US8396893B2 - Unified configuration of multiple applications - Google Patents
Unified configuration of multiple applications Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US8396893B2 US8396893B2 US12/332,513 US33251308A US8396893B2 US 8396893 B2 US8396893 B2 US 8396893B2 US 33251308 A US33251308 A US 33251308A US 8396893 B2 US8396893 B2 US 8396893B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- application
- configuration
- computer applications
- distinct
- distinct computer
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
- 238000004883 computer application Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 104
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 69
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 claims description 35
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 44
- 238000001994 activation Methods 0.000 description 15
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 14
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000005012 migration Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000013508 migration Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000007717 exclusion Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013475 authorization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programs
- G06F9/445—Program loading or initiating
- G06F9/44505—Configuring for program initiating, e.g. using registry, configuration files
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
Definitions
- Configuring software applications can be a difficult task.
- the difficulty in configuring such systems grows in complexity as the size of the software application increases.
- An example of a complex software application to configure is an enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) application.
- ERP enterprise resource planning
- Efforts to configure such applications often involve a large number of employees and even consultants. These efforts may string out over many months, and even multiple years.
- modifying a large software application configuration or upgrading such an application can, depending on the size of the configuration modification project or scope of the application upgrade, may involve equal amounts of time and cost as an initial implementation.
- ERP applications In many organizations utilizing ERP applications, more than one ERP application may be implemented. This may be due to migration from one ERP platform to another, mergers and acquisitions of other organizations, or other reasons. In such instances when configuring multiple ERP applications, the complex issues related thereto are at least doubled. Each software application is configured separately.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system according to an example embodiment.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a system according to an example embodiment.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a system according to an example embodiment.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a system according to an example embodiment.
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a system according to an example embodiment.
- FIG. 6 is a block flow diagram of a method according to an example embodiment.
- FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a system according to an example embodiment.
- Various embodiments described herein provide system, methods, and software to reduce the complexity of configuring software applications, such as large-scale enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) applications.
- ERP enterprise resource planning
- Some embodiments reduce the complexity of configuring multiple distinct instances of the same or differing ERP applications through a unified application configuration environment.
- the configuring may be performed in such a single application configuration environment and configuration settings may be deployed to one or more application execution environments where respective ERP applications execute.
- the configuring may be performed once and translated to a configuration of each target computer application. For example, two distinct computer applications may be deployed to distinct application execution environments.
- the term “distinct computer applications” is used herein to differentiate between at least two computer applications that are either different in one or more ways including version number, and the software development organizations that developed the at least two computer applications.
- the configuring may be performed in a single application configuration environment and when the configuration settings are deployed, the configuration settings are translated to a form of each distinct computer application and deployed from the single application configuration environment to the respective application execution environments.
- the functions or algorithms described herein are implemented in hardware, software or a combination of software and hardware in one embodiment.
- the software comprises computer executable instructions stored on computer readable media such as memory or other type of storage devices. Further, described functions may correspond to modules, which may be software, hardware, firmware, or any combination thereof. Multiple functions are performed in one or more modules as desired, and the embodiments described are merely examples.
- the software is executed on a digital signal processor, ASIC, microprocessor, or other type of processor operating on a system, such as a personal computer, server, a router, or other device capable of processing data including network interconnection devices.
- Some embodiments implement the functions in two or more specific interconnected hardware modules or devices with related control and data signals communicated between and through the modules, or as portions of an application-specific integrated circuit.
- the exemplary process flow is applicable to software, firmware, and hardware implementations.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system 100 according to an example embodiment.
- the system 100 includes an application configuration environment 102 a first application execution environment 104 and a second application execution environment 106 .
- the application execution environments 104 , 106 and the application configuration environment 102 are typically interconnected via one or more networks.
- the application configuration environment 102 is a system 100 environment within which an application is configurable. However, the applications will, or do, execute within at least one of the application execution environments 104 , 106 . In some embodiments, this arrangement of the application configuration environment 102 and the application execution environments 104 , 106 separates the configuration of the applications from the environment within which they execute. When application configurations are established, all or part of the configurations are then deployed to the application execution environments 104 , 106 . This deployment can occur to one or more separate instances of each of a plurality of applications in the application execution environments 104 , 106 . Although two application execution environments 104 , 106 are illustrated, one application execution environment 104 , 106 may exist or more application execution environments 104 , 106 may exist. The deployment may be made to one or more of the multiple application execution environments 104 , 106 .
- the application execution environments 104 , 106 are computing environments within which one or more applications may execute.
- Such applications may include ERP computer applications, or portions thereof.
- one application may be an account portion of a first ERP application and another application may be a customer relationship management portion of a second ERP application.
- the first and second ERP applications are typically distinct computer applications, such as may be developed and offered by different software development organizations. However, the distinction computer applications may simply be different computer applications offered by the same software development organization that may offer the same or alternative functionality and data processing activities.
- the multiple computer applications that execute in the same or different application execution environments 104 , 106 may be configured in the single application configuration environment 102 .
- the processes, procedures, and data processing activities may be specified in a single location, translated to a configuration setting form of computer applications tasked with implementing the specified processes, procedures, and data processing activities, and deployed.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a system 200 according to an example embodiment.
- the system 200 includes a configuration scoping application 202 and the application configuration environment 102 .
- the configuration scoping application 202 typically is a software tool that executes on a computing device, such as a portable computer, on a same computing device within which the application configuration environment 102 exists, or on another computing device that can be communicatively coupled to the application configuration environment 102 .
- the configuration scoping application 202 when executed, typically presents a set of scoping questions to a user.
- the scoping questions are linked to one of many adaptation catalog entries.
- the adaptation catalog entries include a representation of all of the solution capabilities of applications to be configured, and eventually executed in one or more of the application execution environments 104 , 106 .
- the solution capabilities are hierarchically divided into areas, packages, topics, and options. There may be multiple areas and each area may have multiple packages. Each package may have multiple topics and each topic may have multiple options.
- the adaptation catalog may provide in the area Sales, a package Customer Order Management that contains the topics Sales Order Quote, Sales Order, Sales Order Analysis, and others. On that level, one or more options typically exist such as Approval Processing.
- each scoping question may be linked to an adaptation catalog entry.
- An adaptation catalog entry further includes a rule.
- rules typically model dependencies between the areas, packages, topics, and options and corresponding solution capabilities of the application.
- a rule may specify required inclusion or exclusion of other areas, packages, topics, or options, or may require specification of further areas, packages, topics, or options.
- a rule may also specify a recommendation or default area, package, topic, or option.
- a first example scoping question “What is the primary focus of your business?” may have three possible answers including “Sales,” “Service,” and “Logistics.”
- Such a first scoping question typically is aimed at identifying an area of business in which the application is going to be used.
- Answering “Sales” typically tells the configuration scoping application 202 that the area is “Sales” and a rule tied to the adaptation catalog entry for “Sales” specifies dependencies with packages, topics, and options and the corresponding solution capabilities of the application necessary or optional in using the application in a sales business.
- Such a rule can also specify that other packages, topics, and options and the corresponding solution capabilities be excluded.
- Another example includes one or more scoping question that request information regarding the specific computer applications that are used to implement certain processes, procedures, functionality, or for specific purposes.
- Such as question may pose a scoping question that asks, “What computer application is used for accounting purposes?”
- Possible responses to such a question may include one or more computer applications of a certain software development organization and one or more computer applications of other software development organizations.
- the answers to such questions identify computer applications that are to be configured in the application configuration environment 102 and identify within the application configuration environment 102 computer application specific areas, packages, topics, and options for configuring the identified computer applications.
- FIG. 3 provides further detail of some embodiments of the configuration scoping application 202 in conjunction with an embodiment of the application configuration environment 102 .
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a system 210 according to an example embodiment.
- the system 210 includes a portable computing device 232 including a configuration application 236 , an application configuration dataset 234 stored in a memory, an application transaction dataset 238 , and the configuration scoping application 202 .
- the system 210 further includes the application configuration environment 102 .
- the application configuration environment 102 is not illustrated within the portable computing device 232 , in some embodiments, the application configuration environment 102 may reside within the portable computing device 232 .
- the application configuration environment 102 , the configuration scoping application 202 , the application configuration dataset 234 , the configuration application 236 , and the application transaction dataset 238 may all reside on a computing device other than the portable computing device 232 , such as on a desktop computer or on a server accessible via a remote user interface over a network.
- the remote user interface may include a web browser based user interface.
- the configuration application 236 typically provides a set of tools via user interfaces to a user.
- the tools of the configuration application 236 may allow the user to modify answers to scoping question answers stored in an input cache 220 of the configuration scoping application 202 , the application configuration dataset 234 , and the application transaction dataset 238 .
- the application configuration dataset 234 may be populated with data copied from a configuration repository 242 stored within a configuration workspace 228 of the application configuration environment 102 .
- the application transaction dataset 238 when present, may be populated with data copied either from a demonstration dataset stored in data repository 244 of the configuration workspace 228 or from the content repository 222 .
- the input cache 220 may exist separate from the configuration scoping application 202 within a memory of the portable computing device 232 . In such embodiments, the input cache 220 may be populated with data copied from the scoping input database 226 .
- the configuration scoping application 202 includes a deduction engine 212 and an adaptation catalog 214 ′.
- the configuration scoping application 202 may further include a solution proposal and estimate engine 216 , a data migration planner 218 , and the input cache 220 .
- the application configuration environment 102 includes an adaptation catalog 214 , a content repository 222 , and a configuration package repository 224 .
- the application configuration environment 102 further includes a scoping input database 226 , a configuration workspace 118 , a deployment module 230 , and a deployment data store 240 .
- the adaptation catalog 214 may include a representation of all of the solution capabilities of some or all applications that may be configured in the application configuration environment 102 . Each capability of the application available for configuration is identified in an adaptation catalog 214 entry.
- the adaptation catalog 214 entries each may be associated with a particular application and be identified as an area, package, topic, or option and may be organized in a hierarchy with a child identifying the parent.
- An example hierarchy associated with one particular computer application is a “General Ledger” capability, which in some embodiments typically is a package having two topics, “cash based” and “accrual based” which are two capabilities of the particular computer application within the “General Ledger” capability.
- the adaptation catalog 214 entries may further include scoping questions directed toward obtaining scoping information to identify applications to be configured and to determine what areas, packages, topics, and options are relevant to the user's needs. Additionally, the adaptation catalog entries typically include rules, the application of which can require inclusion or exclusion, or specify default inclusion or exclusion, of certain other areas, packages, topics, and options. Thus, because the areas, packages, topics, and options correlate to application capabilities, the inclusion, exclusion, and defaulting specifies what capabilities will be enabled and disabled in the application being configured when deployed by the deployment module 230 .
