringcursor 23 for the lateral deviation undersymbol 7 of the aircraft (FIG. 26 ).Device 3 also reminds the pilot that he is in the final approach phase at point P4 and that the scale sensitivity is therefore maximum so that he can fly accurately in the horizontal plane. -
System 2 conforming to the invention also includes means ofdisplay 5, means 4, 16 and 18 as mentioned above, including, as shown inFIG. 1 : -
- a
localization system 30 including sensors (satellites, etc.) supplying the three dimensional precise position of the aircraft; - a
system 31 including ground andmodels 32 and/orsensors 33 detecting any conflicts in the approach flight path with respect to the ground and/or the obstacles; - a
calculator 34 generating an approach flight path and the lateral follow-up margins; and - a
calculator 35, which, once interception has been carried out, calculates the deviations and ground speed in the horizontal plane of the aircraft with respect to the setpoint flight path and determines the current flight phase.
- a
- Note that aforementioned means 30, 31, 34 and 35 are sufficient to supply secure guidance information needed by the
aircraft autopilot 37, in this case the information allows [[he]] the interception and then the follow-up of the flight path. To this end, all the data generated by the approach and follow-upflight path calculator 34 can be exported by the customary means oftransmission 37 to anautopilot 36 in such a way that the latter can then fly the aircraft automatically.
Claims (13)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/636,439 US7367526B2 (en) | 2002-11-27 | 2006-12-11 | Device and system for assistance within interception by an aircraft of a flight path segment |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR0214872 | 2002-11-27 | ||
FR0214872A FR2847553B1 (en) | 2002-11-27 | 2002-11-27 | DEVICE FOR ASSISTING THE INTERCEPTION BY AN AIRCRAFT OF A SEGMENT OF A PATH LOCATED IN A HORIZONTAL PLANE AND SYSTEM FOR ASSISTING INTERCEPTION AND TRACKING SUCH A SEGMENT |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/636,439 Division US7367526B2 (en) | 2002-11-27 | 2006-12-11 | Device and system for assistance within interception by an aircraft of a flight path segment |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20070145183A1 true US20070145183A1 (en) | 2007-06-28 |
US7237747B1 US7237747B1 (en) | 2007-07-03 |
Family
ID=32241666
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/723,064 Expired - Fee Related US7237747B1 (en) | 2002-11-27 | 2003-11-26 | Device for assisting an airplane in intercepting a segment of a flight path utilizing positional and ground speed indicators |
US11/636,439 Expired - Fee Related US7367526B2 (en) | 2002-11-27 | 2006-12-11 | Device and system for assistance within interception by an aircraft of a flight path segment |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/636,439 Expired - Fee Related US7367526B2 (en) | 2002-11-27 | 2006-12-11 | Device and system for assistance within interception by an aircraft of a flight path segment |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7237747B1 (en) |
FR (1) | FR2847553B1 (en) |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080140270A1 (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2008-06-12 | The Boeing Company | Integrated approach navigation system, method, and computer program product |
US20080312777A1 (en) * | 2007-06-14 | 2008-12-18 | The Boeing Company | Automatic Strategic Offset Function |
EP2318278A2 (en) * | 2008-07-30 | 2011-05-11 | L-3 Communications Avionics Systems, Inc. | Advanced primary navigation displays for precision and non-precision approaches |
FR2988202A1 (en) * | 2012-03-13 | 2013-09-20 | Thales Sa | NAVIGATION ASSISTANCE METHOD FOR MONITORING LINEAR OR ANGULAR NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE |
FR3017703A1 (en) * | 2014-02-14 | 2015-08-21 | Thales Sa | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING THE COMPATIBILITY OF ANGULAR GUIDANCE WITH AN APPROACH |
US9815567B2 (en) * | 2011-09-21 | 2017-11-14 | The Boeing Company | Aircraft speed guidance display |
US10242578B2 (en) * | 2016-08-01 | 2019-03-26 | Ge Aviation Systems Llc | Flight path management system |
