We had a hard time nailing this one down in engineering sync. Can you go into more detail on how you expect to (eventually) present this data to the user? That will affect how we store this in the database, and ultimately affects the estimate we determine.

Questions from eng sync:

@cmadeo We will be redoing our navigation in the near future so I'm not sure these changes (Log in, Temp account row) will still remain in Settings. Can you let us know how this should look with the new navigation pattern? T373714

Eng sync notes:

Are you good with us merging these changes or do you have any feedback for the volunteer? You can look on device in Experimental 7.5.9 (161).

@scblr Are you good with us merging these changes or do you have any feedback for the volunteer? You can look on device in Experimental 7.5.9 (160).

@Alevtina_Mashtaler I commented on the PR with some tips for fixing the opt string. Hope it helps!

@scblr @HNordeenWMF Latest work on this is in Experimental build 7.5.9 (158). Let me know if it looks good to y'all and you are ready for it to be merged into the next release.

And here is an example of an article with some content with math: https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/page/mobile-html/User%3AJGiannelos_(WMF)%2Ftest-mathml

With this work, weird bugs found in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T361712#10097437 should be fixed. When user is in temporary account state, the app should appear as if the user is logged out.

@cmadeo We had some questions/notes from engineering sync:

@cmadeo Questions we had from engineering sync:

Setting as blocked until https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T339378 work is up.

@Netsnipe There have been blockers in the past on this (T248339, T354701, T348388), so we have not considered this up to this point. We need to do a fresh investigation on what this change would take for the apps team. We have reopened our original investigation spike task (T231242), but note that this support is not on our roadmap. Thank you for flagging and bringing this to our attention.

@HNordeenWMF We were wondering when estimating this - is it important that the user sees multiple rows of the same article in the History tab, or can we leave the History tab as-is but collect the viewed data for Wikiwrapped separately (which will consider article revisits)? @GOlson-WMF pointed out that it appear buggy and annoying if a user checks out the same article multiple times in one day.

Kinda between Small to Medium if unexpected things pop up. If we avoid the config, hardcoding it would be XS.

@Viktor.dev sorry for the delay - we have been busy on a different feature lately. We will code review (and likely merge) this next week. Thank you for your contribution. This will help with our upcoming campaigns.

Note: will move this to Blocked while T370205 is in progress. We can kick off another build for testing when a lot of the issues there are solved.