- rules and entries in the adaptation catalog can be linked to a configuration package that exists in the configuration package repository 224 .
- a configuration package includes one or more configuration settings that enable or disable functionality of computer applications when deployed by the deployment module 230 or by a configuration process within the application configuration environment 102 when configuring the applications within the configuration workspace 228 .
- a configuration package can further be linked to one or more content items or content item definitions stored in the content repository 222 .
- Some such content types include report layouts, forms, user interfaces, communication specifications, documentation, and other content that can be used in an application when deployed.
- Some content items may exist in multiple instances, where each instance is specific to a computer application that may be configured in the application configuration environment 102 .
- a communication specification can include an XML schema, an EDI schema and connectivity information, mappings between file layouts and application data storage mechanisms, such as databases, and other similar communication specifications.
- the rules of adaptation catalog 214 entries may also be used by the deduction engine 212 of the configuration scoping application 202 .
- the configuration scoping application 202 typically presents a user interface to a user that requests answers to questions. The questions to be asked via the user interface may be identified by the deduction engine 212 based on the adaptation catalog 214 ′.
- the adaptation catalog 214 ′ is typically a copy of the adaptation catalog 214 from the application configuration environment 102 .
- the answer may be stored in the input cache 220 of the configuration scoping application 202 .
- the deduction engine 212 may then apply the rule associated with the adaptation catalog 214 ′ entry of the question asked to the received answer.
- the deduction engine 212 typically identifies a next question to ask. The identified question may then be presented to the user through the user interface. This process typically continues until either all of the questions have been asked, the user is out of time, or otherwise chooses to stop. If questions remain that have not been answered, the process may be continued at a later time or rules specifying default areas, packages, topics, and options typically supply enough information to allow deployment of an identified application in a functional form.
- the configuration scoping application 218 may further include a data migration planner 218 .
- one or more additional scoping questions may be asked. These additional scoping questions are typically directed toward obtaining information from the user about legacy systems and how data is stored within them. In some embodiments, the questions simply may ask what systems are currently in use. In other embodiments, the questions may be more detailed to obtain information such as what type of database an application is utilizing and what type of customization has been made or custom applications developed. The data migration planner 218 may then use the answers to these additional questions to propose a data migration plan to the new application.
- the configuration scoping application 202 includes a solution proposal and estimate engine 216 .
- the solution proposal and estimate engine 216 may be used in a sales situation. For example, if a sales person is discussing with a sales lead what a certain application product can do for the sales lead, the sales person typically can utilize the configuration scoping application 202 to obtain information about the needs of the sales lead via the scoping questions. The scoping question answers may then be utilized by the solution proposal and estimate engine 216 to make an initial determination of what will be involved if the sales lead decides to purchase the application.
- the solution proposal and estimate engine 216 normally is configured to output information for the sales lead to make several determinations, such as the size of effort necessary to implement or transition to the application from legacy system, the cost involved, and cost.
- the output of the solution proposal and estimate engine 216 outputs one or more of an implementation cost estimate, an application solution proposal, and a recommended project roadmap.
- the solution proposal and estimate engine 216 outputs a proposal for one or more other options, application descriptions, sales literature, benefit statements of using the application, and addition documents, such as a proposal of key performance indicators the application can monitor to assist in managing the application or enterprise of the sales lead.
- the configuration scoping application 236 may also be used in other situations, such as when an application configuration needs to be updated. Answers to previously answered scoping questions in such instances may be modified via the configuration scoping application. However, the change in configuration may be considered more as an organizational configuration change rather than an application configuration change. Through the abilities to configure multiple computer applications via the unified application configuration environment 102 , scoping questions may be answered and answers modified that will populate configuration changes across multiple applications. As a result, organizations may quickly reconfigure how they operate.
- the information typically is uploaded to the application configuration environment 102 .
- the configuration scoping application 202 executes on the same computing device as the application configuration environment 202
- the scoping question answers and other information may be stored directly to the application configuration environment 102 .
- the scoping question answers are stored to the scoping input database 226 .
- the scoping question answers in some instances, will be referred to interchangeably as the “scoping information.”
- the scoping information includes answers to scoping questions that are associated with one or more computer applications and configuration settings therefore through areas, packages, topics, and options.
- the configuration repository 242 may include a set of configuration tables that mirrors, at least in part, the configuration tables of each application that may be configured within the application configuration environment 102 .
- the configuration repository 242 may include a set of configuration tables for each of multiple instances of the applications to allow use of the application configuration environment 102 to configure multiple instances of each application that may be configured with the application configuration environment 102 .
- the process that configures the applications may be configured to determine one or more configuration packages to instantiate in the configuration repository 242 .
- Configuration packages may include one or a set of configuration settings to enable or disable certain capabilities of the application to which the package is relevant.
- Configuration packages may be linked to adaptation catalog 214 entries and rules associated with adaptation catalog entries.
- the process that configures the application in the configuration repository 242 may be configured to query the scoping information in the scoping input database 226 to identify configuration packages to instantiate.
- demonstration data may exist to facilitate instantiation of a demonstration instance of one or more applications for a sales lead, training session, or other purpose.
- the demonstration data in some embodiments, may be linked to one or more applications and/or configuration packages from the configuration package repository 224 .
- the demonstration data typically exists in the content repository 222 so that it can be copied into a set of application tables in the data repository 244 of the configuration workspace 228 . These tables may hold such data as transactional data, operational data, master data, or other data that can exist in the application when the application is ready for execution or is executed.
- That data may be fine-tuned to more closely match the intended use of the demonstration data.
- the system may be configured so that a sales person, or other individual, can fine-tune demonstration data values to more closely match a sales lead's expectations of the application.
- Such fine-tuning may include modifying sales order documents in the demonstration data to include a name, address, and logo of the sales lead's enterprise, or other similar modifications to the demonstration data.
- Some embodiments of the application configuration environment 102 may further include the deployment data store 240 .
- the deployment data store 240 typically stores a representation of computer application configurations of deployed computer applications.
- the representations of application configurations may be stored or updated in the deployment data store 240 by the deployment module 230 upon successful deployment of an application configuration.
- a representation of an application configuration typically includes data representative of the application configuration settings.
- the representation may further include data representative of content deployed to the application.
- An application configuration representation may exist for each deployed computer application that may be configured through the application configuration environment 102 .
- the deployment data store 240 may be updated upon each configuration or content modification of a deployed system.
- the deployment data store may further include a versioning mechanism that maintains not only a current configuration representation, but also historical representations, of one or more computer applications configured through the application configuration environment.
- the deployment data store 240 may be maintained by an entity that developed, or otherwise offers for sale, an application configured via the application configuration environment.
- the deployment data store 240 may be used by such an entity to monitor current application usage, perform billing processes as a function of a current application configuration, provide application upgrade information based on portions of the application or content utilized, and for other purposes.
- the entity may provide application updates, bug fixes, or other upgrades directly to a deployed application instance. Such updates, bug fixes, or other upgrades may be identified as relevant to a particular application instance as a function of the configuration representation in view of adaptation catalog 214 entries.
- the configuration application 236 may provide a set of tools via user interfaces to a user.
- the tools of the configuration application 236 typically allow the user to modify answers to scoping question answers stored in an input cache 220 , the application configuration datasets 234 , and the application transaction datasets 238 .
- the application configuration datasets 234 may be populated with data copied from the configuration repository 242 .
- the application transaction dataset 238 may be populated with data copied either from a demonstration dataset stored in the data repository 244 or from the content repository 222 .
- the input cache 220 if separate from the configuration scoping application 202 may be populated with scoping information copied from the scoping input database 226 .
- a user may modify data within the application transaction dataset 238 to customize the data used of a demonstration application to more closely reflect how a sales lead's enterprise will use the application.
- data displayed within the demonstration may include orders with products, customers, addresses, countries, and other details that truly reflect those of the sales lead's enterprise.
- configuration application 236 user interfaces may also allow a user to further refine an application configuration to more closely match the needs of an organization, a customer, or a sales lead. This can include a user taking a copy of an application configuration to work on while away from a connection to the application to be configured or application configuration environment 102 , such as when traveling.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a system 320 according to an example embodiment.
- the system 320 typically includes the deployment module 230 and the application execution environments 104 , 106 .
- the deployment module 230 may include one or more configuration setting deployment processes 304 , optional activation process(s) 306 , and data deployment process(s) 308 . Some embodiments of the deployment module may further include one or more delta deployment processes 310 .
- the application execution environments 104 , 106 include respective distinct computer applications 314 , 324 .
- the computer applications 314 , 324 may be baseline applications that have been instantiated, but are not yet configured. In other instances, the computer applications 314 , 324 may be applications that are already configured, but the configurations may be in need of an update by a process of the deployment module 230 . In either instance, the computer applications 314 , 324 may each include a set of configuration tables 316 , 326 , or other data stores depending on the specific application 314 , 324 , that will be populated, or updated, by the deployment module 230 .
- the applications 314 , 324 may further include other tables, data structures, and storage locations that may be populated and/or updated by the deployment module 230 with one or more of demonstration data, application data, content, or other data.
- the deployment module 230 when executed, typically operates to deploy configurations of applications configured in the application configuration environment. Deployment is typically performed by one or more of the processes of the deployment module 230 . These processes may include one or more configuration setting deployment processes 304 , data deployment processes 308 , activation processes 306 , and delta deployment processes 310 . Some embodiments of the deployment module 230 may include one or more of these processes.
- the configuration setting deployment processes 304 typically deploy configuration settings to the configuration tables 316 , 326 of the applications 314 , 324 if the computer application 314 , 324 have already been instantiated. However, in some embodiments, if the computer applications 314 , 324 have not been instantiated, the configuration setting deployment processes 304 , or other process of the deployment module 230 , may instantiate the computer application(s) 314 , 324 or call another process that will instantiate the computer application(s) 314 , 324 .
- the deployment of the configuration settings may include a copying of configuration settings from the configuration tables of the configuration repository 242 to the configuration tables 316 , 326 of the respective application 314 , 324 .
- a configuration setting that is copied to one of the computer applications 314 , 324 may refer to an item of content or data stored in the data repository 244 , of FIG. 3 , or the content repository 222 , of FIG. 3 .
- the configuration setting deployment process 304 for the respective application 314 , 324 may call a method of the data deployment process 308 to cause that data or content to be copied to the application 314 , 324 .
- that data or content may be copied when the data deployment process 308 is executed at either an earlier or a later time.