Families Citing this family (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7091881B2 (en) | 2003-03-31 | 2006-08-15 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Integrated hover display with augmented approach to hover symbology cueing for degraded visual environmental conditions |
FR2887329B1 (en) | 2005-06-21 | 2007-08-03 | Airbus France Sas | METHOD AND DISPLAY DEVICE FOR AN AIRCRAFT THAT FOLLOWS A FLIGHT PLAN |
FR2897712B1 (en) * | 2006-02-20 | 2008-04-04 | Airbus France Sas | DEVICE FOR AIDING THE CONTROL OF AN AIRCRAFT DURING AN APPROACH PHASE FOR LANDING. |
US8996309B2 (en) * | 2007-07-21 | 2015-03-31 | Aspen Avionics, Inc. | Apparatus and method to indicate instrument saturation |
WO2009015098A2 (en) * | 2007-07-21 | 2009-01-29 | Peter Lyons | Apparatus and method to indicate course deviation instrument saturation |
FR2920232B1 (en) | 2007-08-22 | 2015-02-27 | Airbus France | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AIDING THE CONTROL OF AN AIRCRAFT |
FR2928726B1 (en) * | 2008-03-11 | 2013-05-17 | Thales Sa | JUNCTION OF A CIVIL TRAJECTORY AND A MILITARY TRAJECTORY |
US7961115B2 (en) * | 2008-06-19 | 2011-06-14 | Honeywell International Inc. | System for displaying required navigation performance on a horizontal situation indicator |
US8155800B2 (en) * | 2008-06-19 | 2012-04-10 | Honeywell International Inc. | System for displaying required navigation performance on a horizontal situation indicator |
US9330573B2 (en) | 2009-06-25 | 2016-05-03 | Honeywell International Inc. | Automated decision aid tool for prompting a pilot to request a flight level change |
US8271152B2 (en) * | 2010-03-10 | 2012-09-18 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for rendering an onboard aircraft display for use with in-trail procedures |
US8417397B2 (en) | 2010-05-05 | 2013-04-09 | Honeywell International Inc. | Vertical profile display with variable display boundaries |
US9020681B2 (en) | 2010-06-08 | 2015-04-28 | Honeywell International Inc. | Display of navigation limits on an onboard display element of a vehicle |
US9495883B2 (en) | 2011-08-02 | 2016-11-15 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for displaying a procedure to an aircrew member |
US8478513B1 (en) | 2012-01-20 | 2013-07-02 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for displaying degraded traffic data on an in-trail procedure (ITP) display |
US8554394B2 (en) | 2012-02-28 | 2013-10-08 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for rendering an aircraft cockpit display for use with an in-trail procedure (ITP) |
US8781649B2 (en) | 2012-03-19 | 2014-07-15 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for displaying in-trail procedure (ITP) opportunities on an aircraft cockpit display |
EP3304232A4 (en) * | 2015-06-02 | 2019-01-23 | Sandel Avionics, INC. | System and method for path guidance panel |
FR3044086B1 (en) | 2015-11-24 | 2018-05-18 | Airbus Helicopters | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CALCULATING A SECURE TRACK FROM THE CURRENT POSITION OF AN AIRCRAFT UP TO A POINT OF ATTACHMENT |
US11781875B2 (en) * | 2019-08-21 | 2023-10-10 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Apparatus and method for forming and analyzing connected roads |
US20230035682A1 (en) * | 2019-12-17 | 2023-02-02 | Kt Corporation | Method and device for setting drone flight path |
Citations (42)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2932023A (en) * | 1955-08-04 | 1960-04-05 | Aircraft Radio Corp | Aircraft course director |
US3140391A (en) * | 1959-06-29 | 1964-07-07 | Tasker Instr Corp | Apparatus for ground computed radial navigation |
US3293348A (en) * | 1961-09-19 | 1966-12-20 | Communications Patents Ltd | Flight training apparatus |
US3383679A (en) * | 1966-07-15 | 1968-05-14 | Roger P. Baird Jr. | Visual landing simulator for instrument flying |
US3521227A (en) * | 1966-10-10 | 1970-07-21 | Kaiser Aerospace & Electronics | Display system for providing integrated display of aircraft information |
US3520994A (en) * | 1967-01-12 | 1970-07-21 | Kaiser Aerospace & Electronics | Combination raster and calligraphic scanning techniques for aircraft displays |
US3573827A (en) * | 1968-04-01 | 1971-04-06 | Bendix Corp | Runway centerline display |
US3574262A (en) * | 1967-05-25 | 1971-04-13 | Itek Corp | Cinematographic apparatus |
