Commons:Deletion requests/Erik F. Brandsborg photos

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  • Add {{delete|reason=Fill in reason for deletion here!|subpage=Erik F. Brandsborg photos|year=2024|month=November|day=04}} to the description page of each file.
  • Notify the uploader(s) with {{subst:idw||Erik F. Brandsborg photos|plural}} ~~~~
  • Add {{Commons:Deletion requests/Erik F. Brandsborg photos}} at the end of today's log.

Erik F. Brandsborg photos

[edit]

All the photos below are credited to "Erik F. Brandsborg www.aktivioslo.no/generalprove-finale.php" Clicking through to that page reveals this licence notice which says that the photos are released under CC-BY-ND. This licence is not free as it doesn't permit modification. The photographer appears to go to great lengths to explain, in his own words, what the terms of the licence are, and in particular that modification is not permitted. This seems at odds with the Flickr licence selection but I'd be inclined to give greater weight to the author's own words. —Psychonaut (talk) 12:54, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Coomment But, if the author released these photos under non-free licence and simultaneously released it on Flickr under free licence (CC BY-SA 2.0), then I think the free licence should apply. You say that we should "give greater weight to the author's own words", but these are both his words. He released the photos on Flickr under free licence, so these are his words too. Vanja / Вања (talk) 20:37, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • In a way, yes, though the distinction I was referring to was selecting an option from someone else's list versus writing an entire essay from scratch explaining the usage conditions in great detail. —Psychonaut (talk) 07:53, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that these files are indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host them on Commons FASTILY 23:59, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What a descision. This will make ALL the free licensing revocable anytime. The Autor just have to declare somewhere something what contradicts the free license. So we can close all free projects. Whats going on here? --Itu (talk) 02:50, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously a Flickr user who doesn't know how to handle these licenses properly, on their profile page they clearly state cc-by-nd-nc-3.0 --Denniss (talk) 12:38, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]