User talk:Matthew hk: Difference between revisions
Matthew hk (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
Now that the path forward is clarified, please refrain from any further insinuations about other editors are being paid either below, on that talk page, or elsewhere. Even if it wasn't your intent, your current approach could be perceived as [[WP:HOUNDING]]. - [[User:RevelationDirect|RevelationDirect]] ([[User talk:RevelationDirect|talk]]) 00:20, 19 December 2020 (UTC) |
Now that the path forward is clarified, please refrain from any further insinuations about other editors are being paid either below, on that talk page, or elsewhere. Even if it wasn't your intent, your current approach could be perceived as [[WP:HOUNDING]]. - [[User:RevelationDirect|RevelationDirect]] ([[User talk:RevelationDirect|talk]]) 00:20, 19 December 2020 (UTC) |
||
:Don't worry, once i collect enough info i will submit either COIN or SPI. It is very very fishy that the user was renamed, for so long not interested in shipping, suddenly create a shipping article in 2016, but inactive in this editing field again and no more improvement for his one and only shipping article created (2016- November 2020), and then sudden decided to knock off the article [[COSCO]] in 2020 by merge discussion and [[China Shipping Group]] by bold merge. All these moves seem want to channel google hit and pageview of the latter to the [[COSCO Shipping]] as typical sign of upe. Typical non paid editor only leave their pov and that all, not repeat the same merge agenda again and again and persuade other. [[User:Matthew hk|Matthew hk]] ([[User talk:Matthew hk#top|talk]]) 17:24, 19 December 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:24, 19 December 2020
| This is Matthew hk's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39Auto-archiving period: 14 days  |
 |
|
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Matthew_hk. |
| This is Matthew hk's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
Try to use {{talkback}} template on my talk page, that link to a thread in your talk page. Also , try to use {{reply}} (aka ping).
Post Below this line
New Page Patrol December Newsletter
Hello Matthew hk,
- Year in review
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DannyS712 bot III (talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Rosguill (talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | John B123 (talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Onel5969 (talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | JTtheOG (talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | Mcampany (talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Mccapra (talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Hughesdarren (talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Utopes (talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
- Reviewer of the Year
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
- NPP Technical Achievement Award
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Correct and incorrect ways to address undisclosed paid editing
Matthew hk, Thank you for your efforts to improve the shipping company articles. I'm concerned that you are repeatedly accusing @CartleR255: of being an undisclosed paid edtor at the Talk:COSCO discussion though. I assume your concerns are well founded and based on clear evidence and you were not familiar with the next steps in the process. Please review WP:PAID and follow the reporting process as described there. (Since good faith reporting can be close to WP:OUTING, the e-mail address is a good option.)
Now that the path forward is clarified, please refrain from any further insinuations about other editors are being paid either below, on that talk page, or elsewhere. Even if it wasn't your intent, your current approach could be perceived as WP:HOUNDING. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:20, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Don't worry, once i collect enough info i will submit either COIN or SPI. It is very very fishy that the user was renamed, for so long not interested in shipping, suddenly create a shipping article in 2016, but inactive in this editing field again and no more improvement for his one and only shipping article created (2016- November 2020), and then sudden decided to knock off the article COSCO in 2020 by merge discussion and China Shipping Group by bold merge. All these moves seem want to channel google hit and pageview of the latter to the COSCO Shipping as typical sign of upe. Typical non paid editor only leave their pov and that all, not repeat the same merge agenda again and again and persuade other. Matthew hk (talk) 17:24, 19 December 2020 (UTC)