US3697022A (en) * | 1970-07-06 | 1972-10-10 | Sfim | Method and apparatus for aircraft guidance |
US3824381A (en) * | 1972-05-25 | 1974-07-16 | Bendix Corp | Aircraft control system using inertial signals |
US3989209A (en) * | 1974-06-26 | 1976-11-02 | The Bendix Corporation | Apparatus for guiding an aircraft along a multi-segment path when landing the craft |
US4078317A (en) * | 1976-07-30 | 1978-03-14 | Wheatley Ronald B | Flight simulator system |
US4354240A (en) * | 1980-03-24 | 1982-10-12 | Sperry Corporation | Flight path transition control apparatus with predictive roll command |
US4368517A (en) * | 1978-03-16 | 1983-01-11 | Bunker Ramo Corporation | Aircraft landing display system |
US4384338A (en) * | 1980-12-24 | 1983-05-17 | The Singer Company | Methods and apparatus for blending computer image generated features |
US4533999A (en) * | 1981-08-19 | 1985-08-06 | The Boeing Company | Aircraft roll steering command system |
US4972321A (en) * | 1989-04-24 | 1990-11-20 | Honeywell Inc. | Lateral axis rollout control for aircraft |
US5023796A (en) * | 1989-10-03 | 1991-06-11 | Honeywell, Inc. | Flight control apparatus with predictive heading/track hold command |
US5308022A (en) * | 1982-04-30 | 1994-05-03 | Cubic Corporation | Method of generating a dynamic display of an aircraft from the viewpoint of a pseudo chase aircraft |
US5371581A (en) * | 1993-03-08 | 1994-12-06 | Schwartz Electro-Optics, Inc. | Helicopter obstacle warning system |
US5465142A (en) * | 1993-04-30 | 1995-11-07 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Obstacle avoidance system for helicopters and other aircraft |
US5695157A (en) * | 1994-10-18 | 1997-12-09 | Sextant Avionique | Device for assistance in the piloting of an aircraft at the landing stage |
US5774818A (en) * | 1995-01-06 | 1998-06-30 | Sextant Avionique | Method for piloting an aerodyne by automatic control onto a horizontal path determined from way points |
US5978715A (en) * | 1997-10-15 | 1999-11-02 | Dassault Aviation | Apparatus and method for aircraft display and control |
US5995901A (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 1999-11-30 | Rockwell International Corporation | Automatic view adjusting flight plan display |
US6108595A (en) * | 1997-06-23 | 2000-08-22 | Eurocopter | Aircraft position indicator device |
US6255965B1 (en) * | 1998-09-23 | 2001-07-03 | Eurocopter | Device for aiding the piloting of an aircraft, especially a rotary-wing aircraft and in particular a helicopter |
US20010028817A1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2001-10-11 | Satoshi Tamura | Image forming apparatus |
US20020039072A1 (en) * | 1998-02-09 | 2002-04-04 | Scott Gremmert | Aircraft weather information system |
US20020039070A1 (en) * | 2000-09-29 | 2002-04-04 | Honeywell International Inc. | Alerting and notification system |
US6389355B1 (en) * | 1999-09-14 | 2002-05-14 | Honeywell International Inc. | Methods and apparatus for graphical display and editing of flight plans |
US20030004619A1 (en) * | 2001-07-02 | 2003-01-02 | The Boeing Company | Assembly, computer program product and method for displaying navigation performance based flight path deviation information |
US6574532B2 (en) * | 2000-06-06 | 2003-06-03 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | Path controller for vehicles whose path is influenced by cross currents and a path control system and associated methods |
US6625537B2 (en) * | 2002-01-23 | 2003-09-23 | Honeywell | Methods and apparatus for assembling a flight plan |
US20030195672A1 (en) * | 2002-04-12 | 2003-10-16 | Gang He | Terrain augmented 3d flight path display for flight management systems |
US6664989B1 (en) * | 1999-10-18 | 2003-12-16 | Honeywell International Inc. | Methods and apparatus for graphical display interaction |
US6744382B1 (en) * | 2002-04-19 | 2004-06-01 | Rockwell Collins | Method and apparatus for guiding an aircraft through a cluster of hazardous areas |
US6870490B2 (en) * | 2001-08-23 | 2005-03-22 | Honeywell International Inc. | Display of altitude and path capture trajectories |
US20050098681A1 (en) * | 2003-07-14 | 2005-05-12 | Supersonic Aerospace International, Llc | System and method for controlling the acoustic signature of a device |
