User talk:A0m0rajab

This is A0m0rajab's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome

Hello, A0m0rajab, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 15:19, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivy (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ivy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:19, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, A0m0rajab! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:19, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ivy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ivy. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:37, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fawzi mesmar (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please convert the external links into references if they can be used to establish notabily. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 19:03, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fawzi mesmar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 19:03, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Lenton (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Lenton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 19:08, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fawzi Mesmar (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OceanHok was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fawzi Mesmar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OceanHok (talk) 18:35, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahmet Faik Şener has been accepted

Ahmet Faik Şener, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Newystats (talk) 11:39, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Linking years

Hello. While linking years was common during in English Wikipedia's early years, the practice was abandoned a long time ago and is not in conformance with the Manual of Style. Largoplazo (talk) 19:35, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

do you mean that this act is not accepted right now? and why it's been abandoned? A0m0rajab (talk) 19:42, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's correct. If you look, you'll see that someone else has reverted all those edits. I'm not certain why but I think it's because it was felt that readers see years in text all the time, and it very rarely triggers the desire to learn more about that year outside of the context of the article they're reading. Also, there's more general guidance against linking terms that readers probably don't need help with, and weighing their value against the disruption to smooth reading produced by an abundance of links. See WP:OVERLINKING. Largoplazo (talk) 19:48, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining and letting me know! what contributions that I could do tho? I am trying to get familiar and contribute to the wiki these days. and I did not realize till now that the 170 links I did was useless lol. A0m0rajab (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I understand that's frustrating! One thought, if you're confident in your editing abilities and are interested in improving the writing in articles, is that you could look through some of the thousands of articles listed under subcategories of Category:Articles needing cleanup. Each of the articles listed there has a cleanup tag at the top, placed there by somebody who felt the writing should be better, and hopefully with a note as to why. See if you can find any articles that interest you and tackle them. Let me know if you'd like me to go over anything with you if you give this a go. Largoplazo (talk) 21:38, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that, I had a quick check and was wondering if there is a similar page based on topics? I would like to check it. A0m0rajab (talk) 07:52, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That would be useful but maintenance categories aren't broken down that way. However, you could choose a category, browse through the articles in it, and see if any can use attention. Largoplazo (talk) 21:57, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's a great advice, thank you for that! I will check them definitely. A0m0rajab (talk) 22:35, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, A0m0rajab!

A plate of chocolate chip cookies on a blue and white striped plate. The plate sits on a beige surface. — Have a plate of cookies!

Welcome to Wikipedia, A0m0rajab! I'm Ozzie10aaaa, and I've been assigned as your mentor. About half of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:03, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ivy

Hello, A0m0rajab. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ivy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Daniel Lenton

Hello, A0m0rajab. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daniel Lenton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Arwad Castle

Hello, A0m0rajab. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arwad Castle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ivy

Hello, A0m0rajab. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ivy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:31, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fawzi Mesmar

Hello, A0m0rajab. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fawzi Mesmar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arwad Castle

Hello, A0m0rajab. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arwad Castle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]