- the data deployment processes 308 may be executed if there is demonstration data in the configuration workspace 228 or if there is content to deploy from the data repository 244 of FIG. 3 or the content repository 222 of FIG. 3 . If there is demonstration data, the data may be copied from the configuration workspace 228 to application tables, data structures, storage locations, or other data stores in the application execution environment 104 . If a proper table, data structure, storage location, or other data store does not exist in the application execution environment 104 , 106 , the data deployment process, in some embodiments, is configured to execute, or call a method of another module, to cause that data location to be created or allocated.
- Some embodiments of the deployment module 230 may further include the activation processes 306 .
- the activation processes are configured to execute to activate the computer applications 314 , 316 after they have been successfully deployed.
- the activation process 306 may require an activation key, message, code, or other authorization from an activation authority to activate a configured application 314 , 316 .
- the activation authority may include one or more of a number of individuals or entities.
- An example of an activation authority may include an entity selling or an organization that developed the computer application 314 , 324 to be activated.
- Such activation processes 306 and associated functionality may be utilized for several purposes. Some such purposes may include allowing the entity selling the application to ensure the application is properly configured, has passed certain testing necessary for the entity to ensure it will meet guaranteed service level agreements or objectives, for billing purposes, or other purposes that may benefit from such an activation process.
- an activation key, or other activation signal may be received over a network, such as the Internet.
- an activation key, or other activation signal may be manually input into an administration user interface or configuration table of a configured application 314 , 324 .
- the deployment module 230 may further include the delta deployment processes 310 .
- the delta deployment processes 310 are typically only relevant after an application has already been deployed. When an application is deployed, or subsequently modified, a representation of the application configuration may be stored or updated in the deployment data store 240 as described and illustrated with reference to FIG. 3 . This may enable tracking of a current configuration of a deployed application.
- the scoping information may further be tracked on a historical basis to provide a view of a current configuration and a modified configuration not yet deployed, if applicable.
- the delta deployment processes 310 may then use that historical tracking of the application configuration to identify changes between the current application configurations and modified configurations not yet deployed.
- the delta deployment processes 310 may then only deploy the changes to the application configurations and any additional content needed or otherwise referenced by the new application configuration.
- the processes 304 , 306 , 308 , 310 of the deployment module 230 may be in the form of a single process or multiple process modules depending on the particular embodiment.
- a process module may exist for each of the processes 304 , 306 , 308 , 310 for each distinct application that may be configured in the application configuration environment 102 of FIG. 3 .
- a single process module may exist for each process 304 , 306 , 308 , 310 , but each single process module is able to communicate with each distinct application 314 , 324 type that may be configured in the application configuration environment 102 of FIG. 3 .
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a system 300 according to an example embodiment.
- the system 300 includes the application configuration environment 102 as discussed above with regard to FIG. 1 , FIG. 2 , and FIG. 3 .
- the system 300 further includes application execution environments 104 , 106 .
- the application execution environments 104 , 106 are data processing environments within which an application, or an application to be deployed, may execute.
- the deployment module 230 typically needs to know what application execution environment 104 , the type of the application, and what application instance within that environment.
- the application execution environment 104 may already be known.
- the instance may already be known.
- Each instance of an application typically includes a set of identical configuration tables which may include distinct configuration settings from one another.
- multiple instances of the application may exist such as to provide a development instance, a test instance, and a production instance.
- the deployment module 230 may deploy the configuration settings from one of the application instances in an application execution environment 104 , 106 to another application in the same or another application execution environment 104 , 106 .
- the deployment module 230 is illustrated as being a part of the application configuration environment 102 , the deployment module 230 , in other embodiments, may be a standalone application or a part of another application or process.
- FIG. 6 is a block flow diagram of a method 600 according to an example embodiment.
- Method 600 is an example of a method that may be performed to configure a set of distinct computer applications in a unified manner.
- the method 600 includes receiving 602 input configuring a set of distinct computer applications in an application configuration environment.
- the application configuration environment in such embodiments may include a configuration repository stored in a memory including configuration settings of each distinct computer application.
- the method 600 further includes deploying 604 the configuration settings of the set of distinct computer applications from the configuration repository to at least one application execution environment including and instance of one of the set of distinct computer applications.
- the application configuration environment may include a dataset with regard to each distinct computer application where each dataset is representative of at least some configuration settings of the respective distinct computer application.
- the application configuration environment may further include a data repository stored in the memory storing data to be included with at least one of the distinct computer applications when deployed.
- the deploying may also include deploying data from the data repository to a data store of at least one of the distinct computer applications in the at least one application execution environment.
- Receiving 602 input configuring the set of distinct computer applications may include receiving input in response to scoping questions related to configuring the set of distinct computer applications and applying an adaptation catalog to the received input to translate the received input to configuration settings for the set of distinct computer applications.
- the configuration settings may then be stored in the configuration repository.
- the adaptation catalog in such embodiments may include an entry for each scoping question and a mapping from each possible answer to at least one configuration setting of one or more of the set of distinct computer applications.
- FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a computing device according to an example embodiment.
- multiple such computing devices are utilized in a distributed network to implement multiple components of the various embodiments described above, such as the application configuration environment, the application execution environments, and the portable computing device.
- An object oriented, service oriented, or other architecture may be used to implement such functions and communicate between the multiple systems and components.
- One example computing device in the form of a computer 710 may include one, two, or more processing units 702 , one or more memory 704 and removable storage devices 712 and non-removable storage devices 714 .
- Memory 704 may include volatile memory 706 and non-volatile memory 708 .
- Computer 710 may include—or have access to a computing environment that includes—a variety of computer-readable media, such as volatile memory 706 and non-volatile memory 708 , removable storage 712 , and non-removable storage 714 .
- Computer storage includes random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM) & electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technologies, compact disc read-only memory (CD ROM), Digital Versatile Disks (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium capable of storing computer-readable instructions.
- Computer 710 may include or have access to a computing environment that includes input 716 , output 718 , and a communication connection 720 .
- the computer may operate in a networked environment using a communication connection to connect to one or more remote computers, such as database servers.
- the remote computer may include a personal computer (PC), server, router, network PC, a peer device or other common network node, or the like.
- the communication connection may include a Local Area Network (LAN), a Wide Area Network (WAN), System Area Network (SAN), or other networks.
- LAN Local Area Network
- WAN Wide Area Network
- SAN System Area Network
- Computer-readable instructions stored on a computer-readable medium are executable by the processing unit 702 of the computer 710 .
- a hard drive, CD-ROM, and RAM are some examples of articles including a computer-readable medium.
- the computer-readable instructions, when executed by a processing unit 702 may perform one or more of the methods and processes described above.
- processors may be temporarily configured (e.g., by software) or permanently configured to perform the relevant operations. Whether temporarily or permanently configured, such processors may constitute processor-implemented modules that operate to perform one or more operations or functions.
- the modules referred to herein may, in some example embodiments, comprise processor-implemented modules.
- the methods and processes described herein may be at least partially processor-implemented. For example, at least some of the operations of a method may be performed by one or more processors or processor-implemented modules. The performance of certain of the operations may be distributed among the one or more processors, not only residing within a single machine, but deployed across a number of machines. In some example embodiments, the processor or processors may be located in a single location (e.g., within a home environment, an office environment or as a server farm), while in other embodiments the processors may be distributed across a number of locations.
- the one or more processors may also operate to support performance of the relevant operations in a “cloud computing” environment or as a “software as a service” (SaaS). For example, at least some of the operations may be performed by a group of computers (as examples of machines including processors), these operations being accessible via a network (e.g., the Internet) and via one or more appropriate interfaces (e.g., Application Program Interfaces (APIs)).
- SaaS software as a service
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Stored Programmes (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (15)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/332,513 US8396893B2 (en) | 2008-12-11 | 2008-12-11 | Unified configuration of multiple applications |
EP20090012347 EP2196955A1 (en) | 2008-12-11 | 2009-09-29 | Unified configuration of multiple applications |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/332,513 US8396893B2 (en) | 2008-12-11 | 2008-12-11 | Unified configuration of multiple applications |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20100153443A1 US20100153443A1 (en) | 2010-06-17 |
US8396893B2 true US8396893B2 (en) | 2013-03-12 |
Family
ID=41263671
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/332,513 Active 2029-10-31 US8396893B2 (en) | 2008-12-11 | 2008-12-11 | Unified configuration of multiple applications |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8396893B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2196955A1 (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8595258B2 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2013-11-26 | Mark Gordon Damm | Method and system to manage complex systems knowledge |
