Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Augusto Marietti
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:18, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Augusto Marietti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This person is relatively unknown, non-public figure, the article is also poorly sourced maju (talk) 01:41, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete From what I can tell the article offers very little that isn't already in the Mashape article. Otherwise a merger might be in place, but whatever notability this guy has seems to only relate to the company. The article from the company needs a lot of work too though as it doesn't look like it meets WP:NPOV at the moment. Hst20 (talk) 22:15, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 20:15, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable as an individual, and the company article doesn't really need any of the information in here. Ducknish (talk) 18:56, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; subject has received multiple mentions in non-primary reliable sources, however non appear to be significant coverage; therefore the subject does not pass WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:57, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.