US20050150997A1 (en) * | 2002-02-08 | 2005-07-14 | Saab Ab | Method and system for calculating a flight route |
US6980198B1 (en) * | 2000-09-19 | 2005-12-27 | Honeywell International Inc. | Multifunction keyboard for advanced cursor driven avionic flight decks |
US6985801B1 (en) * | 2002-02-28 | 2006-01-10 | Garmin International, Inc. | Cockpit instrument panel systems and methods with redundant flight data display |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5797106A (en) * | 1996-03-29 | 1998-08-18 | The Boeing Company | Method and apparatus for an improved flight management system providing for linking of an outbound course line from a predetermined position with an existing flight plan |
FR2752051B1 (en) * | 1996-08-02 | 1998-10-30 | Sextant Avionique | DEVICE FOR ASSISTING THE GUIDANCE OF A VEHICLE ON A TRAJECTORY |
FR2801967B1 (en) * | 1999-12-07 | 2002-04-12 | Eurocopter France | VARIABLE INDICATOR FOR AIRCRAFT |
FR2803655B1 (en) * | 2000-01-07 | 2002-06-14 | Thomson Csf Sextant | FLIGHT CALCULATOR SMOOTHING THE TRAJECTORY OF AN AIRCRAFT ON SEVERAL SEQUENCES |
US6347633B1 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2002-02-19 | First Circle Medical, Inc. | Treatment of hepatitis C using hyperthermia |
CN101030948A (en) | 2006-03-02 | 2007-09-05 | 华为技术有限公司 | Routing method and system based on IP message |
-
2002
- 2002-11-27 FR FR0214872A patent/FR2847553B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2003
- 2003-11-26 US US10/723,064 patent/US7237747B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2006
- 2006-12-11 US US11/636,439 patent/US7367526B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (42)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2932023A (en) * | 1955-08-04 | 1960-04-05 | Aircraft Radio Corp | Aircraft course director |
US3140391A (en) * | 1959-06-29 | 1964-07-07 | Tasker Instr Corp | Apparatus for ground computed radial navigation |
US3293348A (en) * | 1961-09-19 | 1966-12-20 | Communications Patents Ltd | Flight training apparatus |
US3383679A (en) * | 1966-07-15 | 1968-05-14 | Roger P. Baird Jr. | Visual landing simulator for instrument flying |
US3521227A (en) * | 1966-10-10 | 1970-07-21 | Kaiser Aerospace & Electronics | Display system for providing integrated display of aircraft information |
US3520994A (en) * | 1967-01-12 | 1970-07-21 | Kaiser Aerospace & Electronics | Combination raster and calligraphic scanning techniques for aircraft displays |
US3574262A (en) * | 1967-05-25 | 1971-04-13 | Itek Corp | Cinematographic apparatus |
US3573827A (en) * | 1968-04-01 | 1971-04-06 | Bendix Corp | Runway centerline display |
US3697022A (en) * | 1970-07-06 | 1972-10-10 | Sfim | Method and apparatus for aircraft guidance |
US3824381A (en) * | 1972-05-25 | 1974-07-16 | Bendix Corp | Aircraft control system using inertial signals |
US3989209A (en) * | 1974-06-26 | 1976-11-02 | The Bendix Corporation | Apparatus for guiding an aircraft along a multi-segment path when landing the craft |
US4078317A (en) * | 1976-07-30 | 1978-03-14 | Wheatley Ronald B | Flight simulator system |
US4368517A (en) * | 1978-03-16 | 1983-01-11 | Bunker Ramo Corporation | Aircraft landing display system |
US4354240A (en) * | 1980-03-24 | 1982-10-12 | Sperry Corporation | Flight path transition control apparatus with predictive roll command |
US4384338A (en) * | 1980-12-24 | 1983-05-17 | The Singer Company | Methods and apparatus for blending computer image generated features |
US4533999A (en) * | 1981-08-19 | 1985-08-06 | The Boeing Company | Aircraft roll steering command system |
US5308022A (en) * | 1982-04-30 | 1994-05-03 | Cubic Corporation | Method of generating a dynamic display of an aircraft from the viewpoint of a pseudo chase aircraft |
US4972321A (en) * | 1989-04-24 | 1990-11-20 | Honeywell Inc. | Lateral axis rollout control for aircraft |
US5023796A (en) * | 1989-10-03 | 1991-06-11 | Honeywell, Inc. | Flight control apparatus with predictive heading/track hold command |
US5371581A (en) * | 1993-03-08 | 1994-12-06 | Schwartz Electro-Optics, Inc. | Helicopter obstacle warning system |
US5465142A (en) * | 1993-04-30 | 1995-11-07 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Obstacle avoidance system for helicopters and other aircraft |