US20150067805A1 (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2015-03-05 | U-Me Holdings LLC | Making a user's data, settings, and licensed content available in the cloud |
US9213771B2 (en) | 2013-06-04 | 2015-12-15 | Sap Se | Question answering framework |
US9323512B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2016-04-26 | Sap Se | Tools and methods for copying applications |
US9456164B2 (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2016-09-27 | U-Me Holdings LLC | Universal remote control that is automatically programmable according to location |
US10095717B2 (en) | 2015-08-05 | 2018-10-09 | Sap Se | Data archive vault in big data platform |
US10467890B2 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2019-11-05 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Secured sensor interface |
US20200334047A1 (en) * | 2019-04-18 | 2020-10-22 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Systems and computer-implemented methods for managing application configurations |
Families Citing this family (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7827528B2 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2010-11-02 | Sap Ag | Delta layering |
US7823124B2 (en) * | 2006-08-29 | 2010-10-26 | Sap Ag | Transformation layer |
US20080071555A1 (en) * | 2006-08-29 | 2008-03-20 | Juergen Sattler | Application solution proposal engine |
US20080059630A1 (en) * | 2006-08-29 | 2008-03-06 | Juergen Sattler | Assistant |
US7912800B2 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2011-03-22 | Sap Ag | Deduction engine to determine what configuration management scoping questions to ask a user based on responses to one or more previous questions |
US8131644B2 (en) * | 2006-08-29 | 2012-03-06 | Sap Ag | Formular update |
US20080082517A1 (en) * | 2006-08-29 | 2008-04-03 | Sap Ag | Change assistant |
US7831568B2 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2010-11-09 | Sap Ag | Data migration |
US20080127082A1 (en) * | 2006-08-29 | 2008-05-29 | Miho Emil Birimisa | System and method for requirements-based application configuration |
US7908589B2 (en) * | 2006-08-29 | 2011-03-15 | Sap Ag | Deployment |
US7831637B2 (en) * | 2006-08-29 | 2010-11-09 | Sap Ag | System on the fly |
US8065661B2 (en) * | 2006-08-29 | 2011-11-22 | Sap Ag | Test engine |
US8135659B2 (en) * | 2008-10-01 | 2012-03-13 | Sap Ag | System configuration comparison to identify process variation |
US8255429B2 (en) | 2008-12-17 | 2012-08-28 | Sap Ag | Configuration change without disruption of incomplete processes |
US20120116848A1 (en) * | 2010-11-10 | 2012-05-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Optimizing business operational environments |
US8595353B2 (en) * | 2011-06-06 | 2013-11-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automated recommendations for cloud-computing options |
US8838799B2 (en) | 2012-02-13 | 2014-09-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Command management in a networked computing environment |
US9210098B2 (en) | 2012-02-13 | 2015-12-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Enhanced command selection in a networked computing environment |
US8700838B2 (en) | 2012-06-19 | 2014-04-15 | Concurix Corporation | Allocating heaps in NUMA systems |
US9047196B2 (en) | 2012-06-19 | 2015-06-02 | Concurix Corporation | Usage aware NUMA process scheduling |
US9575813B2 (en) | 2012-07-17 | 2017-02-21 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Pattern matching process scheduler with upstream optimization |
US9043788B2 (en) | 2012-08-10 | 2015-05-26 | Concurix Corporation | Experiment manager for manycore systems |
US9311070B2 (en) | 2012-10-05 | 2016-04-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamically recommending configuration changes to an operating system image |
US9286051B2 (en) | 2012-10-05 | 2016-03-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic protection of one or more deployed copies of a master operating system image |
US9208041B2 (en) | 2012-10-05 | 2015-12-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic protection of a master operating system image |
US8990772B2 (en) * | 2012-10-16 | 2015-03-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamically recommending changes to an association between an operating system image and an update group |
US8656135B2 (en) | 2012-11-08 | 2014-02-18 | Concurix Corporation | Optimized memory configuration deployed prior to execution |
US8607018B2 (en) | 2012-11-08 | 2013-12-10 | Concurix Corporation | Memory usage configuration based on observations |
US8656134B2 (en) | 2012-11-08 | 2014-02-18 | Concurix Corporation | Optimized memory configuration deployed on executing code |
US8694574B2 (en) | 2012-11-08 | 2014-04-08 | Concurix Corporation | Optimized settings in a configuration database with boundaries |
US10579497B2 (en) * | 2013-02-26 | 2020-03-03 | Red Hat, Inc. | Providing context simulation |
US20130227529A1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2013-08-29 | Concurix Corporation | Runtime Memory Settings Derived from Trace Data |
US10735281B1 (en) * | 2016-12-14 | 2020-08-04 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Application focused provisioning system |
US10956526B2 (en) * | 2019-03-04 | 2021-03-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Implementing a policy-driven resource deployment mechanism in a cloud environment |
Citations (173)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4079452A (en) | 1976-06-15 | 1978-03-14 | Bunker Ramo Corporation | Programmable controller with modular firmware for communication control |
US4501528A (en) | 1982-04-07 | 1985-02-26 | Ing. Gunter Knapp Ges. Mbh & Co. Kg | System for automatic stacking, storage and withdrawal of packaged merchandise in large warehouses |
US5307499A (en) | 1990-11-30 | 1994-04-26 | Singapore Computer Systems Limited | Interpretive object-oriented facility which can access pre-compiled classes |
US5428791A (en) * | 1992-07-18 | 1995-06-27 | International Computers Limited | Configuration mechanism for a computer system having generic user interface and component-specific builder modules |
US5459868A (en) | 1990-11-30 | 1995-10-17 | St Computer Systems & Services | Interpretive object-oriented facility which can access pre-compiled classes |
US5647056A (en) | 1992-11-18 | 1997-07-08 | Canon Information Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for managing access to a networked peripheral |
US5657448A (en) | 1992-11-18 | 1997-08-12 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | System for an interactive network board remotely configurable by selecting from a plurality of functionality defining software, such as a printer server stored in prom |
US5680624A (en) | 1993-12-21 | 1997-10-21 | Object Licensing Corporation | Object oriented interrupt system |
US5754845A (en) | 1989-09-28 | 1998-05-19 | Sterling Software, Inc. | Portable and dynamic distributed applications architecture |
US5758062A (en) | 1996-04-30 | 1998-05-26 | Oracle Corporation | Method and apparatus for regression testing of application logic |
US5857102A (en) | 1995-03-14 | 1999-01-05 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System and method for determining and manipulating configuration information of servers in a distributed object environment |
US5978579A (en) | 1997-08-12 | 1999-11-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Architecture for customizable component system |
US6006035A (en) * | 1997-12-31 | 1999-12-21 | Network Associates | Method and system for custom computer software installation |
US6044461A (en) | 1997-09-16 | 2000-03-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Computer system and method of selectively rebooting the same in response to a system program code update |
US6067525A (en) | 1995-10-30 | 2000-05-23 | Clear With Computers | Integrated computerized sales force automation system |
US6128730A (en) | 1997-12-29 | 2000-10-03 | Bull Hn Information Systems Inc. | Method and apparatus for multilevel software configuration having administrator and software driven override limiting capabilities |
US6161123A (en) | 1997-05-06 | 2000-12-12 | Intermec Ip Corporation | Providing reliable communication over an unreliable transport layer in a hand-held device using a persistent session |
US6161176A (en) | 1998-11-20 | 2000-12-12 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for storing configuration settings for transfer from a first system to a second system |
US6185587B1 (en) | 1997-06-19 | 2001-02-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for building a web site with automated help |
US6189139B1 (en) | 1997-12-10 | 2001-02-13 | Ncr Corporation | INF development environment |
US6230305B1 (en) | 1997-09-08 | 2001-05-08 | Intusoft | Methods and apparatus for configuring schematic diagrams |
US6301710B1 (en) | 1999-01-06 | 2001-10-09 | Sony Corporation | System and method for creating a substitute registry when automatically installing an update program |
US6321282B1 (en) | 1999-10-19 | 2001-11-20 | Rambus Inc. | Apparatus and method for topography dependent signaling |
US20010044834A1 (en) | 2000-03-22 | 2001-11-22 | Robert Bradshaw | Method and apparatus for automatically deploying data in a computer network |
US6324578B1 (en) | 1998-12-14 | 2001-11-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods, systems and computer program products for management of configurable application programs on a network |
US20010054091A1 (en) | 1999-12-30 | 2001-12-20 | Norbert Lenz | Request scheduler for automated software configuration |
US20020026572A1 (en) | 2000-08-31 | 2002-02-28 | Rafael Joory | Reconfiguration incident to enabling an application access to setup information therefor |
US6397232B1 (en) | 2001-02-02 | 2002-05-28 | Acer Inc. | Method and system for translating the format of the content of document file |
US20020099578A1 (en) | 2001-01-22 | 2002-07-25 | Eicher Daryl E. | Performance-based supply chain management system and method with automatic alert threshold determination |
US20020104097A1 (en) | 2000-05-04 | 2002-08-01 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc | System and method for a communication terminal to manage memory and maintain a current application version for multiple applications |
US20020116373A1 (en) | 2001-02-22 | 2002-08-22 | Norifumi Nishikawa | Database management system, and query method and query execution program in the database management system |
US6449624B1 (en) | 1999-10-18 | 2002-09-10 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Version control and audit trail in a process control system |
US6453302B1 (en) | 1996-11-25 | 2002-09-17 | Clear With Computers, Inc. | Computer generated presentation system |
US20020138570A1 (en) | 2001-03-23 | 2002-09-26 | Neil Hickey | System for and method of automatically migrating data among multiple legacy applications and accessible storage formats |
US20020147784A1 (en) | 2001-04-06 | 2002-10-10 | Stephen Gold | User account handling on aggregated group of multiple headless computer entities |
US6466972B1 (en) | 1999-03-31 | 2002-10-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Server based configuration of network computers via machine classes |
US6470464B2 (en) | 1999-02-23 | 2002-10-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for predicting computer system performance and for making recommendations for improving its performance |
US20020156947A1 (en) | 2001-04-19 | 2002-10-24 | Masahiro Nishio | Information processing apparatus, information processing method, alternate response apparatus, response method, control program, and network system |
US20020188625A1 (en) | 2001-06-11 | 2002-12-12 | Jans Jozef Theodorus Johannes Maria | Method, system and computer program for executing hot migrate operation using migration plug-ins |
US20030005411A1 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2003-01-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for dynamic packaging of component objects |
US6513045B1 (en) | 1999-11-17 | 2003-01-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and an apparatus for providing cross product automated user assistance in the planning, configuration, and management of information systems |
US20030023963A1 (en) | 2001-07-25 | 2003-01-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for automating software upgrades |
US6523027B1 (en) | 1999-07-30 | 2003-02-18 | Accenture Llp | Interfacing servers in a Java based e-commerce architecture |
US6539372B1 (en) | 1999-11-17 | 2003-03-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for providing automated user assistance customized output in the planning, configuration, and management of information systems |
