Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tshi
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:36, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tshi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As noted by an IP on the talk page, it's sparsely sourced. Obscure languages often don't have an established romanization scheme, so it's plausible that this doesn't refer to a distinct people. Looking up "the Tshi people" on DDG or Google exclusively gives me results for a book The Tshi-Speaking Peoples of the Gold Coast of West Africa by A. B. Ellis (1964); if they were real, I would have expected more varied results. @Siva1979 __Gamren (talk) 13:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:10, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:10, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. A.B. Ellis book was published in 1887. The 1964 date is presumably a reprint. I added another reference: JEHLE, A. (July 1907). "SOUL, SPIRIT, FATE ACCORDING TO THE NOTIONS OF THE TSHI AND EHWE TRIBES (GOLD COAST AND TOGO, W. AFRICA)". African Affairs. VI (XXIV): 405–415. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.afraf.a099169. ISSN 1468-2621. Together with the Encyclopedia Brittanica article, I think notability has been established. I recognize that a linguistic grouping is not necessarily an ethnic grouping, but I can't find any references saying that it's not an ethnic group. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:11, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:53, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:53, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Eastmain. Waddles 🗩 🖉 16:05, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:44, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:44, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Eastmain. ─ The Aafī (talk) 10:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.