User talk:Daniel VILLAFRUELA/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Fotos de Silybum marianum

Sus fotos etiquetadas Silybum marianum en wikimedia commons no corresponden en absoluto ni a esta especie, ni al género. Son claramente de unas especies de Onopordum, muy probablemente Onopordum illyricum y Onopordum nervosum (habría que medir el ancho de las brácteas involucrales medias, y examinar otros detalles no visibles en las fotos). Para su información, una de las características más notables a simple vista del género Silybum es la ausensia de alas en el tallo y brácteas involucrales externas muy anchas, acanaladas y con espinas laterales (entre otras). Le ruego rectifique a fondo sus leyendas erróneas, incluidas las profundamente inexactas, como: Flor cuando es un capítulo, tallo, plantas etc..., y los enlaces. Un saludo.--philmarin (talk) 08:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

  1. ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Country photographs of the day

Please read User talk:Helgi-S#United States photographs category. Elisfkc (talk) 20:53, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Silybum marianum-Chardon Marie-201607035.jpg

File:Silybum marianum-Chardon Marie-201607035.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 09:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Compiègne-Église saint Jacques-Banc d'œuvre-20140303.jpg

File:Compiègne-Église saint Jacques-Banc d'œuvre-20140303.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

P.poschadel (talk) 08:26, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Trichodes octopunctatus-Clairon à huit points-20150609.jpg

Hello Daniel, This is not a Trichodes, but belongs to the Moloidae-familiy --Siga (talk) 08:40, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

fr:Bonjour Siga, je ne suis pas un spécialiste, juste curieux de voir si je retrouve les mêmes espèce d'une année sur l'autre, sur un petit territoire au bout de ma rue. Comme tu es un spécialiste reconnu, peux-tu m'indiquer si renommer ce fichier en Unidentied Meloidae-20150609.jpg suffira-t-il ou si l'on peut préciser de quel espèce s'agit-il précisement.
french en: Hello Siga, I am not a specialist, just curious to see if I find the same species from one year to the other, in a small territory at the end of my street. As you are a recognized specialist, can you tell me whether to rename this file in Unidentied Meloidae-20150609.jpg will it be enough or if it can be specified which species it is precisely.
--Daniel Villafruela (talk) 16:19, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Spécialiste chez les insectes, ça veut dire, qu'on connait une petite groupe des insectes très bien. Moi, toutes mes photos je donne dans un forum pour vérifier mes hypothèses. Je crois, c'est Mylabris quadripunctata, voir https://www.galerie-insecte.org/galerie/Fam_Meloidae_02.html mais j'en ne suis pas sure. Je recommande https://www.insecte.org/forum/ ils sont très bien. --Siga (talk) 17:24, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Photos de Andryale à feuilles entières en Wikimedia Commons

Salut; Aucune de vos fotos intitulées Andryale à feuilles entières ne correspondent à cette espèce ou ses éventuelles variétés, mais, sans l'ombre d' un doute, d'une part à Urospermum laciniatum (Andryala integrifolia-Andryale à feuilles entières-Fleur mature-20160606.jpg et Andryala integrifolia-Andryale à feuilles entières (var)-Calice-20160427.jpg) et au moins 2 autres espèces de Cichorieae difficiles de determiner à la vue de vos seules photos. Merci de corriger d'urgence, et, dans le cas contraire, ce sera avec plaisir que je corrigerai moi-même les déterminations et autres incorrections de description.--philmarin (talk) 08:41, 11 June 2017 (UTC) PS : Si así lo prefiere, puedo expresarme en Castellano.--philmarin (talk) 09:42, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Fontainebleau-Griffon de La Fontaine-20170625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 00:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Fontainebleau-Chien assis-Pierre Biart-20170625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very weak  Support DoF is too small, f/3.5 isn't enough. The dog is unsharp at the bottom. --XRay 05:55, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Fontainebleau-Ulysse-20170625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:28, 2 July 2017 (UTC) Question@XRay: Are the categories accurate enough?--Peulle 11:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
I think so. But I just added another category too. --XRay 18:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Fontainebleau-Ulysse (Plan poitrine)-20170625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Consider adding relevant statue category.--Peulle 11:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC) CommentNo doubt, but how to categorize the statue of Ulysses which is only part of the fountain in the Courtyard of the... Fountain, moreover, little photographed. - Daniel VILLAFRUELA 20:45, 3 July 2017 (UTC) Hmmm difficult. It doesn't have its own name, like "Ulysses" or anything?--Peulle 18:50, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 CommentI baptized it "Ulysses at the games of the Phaeacians" for lack of having found a reference that binds the statue to its author. In fact, the Fountain of the Court of the Fountain, is a composite work of the nineteenth century, consisting of the pedestal, rebuilt first, and a statue that replaces the Hercules' statue that was originally there. A few years later ... While waiting for my brother already added some cock-and-bull categories. Daniel VILLAFRUELA 06:42, 6 July 2017 (UTC) Well, the photo is good enough. Perhaps you should write something about this in the file description when you have time. :) --Peulle 12:13, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Nobots