US6538668B1 (en) | 1999-04-09 | 2003-03-25 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Distributed settings control protocol |
US20030115292A1 (en) | 2001-10-24 | 2003-06-19 | Griffin Philip B. | System and method for delegated administration |
US20030120780A1 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2003-06-26 | Xiaoyun Zhu | Network resource assignment system and method |
US20030135842A1 (en) | 2002-01-16 | 2003-07-17 | Jan-Erik Frey | Software development tool for embedded computer systems |
US20030227392A1 (en) | 2002-01-11 | 2003-12-11 | Ebert Peter S. | Context-aware and real-time item tracking system architecture and scenarios |
US20030237093A1 (en) | 2002-06-19 | 2003-12-25 | Marsh David J. | Electronic program guide systems and methods for handling multiple users |
US20040019670A1 (en) | 2002-07-25 | 2004-01-29 | Sridatta Viswanath | Pluggable semantic verification and validation of configuration data |
US20040019669A1 (en) | 2002-07-25 | 2004-01-29 | Sridatta Viswanath | Event notification in an administration framework for server systems |
US20040031030A1 (en) | 2000-05-20 | 2004-02-12 | Equipe Communications Corporation | Signatures for facilitating hot upgrades of modular software components |
US20040060047A1 (en) | 2002-09-24 | 2004-03-25 | Inrange Technologies Corporation | Method and apparatus for downloading executable code in a non-disruptive manner |
US6728877B2 (en) | 1999-04-28 | 2004-04-27 | Tranxition Corporation | Method and system for automatically transitioning of configuration settings among computer systems |
US20040088691A1 (en) | 2002-10-31 | 2004-05-06 | Jeffrey Hammes | Debugging and performance profiling using control-dataflow graph representations with reconfigurable hardware emulation |
US20040111417A1 (en) | 2002-08-23 | 2004-06-10 | Fujitsu Limited | Data manipulation persisting method in transaction processing system and data manipulating program for remote database |
US6763327B1 (en) | 2000-02-17 | 2004-07-13 | Tensilica, Inc. | Abstraction of configurable processor functionality for operating systems portability |
US20040176996A1 (en) | 2003-03-03 | 2004-09-09 | Jason Powers | Method for monitoring a managed system |
US20040186927A1 (en) | 2003-03-18 | 2004-09-23 | Evren Eryurek | Asset optimization reporting in a process plant |
US6804709B2 (en) | 2001-02-20 | 2004-10-12 | Microsoft Corporation | System uses test controller to match different combination configuration capabilities of servers and clients and assign test cases for implementing distributed testing |
JP2004287972A (en) | 2003-03-24 | 2004-10-14 | Japan Research Institute Ltd | Edi system, and format definition and production program for edi message |
US6810401B1 (en) | 1999-10-08 | 2004-10-26 | Edgenet Inc. | Automated configuration system and method |
WO2004114130A2 (en) | 2003-06-23 | 2004-12-29 | Red Bend Ltd. | Method and system for updating versions of content stored in a storage device |
US20040268342A1 (en) | 2003-06-30 | 2004-12-30 | Dell Products L.P. | System for automated generation of config to order software stacks |
US20050007964A1 (en) | 2003-07-01 | 2005-01-13 | Vincent Falco | Peer-to-peer network heartbeat server and associated methods |
US20050044215A1 (en) | 2003-08-22 | 2005-02-24 | Cohen Alain J. | System for automatic import, analysis, and reporting of network configuration and status information |
US20050044546A1 (en) | 2003-07-03 | 2005-02-24 | Euroform A/S | Method of allowing printing from a network attached device |
US6868392B1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2005-03-15 | Fujitsu Limited | System and method for electronic shopping using an interactive shopping agent |
US20050080801A1 (en) | 2000-05-17 | 2005-04-14 | Vijayakumar Kothandaraman | System for transactionally deploying content across multiple machines |
US20050086195A1 (en) | 2003-09-04 | 2005-04-21 | Leng Leng Tan | Self-managing database architecture |
US20050108707A1 (en) | 2003-11-14 | 2005-05-19 | Taylor Thomas M. | Systems and methods for creating and managing a virtual retail store on end-user client computers within a network |
US20050108219A1 (en) | 1999-07-07 | 2005-05-19 | Carlos De La Huerga | Tiered and content based database searching |
WO2005045670A1 (en) | 2003-11-07 | 2005-05-19 | Sap Ag | Systems and methods for configuring software |
US20050144474A1 (en) | 2003-11-26 | 2005-06-30 | F-Secure Oyj | Securing a data transmission channel |
US20050160419A1 (en) | 2004-01-20 | 2005-07-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for replacing an application on a server |
US20050188422A1 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2005-08-25 | Everdream Corporation | Protected execution environments within a computer system |
US20050193103A1 (en) | 2002-06-18 | 2005-09-01 | John Drabik | Method and apparatus for automatic configuration and management of a virtual private network |
US20050262499A1 (en) | 2004-05-21 | 2005-11-24 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for external override of annotations |
US20050262076A1 (en) | 2004-05-21 | 2005-11-24 | Voskuil Eric K | System for policy-based management of software updates |
US20050268282A1 (en) | 2004-05-05 | 2005-12-01 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for inventory services |
US20050278202A1 (en) * | 2004-06-15 | 2005-12-15 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Information technology transformation assessment tools |
US20050278280A1 (en) | 2004-05-28 | 2005-12-15 | Semerdzhiev Krasimir P | Self update mechanism for update module |
US20060037000A1 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2006-02-16 | Speeter Thomas H | Configuration management data model using blueprints |
US20060047793A1 (en) | 2004-08-31 | 2006-03-02 | Ibm Corporation | Method for configuring computing devices using reference groups |
US7031951B2 (en) | 2000-07-19 | 2006-04-18 | Convergys Information Management Group, Inc. | Expert system adapted dedicated internet access guidance engine |
US7032114B1 (en) | 2000-08-30 | 2006-04-18 | Symantec Corporation | System and method for using signatures to detect computer intrusions |
US7051130B1 (en) | 1999-10-19 | 2006-05-23 | Rambus Inc. | Integrated circuit device that stores a value representative of a drive strength setting |
US7062502B1 (en) | 2001-12-28 | 2006-06-13 | Kesler John N | Automated generation of dynamic data entry user interface for relational database management systems |
US20060173857A1 (en) | 2005-01-31 | 2006-08-03 | Cassatt Corporation | Autonomic control of a distributed computing system using rule-based sensor definitions |
US7089317B2 (en) | 2002-03-21 | 2006-08-08 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Architecture for plugging messaging systems into an application server |
US20060184926A1 (en) | 2002-07-17 | 2006-08-17 | Yan Or | Deployment of applications in a multitier compute infrastructure |
US20060184917A1 (en) | 2005-02-14 | 2006-08-17 | Troan Lawrence E | System And Method for Verifying Compatibility of Computer Equipment with a Software Product |
US7099945B2 (en) | 2000-09-19 | 2006-08-29 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Mapping control functions of a plurality of communication installations into a single logical interface |
US20060224637A1 (en) | 2005-04-01 | 2006-10-05 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Chasing engine for data transfer |
US20060234698A1 (en) | 2005-04-14 | 2006-10-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Apparatus and process for a universal diagnostic monitor module on a wireless device |
US20060242697A1 (en) | 2005-04-26 | 2006-10-26 | Kyocera Mita Corporation | Software authentication device and image forming device |
US20060248450A1 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2006-11-02 | Microsoft Corporation | XML application framework |
US20060253588A1 (en) | 2005-05-09 | 2006-11-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for managing test results in a data center |
US20070006161A1 (en) | 2005-06-02 | 2007-01-04 | Kuester Anthony E | Methods and systems for evaluating the compliance of software to a quality benchmark |
US20070016591A1 (en) | 2001-08-14 | 2007-01-18 | Endforce, Inc. | Selection and storage of policies in network management |
US20070022323A1 (en) | 2005-07-19 | 2007-01-25 | Loh Aik K | Product framework for manufacturing testing environment |
US20070025704A1 (en) | 2005-08-01 | 2007-02-01 | Sony Corporation | Information-processing apparatus, reproduction apparatus, communication method, reproduction method and computer programs |
US7181731B2 (en) | 2000-09-01 | 2007-02-20 | Op40, Inc. | Method, system, and structure for distributing and executing software and data on different network and computer devices, platforms, and environments |
US20070074203A1 (en) | 2005-09-27 | 2007-03-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Deployment, maintenance and configuration of complex hardware and software systems |
US20070079289A1 (en) | 2005-09-27 | 2007-04-05 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for quick range finder for performance test |
US20070079291A1 (en) | 2005-09-27 | 2007-04-05 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for dynamic analysis window for accurate result analysis for performance test |
US7206827B2 (en) | 2002-07-25 | 2007-04-17 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Dynamic administration framework for server systems |
US7209851B2 (en) | 2003-02-14 | 2007-04-24 | Advantest America R&D Center, Inc. | Method and structure to develop a test program for semiconductor integrated circuits |
US20070093926A1 (en) | 2005-10-26 | 2007-04-26 | D Braun Scott | Wireless industrial control user interface with configurable software capabilities |
US20070097975A1 (en) | 2005-11-02 | 2007-05-03 | Sbc Knowledge Ventures, L.P. | Service to push author-spoken audio content with targeted audio advertising to users |
US7228326B2 (en) | 2002-01-18 | 2007-06-05 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for application deployment |
US20070157192A1 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2007-07-05 | Dorothea Hoefler | Software maintenance management |
US20070157185A1 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2007-07-05 | Semerdzhiev Krasimir P | System and method for deployable templates |
US20070168065A1 (en) | 2004-05-04 | 2007-07-19 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | System for configuring graphic display elements and process modules in process plants |
US20070168971A1 (en) | 2005-11-22 | 2007-07-19 | Epiphany, Inc. | Multi-tiered model-based application testing |
US20070198437A1 (en) | 2005-12-01 | 2007-08-23 | Firestar Software, Inc. | System and method for exchanging information among exchange applications |
US20070234274A1 (en) | 2006-01-19 | 2007-10-04 | David Ross | System and method for building software applications |
US20070234293A1 (en) | 2005-12-12 | 2007-10-04 | Archivas, Inc. | Automated software testing framework |
US20070257715A1 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2007-11-08 | Semerdzhiev Krasimir P | System and method for abstract configuration |
US7299382B2 (en) | 2002-04-29 | 2007-11-20 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System and method for automatic test case generation |
US7305659B2 (en) | 2002-09-03 | 2007-12-04 | Sap Ag | Handling parameters in test scripts for computer program applications |
US7337317B2 (en) | 2003-07-03 | 2008-02-26 | Hand Held Products, Inc. | Memory data copying system for devices |
US7340411B2 (en) | 1998-02-26 | 2008-03-04 | Cook Rachael L | System and method for generating, capturing, and managing customer lead information over a computer network |
US20080059474A1 (en) | 2005-12-29 | 2008-03-06 | Blue Jungle | Detecting Behavioral Patterns and Anomalies Using Activity Profiles |
US20080059490A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-03-06 | Juergen Sattler | Design time |
US20080059630A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-03-06 | Juergen Sattler | Assistant |
US20080059537A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-03-06 | Juergen Sattler | Content subscription |
US20080071828A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-03-20 | Juergen Sattler | Formular update |
US20080071718A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-03-20 | Sap Ag | Deduction engine |
US20080071839A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-03-20 | Juergen Sattler | Content authoring |
US20080071555A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-03-20 | Juergen Sattler | Application solution proposal engine |
