[go: nahoru, domu]
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Invictus Games[edit]

Reason: Request temporary semi-protection. For the past few weeks, and after any announcement with this Foundation, vandalism and/sockpuppetry occurs on these and related pages. The editing with unreliable or inaccurate sources make it difficult to read and lead to poor editing of the page Cibrian209 (talk) 15:16, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've reviewed the edit history of the article, and there's a lot of suspicious editing from new accounts. ECP may be necessary, but I'm on the fence, so I'll leave the decision to another administrator. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:59, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see if WP:SEMI does the trick. If it falls short, editors are welcome to relist here (with immediate effect) with a request for an WP:ECP upgrade. @Cibrian209 and Daniel Quinlan: courtesy pings. El_C 05:32, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Middle Belt[edit]

Reason: Unregistered and new editors editing page without a proper understanding of the subject matter. Kambai Akau (talk) 20:58, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:15, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Davis (businessman)[edit]

Reason: Repeat of of vandalism an antisemitic bent KnittingQueenKY (talk) 21:02, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I've warned the editor. If they continue, please report them to WP:ANI. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Kaduna[edit]

Reason: Unseasoned editors with poor knowledge of the area attempting to vandalism page. Kambai Akau (talk) 21:04, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of United States presidential assassination attempts and plots[edit]

Reason: Breaking news on the topic will likely lead to many edits with conflicting information 50.35.75.176 (talk) 22:30, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:39, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Elli. It looks like the level of disruption increased. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Security incidents involving Donald Trump[edit]

Reason: Donald Trump attacked a rally. Requesting ECP as part of American politics sanctions. Ovioas,wo (talk) 22:53, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The article is already semi-protected and that seems to be sufficient right now. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:36, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 assassination attempt of Donald Trump[edit]

Reason: High vandalism. High political. Post-1992 ArbCom protection needed. Page already admin-move protected, but somehow was not even EC protected. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 22:55, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it only semi protected please make it extended confirmed protected 24.115.255.37 (talk) 22:57, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Article is protected at the current location. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:38, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump[edit]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Alleged assassination attempt. We may need some time to sort through this, and then will need to return it to ECP. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:56, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Protecting it would be a bit premature at this point. The article is already ECP. Let's try issuing some warnings if needed. We're dealing with EC editors. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:59, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of United States presidential assassination attempts and plots[edit]

Reason: Already seeing higher levels of IP vandalism at this page. – TCMemoire 23:04, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already done + duplicate 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Elli. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Security incidents involving Donald Trump[edit]

Reason: existing vandalism - current event LucasR muteacc (talk) 23:05, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Elli. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:38, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of United States presidential assassination attempts and plots[edit]

Reason: existing vandalism - breaking news/current event LucasR muteacc (talk) 23:05, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Elli. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:13, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rock Machine[edit]

Reason:: Conflict of interest editing. This editor who only edits the Rock Machine article admits to being a Rock Machine member here [1] and shows all the signs of treating Wikipedia like a battleground. --A.S. Brown (talk) 23:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. This is better suited for WP:ANI. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:35, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 shooting at a Donald Trump rally[edit]

Reason: Requesting extended confirmed protection to counter vandalism. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 23:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:16, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that there has been a bunch of vandalism on the article, and we don't tend to block preventatively. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:21, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I declined to increase the protection level earlier, but the article started getting more problematic edits from autoconfirmed editors such as [2] and [3] so it seemed appropriate to ECP it under WP:CT/AP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:29, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those edits aren't exactly vandalism. And I do think that six months is quite long all things considered, especially if the only basis for doing so are the sorts of edits that you've cited (which are not optimal, but appear to be good faith). — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:51, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't protect the article due to vandalism. As I replied and logged, I protected it under the contentious topics procedure. There were other issues including some vandalism (although that was largely resolved by the semi-protection), but the worst problems seemed to be edits pushing various points of view, edits adding original research, poorly sourced edits, unsourced edits, and some disruptive reverting and removals. I hope this helps explain my reasoning. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:05, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/AP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:2024 shooting at a Donald Trump rally[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: A bit of an IAR situation, but could be good until the dust settles, per an IP on the page. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 23:47, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Fuzheado. ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 23:49, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Fuzheado. @Fuzheado: Could you please shorten the edit protection duration from indefinite to something shorter, like a week or a month, as per WP:PREEMPTIVE? Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:52, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'll match the 6 months of the ECP on the article though folks may want to lift it sooner. - Fuzheado | Talk 00:07, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Respectfully, the only way for any non-autoconfirmed user to possibly participate on the page, including in the form of move requests, is to allow them to make edits to the page. I think that a six-month ECP on the article is too long, and also that a six month talk page semiprotection is not proportional to the disruption that has occurred. This is particularly concerning, given that the protecting administrator is is an active participant on the substance of discussions on that talk page; I don't think that we should be making protections of pages where we are actively involved. I would urge Fuzheado to reduce the length of the semi-protection to no more than one week. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Red-tailed hawk: I agree about the duration of the talk page protection. Regarding the article protection, which I made as an uninvolved administrator, I would have used a shorter duration if it seemed remotely viable. Also, six months is a common duration for WP:CT/AP enforcement. Reviewing the 2024 log, there have only been three protections (not counting full protection) shorter than six months and they were all three months long. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’m fine with a shorter protection though User:JPxG has already removed the protection so let’s see how that goes. - Fuzheado | Talk 13:53, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Toretsk[edit]