US5695157A (en) * | 1994-10-18 | 1997-12-09 | Sextant Avionique | Device for assistance in the piloting of an aircraft at the landing stage |
US5774818A (en) * | 1995-01-06 | 1998-06-30 | Sextant Avionique | Method for piloting an aerodyne by automatic control onto a horizontal path determined from way points |
US5995901A (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 1999-11-30 | Rockwell International Corporation | Automatic view adjusting flight plan display |
US6108595A (en) * | 1997-06-23 | 2000-08-22 | Eurocopter | Aircraft position indicator device |
US5978715A (en) * | 1997-10-15 | 1999-11-02 | Dassault Aviation | Apparatus and method for aircraft display and control |
US20020039072A1 (en) * | 1998-02-09 | 2002-04-04 | Scott Gremmert | Aircraft weather information system |
US6255965B1 (en) * | 1998-09-23 | 2001-07-03 | Eurocopter | Device for aiding the piloting of an aircraft, especially a rotary-wing aircraft and in particular a helicopter |
US6389355B1 (en) * | 1999-09-14 | 2002-05-14 | Honeywell International Inc. | Methods and apparatus for graphical display and editing of flight plans |
US6664989B1 (en) * | 1999-10-18 | 2003-12-16 | Honeywell International Inc. | Methods and apparatus for graphical display interaction |
US20010028817A1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2001-10-11 | Satoshi Tamura | Image forming apparatus |
US6574532B2 (en) * | 2000-06-06 | 2003-06-03 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | Path controller for vehicles whose path is influenced by cross currents and a path control system and associated methods |
US6980198B1 (en) * | 2000-09-19 | 2005-12-27 | Honeywell International Inc. | Multifunction keyboard for advanced cursor driven avionic flight decks |
US20020039070A1 (en) * | 2000-09-29 | 2002-04-04 | Honeywell International Inc. | Alerting and notification system |
US20030004619A1 (en) * | 2001-07-02 | 2003-01-02 | The Boeing Company | Assembly, computer program product and method for displaying navigation performance based flight path deviation information |
US6870490B2 (en) * | 2001-08-23 | 2005-03-22 | Honeywell International Inc. | Display of altitude and path capture trajectories |
US6625537B2 (en) * | 2002-01-23 | 2003-09-23 | Honeywell | Methods and apparatus for assembling a flight plan |
US20050150997A1 (en) * | 2002-02-08 | 2005-07-14 | Saab Ab | Method and system for calculating a flight route |
US6985801B1 (en) * | 2002-02-28 | 2006-01-10 | Garmin International, Inc. | Cockpit instrument panel systems and methods with redundant flight data display |
US20030195672A1 (en) * | 2002-04-12 | 2003-10-16 | Gang He | Terrain augmented 3d flight path display for flight management systems |
US6744382B1 (en) * | 2002-04-19 | 2004-06-01 | Rockwell Collins | Method and apparatus for guiding an aircraft through a cluster of hazardous areas |
US20050098681A1 (en) * | 2003-07-14 | 2005-05-12 | Supersonic Aerospace International, Llc | System and method for controlling the acoustic signature of a device |
Cited By (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080140270A1 (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2008-06-12 | The Boeing Company | Integrated approach navigation system, method, and computer program product |
US8423207B2 (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2013-04-16 | The Boeing Company | Integrated approach navigation system, method, and computer program product |
US8027756B2 (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2011-09-27 | The Boeing Company | Integrated approach navigation system, method, and computer program product |
US20110313600A1 (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2011-12-22 | The Boeing Company | Integrated approach navigation system, method, and computer program product |
US8185258B2 (en) * | 2007-06-14 | 2012-05-22 | The Boeing Company | Automatic strategic offset function |
US20080312777A1 (en) * | 2007-06-14 | 2008-12-18 | The Boeing Company | Automatic Strategic Offset Function |
US7698026B2 (en) * | 2007-06-14 | 2010-04-13 | The Boeing Company | Automatic strategic offset function |
US20100161159A1 (en) * | 2007-06-14 | 2010-06-24 | The Boeing Company | Automatic strategic offset function |
EP2318278A2 (en) * | 2008-07-30 | 2011-05-11 | L-3 Communications Avionics Systems, Inc. | Advanced primary navigation displays for precision and non-precision approaches |
US20110130897A1 (en) * | 2008-07-30 | 2011-06-02 | L-3 Communications Avionics Systems, Inc. | Advanced primary navigation displays for precision and non-precision approaches |
EP2318278A4 (en) * | 2008-07-30 | 2013-07-03 | L 3 Comm Avionics Systems Inc | Advanced primary navigation displays for precision and non-precision approaches |
US9815567B2 (en) * | 2011-09-21 | 2017-11-14 | The Boeing Company | Aircraft speed guidance display |
FR2988202A1 (en) * | 2012-03-13 | 2013-09-20 | Thales Sa | NAVIGATION ASSISTANCE METHOD FOR MONITORING LINEAR OR ANGULAR NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE |
US8948939B2 (en) | 2012-03-13 | 2015-02-03 | Thales | Navigation assistance method for monitoring navigation performance in linear or angular mode |
FR3017703A1 (en) * | 2014-02-14 | 2015-08-21 | Thales Sa | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING THE COMPATIBILITY OF ANGULAR GUIDANCE WITH AN APPROACH |
US9766091B2 (en) | 2014-02-14 | 2017-09-19 | Thales | Method and system for determining the compatibility of an angular guidance with an approach |
US10242578B2 (en) * | 2016-08-01 | 2019-03-26 | Ge Aviation Systems Llc | Flight path management system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20070145184A1 (en) | 2007-06-28 |
FR2847553B1 (en) | 2004-12-31 |
US7237747B1 (en) | 2007-07-03 |
FR2847553A1 (en) | 2004-05-28 |
US7367526B2 (en) | 2008-05-06 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7367526B2 (en) | Device and system for assistance within interception by an aircraft of a flight path segment | |
EP1882157B1 (en) | Integrated hover display with augmented approach to hover symbology cueing for degraded visual environmental conditions | |
EP3012590B1 (en) | System and method for displaying runway landing information | |
EP2808856B1 (en) | System and method for displaying a runway position indicator | |
CA2501903C (en) | Method and apparatus for reducing false taws warnings | |
EP3473982B1 (en) | Method and system for displaying an alignment symbol for indicating deviations between ownship runway course heading and tracking | |
EP1254445B1 (en) | Flight control system and method for an aircraft circle-to-land manoeuvre | |
US9233761B2 (en) | Display apparatus, control support system, and display method | |
EP2830032B1 (en) | Aircraft flight deck display, system and method for displaying integrated minimum safe altitude and minimum vectoring altitude information on a display device in an aircraft | |
US11138891B2 (en) | Method and electronic system for managing the flight of an aircraft in a visual approach phase to a runway, related computer program | |
WO2010077531A2 (en) | Module for integrated approach to an offshore facility | |
US10290220B2 (en) | Method and device for guiding an aircraft | |
EP3627476A1 (en) | Energy management visualization methods and systems | |
WO2009017860A2 (en) | Aircraft guidance using localizer capture criteria for rectilinear displacement data | |
EP3751541A1 (en) | Judgmental oversteering taxi aid system and method | |
US3496769A (en) | Descent-approach system for aircraft | |
US3776455A (en) | Terminal guidance system | |
US6038497A (en) | Aircraft turn guidance system | |
RU2585204C1 (en) | Method of controlling aircraft when approaching navigation point from given direction | |
EP3540551A1 (en) | Flight control system | |
RU2549145C1 (en) | Method of control of aircraft landing path at landing on programmed airfield | |
EP3882890A1 (en) | Systems and methods for automatic sequencing behind preceding aircraft on approach | |
US11094211B2 (en) | Judgmental oversteering taxi aid system and method | |
US20220335845A1 (en) | Taxiing method and apparatus | |
JPS636400B2 (en) |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: EUROCOPTER, FRANCE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BAUDRY, JEAN PIERRE;REEL/FRAME:014915/0578 Effective date: 20031215 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AIRBUS HELICOPTERS, FRANCE Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:EUROCOPTER;REEL/FRAME:034663/0976 Effective date: 20140107 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20190703 |