US20080082517A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-04-03 | Sap Ag | Change assistant |
US7376682B2 (en) | 2003-09-05 | 2008-05-20 | Oracle International Corporation | Time model |
US7379455B2 (en) | 1998-04-03 | 2008-05-27 | Converged Data Solutions Llc | Systems and methods for providing configurable caller ID information |
US20080127084A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-05-29 | Sap Ag | Deployment |
US20080127082A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-05-29 | Miho Emil Birimisa | System and method for requirements-based application configuration |
US20080126375A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-05-29 | Juergen Sattler | Data migration |
US20080127123A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-05-29 | Juergen Sattler | Transformation layer |
US20080127086A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-05-29 | Juergen Sattler | Delta layering |
US20080126448A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-05-29 | Juergen Sattler | Test engine |
US20080127085A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-05-29 | Juergen Sattler | System on the fly |
US7412497B2 (en) | 2002-07-25 | 2008-08-12 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Generation of Administration framework for server systems |
US20080195579A1 (en) | 2004-03-19 | 2008-08-14 | Kennis Peter H | Methods and systems for extraction of transaction data for compliance monitoring |
US7421621B1 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2008-09-02 | Matador Technologies Corp. | Application integration testing |
US7426694B2 (en) | 2004-02-17 | 2008-09-16 | Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. | System and method for customizing design of settings management user interface systems used to configure settings for intelligent electronic devices |
US7451451B2 (en) * | 2001-05-16 | 2008-11-11 | Softricity, Inc. | Operating system abstraction and protection layer |
US20090024990A1 (en) | 2003-07-01 | 2009-01-22 | Avaya Inc. | Security Vulnerability Monitor |
US7487231B2 (en) | 2001-06-12 | 2009-02-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing configuration of computer systems on a computer network |
US7519964B1 (en) | 2003-12-03 | 2009-04-14 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System and method for application deployment in a domain for a cluster |
US7540014B2 (en) | 2005-02-23 | 2009-05-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Automated policy change alert in a distributed enterprise |
US20090157455A1 (en) | 2003-09-10 | 2009-06-18 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Instruction system and method for equipment problem solving |
US20090193439A1 (en) | 2008-01-30 | 2009-07-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Managing component programs within a service application |
US7590669B2 (en) | 2004-04-06 | 2009-09-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Managing client configuration data |
US7593124B1 (en) | 2004-02-06 | 2009-09-22 | Yazaki North America, Inc. | System and method for managing devices |
US7599895B2 (en) | 2005-07-07 | 2009-10-06 | Knowm Tech, Llc | Methodology for the configuration and repair of unreliable switching elements |
US7603452B1 (en) * | 2002-03-26 | 2009-10-13 | Symantec Corporation | Networked computer environment assurance system and method |
US7606840B2 (en) | 2004-06-15 | 2009-10-20 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Version control in a distributed computing environment |
US7610582B2 (en) | 2003-04-18 | 2009-10-27 | Sap Ag | Managing a computer system with blades |
US7609651B1 (en) | 2006-01-03 | 2009-10-27 | Emc Corporation | Methods and systems for maintaining configuration information |
US7617256B2 (en) | 2004-07-19 | 2009-11-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Remote file updates through remote protocol |
US20090300416A1 (en) | 2008-05-27 | 2009-12-03 | Kentaro Watanabe | Remedying method for troubles in virtual server system and system thereof |
US7640542B2 (en) | 2005-03-24 | 2009-12-29 | Nokia Corporation | Managing midlet suites in OSGI environment |
US7644432B2 (en) | 2003-10-10 | 2010-01-05 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Policy inheritance through nested groups |
US7665082B2 (en) | 2000-06-30 | 2010-02-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Methods and systems for adaptation, diagnosis, optimization, and prescription technology for network-based applications |
US7685577B2 (en) | 2000-09-01 | 2010-03-23 | Op40, Inc. | System and method for translating an asset for distribution over multi-tiered networks |
US20100082518A1 (en) | 2008-10-01 | 2010-04-01 | Joachim Gaffga | System configuration comparison to identify process variation |
US7702897B2 (en) | 2002-02-07 | 2010-04-20 | Netapp, Inc. | Method and system to quarantine system software and configuration |
US7725877B2 (en) | 2004-01-09 | 2010-05-25 | National Instruments Corporation | Graphical program which includes an I/O node for hardware abstraction |
US7725200B2 (en) | 2006-10-20 | 2010-05-25 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Validation of configuration settings in an industrial process |
US7739657B2 (en) | 2001-05-17 | 2010-06-15 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Pipeline architecture for use with net-centric application program architectures |
US20100153468A1 (en) | 2008-12-17 | 2010-06-17 | Sap Ag | Configuration change without disruption of incomplete processes |
US20100192135A1 (en) | 2003-02-14 | 2010-07-29 | Advantest Corporation | Method and Structure to Develop a Test Program for Semiconductor Integrated Circuits |
-
2008
- 2008-12-11 US US12/332,513 patent/US8396893B2/en active Active
-
2009
- 2009-09-29 EP EP20090012347 patent/EP2196955A1/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (192)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4079452A (en) | 1976-06-15 | 1978-03-14 | Bunker Ramo Corporation | Programmable controller with modular firmware for communication control |
US4501528A (en) | 1982-04-07 | 1985-02-26 | Ing. Gunter Knapp Ges. Mbh & Co. Kg | System for automatic stacking, storage and withdrawal of packaged merchandise in large warehouses |
US5754845A (en) | 1989-09-28 | 1998-05-19 | Sterling Software, Inc. | Portable and dynamic distributed applications architecture |
US5459868A (en) | 1990-11-30 | 1995-10-17 | St Computer Systems & Services | Interpretive object-oriented facility which can access pre-compiled classes |
US5307499A (en) | 1990-11-30 | 1994-04-26 | Singapore Computer Systems Limited | Interpretive object-oriented facility which can access pre-compiled classes |
US5428791A (en) * | 1992-07-18 | 1995-06-27 | International Computers Limited | Configuration mechanism for a computer system having generic user interface and component-specific builder modules |
US5647056A (en) | 1992-11-18 | 1997-07-08 | Canon Information Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for managing access to a networked peripheral |
US5657448A (en) | 1992-11-18 | 1997-08-12 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | System for an interactive network board remotely configurable by selecting from a plurality of functionality defining software, such as a printer server stored in prom |
US5680624A (en) | 1993-12-21 | 1997-10-21 | Object Licensing Corporation | Object oriented interrupt system |
US5857102A (en) | 1995-03-14 | 1999-01-05 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System and method for determining and manipulating configuration information of servers in a distributed object environment |
US6067525A (en) | 1995-10-30 | 2000-05-23 | Clear With Computers | Integrated computerized sales force automation system |
US5758062A (en) | 1996-04-30 | 1998-05-26 | Oracle Corporation | Method and apparatus for regression testing of application logic |
US6453302B1 (en) | 1996-11-25 | 2002-09-17 | Clear With Computers, Inc. | Computer generated presentation system |
US6161123A (en) | 1997-05-06 | 2000-12-12 | Intermec Ip Corporation | Providing reliable communication over an unreliable transport layer in a hand-held device using a persistent session |
US6185587B1 (en) | 1997-06-19 | 2001-02-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for building a web site with automated help |
US5978579A (en) | 1997-08-12 | 1999-11-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Architecture for customizable component system |
US6230305B1 (en) | 1997-09-08 | 2001-05-08 | Intusoft | Methods and apparatus for configuring schematic diagrams |
US6044461A (en) | 1997-09-16 | 2000-03-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Computer system and method of selectively rebooting the same in response to a system program code update |
US6189139B1 (en) | 1997-12-10 | 2001-02-13 | Ncr Corporation | INF development environment |
US6128730A (en) | 1997-12-29 | 2000-10-03 | Bull Hn Information Systems Inc. | Method and apparatus for multilevel software configuration having administrator and software driven override limiting capabilities |
US6006035A (en) * | 1997-12-31 | 1999-12-21 | Network Associates | Method and system for custom computer software installation |
US7340411B2 (en) | 1998-02-26 | 2008-03-04 | Cook Rachael L | System and method for generating, capturing, and managing customer lead information over a computer network |
US7379455B2 (en) | 1998-04-03 | 2008-05-27 | Converged Data Solutions Llc | Systems and methods for providing configurable caller ID information |
US6161176A (en) | 1998-11-20 | 2000-12-12 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for storing configuration settings for transfer from a first system to a second system |
US6324578B1 (en) | 1998-12-14 | 2001-11-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods, systems and computer program products for management of configurable application programs on a network |
US6301710B1 (en) | 1999-01-06 | 2001-10-09 | Sony Corporation | System and method for creating a substitute registry when automatically installing an update program |
US6470464B2 (en) | 1999-02-23 | 2002-10-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for predicting computer system performance and for making recommendations for improving its performance |
US6466972B1 (en) | 1999-03-31 | 2002-10-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Server based configuration of network computers via machine classes |
US6538668B1 (en) | 1999-04-09 | 2003-03-25 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Distributed settings control protocol |
US6728877B2 (en) | 1999-04-28 | 2004-04-27 | Tranxition Corporation | Method and system for automatically transitioning of configuration settings among computer systems |
US7346766B2 (en) | 1999-04-28 | 2008-03-18 | Tranxition Corporation | Method and system for automatically transitioning of configuration settings among computer systems |
US20050108219A1 (en) | 1999-07-07 | 2005-05-19 | Carlos De La Huerga | Tiered and content based database searching |
US6868392B1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2005-03-15 | Fujitsu Limited | System and method for electronic shopping using an interactive shopping agent |
US6523027B1 (en) | 1999-07-30 | 2003-02-18 | Accenture Llp | Interfacing servers in a Java based e-commerce architecture |
US6810401B1 (en) | 1999-10-08 | 2004-10-26 | Edgenet Inc. | Automated configuration system and method |
US6449624B1 (en) | 1999-10-18 | 2002-09-10 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Version control and audit trail in a process control system |
US6321282B1 (en) | 1999-10-19 | 2001-11-20 | Rambus Inc. | Apparatus and method for topography dependent signaling |
US7051130B1 (en) | 1999-10-19 | 2006-05-23 | Rambus Inc. | Integrated circuit device that stores a value representative of a drive strength setting |
US7174400B2 (en) | 1999-10-19 | 2007-02-06 | Rambus Inc. | Integrated circuit device that stores a value representative of an equalization co-efficient setting |
US7546390B2 (en) | 1999-10-19 | 2009-06-09 | Rambus, Inc. | Integrated circuit device and signaling method with topographic dependent equalization coefficient |
US6539372B1 (en) | 1999-11-17 | 2003-03-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for providing automated user assistance customized output in the planning, configuration, and management of information systems |
US6513045B1 (en) | 1999-11-17 | 2003-01-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and an apparatus for providing cross product automated user assistance in the planning, configuration, and management of information systems |
US20010054091A1 (en) | 1999-12-30 | 2001-12-20 | Norbert Lenz | Request scheduler for automated software configuration |