Hola Daniel! I noticed that many images you uploaded have the {{Nobots}}. Is there a specific reason for it? Please reconsider it because bots are performing many useful, sometimes obscure, maintenance tasks to the pages. I understand that you could consider annoying this activity on your watchlist, but do not forget that you can filter out the bots just clicking here and selecting "Hide bot edits from the watchlist". Thanks for your understanding. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 07:48, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Melitaea diamina-Damier noir-20180529.jpg

Bonjour, qu'est-ce qui vous fait identifier ce papillon comme Melitaea diamina ? Il n'est pas très sombre et je crois plutôt y reconnaître M. athalia. Cordialement --LamBoet (talk) 12:18, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Le lépidoptère n'est pas ma tasse de nectar. J'avais essayé de l'identifier avec l'outil Clé d'identification des insectes du spipoll auquel je participe parfois, puis en comparant avec d'autres photos sur internet. C'est vrai qu'il paraissait plus clair, mais les photos sont parfois trop corrigées. Aussi étais-je plutôt content du résultat, j'aurais du me méfier!
Le spécialiste possède sans doute des droits lui permettant de renommer ce fichier. Merci d'avance. Daniel Villafruela (talk) 14:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Oui, M. diamina a normalement plus de noir que de fauve, en particulier à l'aile postérieure. OK, je vais le renommer. Bon week-end --LamBoet (talk) 14:03, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour, celui-ci aussi est en fait une mélitée (mais pas sûr que l'espèce soit identifiable sous cet angle). --LamBoet (talk) 15:51, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour, celui-là est Brenthis daphne (plus gros que Boloria selene, et les dessins marginaux sont différents). Bonne journée --LamBoet (talk) 08:35, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour, un autre ici : c'est Ochlodes sylvanus. Bonne journée --LamBoet (talk) 08:46, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Fotos: Andryala integrifolia

Sus fotos tituladas File:Andryala integrifolia-Andryale à feuilles entières (Variété)-20150427.jpg, File:Andryala integrifolia-Andryale à feuilles entières-Fleur mature-20160606.jpg no son de Andryala integrifolia, pero sin la menor duda de Urospermum dalechampii. La titulada Andryala integrifolia-Andryale à feuilles entières (var)-20160727.jpg y File:Andryala integrifolia-Fleur d'une variété d'Andryale à feuilles entières--20150727.jpg no son tampoco de A. integrifolia, pero de un Cichorieae por identificar. Le ruego las debidas rectificaciones.--philmarin (talk) 17:42, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour Philmarin,

Ces fleurs m'avaient donné bien du mal. Réginald avait fait une suggestion, avec des réserves il est vrai et personne d'autre ne s'était manifesté... Effectivement cela ressemble à Urospermum dalechampii et toutes ces plantes ou/et fleurs sont les mêmes, photographiées sensiblement au même endroit, le bassin de la Vaunage. Si tu as les droits pour renommer les fichiers, peux-tu t'en charger, je ferais le travail de mises à jour des descriptions des fichiers, sinon je ferais le nécessaire pour qu'ils soient renommés.
Salut et remerciements.
Daniel Villafruela (talk) 08:20, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Andryala integrifolia-Andryale à feuilles entières (Variété)-20150727.jpg

File:Andryala integrifolia-Andryale à feuilles entières (Variété)-20150727.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 19:08, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Misidentified photographs

