Scu ba
A barnstar for you!
editThe Original Barnstar | |
Flag of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:12, 6 March 2023 (UTC) |
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHello, Scu ba. Thank you for your work on Kings County Republican Party (New York). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHello, Scu ba. Thank you for your work on Dan Cantor. Chaotic Enby, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Great job, congrats!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Chaotic Enby}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
O'Donnell and Naccarato moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, O'Donnell and Naccarato, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Articles must be based in independent third party sources, not the company’s own website. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:14, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
February 2024
edit Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ryan Binkley, you may be blocked from editing. Tagging an article with spurious maintenance templates to support your position is POINTY. The article recently survived an AfD by an overwhelming margin, so claiming it is not notable is baseless. Sourcing is overwhelming present–heck, you did a lot of it yourself–so claiming that there is a deficiency is baseless. The recentism tag is peculiar, especially since it was your own edits that gave the article is rather recent bent. I suggest immediately reverting. Again, all of this reads as BATTLEGROUND behavior. ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:55, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- This is actually laughable, how is this disruptive? you're the one citing blogs and sources that fail WP:RSP. I am just updating his article with information relating to his presidential campaign. We can delete the entire presidential campaign, but then there wouldn't be enough information for the article to exist. What do you want? Again. RYAN BINKLEY THE INDIVIDUAL IS NOT NOTABLE you've yet to even counter that. Stop citing blogs and other nonsensical sources. If anyone is being disruptive it is you for flagrantly violating every single rule wikipedia has for reliable sources and notability. Scu ba (talk) 20:57, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Take a step back. You could have been blocked for the earlier edit warring. I don't want to have to report you to a noticeboard, but this behavior is beyond the pale. This is your final warning. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- You're the one warring by just flagrantly ignoring wikipedia's rules. I am trying my best to make the article work in a way the comports to wikipedia's rules. You're efforts against this, are harmful to the site. Scu ba (talk) 21:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Take a step back. You could have been blocked for the earlier edit warring. I don't want to have to report you to a noticeboard, but this behavior is beyond the pale. This is your final warning. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Scu_ba reported by User:Pbritti (Result: ). Thank you. Pbritti (talk) 21:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sweet! I love it when trying to follow wikipedia's rules gets me in trouble. So much for biographical articles needing notability, ill make sure to cite this every time an article gets an AfD request after I only cite blogs and press releases. Scu ba (talk) 21:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Braun Research
editHello, Scu ba. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Braun Research".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Shawnee Mission Post Scroll.png
editThanks for uploading File:Shawnee Mission Post Scroll.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Merger discussion for List of Liberian flags
edit An article that you have been involved in editing—List of Liberian flags—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. CanonNi (talk) 04:32, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Battle of Chasiv Yar for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Chasiv Yar, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Chasiv Yar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHello, Scu ba. Thank you for your work on Sarmat Ikoev. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Orphaned non-free image File:Union of Donbass Volunteers Logo.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Union of Donbass Volunteers Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
new page within your scope
edit@Scu ba hey, Dragon Capital (company) new page appeared. I just linked it to the The New Voice of Ukraine page of yours (as there was a mistake). 2600:6C55:600:A6:A0FC:96E5:82E3:1A32 (talk) 08:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: O'Donnell and Naccarato (April 30)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:O'Donnell and Naccarato and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Scu ba!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Clearfrienda 💬 03:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
|
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHi Scu ba. Thank you for your work on Alan Alborov (politician). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHi Scu ba. Thank you for your work on Inal Tasoev (politician). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Introduction to contentious topics
editYou have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
United Citizens Party
editFar too much content based on one citation. If you seek to restore, please find additional sources and provide more than one citation. ProfessorKaiFlai (talk) 06:10, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah awesome but that's not how wikipedia works, as long as it's a reliable source I can cite it as many times as I want. Scu ba (talk) 11:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
ITN recognition for 2024 Syrian parliamentary election
editOn 22 July 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Syrian parliamentary election, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 00:45, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of 1977 Allentown mayoral election for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1977 Allentown mayoral election, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1977 Allentown mayoral election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Woodcliff Lake Wordmark.png
editThanks for uploading File:Woodcliff Lake Wordmark.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
On mayoral elections
editClearly this argument about mayoral elections is not going to go anywhere. I believe is in the best interests of everybody to have a concrete notability guideline for local elections for WP:NEVENT. As I believe you are a more experienced editor, do you know where I can bring this to an administrator to create some type of guideline for this? Cheers, -1ctinus📝🗨 01:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- In my experience, the less guidelines the better. Wikipedia should be a creative place, and hard-coded guidelines that must always, 100%, be adhered to crushes the creative freedoms of editors. Scu ba (talk) 01:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Hohokus Township
editHey there, regarding this edit, how come you reverted to restore the article, when the township clearly became Mahwah, New Jersey? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 06:49, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Historical municipalities that got abolished should be kept on separate pages Scu ba (talk) 01:43, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Any reason you feel that way? If historical municipalities became a current one, then that would just fall under the "history" section, as there isn't much to add if it no longer exists. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:11, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- There is precedent with having an abolished township having it's own page. In this instance although they shared borders there is no continuity between the municipal governments, and the former township was abolished instead of reincorporated as is usually the case in a township becoming a borough.
- Additionally, only a portion of the township became Mahwah, there where also portions that became Allendale and Upper Saddle River. All three boroughs can trace themselves back to Hohokus Township, as such it would be unfair to the other two to have Mahwah monopolize the history of the township. Scu ba (talk) 16:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- I forgot to mention Ramsey too was also spun out of Hohokus township Scu ba (talk) 16:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Any reason you feel that way? If historical municipalities became a current one, then that would just fall under the "history" section, as there isn't much to add if it no longer exists. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:11, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting for coordinators is now open!
editNominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)