US6763327B1 (en) | 2000-02-17 | 2004-07-13 | Tensilica, Inc. | Abstraction of configurable processor functionality for operating systems portability |
US20010044834A1 (en) | 2000-03-22 | 2001-11-22 | Robert Bradshaw | Method and apparatus for automatically deploying data in a computer network |
US20050188422A1 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2005-08-25 | Everdream Corporation | Protected execution environments within a computer system |
US20020104097A1 (en) | 2000-05-04 | 2002-08-01 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc | System and method for a communication terminal to manage memory and maintain a current application version for multiple applications |
US7657887B2 (en) | 2000-05-17 | 2010-02-02 | Interwoven, Inc. | System for transactionally deploying content across multiple machines |
US20050080801A1 (en) | 2000-05-17 | 2005-04-14 | Vijayakumar Kothandaraman | System for transactionally deploying content across multiple machines |
US20040031030A1 (en) | 2000-05-20 | 2004-02-12 | Equipe Communications Corporation | Signatures for facilitating hot upgrades of modular software components |
US7665082B2 (en) | 2000-06-30 | 2010-02-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Methods and systems for adaptation, diagnosis, optimization, and prescription technology for network-based applications |
US7031951B2 (en) | 2000-07-19 | 2006-04-18 | Convergys Information Management Group, Inc. | Expert system adapted dedicated internet access guidance engine |
US7032114B1 (en) | 2000-08-30 | 2006-04-18 | Symantec Corporation | System and method for using signatures to detect computer intrusions |
US20020095663A1 (en) | 2000-08-31 | 2002-07-18 | Rafael Joory | Enabling an application access to setup information therefor |
US20020026572A1 (en) | 2000-08-31 | 2002-02-28 | Rafael Joory | Reconfiguration incident to enabling an application access to setup information therefor |
US7181731B2 (en) | 2000-09-01 | 2007-02-20 | Op40, Inc. | Method, system, and structure for distributing and executing software and data on different network and computer devices, platforms, and environments |
US7685577B2 (en) | 2000-09-01 | 2010-03-23 | Op40, Inc. | System and method for translating an asset for distribution over multi-tiered networks |
US7099945B2 (en) | 2000-09-19 | 2006-08-29 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Mapping control functions of a plurality of communication installations into a single logical interface |
US20020099578A1 (en) | 2001-01-22 | 2002-07-25 | Eicher Daryl E. | Performance-based supply chain management system and method with automatic alert threshold determination |
US6397232B1 (en) | 2001-02-02 | 2002-05-28 | Acer Inc. | Method and system for translating the format of the content of document file |
US6804709B2 (en) | 2001-02-20 | 2004-10-12 | Microsoft Corporation | System uses test controller to match different combination configuration capabilities of servers and clients and assign test cases for implementing distributed testing |
US20020116373A1 (en) | 2001-02-22 | 2002-08-22 | Norifumi Nishikawa | Database management system, and query method and query execution program in the database management system |
US20020138570A1 (en) | 2001-03-23 | 2002-09-26 | Neil Hickey | System for and method of automatically migrating data among multiple legacy applications and accessible storage formats |
US20020147784A1 (en) | 2001-04-06 | 2002-10-10 | Stephen Gold | User account handling on aggregated group of multiple headless computer entities |
US20020156947A1 (en) | 2001-04-19 | 2002-10-24 | Masahiro Nishio | Information processing apparatus, information processing method, alternate response apparatus, response method, control program, and network system |
US7451451B2 (en) * | 2001-05-16 | 2008-11-11 | Softricity, Inc. | Operating system abstraction and protection layer |
US7739657B2 (en) | 2001-05-17 | 2010-06-15 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Pipeline architecture for use with net-centric application program architectures |
US20020188625A1 (en) | 2001-06-11 | 2002-12-12 | Jans Jozef Theodorus Johannes Maria | Method, system and computer program for executing hot migrate operation using migration plug-ins |
US7487231B2 (en) | 2001-06-12 | 2009-02-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing configuration of computer systems on a computer network |
US20030005411A1 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2003-01-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for dynamic packaging of component objects |
US20030023963A1 (en) | 2001-07-25 | 2003-01-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for automating software upgrades |
US20070016591A1 (en) | 2001-08-14 | 2007-01-18 | Endforce, Inc. | Selection and storage of policies in network management |
US20030115292A1 (en) | 2001-10-24 | 2003-06-19 | Griffin Philip B. | System and method for delegated administration |
US20030120780A1 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2003-06-26 | Xiaoyun Zhu | Network resource assignment system and method |
US7062502B1 (en) | 2001-12-28 | 2006-06-13 | Kesler John N | Automated generation of dynamic data entry user interface for relational database management systems |
US20030227392A1 (en) | 2002-01-11 | 2003-12-11 | Ebert Peter S. | Context-aware and real-time item tracking system architecture and scenarios |
US20030135842A1 (en) | 2002-01-16 | 2003-07-17 | Jan-Erik Frey | Software development tool for embedded computer systems |
US7228326B2 (en) | 2002-01-18 | 2007-06-05 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for application deployment |
US7702897B2 (en) | 2002-02-07 | 2010-04-20 | Netapp, Inc. | Method and system to quarantine system software and configuration |
US7089317B2 (en) | 2002-03-21 | 2006-08-08 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Architecture for plugging messaging systems into an application server |
US7603452B1 (en) * | 2002-03-26 | 2009-10-13 | Symantec Corporation | Networked computer environment assurance system and method |
US7299382B2 (en) | 2002-04-29 | 2007-11-20 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System and method for automatic test case generation |
US20050193103A1 (en) | 2002-06-18 | 2005-09-01 | John Drabik | Method and apparatus for automatic configuration and management of a virtual private network |
US20030237093A1 (en) | 2002-06-19 | 2003-12-25 | Marsh David J. | Electronic program guide systems and methods for handling multiple users |
US20060184926A1 (en) | 2002-07-17 | 2006-08-17 | Yan Or | Deployment of applications in a multitier compute infrastructure |
US7412497B2 (en) | 2002-07-25 | 2008-08-12 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Generation of Administration framework for server systems |
US7206827B2 (en) | 2002-07-25 | 2007-04-17 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Dynamic administration framework for server systems |
US20040019669A1 (en) | 2002-07-25 | 2004-01-29 | Sridatta Viswanath | Event notification in an administration framework for server systems |
US20040019670A1 (en) | 2002-07-25 | 2004-01-29 | Sridatta Viswanath | Pluggable semantic verification and validation of configuration data |
US20040111417A1 (en) | 2002-08-23 | 2004-06-10 | Fujitsu Limited | Data manipulation persisting method in transaction processing system and data manipulating program for remote database |
US7305659B2 (en) | 2002-09-03 | 2007-12-04 | Sap Ag | Handling parameters in test scripts for computer program applications |
US20040060047A1 (en) | 2002-09-24 | 2004-03-25 | Inrange Technologies Corporation | Method and apparatus for downloading executable code in a non-disruptive manner |
US20040088691A1 (en) | 2002-10-31 | 2004-05-06 | Jeffrey Hammes | Debugging and performance profiling using control-dataflow graph representations with reconfigurable hardware emulation |
US7209851B2 (en) | 2003-02-14 | 2007-04-24 | Advantest America R&D Center, Inc. | Method and structure to develop a test program for semiconductor integrated circuits |
US20100192135A1 (en) | 2003-02-14 | 2010-07-29 | Advantest Corporation | Method and Structure to Develop a Test Program for Semiconductor Integrated Circuits |
US20040176996A1 (en) | 2003-03-03 | 2004-09-09 | Jason Powers | Method for monitoring a managed system |
US20040186927A1 (en) | 2003-03-18 | 2004-09-23 | Evren Eryurek | Asset optimization reporting in a process plant |
JP2004287972A (en) | 2003-03-24 | 2004-10-14 | Japan Research Institute Ltd | Edi system, and format definition and production program for edi message |
US7610582B2 (en) | 2003-04-18 | 2009-10-27 | Sap Ag | Managing a computer system with blades |
WO2004114130A2 (en) | 2003-06-23 | 2004-12-29 | Red Bend Ltd. | Method and system for updating versions of content stored in a storage device |
US20040268342A1 (en) | 2003-06-30 | 2004-12-30 | Dell Products L.P. | System for automated generation of config to order software stacks |
US7360211B2 (en) | 2003-06-30 | 2008-04-15 | Dell Products L.P. | System for automated generation of config to order software stacks |
US20090024990A1 (en) | 2003-07-01 | 2009-01-22 | Avaya Inc. | Security Vulnerability Monitor |
US20050007964A1 (en) | 2003-07-01 | 2005-01-13 | Vincent Falco | Peer-to-peer network heartbeat server and associated methods |
US7337317B2 (en) | 2003-07-03 | 2008-02-26 | Hand Held Products, Inc. | Memory data copying system for devices |
US20050044546A1 (en) | 2003-07-03 | 2005-02-24 | Euroform A/S | Method of allowing printing from a network attached device |
US20050044215A1 (en) | 2003-08-22 | 2005-02-24 | Cohen Alain J. | System for automatic import, analysis, and reporting of network configuration and status information |
US20050086195A1 (en) | 2003-09-04 | 2005-04-21 | Leng Leng Tan | Self-managing database architecture |
US7376682B2 (en) | 2003-09-05 | 2008-05-20 | Oracle International Corporation | Time model |
US20090157455A1 (en) | 2003-09-10 | 2009-06-18 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Instruction system and method for equipment problem solving |
US7421621B1 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2008-09-02 | Matador Technologies Corp. | Application integration testing |
US7644432B2 (en) | 2003-10-10 | 2010-01-05 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Policy inheritance through nested groups |
US20060037000A1 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2006-02-16 | Speeter Thomas H | Configuration management data model using blueprints |
US20050138558A1 (en) | 2003-11-07 | 2005-06-23 | Olaf Duevel | Systems and methods for configuring software |
US7526457B2 (en) | 2003-11-07 | 2009-04-28 | Sap Ag | Systems and methods for configuring software |
WO2005045670A1 (en) | 2003-11-07 | 2005-05-19 | Sap Ag | Systems and methods for configuring software |
US20050108707A1 (en) | 2003-11-14 | 2005-05-19 | Taylor Thomas M. | Systems and methods for creating and managing a virtual retail store on end-user client computers within a network |
US20050144474A1 (en) | 2003-11-26 | 2005-06-30 | F-Secure Oyj | Securing a data transmission channel |
US7519964B1 (en) | 2003-12-03 | 2009-04-14 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System and method for application deployment in a domain for a cluster |
US7725877B2 (en) | 2004-01-09 | 2010-05-25 | National Instruments Corporation | Graphical program which includes an I/O node for hardware abstraction |
US20050160419A1 (en) | 2004-01-20 | 2005-07-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for replacing an application on a server |
US7593124B1 (en) | 2004-02-06 | 2009-09-22 | Yazaki North America, Inc. | System and method for managing devices |
US7426694B2 (en) | 2004-02-17 | 2008-09-16 | Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. | System and method for customizing design of settings management user interface systems used to configure settings for intelligent electronic devices |
US20080195579A1 (en) | 2004-03-19 | 2008-08-14 | Kennis Peter H | Methods and systems for extraction of transaction data for compliance monitoring |
US7590669B2 (en) | 2004-04-06 | 2009-09-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Managing client configuration data |
US20070168065A1 (en) | 2004-05-04 | 2007-07-19 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | System for configuring graphic display elements and process modules in process plants |
US20050268282A1 (en) | 2004-05-05 | 2005-12-01 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for inventory services |
US20050262499A1 (en) | 2004-05-21 | 2005-11-24 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for external override of annotations |
US20050262076A1 (en) | 2004-05-21 | 2005-11-24 | Voskuil Eric K | System for policy-based management of software updates |