  • your file #1
    your file #1
  • your file #2
    your file #2
  • your file #3
    your file #3
  • Geranium pratense
    Geranium pratense
  • Geranium pratense
    Geranium pratense
  • Geranium sanguineum
    Geranium sanguineum
  • Geranium sanguineum
    Geranium sanguineum

Hi Daniel VILLAFRUELA/Archive 2,
Your three images above (the leftmost three photographs) show typical Geranium sanguineum, not Geranium pratense. Geranium sanguineum has got single, bright red flowers (which frequently appear much too blue on photographs) and leaf lobes even narrower than and different from Geranium pratense, which has blue or white flowers. I changed the ID already, but please check the Spanish part, which might be wrong. The images should be also renamed, of course.
With best regards,
--Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:52, 25 July 2018 (UTC).

Rename

Hi Daniel. Sorry I didn't notice your note on File:Garrigues-Mairie-20190327.jpg. Hanooz 00:46, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

There was an error of location, Gard and Hérault arent dépatment of a region where Garrigues designates several villages -Daniel Villafruela (talk) 19:16, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Category:Le Castellas, Sauve and Category:Castellas, Sauve

@Daniel VILLAFRUELA: I was wondering what the difference is between those 2 categories. There is a Le Castellas (Q31394797), but I am not sure if this is related. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 12:01, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

identity

Bonjour Daniel - I fear I found two more misidentified photos in your Flore de la Vaunage set; File:Crataegus monogyna-Aubépine-Fleur-20180429.jpg and File:Crataegus monogyna-Aubépine-Rameau-20190221.jpg are Prunus cerasifera, not Crataegus monogyna. A third linked file also labelled Crataegus at a nearby locality, is correctly labelled as Crataegus sp. Hope this helps! - MPF (talk) 23:57, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Category:Tabernacle Agneau sans Tache, Notre-Dame church, La Bastide-Clairence

Dear Billinghurst,
Enfin un Anglais qui comprend le français... L'objet de mon tourment est une péposition qui me parait nécessaire
L ’Agneau sans Tache qui orne le tabernacle représente le Christ dont le sacrifice nous délivre du péché originel* …, donc s’agissant d’un ornement il est nécessaire de conserver la préposition à et renommer la catégorie en Tabernacle à l’Agneau sans Tache, Église Notre-Dame, La Bastide-Clairence. (whole in french) Toutefois Agneau sans Tache est synonyme d’Agneau de Dieu à quelques nuances près, c’est la traduction littérale de ce que l’on chantait avant Vatican II :

  • Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccáta mundi, miserere nobis … (en Latin)
  • Agneau de Dieu, qui enlève les péchés du monde, ayez pitié de nous. (in french)
  • Lamb of God, who takes away the sins of the world, have mercy upon us. (in English)
  • Cordero de Dios, que quitas el pecado del mundo, ten piedad de nosotros (en Español)

C’est pourquoi on peut préférer Lamb of God à Lamb without stain. À voir la frénésie avec laquelle sont renommées les catégories en langue vernaculaire je pense que dans un futur proche, des données structurées et un {{LangSwitch}} bien compris devrait donner satisfaction à tout le monde et dans cette perspective la catégorie pourrait être renommé en

  • {{LangSwitch
  • |fr= Tabernacle à l’Agneau sans Tache, Église Notre-Dame, La Bastide-Clairence. ( whole in french)
  • |es= Tabernaculo con Cordero de dios, Iglesia Nuestra Séñora, La Bastide-Clairence, ( whole en Español)
  • |en= Lamb of God adorned tabernacle, Our Lady church, Labastide-Clairence (in English delfaut language)
  • }}

Encore une discussion byzantine, Sacré froggies ! ...
Daniel Villafruela (talk) 17:38, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Deletion taggings

Hi, you cannot get your uploads speedy deleted if they were uploaded more than 7 days ago. Also please don't remove the content from the description page when nominating for deletion. Jcb (talk) 21:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Daniel VILLAFRUELA/Archive 2,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Abbaye St Philibert-Tournus-La madone de Csurgó.jpg

File:Abbaye St Philibert-Tournus-La madone de Csurgó.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Civa (talk) 18:10, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Daniel VILLAFRUELA,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Photos File:Mensularia nodulosa-Polypore du hêtre 1-20170311.jpg etc.

Bonjour. Vous avez contribué ces trois belles photos de polypores : File:Mensularia nodulosa-Polypore du hêtre 1-20170311.jpg, File:Mensularia nodulosa-Polypore du hêtre 2-20170311.jpg et File:Mensularia nodulosa-Polypore du hêtre 3-20170311.jpg. Mais elles ne montrent pas Mensularia nodulosa et je suis presque sûr que les champignons sont Trametes versicolor. J'ai changé la catégorie ; veuillez voir les pages de discussion. J'espère que mes changements sont bons. Strobilomyces (talk) 18:36, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Tormentille-Fleur-20141018.jpg

Dear Daniel VILLAFRUELA,

we are currently working on a student textbook with the title “Biologie” scheduled to be published in 2020. In addition an electronic version of this book is planned which will be sold to scientific institutions and libraries. In this book we would like to use the following illustration

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tormentille-Fleur-20141018.jpg

We want to kindly ask you for the nonexclusive permission to use this material in this and future editions of our book including the electronic version and for the German speaking countries (Germany/Austria/Switzerland). Thanks in advance for your assistance.

Kindest regards UniDuE Biodiversity (talk) 14:52, 19 December 2019 (UTC)UniDuE Biodiversity

Category:Bada_Bagh,_Jehtwai

Category discussion warning

Bada Bagh, Jehtwai has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 16:49, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Chapelle_Saint-Cyr_et_Sainte-Julite_(Semur-en-Auxois)

Category discussion warning

Chapelle Saint-Cyr et Sainte-Julite (Semur-en-Auxois) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 05:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Odysseus, Palace of Fontainebleau

Bonjour Daniel VILLAFRUELA, merci pour vos magnifiques photos, dont celle-ci, primée. Félicitations. Par contre, connaissant cette statue sous le titre Ulysse chez Alcinoüs, roi des Phéaciens, qui est aussi celui donné par le site officiel du château de Fontainebleau, mais n'apparaît ni dans la catégorie ni dans le descriptif des images, j'ai mis un certain temps à la trouver. Je me suis permise d'ajouter une note sourcée au fichier et vous serais reconnaissant si vous pouviez jeter un coup d’œil. Je me transporte sur la page de discussion pour proposer un renommage et vous remercie d'avance de vous y rendre aussi. Bien à vous, --Bohème (talk) 11:36, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Château du Castellas (Saint-Bonnet-de-Salendrinque)

Hello, you uploaded some photographss of the castle. I plan to write an article about it in de.wiki. On this photos in the Base Mérimée there can a building be seen with an apse (or remains of a round tower?). Is this the former romanesque chapel? Thank you and best regards! --Chris06 (talk) 11:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC) https://www.pop.culture.gouv.fr/notice/memoire/MHR91_20103011466 https://www.pop.culture.gouv.fr/notice/memoire/MHR91_20103011464

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aigle défendant sa proie (Auguste Cain)-2-20200730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, good quality, pls correct date of exposure (2030?) --Isiwal 12:54, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 07:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 09:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Quel est l'objectif encyclopédique de vos commentaires ?

Bonjour, merci des images que vous amenez à l'encyclopédie. Par contre, j'ai du mal à comprendre le caractère encyclopédique de certains de vos commentaires comme par exemple celui-ci "Ce que le duc de Rohan ne put faire; la COVID l'a fait, le château de Portes est fermé". Est-ce sourcé, est-ce utile, est-ce pertinent ? Bonne continuation et confinement, --FHd (talk) 18:14, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Durant les guerres de religions De Budos avait pour mission de tenir Portes, première place forte catholique commandant la voie Regordane. De Rohan chef du parti protestant tenait Alès au bas de la dite voie, et toutes ses tentatives pour prendre le château furent vouées à l’échec. Une jolie pancarte sur à l’entrée du château prouve que Sars-Covid 19 l’a fait... 2A01:CB1D:8C86:A600:B0F0:C0FC:9D6D:47F6 19:27, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Daniel_VILLAFRUELA/Archive_2&oldid=574887199"