[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dustin-Leigh Konzelman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Killiondude (talk) 05:29, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dustin-Leigh Konzelman[edit]

Dustin-Leigh Konzelman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsuccessful in national beauty contest and did some reality tv after without winning. Google gives me social media and some images and Google news offers not a single return. Appears to be non notable. Spartaz Humbug! 06:25, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 06:36, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 06:36, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 06:36, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep plenty of references to establish notability. --evrik (talk) 16:50, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep References and continuing coverage establishes notability per WP:GNG. Lonehexagon (talk) 23:32, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete we should not confuse human interest and other minor coverage with the type of coverage needed to pass GNG. The latter is entirely lacking here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:13, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • What references pass the gng please? Spartaz Humbug! 20:55, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 23:12, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.