US20050278280A1 (en) | 2004-05-28 | 2005-12-15 | Semerdzhiev Krasimir P | Self update mechanism for update module |
US7606840B2 (en) | 2004-06-15 | 2009-10-20 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Version control in a distributed computing environment |
US20050278202A1 (en) * | 2004-06-15 | 2005-12-15 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Information technology transformation assessment tools |
US7617256B2 (en) | 2004-07-19 | 2009-11-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Remote file updates through remote protocol |
US20060047793A1 (en) | 2004-08-31 | 2006-03-02 | Ibm Corporation | Method for configuring computing devices using reference groups |
US20060173857A1 (en) | 2005-01-31 | 2006-08-03 | Cassatt Corporation | Autonomic control of a distributed computing system using rule-based sensor definitions |
US20060184917A1 (en) | 2005-02-14 | 2006-08-17 | Troan Lawrence E | System And Method for Verifying Compatibility of Computer Equipment with a Software Product |
US7540014B2 (en) | 2005-02-23 | 2009-05-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Automated policy change alert in a distributed enterprise |
US7640542B2 (en) | 2005-03-24 | 2009-12-29 | Nokia Corporation | Managing midlet suites in OSGI environment |
US20060224637A1 (en) | 2005-04-01 | 2006-10-05 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Chasing engine for data transfer |
US20060234698A1 (en) | 2005-04-14 | 2006-10-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Apparatus and process for a universal diagnostic monitor module on a wireless device |
US7283816B2 (en) | 2005-04-14 | 2007-10-16 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Apparatus and process for a universal diagnostic monitor module on a wireless device |
US20060242697A1 (en) | 2005-04-26 | 2006-10-26 | Kyocera Mita Corporation | Software authentication device and image forming device |
US20060248450A1 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2006-11-02 | Microsoft Corporation | XML application framework |
US20060253588A1 (en) | 2005-05-09 | 2006-11-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for managing test results in a data center |
US20070006161A1 (en) | 2005-06-02 | 2007-01-04 | Kuester Anthony E | Methods and systems for evaluating the compliance of software to a quality benchmark |
US7599895B2 (en) | 2005-07-07 | 2009-10-06 | Knowm Tech, Llc | Methodology for the configuration and repair of unreliable switching elements |
US20070022323A1 (en) | 2005-07-19 | 2007-01-25 | Loh Aik K | Product framework for manufacturing testing environment |
US20070025704A1 (en) | 2005-08-01 | 2007-02-01 | Sony Corporation | Information-processing apparatus, reproduction apparatus, communication method, reproduction method and computer programs |
US20070074203A1 (en) | 2005-09-27 | 2007-03-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Deployment, maintenance and configuration of complex hardware and software systems |
US20070079289A1 (en) | 2005-09-27 | 2007-04-05 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for quick range finder for performance test |
US20070079291A1 (en) | 2005-09-27 | 2007-04-05 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for dynamic analysis window for accurate result analysis for performance test |
US20070093926A1 (en) | 2005-10-26 | 2007-04-26 | D Braun Scott | Wireless industrial control user interface with configurable software capabilities |
US20070097975A1 (en) | 2005-11-02 | 2007-05-03 | Sbc Knowledge Ventures, L.P. | Service to push author-spoken audio content with targeted audio advertising to users |
US20070168971A1 (en) | 2005-11-22 | 2007-07-19 | Epiphany, Inc. | Multi-tiered model-based application testing |
US20070198437A1 (en) | 2005-12-01 | 2007-08-23 | Firestar Software, Inc. | System and method for exchanging information among exchange applications |
US20110035629A1 (en) | 2005-12-12 | 2011-02-10 | Noller Jesse A | Automated software testing framework |
US20070234293A1 (en) | 2005-12-12 | 2007-10-04 | Archivas, Inc. | Automated software testing framework |
US7694181B2 (en) | 2005-12-12 | 2010-04-06 | Archivas, Inc. | Automated software testing framework |
US20080059474A1 (en) | 2005-12-29 | 2008-03-06 | Blue Jungle | Detecting Behavioral Patterns and Anomalies Using Activity Profiles |
US20070257715A1 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2007-11-08 | Semerdzhiev Krasimir P | System and method for abstract configuration |
US20070157185A1 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2007-07-05 | Semerdzhiev Krasimir P | System and method for deployable templates |
US20070157192A1 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2007-07-05 | Dorothea Hoefler | Software maintenance management |
US7609651B1 (en) | 2006-01-03 | 2009-10-27 | Emc Corporation | Methods and systems for maintaining configuration information |
US20070234274A1 (en) | 2006-01-19 | 2007-10-04 | David Ross | System and method for building software applications |
US7716634B2 (en) | 2006-01-19 | 2010-05-11 | Medseek Inc. | System and method for building and modifying software applications |
US20080127085A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-05-29 | Juergen Sattler | System on the fly |
US7823124B2 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2010-10-26 | Sap Ag | Transformation layer |
US20080082517A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-04-03 | Sap Ag | Change assistant |
US20080071718A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-03-20 | Sap Ag | Deduction engine |
US8065661B2 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2011-11-22 | Sap Ag | Test engine |
US20080071839A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-03-20 | Juergen Sattler | Content authoring |
US20080059490A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-03-06 | Juergen Sattler | Design time |
US20080126448A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-05-29 | Juergen Sattler | Test engine |
US20080127086A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-05-29 | Juergen Sattler | Delta layering |
US20080127123A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-05-29 | Juergen Sattler | Transformation layer |
US7912800B2 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2011-03-22 | Sap Ag | Deduction engine to determine what configuration management scoping questions to ask a user based on responses to one or more previous questions |
US20080059537A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-03-06 | Juergen Sattler | Content subscription |
US20080126375A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-05-29 | Juergen Sattler | Data migration |
US7908589B2 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2011-03-15 | Sap Ag | Deployment |
US20080127082A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-05-29 | Miho Emil Birimisa | System and method for requirements-based application configuration |
US20080059630A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-03-06 | Juergen Sattler | Assistant |
US20080127084A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-05-29 | Sap Ag | Deployment |
US7831568B2 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2010-11-09 | Sap Ag | Data migration |
US20080071555A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-03-20 | Juergen Sattler | Application solution proposal engine |
US20080071828A1 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2008-03-20 | Juergen Sattler | Formular update |
US7827528B2 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2010-11-02 | Sap Ag | Delta layering |
US7831637B2 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2010-11-09 | Sap Ag | System on the fly |
US7725200B2 (en) | 2006-10-20 | 2010-05-25 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Validation of configuration settings in an industrial process |
US20090193439A1 (en) | 2008-01-30 | 2009-07-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Managing component programs within a service application |
US20090300416A1 (en) | 2008-05-27 | 2009-12-03 | Kentaro Watanabe | Remedying method for troubles in virtual server system and system thereof |
US20100082518A1 (en) | 2008-10-01 | 2010-04-01 | Joachim Gaffga | System configuration comparison to identify process variation |
US20100153468A1 (en) | 2008-12-17 | 2010-06-17 | Sap Ag | Configuration change without disruption of incomplete processes |
Non-Patent Citations (122)
Cited By (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8595258B2 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2013-11-26 | Mark Gordon Damm | Method and system to manage complex systems knowledge |
US9406022B2 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2016-08-02 | Mark Gordon Damm | Method and system to manage complex systems knowledge |
US9323512B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2016-04-26 | Sap Se | Tools and methods for copying applications |
US9213771B2 (en) | 2013-06-04 | 2015-12-15 | Sap Se | Question answering framework |
US20150067805A1 (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2015-03-05 | U-Me Holdings LLC | Making a user's data, settings, and licensed content available in the cloud |
US9118670B2 (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2015-08-25 | U-Me Holdings LLC | Making a user's data, settings, and licensed content available in the cloud |
US9456164B2 (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2016-09-27 | U-Me Holdings LLC | Universal remote control that is automatically programmable according to location |
US9781204B2 (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2017-10-03 | U-Me Holdings LLC | Making a user's data, settings, and licensed content available in the cloud |
US10095717B2 (en) | 2015-08-05 | 2018-10-09 | Sap Se | Data archive vault in big data platform |
US10467890B2 (en) | 2016-05-13 | 2019-11-05 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Secured sensor interface |
US20200334047A1 (en) * | 2019-04-18 | 2020-10-22 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Systems and computer-implemented methods for managing application configurations |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2196955A1 (en) | 2010-06-16 |
US20100153443A1 (en) | 2010-06-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8396893B2 (en) | Unified configuration of multiple applications | |
US7908589B2 (en) | Deployment | |
US8255429B2 (en) | Configuration change without disruption of incomplete processes | |
US7831637B2 (en) | System on the fly | |
US7912800B2 (en) | Deduction engine to determine what configuration management scoping questions to ask a user based on responses to one or more previous questions | |
US7823124B2 (en) | Transformation layer | |
US7827528B2 (en) | Delta layering | |
US20080059537A1 (en) | Content subscription | |
US7831568B2 (en) | Data migration | |
US8065661B2 (en) | Test engine | |
US8131644B2 (en) | Formular update | |
US20080059490A1 (en) | Design time | |
US8584087B2 (en) | Application configuration deployment monitor | |
US20080071839A1 (en) | Content authoring | |
US20080082517A1 (en) | Change assistant | |
US20080059630A1 (en) | Assistant | |
US8135659B2 (en) | System configuration comparison to identify process variation | |
US20080071555A1 (en) | Application solution proposal engine | |
CN103593174B (en) | Method, system and computer-readable medium for revisable business object | |
US20160170732A1 (en) | Customer tailored release master plan generation for hybrid networked solutions | |
US20130304693A1 (en) | Cloud Logistics | |
US8661432B2 (en) | Method, computer program product and system for installing applications and prerequisites components | |
WO2008025514A1 (en) | Systems and methods for rapid application configuration and deployment | |
US20130332178A1 (en) | Business scenario based scoping | |
JP6016735B2 (en) | Business processing system, business-related processing generation method, and program |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SAP AG,GERMANY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GAFFGA, JOACHIM;SATTLER, JUERGEN;MARKERT, FRANK;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:022431/0934 Effective date: 20081211 Owner name: SAP AG, GERMANY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GAFFGA, JOACHIM;SATTLER, JUERGEN;MARKERT, FRANK;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:022431/0934 Effective date: 20081211 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SAP SE, GERMANY Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:SAP AG;REEL/FRAME:033625/0334 Effective date: 20140707 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |