User talk:Domer48: Difference between revisions

File:San patricios flag.jpg

• Pádraig, Rest In Peace a chara - sorely missed - not to be forgotten.

This editor is a Grand Tutnum and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain.

This editor is a Veteran Editor II and is entitled to display this Bronze Editor Star.

Veteran Editor II

This editor is a
Veteran Editor II
and is entitled to display this
Bronze Editor Star.

This editor is a Grand Tutnum and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain.

Today is 8 September 2024

Archives
Archive 1 - February 2007 to December 2007 Archive 2 - Jan 2008 to December 2008 Archive 3 - Jan 2009 to December 2009 Archive 4 - Jan 2010 to December 2010 Archive 5

Useful links

Irish Manual of Style~ Policy ~ Assume good faith ~ Citing sources ~ Civility ~ Consensus ~ Dispute resolution ~ Etiquette ~ No original research ~ What Wikipedia is not ~ No personal attacks ~ Neutral point of view ~ POINT ~ Reliable sources ~ Verifiability ~ WP:Attribution ~ WP:Synthesis ~ tools ~ WP:Avoid peacock terms ~ Wikipedia:Avoid weasel terms

Domer48 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Useful Noticeboard

3RR~ WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard ~ Third opinion Noticeboard ~ Wikipedia:No original research/noticeboard

Template messages

Warning templates ~ Template messages/Sources of articles ~ Template messages/Cleanup ~ Template messages/Disputes

Diff

[1][2][3]

-- Trolls will be removed with Extreme prejudice!

Irish Freedom (Fenian Newspaper)

I noticed that you moved Saoirse (Fenian) to a new title. I'm just wondering if it would not be better at Irish Freedom - Saoirse or Irish Freedom Saoirse based on this. If the current title is the best then should it not be at Irish Freedom (Fenian newspaper) (without the capital N) or Irish Freedom, both of which are redirects to the historical publication? By the way I re-wrote it a bit as it looked a little like a copy and paste. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 11:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Two different papers. Irish Freedom was never called Irish Freedom Saoirse. Republican Sinn Féin's newspaper is called Saoirse Irish Freedom. I've no problem with Irish Freedom (Fenian newspaper) (without the capital N) or Irish Freedom. I'll build it up when I get a chance. --Domer48_'fenian' 12:45, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Manchester Martyrs

I think we've had some disagreements over this article in the past, so I'd like to run it by you again now. I want to add just a little bit more info on the reprieves of O'Meaghar Condon and Maguire, possibly explain the false names that some of the accused gave, and admitted to in their speeches to the court, and add a few citations to support some of the statements in the final section. When that's done I'd like to take it to GAN.

Is there anything in the article now, or in what I'm proposing to add, that grates with you? --Malleus Fatuorum 23:15, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Got any socks?

As I certainly have, and there's another equally disruptive one from the same sockmaster as well. What a pity the disruptive sockpuppeteer in question didn't take any notice of what was said last time he was caught socking, I seem to remember a community ban was mentioned. Still that'd be no great loss, he's been nothing but a whinging POV warrior for years now! Sock report to follow... 2 lines of K₃₀₃ 13:56, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Is this the one our old admin friends backed up? BigDunc 14:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Old and new! This is getting beyond a joke!--Domer48_'fenian' 14:17, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Looking forward to the report on the sock. I'm considering putting one together on dishonest claims and accusations and a double standard that is applied to editors. Any time you ask to be given a Diff to support claims you get ignored! --Domer48_'fenian' 14:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

I don't believe it's one you are referring to no, although I could tell you a story or two about an editor you're currently having problems with. Got slightly sidetracked with a more pressing problem, it'll all be sorted in a day or two though. 2 lines of K₃₀₃ 14:47, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Look forward to it! I'm just going through the motions with this editor at the minute, its going to RfC as a first stop. --Domer48_'fenian' 14:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

I think we're talking about different editors, will fill you in on the details later. 2 lines of K₃₀₃ 15:01, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

No worries a chara, I have a good idea who your on about! Look forward to the report and then the excuses. I was just spouting above about a problematic editor. I've a pain in the arse with it at this stage it needs to be addressed. --Domer48_'fenian' 21:11, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violating ArbCom probation by reverting more than once per week at Sinn Féin. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Elonka 16:42, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

The block is for again violating 1RR/week probation as listed at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/The Troubles. Specifically, at Sinn Féin, you reverted Jtdirl (talk · contribs) on January 19,[4][5] and then reverted Snappy (talk · contribs) on January 22.[6][7] Per the terms of your probation, since you have been blocked, this extends the expiration date of your probation, to April 22, 2010. Please let me know if you have any questions, --Elonka 16:46, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Your pettiness really knows no bounds! Now I'll deal with it at the Admin recall against you. --Domer48_'fenian' 20:04, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

That you have failed to support your probation on me and provide the diff's you were asked too you have a really serious conflict of interest. I will address your abuse! --Domer48_'fenian' 20:08, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

If you disagree with the block, you are welcome to request a second opinion via the {{unblock}} template. As for recall, my conditions are at User:Elonka/Recall. --Elonka 20:51, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

History

Since you keep insisting there are no diffs, here's a summarized timeline from mid-October, of administrators who were dealing with you (including myself):

• October 12, warned about edit-warring by SarekOfVulcan (talk · contribs)[8]
• October 20, warned about edit-warring by SarekOfVulcan[9]
• October 25, warned about civility by Elonka (talk · contribs)[10]
• November 4, warned by Elonka about edit warring on Arbitration case page.[11]
• November 6, warned by Elonka about civility[12]
• November 8, warned by Elonka about edit warring.[13]
  • endorsed by John (talk · contribs)[14]
• November 9, banned by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs) from editing Peter Hart (historian)[15]
• November 10, blocked by Angusmclellan[16]
  • Unblocked by SarekOfVulcan[17]
  • Ban questioned by Tznkai (talk · contribs)[18]
• November 11, placed on probation by Elonka[19]
  • endorsed by SirFozzie (talk · contribs)[20]
• November 26, cautioned to "tone it down" by Spartaz (talk · contribs)[21]
  • endorsed by Chillum (talk · contribs)[22]
• December 16, blocked by Elonka for violating 1RR probation.[23]
• January 19, cautioned by Elonka about civility.[24]
• January 22, blocked by Elonka for violating 1RR probation.[25]

Is that sufficient, or would you like more? --Elonka 21:49, 22 January 2010 (UTC)