Indefinite Extended confirmed protection: WP:RUSUKR sanction enforcement; obviously falls under the sanctions. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 01:36, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. El_C 05:11, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chaubisi Rajya[edit]

Reason: ongoing vandalism 103.29.114.44 (talk) 02:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. You might consider registering a personal account so you can watchlist the article. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:24, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pamela Paul[edit]

Reason: Editwarring, especially on a WP:ARBGS article by rando ips.

Think Confirmed protection and reminder to 1RR rule should be ok. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 03:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:ARBGS. Gonna wait to see how effective this protection is before also adding WP:1RR. El_C 05:20, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kimberly Cheatle[edit]

Reason: Related to current events re: assassination attempt on Donald Trump. Folks have vandalized to blame her for it. JohnHawkinsBois (talk) 03:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Joyous!. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:19, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Morello[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There's an IP changing and block evading person who keeps returning to the article. Many blocks haven't worked whatsoever. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:33, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kiryas Joel–Poughkeepsie–Newburgh metropolitan area[edit]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. In particular, many IPs object to "Kiryas Joel" being part of the metropolitan area's name. However, that's what the White House decided to do; people who disagree really need to complain to the White House, not try to edit that decision out of the article. SomethingForDeletion (talk) 05:38, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 05:58, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current event[edit]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Match protection of redirect target. Not many transclusions at any one time, but tends to be translcuded in pages with millions of daily views. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 07:12, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The target is protected at the template editor level, not extended confirmed level. Ymblanter (talk) 09:04, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Zzuuzz: You very recently ECP protected Template:Current event. Perhaps that should be template-editor protected to match the redirect target {{Current}}? I'm not sure of standard procedure but it seems desirable to me. Johnuniq (talk) 09:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I based the level on several factors, including the current vandal and likely vandals, reverters and other editors, that it's a lesser used redirect, and indeed activity at the redirect target (whose protection level was also recently changed). I'm content, however I have absolutely no objections if someone else wants to adjust it. -- zzuuzz (talk) 09:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lanka Tiles[edit]

Temporary full protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Cremastra (talk) 07:37, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 09:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Richmond Park Academy[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Ae245 (talk) 10:35, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PBA season 49 draft[edit]

Reason: Multiple cases of IP vandalism MarcusAbacus (talk) 10:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel LaRusso[edit]

Reason: 1 week semi-protection. Edit warring from anon IPs. Office7724 (talk) 12:25, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sobhita Dhulipala[edit]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – IP range or proxy keeps removing sourced and self-identified content based on their own POV [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]. The article was protected before. Also, note similar POV removal by a now blocked sockpuppet (Fostera12) [11], so this may be a case of sockpuppetry, since IP work started this year, almost immediately after the sock was banned. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:35, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Matthew Crooks[edit]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:51, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Connor Williams (American football)[edit]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism  StarScream1007  ►Talk  13:06, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Tinga Tinga Tales[edit]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. TingaTingaTalesIsBack (talk) 13:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bethel Park, Pennsylvania[edit]

Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Several additions of "Thomas Matthew Crooks". Magnolia677 (talk) 14:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nixie tube[edit]

Reason: Semi-protect due to slow but continuing IP vandalism. IP's keep changing, but each one only seems to be tampering with this page. Hellbus (talk) 15:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Increase&oldid=1234471270"